Modality and ENGAGEMENT in British and German political interviews
Annette Becker | Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main (Germany)
Speakers regulary use modality and other resources from the appraisal system of engagement to position themselves intersubjectively. In doing so, they modify the discursive space for the voices of others. This is particularly relevant in political media interviews, especially in questions with topics that are potentially face-threatening to the interviewees’ public face. This paper compares the use of modality and other engagement resources in British and German political interviews and discusses the differences in frequency and function. Data is taken from videotaped and transcribed political interviews conducted during British and German election night broadcasts. Their analysis is based on recent studies in contrastive pragmatics, appraisal theory and pragmatically oriented studies on media discourse, bearing in mind that cross-cultural comparison of data taken from a particular genre has to take into account a broad range of contextual factors including genre-specific constraints.
Alwohaibi, Hala Abdulrahman & Hesham Suleiman Alyousef
2023. An Investigation of Engagement Resources in the World Cup 2022 Newspaper Articles in the Arab World Media. Journal of Contemporary Language Research 2:2 ► pp. 118 ff.
White, Peter R.R.
2020. The putative reader in mass media persuasion – stance, argumentation and ideology. Discourse & Communication 14:4 ► pp. 404 ff.
Yang, Yang
2020. A contrastive study of engagement resources between English spoken and written texts. Text & Talk 40:6 ► pp. 755 ff.
2011. L'emploi des expressions épistémiquesdans des lettres aux actionnaires en France,aux États Unis et en Allemagne.. Langage et société n° 137:3 ► pp. 115 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.