Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Landscape
Vol. 5:3 (2019) ► pp.217–247

The landscape returns the gaze

Bikescapes and the new economies

| University of Technology Sydney
This paper looks at bikescapes – and particularly dockless share bikes – with a focus on their rapid proliferation and subsequent partial demise in Sydney. Four principal themes emerged from this study: first, bikes are an important part of the cityscape, and studies of urban semiotics need to take greater account of modes of transport. Second, the rise of docked and dockless share bikes has changed the ways the city is felt and perceived: as bikes circulate within the city, these shifting bikescapes make visible changes to the physical city environment. The ebb and flow of dockless bikes – from neat alignments to dispersed arrangements – provide an insight into changing patterns of work, leisure, and mobility, and present entropic rather than ordered city processes. Third, these bikes became significant discourse markers, material artefacts where discourses of consumption, convenience, contamination, and co-operation intersect. Dockless share bikes sit at the hub of a tussle over public and private ownership of space and information, in terms both of their physical incursion into public space and as syphons of personal information. Finally, they suggest not only that aspects of the cityscape may play an active role in semiotic networks, but that the semiotic landscape may be returning our gaze.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: The landscape as a semiotic assemblage
  • 2.Methodology: Radical Vélography
  • 3.Reading bikes
  • 4.Order and disorder
  • 5.Bikes as discourse markers
  • 6.Data-gathering and city bikes
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.18027.pen
References (72)
References
Barni, M. and Bagna, C. (2015). The critical turn in LL: New methodologies and new items in LL. Linguistic Landscape 1(1/2): 6–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bailey, M. (2017). Obike, Reddy Go are more than bike-sharing companies. Financial Review [URL]
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Block, D. (2018). Political economy and sociolinguistics: Neoliberalism, inequality and social class. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Bordenkircher, B. and O’Neil, R. (2018). Dockless Bikes: Regulation Breakdown. Chicago: Twelve Tone Consulting.Google Scholar
Bridle, J. (2018). New Dark Age: Technology and the End of the Future. London: Verso.Google Scholar
China Daily (2017). China’s ‘four great new inventions’ in modern times [URL]
Choo, C. (2018). New licensing regime for bike-sharing operators to kick in from October: MOT. [URL]
City of Sydney (2018). Guidelines for bikeshare operators. [URL]
Crommelin, L., Troy, L., Martin, C. and Parkinson, S. (2018). Technological disruption in private housing markets: the case of Airbnb, AHURI Final Report 305, Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Limited, Melbourne, [URL], DOI logo
Crunchbase (2018). [URL]
Dardot, P. and Laval, C. (2009). La nouvelle raison du monde: Essai sur la société néolibérale. Paris: Éditions La Découverte.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1980). Mille plateaux. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Donohue, R. (2017). Breaking the cycle. The Saturday Paper, November 11, 2017. [URL]
Eddie, R. (2018). Dockless share bikes impounded from Sydney beaches. [URL]
Farivar, C. (2018). Habeas data: Privacy versus the rise of surveillance tech. New York: Melville House.Google Scholar
Farrelly, E. (2018). Data harvesters take us for a sinister ride. The Sydney Morning Herald, News Review, March 10–11, p.30.Google Scholar
Fishman, E., Washington, S. and Haworth, N. (2013). Bike Share: A Synthesis of the Literature, Transport Reviews, 33(2): 148–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiske, J., Turner, G. and Hodge, B. (1987). Myths of Oz: reading Australian popular culture. Sydney, New South Wales: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Flubacher, M.-C. and Del Percio, A. (Eds.) (2018). Language, Education and Neoliberalism: Marketization, dispossession, and subversion. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gorrey, M. (2018). Bump in the road as bike share operators Reddy Go, ofo quit Sydney. [URL]
Gorter, D. and Cenoz, J. (2015). Translanguaging and linguistic landscapes. Linguistic Landscape 1(1/2): 54–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gottdiener, M. (1983). Urban semiotics. In S. Pipkin, M. La Gory, and J. Blau (Eds) Remaking the city: Social science perspectives on urban design (pp. 101–114). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, L. and Taylor, N. (2017). Ethnography after humanism: Power, politics and method in multi-species research. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Han Sun Sheng (2017). Bike sharing schemes might seem like a waste of space but the economics makes sense. [URL]
Hardt, M., and Negri, A. (2017). Assembly. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hiramoto, M. (2015). Inked nostalgia: displaying identity through tattoos as Hawaii local practice, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36 (2): 107–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holborow, M. (2015). The Language of Neoliberalism. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hu, W. (2017). More New Yorkers opting for life in the bike lane. New York Times, July 30th, 2017. [URL]
