Semiotics of a Covid landscape
Tactical urbanism in a pandemic
This paper brings together urban planning and linguistic perspectives to examine the semiotic landscape of a
Washington, DC ‘streatery’ in the context of the intersecting public health- and place-based economic crises unleashed by the
Covid-19 pandemic. Drawing from
Garay-Huamán and Irazábal-Zurita’s (2021) work on
neoliberal
Social Structures of Accumulation (SSA), we examine how different layers of Adams Morgan’s emergent
Covid landscape are rooted in the dynamics of capitalist accumulation through urban placemaking strategies. We focus on signs put
up by the Business Improvement District (BID) that explain the public health regulations applicable to the area through discourse
that playfully encourages people to social distance and wear masks. These signs utilize three linguistic or semiotic discourses:
hygiene, humor and play, and anti-Trump politics. The signs serve as a bona fide effort to both halt the spread of the coronavirus
and take a political stance. At the same time as the signs promote public health, their commodified aestheticization of hygiene
and politics also serves commercial interests.
Keywords: semiotic landscape, BIDs, commodification of language, gentrification, Covid, negative face, aestheticization, humor, language play, tactical urbanism, Trumpism
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.SSAs and the Political Economy of Placemaking
- 3.The role of language and semiotics in urban planning initiatives
- 4.Adams Morgan and its Streatery
- 5.Methods and Data
- 6.Constructing the Streatery
- 7.Aesthetic and Public Health Functions of BID signs
- 7.1Aesthetics of Play and Politics
- 8.Promoting Public Health Playfully
- 9.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (62)
References
Ameel, L. (2021). The Narrative Turn in Urban Planning: Plotting the Helsinki Waterfront. Abington, Oxford: Routledge.
Baro, G. (2017). The Language of urban development in Johannesburg’s inner city. Multilingual Margins: A Journal of Multilingualism from the Periphery, 4(1), 40–52.
Bloom, N. D. (2004). Merchant of illusion: James Rouse, American’s salesman of the businessman’s utopia. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Briffault, R. (1999). A Government for our time? Business Improvement Districts and urban governance. Columbia Law Review, 991: 365–477.
Buchstaller, I. (2021). Community cityscape: Modes of engagement and co-construction of the streetscape. Linguistics Vanguard, 7(5), 20200150.
Collins, C. (2000). Developing the linguistic turn in urban studies: Language, context and political economy. Urban Studies, 37(11), 2027–43.
DC Office of Planning, and Washington DC Economic Partnership WDCEP. (2010). Creative Capital: The Creative DC Action Agenda. District of Columbia.
Didier, S., Morange, M. & Peyroux, E. (2013). The adaptive nature of neoliberalism at the local scale: Fifteen years of city improvement districts in Cape Town and Johannesburg. Antipode, 45(1), 121–39.
Empower DC. (2021). Gentrification as public policy: BIDs, development, and displacement in Washington D.C. Roundtable, October, 21. [URL]
Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Furman, A. (2007). The street as a temporary eventscape. International Journal of the Humanities 5(9), 77–84.
Garay-Huamán, A. N., & Irazábal-Zurita, C. (2021). Latinos in Kansas City: The political economy of placemaking. Journal of Planning Literature 36(2), 131–54.
Gehl, J. (1987). Life between buildings: Using public space. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Gillette, H. (2012). Civitas by design: Building better communities, from the garden city to the new urbanism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Gonçalves, K. (2018). YO! Or OY? – say what? Creative place-making through a metrolingual artifact in Dumbo, Brooklyn. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(1), 42–58.
Harvey, D. (1990). Flexible accumulation through urbanization: Reflections on “post-modernism” in the American city. Perspecta, 261, 251–272.
Hill, J. (2008). The Everyday Language of White Racism. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
Hoyt, L. (2008). From North America to Africa: The Business Improvement District model and the role of policy entrepreneurs. In G. Morçöl and U. Zimmermann (eds), Business improvement districts: Research, theories, and controversies (pp.111–139). New York: Routledge.
Imrie, R., Pinch, S. & Boyle, M. (1996). Identities, Citizenship and Power in the Cities. Urban Studies, 33(8), 1255–1261.
Isenberg, A. (2004). Downtown America: A history of the place and the people who made it. Chicago, Ill.: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage Books.
Järlehed, J. & Fanni, M. (2022). The politics of typographic placemaking: The cases of Tilburgsans and Dubai font. Visual Communication, 0(0).
Järlehd, J. & Jaworski, A. (2015). Typographic landscaping: Creativity, ideology, movement. Social Semiotics, 25(2), 117–125.
Järlehed, J., Löfdahl, M., Milani, T., Nielsen, H. L. & Rosendal, T. (2021). Entrepreneurial Naming and Scaling of Urban Places: the Case of Nya Hovås. In K. Leibring, L. Mattfolk, K. Neumüller, S. Nyström, & E. Pihl (eds), The Economy in Names: Values, Branding and Globalization; The Economy in Names Values, Branding and Globalization: Proceedings of Names in the Economy 6 International Conference (pp. 71–86). Uppsala: Department of Archives and Research Uppsala, Institute for Language and Folklore.
Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23–49.
Lee, B. (2015). Back to the Future writer: Bad guy Biff was based on Donald Trump. The Guardian, October 23.
Leeman, J. & Modan, G. (2009). Commodified language in Chinatown: A contextualized approach to linguistic landscape. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 13(3), 332–62.
Lees, L. (2003). Visions of ‘urban renaissance’: The Urban Task Force report and the Urban White Paper. In R. Imrie & M. Raco (eds) Urban Renaissance? New Labour, community and urban policy. Bristol, UK: Policy Press. 61–82.
Lydon, M. & Garcia, A. (2015). Tactical urbanism: Short-term action for long-term change. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Markusen, A. & Gadwa, A. (2010). Creative placemaking. Washington, DC: National Endowment of the Arts.
Markusen, A., Schrock, G. (2006). The artistic dividend: Urban artistic specialization and economic development implications. Urban Studies, 43(10), 1661–1686.
McCann, E. J. (2002). The cultural politics of local economic development: Meaning-making, place-making, and the urban policy process. Geoforum 33(3), 385–398.
McDonough, T., McMahon, C., & Kotz, D. M., eds (2021). Handbook on social structure of accumulation theory. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Miles, S. (2012). The neoliberal city and the pro-active complicity of the citizen consumer. Journal of Consumer Culture, 12(2), 216–230.
Modan, G. (2008). Mango fufu kimchi yucca: The depoliticization of ‘diversity’ in Washington, D.C. discourse. City & Society, 20(2), 188–221.
Molotch, H. (1976). The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology, 82(2), 309–332.
Murphy, K. M. (2015). Swedish design: An ethnography. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Nowak, J. (2007). The power of place-Making: A summary of creativity and neighborhood development: Strategies for community. Culture and Community Revitalization: A SIAP/ Reinvestment Fund Collaboration 2007–2009.
O’Cleireacain, C. & Rivlin, A. M. (2002). A sound fiscal footing for the nation’s capital: A federal responsibility. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
Peck, J. (2005). Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(4), 740–70.
Peyroux, E., Pütz, R. & Glasze, G. (2012). Business Improvement Districts (BIDs): The internationalization and contextualization of a ‘traveling concept. European Urban and Regional Studies, 19(2), 111–20.
Prifti, R. & Jaupi, F. (2021). Entrepreneurial urban regeneration: Business improvement districts as a form of organizational innovation. New York: Routledge.
Richards, G., Marques, L. & Mein, K. eds. (2015). Event design: Social perspectives and practices. New York: Routledge.
Schaller, S. (2019). Business Improvement Districts and the contradictions of placemaking:BID urbanism in Washington, D.C. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Schaller, S., & Guinand, S. (2017). Pop-up landscapes: A new trigger to push up land value? Urban Geography, 39(1), 54–74.
Scollon, R. & Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in Place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge.
Smith, F. M. (1999). Discourses of citizenship in transition: Scale, politics and urban renewal. Urban Studies, 36(1), 167–187.
Smith, N. (2002). New globalism, new urbanism: Gentrification as global urban strategy. Antipode, 34(3), 427–50.
Summers, B. T. (2019). Black in place: The spatial aesthetics of race in a post-Chocolate City. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Suntikul, W., & Jachna, T. (2016). The co-creation/place attachment nexus. Tourism Management, 521, 276–86.
Talen, E. (2015). Do-It-Yourself urbanism: A history. Journal of Planning History, 14(2), 135–48.
Throgmorton, J. A. (2003). Planning as Persuasive Storytelling in a Global-Scale Web of Relationships. Planning Theory, 2(2), 125–151.
Trinch, S. L., & Snajdr, E. (2020). What the signs say: Language, gentrification, and place-making in Brooklyn. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
Valli, C., and Hammami, F. (2021). Introducing business improvement districts (BIDs) in Sweden: A social justice appraisal. European Urban and Regional Studies 28(2), 155–72.
Waldeck, M. (2020). Typography and nationalism: The past and modernism under Nazi rule. Journal of Visual Political Communication 6(1), 37–80.
Wells, K. J. (2015). A housing crisis, a failed law, and a property conflict: The US urban speculation tax. Antipode, 47(4), 1043–1061.
Whyte, W. (1988). City: Rediscovering the center. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
Zimmer, B. (2021). Pandemic dining on asphalt gets its own name. Wall Street Journal August 14: C31.
Zukin, S. (1995). The cultures of cities. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Felizardo, Ana Carolina Martins Dias
2024.
Tactical Urbanism: Description and Analysis of Its Associated Lexicons. In
Contemporary Heritage Lexicon [
Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering, ],
► pp. 67 ff.
Syakur, Abd., Wahyu Sudrajad, Sutri Winurati & Shouket Ahmad Tilwani
2023.
The Motivation of Students and Their Exposure to Learning Loss After the Pandemic.
Studies in Learning and Teaching 4:3
► pp. 622 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.