Cover not available
Article published In:
Methodology in Linguistic Landscape Research
Edited by Robert Blackwood
[Linguistic Landscape 3:3] 2017
► pp. 246–266

(T)Apping the linguistic landscape

Methodological challenges and the scientific potential of a citizen-science approach to the study of social semiotics

| University of Luxembourg
This article explores methodological challenges and scientific perspectives of a citizen science approach to linguistic landscapes research. Starting from the outline of a disciplinary landscape, the text first discusses development strategies and practical implementation of crowdsourcing via mobile applications as means to data collection in two participatory research projects. The comparison highlights the complex trade-off between empirical benefits and methodological drawbacks in relation to mobile app setups for crowdsourcing. In a second step, the use of crowdsourcing technology is embedded in a methodological framework for a citizen science approach to the study of social semiotics and discussed against the background of five guiding principles: participatory research, lifeworld orientation, societal engagement, computational analysis, and open research practice. The discussion points out that a citizen science approach brings about numerous opportunities as well as substantial challenges for academic practice in terms of a democratization, social embedding, and opening of research activities.
Keywords: methodology, crowdsourcing, mobile application, citizen science, participatory research, shared authority
Article outline
  • 1.Background: A disciplinary landscape
  • 2.Data collection with mobile applications: a comparative account
  • 3.Methodological groundings of a community-based participatory research framework
    • 3.1Participatory research
    • 3.2Lifeworld orientation
    • 3.3Societal engagement
    • 3.4Computational analysis
    • 3.5Open research practice
  • 4.Outlook: Potential and shortcomings for LL research
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 January 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.17023.pur
References (45)
References
Aitkenhead, M., Donnelly, D., Coull, M., & Hastings, E. (2014). Innovations in Environmental Monitoring Using Mobile Phone Technology – A Review. International Magazine of Interactive Mobile Technologies 8(2), 42–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Backhaus, P. (2007). Linguistic Landscapes. A Comparative Study of Urban Multilingualism in Tokyo. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Barni, M. & Bagna, C. (2015). The critical turn in LL: New methodologies and new items in LL. Linguistic Landscape 1(1/2), 6–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). A mapping technique and the linguistic landscape. In Shohamy & Gorter (2009), 126–140.Google Scholar
Ben-Rafael, E. (2009). A sociological approach to the study of linguistic landscapes. In Shohamy & Gorter (2009), 40–54.Google Scholar
Blackwood, R. (2015). LL explorations and methodological challenges. Linguistic Landscape 1(1/2), 38–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2013). Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes: Chronicles of Complexity. Bristol/Buffalo/Toronto: Multilingual matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J., & Wilderman, C. (2009). Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. Washington, D.C.: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE).Google Scholar
Brabham, D. (2013). Crowdsourcing. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in Education: A Systematic Mapping Study. Educational Technology & Society 18(3), 75–88.Google Scholar
Frisch, M. (1990). A Shared Authority: Essays on the Craft and Meaning of Oral and Public History. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Gaiser, L. & Matras, Y. (2016). The spatial construction of civic identities: A study of Manchester’s linguistic landscapes. University of Manchester. [URL] [31.10.2017]
Garbarino, J. & Mason, C. (2016). The Power of Engaging Citizen Scientists for Scientific Progress. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 17(1), 7–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilles, P. & Ziegler, E. (2017). Exploring Google Cloud Vision API for LL research. Presentation given at the 9th International Linguistic Landscapes Workshop , University of Luxembourg, Esch/Belval, 29.–31.03.2017.
