Modality and ENGAGEMENT in British and German political interviews

Annette Becker | Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main (Germany)

Speakers regulary use modality and other resources from the appraisal system of engagement to position themselves intersubjectively. In doing so, they modify the discursive space for the voices of others. This is particularly relevant in political media interviews, especially in questions with topics that are potentially face-threatening to the interviewees’ public face. This paper compares the use of modality and other engagement resources in British and German political interviews and discusses the differences in frequency and function. Data is taken from videotaped and transcribed political interviews conducted during British and German election night broadcasts. Their analysis is based on recent studies in contrastive pragmatics, appraisal theory and pragmatically oriented studies on media discourse, bearing in mind that cross-cultural comparison of data taken from a particular genre has to take into account a broad range of contextual factors including genre-specific constraints.

Keywords: English/German, political discourse, engagement, modality, media discourse, appraisal theory

Published online: 24 March 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.9.1.02bec

Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

No author info given

2016. In Contrastive Pragmatics and Translation [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 261],

Fronhofer, Nina-Maria

2019. In Emotion in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 302], ► pp. 213 ff.

Karas, Hilla

2019. False equality in election advertisements. Journal of Language and Politics 18:1 ► pp. 131 ff.

Ngo, Thu & Len Unsworth

2015. Reworking the appraisal framework in ESL research: refining attitude resources. Functional Linguistics 2:1

Taboada, Maite, Marta Carretero & Jennifer Hinnell

2014. Loving and hating the movies in English, German and Spanish. Languages in Contrast 14:1 ► pp. 127 ff.

Taboada, Maite, Marta Carretero & Jennifer Hinnell

2016. In Genre- and Register-related Discourse Features in Contrast [Benjamins Current Topics, 87], ► pp. 127 ff.

White, Peter R.R.

2020. The putative reader in mass media persuasion – stance, argumentation and ideology. Discourse & Communication 14:4 ► pp. 404 ff.

Yang, Yang

2020. A contrastive study of engagement resources between English spoken and written texts. Text & Talk 40:6 ► pp. 755 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.