Article published In:
The Linguistic Landscape of Covid-19Edited by Jackie Jia Lou, David Malinowski and Amiena Peck
[Linguistic Landscape 8:2/3] 2022
► pp. 149–167
Edited by Jackie Jia Lou, David Malinowski and Amiena Peck
[Linguistic Landscape 8:2/3] 2022
► pp. 149–167
‘Together, soon enough’
Melbourne’s affective-discursive landscape during and since lockdown
Orienting to theoretical descriptions of ‘affective-discursive practices’ (Wetherell, 2012) and linguistic/semiotic landscapes as ‘affective regimes’ (Wee, 2016), this paper accounts for (some of) the complex ways in which the experience of pandemic and lockdown was articulated and felt across the landscape of Melbourne. I employ a novel combination of autoethnographic and citizen sociolinguistic approaches as self-reflexive research techniques. Working more-or-less chronologically, from the lowest ebbs to feelings of (relative) joy, importantly, this paper does not focus solely on negative articulations such as sadness or anxiety. Rather, it examines the affective resonance of expressions of love, kindness, and resilience in the landscape, and these affects’ intersection with chronotopes during and since isolation; from being locked down, to keeping spirits up, from top-down to bottom-up. This paper concludes with an orientation to hope: to Melburnians’ rejoicing in what they’ve achieved, and the belief that there can be an end to crisis.
Keywords: affective-discursive practice, citizen Linguistic Landscapes, Covid-19, Melbourne, autoethnography
Article outline
- 1.‘We missed you ❤’
- 2.The ‘world’s most locked down city’
- 3.Research design
- 4.During
- 5.Since
- 6.Conclusion: Home and hope in a messy ‘during/since’ chronoscape
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (27)
Adams, T., Holman Jones, S. & Ellis, C. (2014). Autoethnography. Oxford University Press.
Agha, A. (2007). Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ahmed, S. (2014). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. 2nd ed. Routledge. 
Baro, G. (2018) Chronoscape of authenticity: Consumption and aspiration in a middle-class market in Johannesburg. In A. Peck, C. Stroud, and Q. Williams (eds.), Making Sense of People and Place in Linguistic Landscapes, 49–70. London: Bloomsbury.
Borba, R. (2019). Injurious signs: the geopolitics of hate and hope in the linguistic landscape of a political crisis. In Peck, A., Stroud, C. & Williams, Q. (eds.) Making Sense of People and Place in Linguistic Landscape, 161–182. London: Bloomsbury.
Comer, J. (2022). Discourses of Global Queer Mobility and the Mediatization of Equality. London: Routledge.
Douglas, G. C. C. (this issue). A sign in the window: Social norms and community resilience through handmade signage in the age of Covid-19. Linguistic Landscape.
Eckert, P. (2008) Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4): 453–476.
(2012). Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 411: 87–100.
Glapka, E. (2019). Critical affect studies: On applying discourse analysis in research on affect, body and power. Discourse & Society 30(6): 600–621.
Gross, J. (2021). Hope against hope: Covid-19 and the space for political imagination. European Journal of Cultural Studies.
Hafner, C. & Sun, T. (2021). The ‘team of 5 million’: The joint construction of leadership discourse during the Covid-19 pandemic in New Zealand. Discourse, Context & Media 431: 100523.
Hiramoto, M. & Wee, L. (2019). Kawaii in the semiotic landscape. Sociolinguistic Studies 13(1): 15–35.
Holman Jones, S. & Adams, T. (2010). Autoethnography is a queer method. In Browne, K. and Nash, C. J. (eds.) Queer Methods and Methodologies: Intersecting Queer Theories and Social Science Research 194–214. London: Routledge.
Jaworski, A. & Lou, J. J. (2020). #wordswewear: mobile texts, expressive persons, and conviviality in urban spaces. Social Semiotics 31(1): 108–135.
Jones, R. (2017). Surveillant landscapes. Linguistic Landscape 3(2): 149–186.
Karlander, D. (2019). A semiotics of nonexistence? Erasure and erased writing under anti-graffiti regimes. Linguistic Landscape 5(2): 198–216.
Milner, D. (2021). 263 days later. The Shot, October 21. [URL]
Modan, G. & Wells, K. J. (this issue). Signs at work: New labor relations and structures of feeling in Washington, D.C.’s Covid landscape. Linguistic Landscape.
Motschenbacher, H. (2020). Affective regimes on Wilton Drive: a multimodal analysis. Social Semiotics.
Silva, D. & Lee, J. (2021) “Marielle, presente”: Metaleptic temporality and the enregisterment of hope in Rio de Janeiro. Journal of Sociolinguistics 25(2):179–197.
Svendsen, B. A. (2018). The dynamics of citizen sociolinguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics 22(2): 137–160.
Tufi, S. (this issue). Hybrid places: The reconfiguration of domestic space in the time of Covid-19. Linguistic Landscape.
Wee, Lionel. (2016). Situating affect in linguistic landscapes. Linguistic Landscape 2(2): 105–126.
Wee, L. & Goh, R. B. H. (2020). Language, Space, and Cultural Play: Theorizing Affect in the Semiotic Landscape. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wetherell, M. (2013). Affect and discourse: What’s the problem? From affect as excess to affective/ discursive practice. Subjectivity 6(4): 349–368.
(2015). Trends in the turn to affect: A social psychological critique. Body & Society 21(2): 139–166.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Jones, Rodney H., Sylvia Jaworska & Zhu Hua
2024. Affective geographies and tribal epistemologies: studying abroad during COVID-19. Applied Linguistics Review 
Pienimäki, Hanna‐Mari, Tuomas Väisänen & Tuomo Hiippala
2024. Making sense of linguistic diversity in Helsinki, Finland: The timespace of affects in the linguistic landscape. Journal of Sociolinguistics 28:2 ► pp. 3 ff.
Szabó, Gergely
2024. Collaborative research practices in the study of diasporisation: chronotopes of dispersion among Hungarians in Catalonia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development ► pp. 1 ff.
Gu, Chonglong
2023. A tale of three global cities: A comparative account of Dubai, Kuala Lumpur and Hong Kong’s multilingual repertoires evidenced in their Covidscapes as part of Covid-19 crisis and public health communication. Language and Health 1:2 ► pp. 51 ff.
Douglas, Gordon C. C.
Milak, Eldin
Modan, Gabriella & Katie J. Wells
Phyak, Prem & Bal Krishna Sharma
2022. Citizen Linguistic Landscape, bordering practices, and semiotic ideology in the COVID-19 pandemic. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 8:2-3 ► pp. 219 ff.
Theng, Andre Joseph, Vincent Wai Sum Tse & Jasper Zhao Zhen Wu
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.