Article published In:
The Linguistic Landscape of Covid-19Edited by Jackie Jia Lou, David Malinowski and Amiena Peck
[Linguistic Landscape 8:2/3] 2022
► pp. 168–183
Edited by Jackie Jia Lou, David Malinowski and Amiena Peck
[Linguistic Landscape 8:2/3] 2022
► pp. 168–183
Covid-19 and public responsibility
A multimodal critical discourse analysis of blaming the public during the UK’s third wave
This paper offers an analysis of a British government publicity campaign during the third national lockdown, which began in England in January 2021. When it came to enforcing lockdown rules, the government’s messaging in the Linguistic Landscape (LL) and elsewhere focused on individualising responsibility for the pandemic. This framing favoured the political interests of the government by apportioning blame for the highest death toll in Europe to the British public’s reckless behaviour, which conveniently elides the government’s own role in the crisis. Drawing on data from social media and the LL, I analyse the publicity campaign according to a Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis approach, taking into account the multiple semiotic systems employed to communicate the campaign’s underlying neoliberal ideology.
Keywords: neoliberalism, responsibilisation, British government, Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data
- 3.Theoretical approach
- 4.Analysis
- 5.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References
Agha, A.
(2003) The social life of cultural value. Language and Communication,
23
(3–4): 231–273. 
Anderson, B.
(2016) Neoliberal affects. Progress in Human Geography,
40
(6): 734–753.
Ben-Rafael, E., Shohamy, E., Amara, M.H., & Trumper-Hecht, N.
(2006) Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of the public space: The case of Israel. International Journal of Multilingualism,
3
(1): 7–30.
Correa, D., & Shohamy, E.
Harvey, D.
(2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harvey, F.
(2021) Tories accused of corruption and NHS privatisation by former chief scientist. The Guardian: [URL]
Holborow, M.
(2012) What is neoliberalism? Discourse, ideology and the real world. In D. Block, J. Gray, & M. Holborow (eds.), Neoliberalism and Applied Linguistics, 14–32. Oxford: Routledge.
Institute for Government
Jaworski, A., & Thurlow, C.
(2010) Introducing Semiotic Landscapes. In A. Jaworski & C. Thurlow (eds.), Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space, 1–40. London: Continuum.
Joppke, C.
(2021) Nationalism in the neoliberal order: Old wine in new bottles? Nations and Nationalism, (March): 1–16.
Kallen, J., Ní Dhonnacha, E., & Wade, K.
(2020) Online Linguistic Landscapes: Discourse, Globalization, and Enregisterment. In D. Malinowski & S. Tufi (eds.), Reterritorializing Linguistic Landscapes: Questioning Boundaries and Opening Spaces, 97–116. London: Bloomsbury.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T.
(2006) Reading Images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
Ledin, P., & Machin, D.
(2018) Multi-modal Critical Discourse Analysis. In J. Flowerdew & J. E. Richardson (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, 60–76. London: Routledge.
Lemke, T.
(2001) “The birth of bio-politics”: Michel Foucault’s lecture at the Collège de France on neo-liberal governmentality. Economy and Society,
30
(2): 190–207.
Lou, J. J., & Jaworski, A.
Lyons, K.
(2019) Let’s get phygital: Seeing through the ‘filtered’ landscapes of Instagram. Linguistic Landscape,
5
(2): 179–197.
Machin, D.
(2016) The need for a social and affordance-driven multimodal critical discourse studies. Discourse and Society,
27
(3): 322–334.
Martin, G., & Roberts, S.
(2021) Exploring legacies of the baby boomers in the twenty-first century. Sociological Review,
69
(4): 727–742.
Martín Rojo, L., & Del Percio, A.
(2020) Neoliberalism, language, and governmentality. In L. Martín Rojo & A. Del Percio (eds.), Language and Neoliberal Governmentality, 1–26. London: Routledge.
Milani, T.
(2014) Sexed Signs – Queering the scenery. International Journal of the Sociology of Language,
228
1: 201–225.
Modan, G. & Wells, K. J.
this issue). Signs at work: New labor relations and structures of feeling in Washington, D.C.’s Covid landscape. Linguistic Landscape.
Office for National Statistics
Rayner, G., Tominey, C., & Hymas, C.
(2020) “Go back to work or risk losing your job”: Major drive launched to get people returning to the office. The Telegraph: [URL]
Schröter, M., & Taylor, C.
(2018) Introduction. In M. Schröter & C. Taylor (eds.), Exploring Silence and Absence in Discourse Empirical Approaches, 1–21. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W.
(2003) Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London: Routledge.
Semino, E.
(2020) “Not Soldiers but Fire-fighters” – Metaphors and Covid-19. Health Communication,
36
(1): 50–58.
Stroud, C., & Mpendukana, S.
(2009) Towards a material ethnography of linguistic landscape: Multilingualism, mobility and space in a South African township. Journal of Sociolinguistics,
13
(3): 363–386.
Svennevig, J.
(2021) How to do things with signs. The formulation of directives on signs in public spaces. Journal of Pragmatics,
175
1: 165–183.
Transport for London
(2019) Travel in London: Understanding our diverse communities 2019. A summary of existing research. Transport for London: [URL]
Tufi, S.
this issue). Hybrid places: The reconfiguration of domestic space in the time of Covid-19. Linguistic Landscape.
U.K. Government
UK Parliament Public Accounts Committee
(2021) “Unimaginable” cost of Test & Trace failed to deliver central promise of averting another lockdown: [URL]
van Leeuwen, T.
(2017) Legitimation and Multimodality. In R. Wodak & B. Forchtner (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, 218–232. Oxon: Routledge.
Zhou, F.