Igo, S. (2018). The Known Citizen: A History of Privacy in Modern America. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karlander, D. (2018). Backjumps: writing, watching, erasing train graffiti, Social Semiotics, 28(1) 41–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kell, C. (2015). “Making people happen”: materiality and movement in meaning-making trajectories. Social Semiotics, 25 (4): 423–445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitis, E. D. and Milani, T. (2015). The performativity of the body: Turbulent spaces in Greece. Linguistic Landscape, 1(3): 268–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2014). A researcher’s auto-socioanalysis: making space for the personal. In B. Spolsky, Inbar-Lourie and M. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Challenges for language education and policy: making space for people (pp. 235–244). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Karaçor, E. K. (2016). Public vs. Private: The evaluation of different space types in terms of publicness dimension. European Journal of Sustainable Development (2016), 5(3): 51–58.Google Scholar
Larmer, B. (2017). China’s Revealing Spin on the ‘Sharing Economy’ [URL]
Makoni, S. and Makoni, B. (2010). Multilingual discourses on wheels and public English in Africa: A case for ‘vague linguistique’. In J. Maybin & J. Swann (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to English Language Studies (pp. 258–270). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
May, S. (2019). Negotiating the multilingual turn in SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 1031: 122–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myurbo (2018). [URL]
Nemeth, J. (2009). Defining a public: The management of privately owned public space. Urban Studies, 46(11): 2463–2490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newens, C. (2017). Véliberté, egalité, fraternité: is Paris’s seminal bike share scheme out of date? [URL]
Ofo (2018). [URL]
Palin, M. (2017). Dockless rental bikes to burst onto the scene in Australian cities. [URL]
Peck, A. and Stroud, C. (2015). Skinscapes. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1/2): 133–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2009). Linguistic landscapes and the transgressive semiotics of graffiti. In Elana Shohamy and Durk Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery, edited (pp. 302–312). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2010). Spatial narrations: Graffscapes and city souls. In A. Jaworski and C. Thurlow (Eds) Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space, (pp. 137–150). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2012). Language and mobility: Unexpected places. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Translanguaging and semiotic assemblages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3): 269–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Posthumanist Applied Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. and Otsuji, E. (2015a). Metrolingualism: Language and the city. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015b). Making scents of the landscape. Linguistic Landscape, 1(3): 191–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Fish, phone cards and semiotic assemblages in two Bangladeshi shops in Sydney and Tokyo, Social Semiotics, 27(4): 434–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravelli, L. and McMurtrie, R. (2016). Multimodality in the built environment: Spatial discourse analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1988). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scholz, T. (2016). Uberworked and underpaid: How workers are disrupting the digital economy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Schor, J. B. and Attwood-Charles, W. (2017). The “sharing” economy: labor, inequality and sociability on for-profit platforms. Sociology Compass, 2017, 11, e12493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schor, J. B., & Fitzmaurice, C. J. (2015). Collaborating and Connecting: The emergence of the sharing economy. In L. Reisch and J. Thogersen, (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Sustainable Consumption (pp. 410–425). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Shaheen, S., Guzman, S., & Zhang, H. (2010). Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia: Past, present, and future. Transportation Research Record 21431, 159–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shaw, B. (2017). Posthuman urbanism: Mapping bodies in contemporary city space. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. (2015). LL research as expanding language and language policy. Linguistic Landscape 1(1/2) 152–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shohamy, A. and Ben-Rafael, E. (2015). Introduction: Linguistic landscape, a new journal. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1/2): 1–5.Google Scholar
Slee, T. (2015). What’s yours is mine: Against the sharing economy. New York; London: OR Books.Google Scholar
Small, A. (2018). Ofo Beats a Retreat From the Dockless Bikesharing Battle [URL]
Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: the new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stephany, A. (2015). The Business of Sharing. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sumpter, D. (2018). Outnumbered: Exploring the Algorithms that Control Our Lives. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Sundararajan, A. (2016). The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. (2018). The Bike-Share Oversupply in China: Huge Piles of Abandoned and Broken Bicycles. [URL]
Thurlow, C. (2016). Queering critical discourse studies or/and performing ‘post-class’ ideologies. Critical Discourse Studies, 13(5), 485–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y. (2018). Singapore requires ‘geofencing’ for all bike-sharing operators in the city by the end of this year. [URL]
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Pennycook, Alastair
2023. Toward the total semiotic fact. Chinese Semiotic Studies 19:4 ► pp. 595 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.