The dominant position among generative grammarians with respect to typological variation is that it should be captured by parameters, which are either directly tied to principles of Universal Grammar (UG) or to functional projections provided by UG. Parameter-setting approaches, however, have failed to live up to their promise. They should be replaced by a model in which language-particular rules take over the work of parameter settings and in which most typological variation follows from independently-needed principles of performance. In such a model, UG specifies the class of possible languages, but not the set of probable languages.
2017. Τhe primitives of the lexicon: Insights from aspect in idioms. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 2:1
Monaghan, Padraic
2017. Canalization of Language Structure From Environmental Constraints: A Computational Model of Word Learning From Multiple Cues. Topics in Cognitive Science 9:1 ► pp. 21 ff.
Arik, Engin
2016. An Experimental Approach to Basic Word Order in Turkish Intransitives. Psychology of Language and Communication 20:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
Barrios, Edison
2016. Simple is not easy. Synthese 193:7 ► pp. 2261 ff.
Richerson, Peter, Ryan Baldini, Adrian V. Bell, Kathryn Demps, Karl Frost, Vicken Hillis, Sarah Mathew, Emily K. Newton, Nicole Naar, Lesley Newson, Cody Ross, Paul E. Smaldino, Timothy M. Waring & Matthew Zefferman
2016. Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39
2011. Funktionale Kategorien in der PP und deren Zweitspracherwerb. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 30:2 ► pp. 169 ff.
Bender, Emily M., Scott Drellishak, Antske Fokkens, Laurie Poulson & Safiyyah Saleem
2010. Grammar Customization. Research on Language and Computation 8:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
Dahl, Östen & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm
2010. Rich agreement, everything else being equal and large-scale cross-linguistic comparison. Theoretical Linguistics 36:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
Holmberg, Anders
2010. Parameters in minimalist theory: The case of Scandinavian. Theoretical Linguistics 36:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Rosenkvist, Henrik
2010. Null Referential Subjects in Övdalian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 33:3 ► pp. 231 ff.
Yang, Charles
2010. Three factors in language variation. Lingua 120:5 ► pp. 1160 ff.
Bley-Vroman, Robert
2009. THE EVOLVING CONTEXT OF THE FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE HYPOTHESIS. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 31:2 ► pp. 175 ff.
Eisenbeiß, Sonja
2009. Generative approaches to language learning. Linguistics 47:2
Lardiere, Donna
2009. Further thoughts on parameters and features in second language acquisition: a reply to peer comments on Lardiere's `Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition' in SLR 25(2). Second Language Research 25:3 ► pp. 409 ff.
MORIYA, TETSUHARU
2008. Typological Generalizations and the Locus of Their Explanation (F. J. Newmeyer, Possible and Probable Languages: A Generative Perspective on Linguistic Typology). ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 25:1 ► pp. 240 ff.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2008. Universals in syntax. The Linguistic Review 25:1-2
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2021. Chomsky and Usage‐Based Linguistics. In A Companion to Chomsky, ► pp. 287 ff.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2021. Complexity and Relative Complexity in Generative Grammar. Frontiers in Communication 6
[no author supplied]
2011. References. In Linguistic Nativism and the Poverty of the Stimulus, ► pp. 217 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.