Gorter, D. (2006). Further Possibilities for Linguistic Landscape Research. In D. Gorter (Ed.), Linguistic Landscape: A New Approach to Multilingualism (pp. 81–89). Clevedon/Buffalo/Toronto: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gorter, D. & Cenoz, J. (2015). Linguistic landscapes inside multilingual schools. In B. Spolsky, O. Inbar-Lourie, & M. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Challenges for Language Education and Policy (pp. 151–169). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hartson, R. & Pyla, P. (2012). The UX Book: Process and Guidelines for Ensuring a Quality User Experience. Waltham MA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Howe, J. (2006). Crowdsourcing. A definiton. Crowdsourcing blog, 02 June 2006, retrieved on 30 September, from [URL] [30.09.2017]
Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Järlehed, J. & Jaworski, A. (Eds.). (2015). Typographic landscaping: Creativity, ideology, movement. Social Semiotics 25(2), 117–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, A. & Thurlow, C. (Eds.). (2010). Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kraker, P., Leony, D., Reinhardt, W., & Beham, G. (2011). The case for an open science in technology enhanced learning. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning 3(6), 643–654. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leemann, A., Kolly, M.-J., Purves, R., Britain, D., & Glaser, E. (2016). Crowdsourcing language change with smartphone applications. PLOS ONE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leemann, A., Kolly, M.-J., Schmid, S., & Dellwo, V. (Eds.). (2015). Trends in Phonetics and Phonology. Studies from German-speaking Europe. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, K. (forthcoming). The Quality of Quantity. In D. Malinowski & S. Tufi (Eds.), Questioning Boundaries, Opening Spaces: Reterritorializing Linguistic Landscapes.
Malinowski, D. (2015). Opening spaces of learning in the linguistic landscape. Linguistic Landscape (1/2), 95–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCullough, M. (2013). Ambient Commons. Attention in the Age of Embodied Information. Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moriarty, M. (2014). Languages in motion: Multilingualism and mobility in the linguistic landscape. International Journal of Bilingualism 18(5), 457–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ngyuen, D., Doğruöz, S., Rosé, C., & de Jong, F. (2016). Computational Sociolinguistics: A Survey. Computational Linguistics 42(3), 537–593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, M. (2011). Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nouri, J., Cerratto-Pargman, T., Rossitto, C., & Ramberg, R. (2014). Learning with or without mobile devices? A comparison of traditional schoolfield trips and inquiry-based mobile learning activities. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 9(2), 241–262.Google Scholar
Peck, A. & Stroud, C. (2015). Skinscapes. Linguistic Landscape 1(1/2), 133–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Purschke, C. (2017): Crowdsourcing the linguistic landscape of a multilingual country. Introducing Lingscape in Luxembourg. In M. Hundt, C. Purschke, & E. Ziegler (Eds.), Sprachräume: Konstellationen, Interaktionen, Perzeptionen. (pp. 191–202) Linguistik Online 85.Google Scholar
(2015). REACT – A constructivist theoretic framework for attitudes. In D. Preston & A. Prikhodkine (Eds.), Responses to Language Varieties: Variability, processes and outcomes (pp. 37–54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins (IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society 39). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rabanus, S., Kehrein, R., & Lameli, A. (2011). Creating digital editions of historical maps. In A. Lameli, R. Kehrein, & S. Rabanus (Eds.), Language and space. Vol. 2: Language mapping (pp. 375–385). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton (Handbooks of linguistics and communication science 30.2).Google Scholar
