Chapter published in:
The Expression of Tense, Aspect, Modality and Evidentiality in Albert Camus’s L'Étranger and Its Translations / L'Étranger de Camus et ses traductions : questions de temps, d'aspect, de modalité et d'évidentialité (TAME): An empirical study / Etude empirique
Edited by Eric Corre, Danh Thành Do-Hurinville and Huy Linh Dao
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa 35] 2020
► pp. 12–37

De la sémantique des temps verbaux à la traductologie

Une comparaison multilingue de L’Étranger de Camus

| Utrecht University
| Utrecht University
| Utrecht University
We develop a linguistic analysis of the distribution and meaning of the verb forms used to translate the Passé Composé in Italian, German, Dutch, Spanish, English and Greek. To achieve this, we carry out a multilingual comparison of tense use in L’Étranger, based on an exploration of data extracted from the original and its translations. We apply Multidimensional Scaling (Wälchli & Cysouw, 2012) to generate a cartographic visualization of the verb forms in the multilingual dataset. The subset relation emerging from the temporal maps links the decrease of the perfect to an increase of past tenses. The investigation of key examples shows how lexical, compositional and dynamic semantics interact and lead to the observed cross-linguistic variation in perfect and past tense use.
Keywords: perfect, past, multilingual comparison, semantics, Multidimensional Scaling
Published online: 11 August 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/lis.35.02van
Références

Références

Apothéloz, D.
(2016) Sémantique du passé composé en français moderne et exploration des rapports passé composé/passé simple dans un corpus de moyen français. Cahiers Chronos 28, 199–246.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, P. M.
(1986) Tempo, Aspetto e Azione nel verbo italiano. Il sistema dell’indicativo, Firenze, Accademia della Crusca.Google Scholar
Boogaart, R.
(1999) Aspect and temporal ordering : a contrastive study of Dutch and English. PhD thesis, Free University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bres, J.
(2010) Polysémie ou monosémie du passé composé ? Actualisation, interaction, effets de sens produits. In N. Flaux, D. Stosic & C. Vet (Eds), Interpréter les temps verbaux (pp. 161–180). Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Caudal, P., & Vetters, C.
(2007) Passé Composé et Passé Simple: sémantique diachronique et formelle. Cahiers Chronos 16, 121–151.Google Scholar
Comrie, B.
(1976) Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö. & Velupillai, V.
(2013) The Perfect. In M. Haspelmath et al. (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online.Google Scholar
Haiman, J.
(1985) Natural syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kamp, H. & Rohrer, C.
(1983) Tense in texts. In R. Bäuerle, Ch. Schwarze & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language (pp. 250–269). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van der Klis, M., Le Bruyn, B. & de Swart, H.
(2017) Mapping the PERFECT via translation mining. Proceedings of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL), 497–502. http://​www​.aclweb​.org​/anthology​/E17​-2080
Van der Klis, M.
(2018) Deriving anteriority in the perfect of recent past. Linguistics in the Netherlands 35, 35–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koehn, P.
(2005) Europarl: A Parallel Corpus for Statistical Machine Translation, MT Summit 2005.Google Scholar
Lindstedt, J.
(2000) The perfect – aspectual, temporal and evidential. In Ö. Dahl (Ed.), Tense and Aspect in the languages of Europe (pp.365–383). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Löbner, S.
(2002) Is the German Perfekt a perfect perfect?, in: G. Katz et al. (eds.). Proceedings of Sinn & Bedeutung 7, 255–273.Google Scholar
McCawley, J.
(1981) Notes on the English perfect. Australian Journal of Linguistics 1, 81–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Portner, P.
(2003) The (temporal) semantics and (modal) pragmatics of the perfect. Linguistics and Philosophy, 26, 459–510. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ritz, M.-E.
(2012) Perfect tense and aspect. In R. Binnick (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect (pp. 881–907). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Schaden, G.
(2009) Present perfects compete. Linguistics and Philosophy 32, 115–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C.
(1991) The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press. 2nd revised version 1997. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Swart, H.
(2007) A cross-linguistic discourse analysis of the perfect. Journal of Pragmatics 39, 2273–2307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vet, C.
(1992) Le passé composé: contextes d’emploi et interprétation. Cahiers de praxématique 19, 37–59.Google Scholar
Wälchli, B., & Cysouw, M.
(2012) Lexical typology through similarity semantics: Toward a semantic map of motion verbs. Linguistics 50, 671–710. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weinrich, W.
(1964) Tempus. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Bruyn, Bert Le, Martijn van der Klis & Henriëtte de Swart
2019. The Perfect in dialogue. Linguistics in the Netherlands 36 ► pp. 162 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.