Article published In:
Information Structuring Resources in ContrastEdited by Bergljot Behrens, Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen, Hilde Hasselgård and Stig Johansson
[Languages in Contrast 7:2] 2007
► pp. 221–240
Edited by Bergljot Behrens, Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen, Hilde Hasselgård and Stig Johansson
[Languages in Contrast 7:2] 2007
► pp. 221–240
The role of discourse topic and proximity for demonstratives in German and Russian
This article discusses the textual functions of demonstratives in German and Russian in terms of ‘discourse topicality’ and ‘proximity’, thus covering a broad range of referential phenomena within a unified approach. It shows that — in spite of important grammatical differences between German and Russian — anaphoric and deictic uses of demonstratives are ruled by the same principles in both languages.
Keywords: deixis, anaphora, German/Russian, demonstratives
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Consten, Manfred & Maria Averintseva-Klisch
2012. Tentative Reference Acts? ‘Recognitional Demonstratives’ as Means of Suggesting Mutual Knowledge – or Overriding a Lack of It. Research in Language 10:3 ► pp. 257 ff. 
Schumacher, Petra B., Manfred Consten & Mareile Knees
2010. Constraints on ontology changing complexation processes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes 25:6 ► pp. 840 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.