‘Beirut you will rise again’
A critical discourse historiographical analysis of the Beiruti Linguistic Landscape
This study examines the Linguistic Landscape (LL) of two streets in Beirut (Foch and Weygand) following a series of protests in October 2019 against the Lebanese government. We analyzed signs of protest on those two streets collected in 2020 and compared them to archival data collected back in 2015 prior to the commencement of the protests. We drew upon an expanding LL literature of contestation and resistance and theoretically framed our study in concepts of reclaiming public spaces through protest signs (
Martín Rojo, 2014a). Photographic data was collected and analyzed based on a critical discourse historiographical approach (
Flowerdew, 2017). Implications with regard to Beirut’s changing identity and conflicting discourses of protest, hope, and censorship competing for space on its streets are presented. The study also presents
asynchronous narrative layering as an approach that addresses historical and cultural dimensions and power structures that underlie the narratives that shape protest movements.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Beiruti context
- 3.Linguistic Landscapes of protest and resistance
- 4.Methodology
- 4.1Research design
- 4.2Data collection and analysis
- 5.Findings
- 5.1Between 2015 and 2020: Protest signs reclaiming the Beiruti LL
- 5.2Processes of reappropriation
- 6.Discussion
- 7.Conclusion
-
References
References (35)
References
Al-Naimat, G. K. (2020). Semiotic analysis of the visual signs of protest on online Jordanian platforms: Code choice and language mobility. Theory and Practice in Language Studies,
10
(1), 61–70.
Azzi, D. (2019, July 21). The Devaluation of the Lebanese Dollar. Dan Azzi. [URL]
BBC News. (2020). Beirut explosion: What we know so far. Retrieved from [URL]
Ben Said, S. & Kasanga, L. (2016). The Discourse of Protest: Frames of identity, intertextuality and interdiscursivity. In R. Blackwood, E. Lanza, & H. Woldermariam (Eds.), Negotiating and Contesting Identities in Linguistic Landscapes, pp.68–83. London: Bloomsbury.
Blackwood, R., Lanza, E., & Woldemariam, H. (2016). Negotiating and Contesting Identities in Linguistic Landscapes. London: Bloomsbury.
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blommaert, J. (2013). Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes: Chronicles of complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Daily Star. (2015). ‘Abu Rakhussa’ brings pre-war nostalgia to Downtown Beirut. Retrieved from [URL]
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1980). Mille plateaux: Capitalisme et schizophrénie. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
Esposito, M. R. (2020). Unheard voices of a rebel city: Re-appropriation of rights through the city walls. In L. Siragusa & J. K. Ferguson (Eds.), Responsibility and language practices in place, pp. 62–78. Helsinki: Studia Fennica.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Flowerdew, J. (2017). Understanding the Hong Kong Umbrella Movement: A critical discourse historiographical approach. Discourse & Society,
28
(5), 453–472.
Gee, J. P. (1989). Literacy, discourse, and linguistics: Introduction. Journal of Education,
171
1, 5–17.
Georgakopoulou, A. (2015). Small stories research: Methods, analysis, outreach. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The handbook of narrative analysis, pp. 255–271. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
Homsi, N. (2018, January 23). A sea of trash on Lebanon’s beaches. The New York Times. [URL]
Karam, F. J., Warren, A., Kibler, A. K., & Shweiry, Z. (2020). Beiruti linguistic landscape: An analysis of private store fronts. International Journal of Multilingualism,
17
(2), 196–214.
Kasanga, L. A. (2014). The linguistic landscape: Mobile signs, code choice, symbolic meaning and territoriality in the discourse of protest. International journal of the sociology of language,
230
1, 19–44.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. London: Blackwell.
Makdisi, S. (1997). Laying claim to Beirut: Urban narrative and spatial identity in the age of Solidere. Critical Inquiry,
23
(3), 661–705.
Pavlenko, A. (2009). Language conflict in post-Soviet linguistic landscapes. Journal of Slavic Linguistics,
17
(1), 247–274.
Pennycook, A. (2009). Linguistic landscape and transgressive semiotics of graffiti. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery, pp. 302–311). London: Routledge.
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA). In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.), pp. 87–121. London: Sage.
Rubdy, R., & Ben Said, S. (2015). Conflict, exclusion and dissent in the linguistic landscape. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Scollon, R. (2001). Mediated discourse: The nexus of practice. London: Routledge.
Seals, C. A. (2015). Overcoming erasure: Reappropriation of space in the linguistic landscape of mass-scale protests. In S. Ben Said & R. Rubdy (Eds.), Conflict, exclusion, and dissent in the linguistic landscape (pp. 223–238). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Seargeant, P., & Giaxoglou, K. (2019). Discourse and the linguistic landscape. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Studies, pp. 306–326. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society,
4
(2), 249–283.
Zakharia, Z. (2010). Language in education policies in contemporary Lebanon. In O. A. Mershed (Ed.), Trajectories of education in the Arab world: Legacies and challenges, pp. 157–183. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.