Riesch, H. & Potter, C. (2014). Citizen science as seen by scientists: Methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions. Public Understanding of Science 23(1), 107–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R. & Scollon, S. (2003). Discourses in place: language in the material world. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shohamy, E. & Gorter, D. (Eds.). (2009). Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sun, J. (2016). Tool choice in innovation diffusion. A human activity readiness theory. Computers in Human Behavior 591, 283–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szabó, T. & Leihonen, P. (2017). Investigating visual practices in educational settings: schoolscapes, language ideologies and organizational cultures. In M. Martin-Jones, & D. Martin (Eds.), Researching multilingualism: Critical and ethnographic approaches (pp. 121–138). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Troyer, R. & Szabó, T. (2017). Representation and videography in linguistic landscape studies. Linguistic Landscape 3(1), 56–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, D. & Orr, R. (2016). The “Sprekend Nederland” project and its application to accent location. Odyssey 2016, June 21–24 2016, Bilbao, Spain, 101–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, W. (2013). Community commitment and social responsibility. In J. Chambers & N. Schilling (Eds.), Handbook of Language Variation and Change (pp. 557-576). 2nd edn. Malden/Cambridge: Wiley/Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woolley, P., McGowan, M., Teare, H., Coathup, V., Fishman, J., Settersten, R., Sterckx, S., Kaye, J., & Juengst, E. (2016). Citizen science or scientific citizenship? Disentangling the uses of public engagement rhetoric in national research initiatives. BMC Medical Ethics 17(33).Google Scholar
Zabrodskaja, A. & Milani, T. (2014). Signs in context: Multilingual and multimodal texts in semiotic space. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2281.Google Scholar
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

Adami, Elisabetta, Emilia Djonov & Zhe Liu
2024. Doing citizen sociosemiotics in the Covid-19 pandemic. Discourse & Communication 18:5 ► pp. 663 ff. DOI logo
Lachkar, Abdenbi
2022. The Status and Future of Arabic Use amid Colonial Languages in the Arab World in Times of Globalization and Advanced Technology: A Political and Sociolinguistic Approach. Lingue Culture Mediazioni - Languages Cultures Mediation (LCM Journal) 8:2 DOI logo
刘, 雨乔
2022. The Linguistic Landscape of Lhasa Airport from the Perspective of Ecolinguistics. Modern Linguistics 10:10 ► pp. 2150 ff. DOI logo
陈, 诗云
2022. Research on Linguistic Landscape Construction of the Ancient Towns in the South of the Yangtze River—An Investigation in Shaoxing Ancient Towns. Modern Linguistics 10:02 ► pp. 298 ff. DOI logo
王, 晓晨
2021. Research on the Linguistic Landscape of University in China: Taking Dalian Maritime University for an Example. Modern Linguistics 09:03 ► pp. 578 ff. DOI logo
Czachur, Waldemar
2020. Teksty minimalne jako przedmiot badań genologicznych. tekst i dyskurs - text und diskurs :13 (2020) ► pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Malinowski, David, Hiram H. Maxim & Sébastien Dubreil
2020. Introduction. In Language Teaching in the Linguistic Landscape [Educational Linguistics, 49], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Nielsen, Helle Lykke, Tove Rosendal, Johan Järlehed & Christopher Kullenberg
2020. Investigating Bulletin Boards with Students: What Can Citizen Science Offer Education and Research in the Linguistic Landscape?. In Language Teaching in the Linguistic Landscape [Educational Linguistics, 49], ► pp. 349 ff. DOI logo
Purschke, Christoph
2020. Exploring the Linguistic Landscape of Cities Through Crowdsourced Data. In Handbook of the Changing World Language Map, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Purschke, Christoph
2020. Exploring the Linguistic Landscape of Cities Through Crowdsourced Data. In Handbook of the Changing World Language Map, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Purschke, Christoph
2021. Crowdscapes. Participatory research and the collaborative (re)construction of linguistic landscapes with Lingscape . Linguistics Vanguard 7:s1 DOI logo
Rüdiger, Sofia & Daria Dayter
2020. Introduction. The expanding landscape of corpus-based studies of social media language. In Corpus Approaches to Social Media [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 98], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kullenberg, Christopher, Frauke Rohden, Anders Björkvall, Fredrik Brounéus, Anders Avellan-Hultman, Johan Järlehed, Sara Van Meerbergen, Andreas Nord, Helle Lykke Nielsen, Tove Rosendal, Lotta Tomasson, Gustav Westberg & Judit Bar-Ilan
2018. What are analog bulletin boards used for today? Analysing media uses, intermediality and technology affordances in Swedish bulletin board messages using a citizen science approach. PLOS ONE 13:8 ► pp. e0202077 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.