Article published in:
Atypical predicate-argument relations
Edited by Thierry Ruchot and Pascale Van Praet
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa 33] 2016
► pp. 87112
References
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
1999Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N
1957Syntactic structures. s’-Gravenhage: Mouton & Co., N.V.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1989Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Delsoir, Jan
2011The acceptability of non-prototypical agents with prototypical agent requiring predicates in Dutch. Gent: Hogeschool Gent.Google Scholar
Dowty, David
1991Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3). 547–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Stefanie
2012Constructional effects of involuntary and inanimate agents: A cross-linguistic study. Unpublished PhD, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J
1968The case for case. In Universals in linguistic theory.Google Scholar
1977aThe case for case reopened. Syntax and Semantics, vol. 8. New York/ San Francisco/London: Academia Press.Google Scholar
1977bScenes-and-frames semantics. In A. Zampolli (ed.), Linguistic structures processing, 55–88. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Gambier, Yves
2009Stratégies et tactiques en traduction et interpretation. In G. Hansen, A. Chesterman, & H. Gerzymisch-Arbogast (eds.), Efforts and models in interpreting and translation research, 63–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1993English grammar: A function-based introduction, 2 vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2001Syntax: An introduction, vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E
1995Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John. A
1986A comparative typology of English and German: Unifying the contrasts. Austin, London and Sydney: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
House, Juliane
2008Towards a linguistic theory of translation as re-contextualisation and a third space phenomenon. Linguistica Antverpiensia 7. 149–175.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum
2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne
2004Animacy, agentivity, and the spread of the progressive in modern English. English Language and Linguistics 8(1). 47–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klaiman, M.H
1991Grammatical voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kussmaul, Paul
1994Semantic models and translating. Target 6(1). 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R
1994Grammatical roles and relations. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Primus, Beatrice
1999Cases and thematic roles: Ergative, accusative and active. Tübingen: 
Niemeyer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1972A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rura, Lidia, Willy Vandeweghe & Maribel M. Perez
2008Designing a parallel corpus as a multifunctional translator’s aid. Proceedings of the XVIII FIT World Congress , 4–7 August 2008, Shanghai, China, from http://​www​.kuleuvenkulak​.be​/DPC​/algemeen​/src​/FIT2008​-rural​.pdf.
Sanfilippo, Antonio
1990Grammatical relations, thematic roles and verb semantics. Unpublished PhD, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Izchak M
1989Instruments as agents: On the nature of semantic relations. Journal of Linguistics 25(1). 189–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
1991Functional grammar. Routledge: New York.Google Scholar
Tamm, Anne
2012Scalar verb classes. Scalarity, thematic roles, and arguments in the estonian aspectual lexicon. Firenze: Firenze University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
2000Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. 1. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vandepitte, Sonia & Robert J. Hartsuiker
2011Metonymic language use as a student translation problem: Towards a controlled psycholinguistic investigation. In C. Alvstad, A. Hild, & E. Tiselius (eds.), Methods and strategies of process research. Integrative approaches in translation studies, 67–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Velupillai, Viveka
2012An introduction to linguistic typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Online dictionary items

“geven” Dikke Van Dale. Van Dale Uitgevers. 02 December 2013. http://​www​.vandale​.nl​/zoeken​/zoeken​.do#.
“give”. Oxford Dictionaries Oxford University Press, n.d. Web 21 October 2013. http://​www​.oxforddictionaries​.com​/definition​/english​/give.