This study investigated prosodic aspects of native and non-native (native Japanese, NJ) speech in American English. Since Japanese is characterized as mora-timed and English as stress-timed, it was hypothesized that durational contrasts among syllables in English spoken by NJ speakers may not be as large as those in native speech. In addition, it was hypothesized that a wider fundamental frequency (F0) range may be found in utterances produced by NJ speakers than in native speech, because NJ speakers may rely on F0 to indicate stress due to pitch accent in Japanese. The participants were NJ adults and children (16 each), and age-matched native English (NE) adults and children (16 each). They repeated ten phrases/sentences after a model. Durations of each syllable and the whole utterance were measured, and the F0 range in each syllable and the whole utterance was calculated in semitones for three out of the ten phrases/sentences. The results indicated that absolute durations of syllables and utterances tended to be longer in the NJ speakers’ utterances than in the NE speakers’. Children’s utterances (NE and NJ combined) also tended to be longer than adults’. The F0 range was larger in the NJ speakers’ utterances than in the NE speakers’ in one target sentence. In addition, it was found that the duration of function words was proportionately longer in the NJ speakers’ utterances than in the NE speakers’ and that the F0 range was greater in the NJ adult speakers’ utterances than the NE adult speakers’ in content words. The results of this study partially support the hypothesis that NJ speakers rely on pitch difference to indicate stress in English. It is also possible that function words were not as reduced in nonnative speech as in native speech. Differences were found between adults and children, indicating that there may be developmental changes in prosodic aspects.
Mallela, Jhansi, Sai Harshitha Aluru & Chiranjeevi Yarra
2024. 2024 National Conference on Communications (NCC), ► pp. 1 ff.
Xue, Liya & Ming Yue
2024. Discrepancy in prosodic disambiguation strategies between Chinese EFL learners and native English speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 62:2 ► pp. 1065 ff.
Abu Guba, Mohammed Nour, Bassil Mashaqba, Samer Jarbou & Omar Al-Haj Eid
2023. Production of vowel reduction by Jordanian–Arabic speakers of English: an acoustic study. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 59:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Drouillet, Lucie, Corine Astésano & Charlotte Alazard-Guiu
2023. Longitudinal study of phonetic drift in L1 speech of late Czech-French bilinguals. AUC PHILOLOGICA 2022:1 ► pp. 131 ff.
Kim, Ji Young
2023. Spanish–English Cross-Linguistic Influence on Heritage Bilinguals’ Production of Uptalk. Languages 8:1 ► pp. 22 ff.
Mallela, Jhansi, Prasanth Sai Boyina & Chiranjeevi Yarra
2023. A Comparison of Learned Representations with Jointly Optimized VAE and DNN for Syllable Stress Detection. In Speech and Computer [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14339], ► pp. 322 ff.
Sönning, Lukas
2023. (Re-)viewing the Acquisition of Rhythm in the Light of L2 Phonological Theories. In Speech Rhythm in Learner and Second Language Varieties of English [Prosody, Phonology and Phonetics, ], ► pp. 123 ff.
Alvarado, Covadonga Sánchez & Meghan Armstrong
2022. Prosodic Marking of Object Focus in L2 Spanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 15:1 ► pp. 211 ff.
Huang, Zhilin, Huijie Yu, Haoqing Wu & Ying Chen
2022. 2022 International Conference on Asian Language Processing (IALP), ► pp. 363 ff.
Lai, Li-Fang & Shelome Gooden
2022. Language Contact, Language Ecology, and Intonational Variation in the Yami Community. Language and Speech 65:4 ► pp. 791 ff.
Zhang, Guangyan, Yichong Leng, Daxin Tan, Ying Qin, Kaitao Song, Xu Tan, Sheng Zhao & Tan Lee
2022. ICASSP 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), ► pp. 6087 ff.
Aoyama, Katsura
2021. Changes in the First Year of Immersion. In Second Language Speech Learning, ► pp. 213 ff.
Yang, Jing & Bei Yang
2021. Duration of Disyllabic Words Produced by Russian Learners of Chinese. In The Acquisition of Chinese as a Second Language Pronunciation [Prosody, Phonology and Phonetics, ], ► pp. 177 ff.
Rothgerber, John
2019. The Causes of Learner Pronunciation Problems in English. In Applied Linguistics for Teachers of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Learners [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ], ► pp. 361 ff.
Rothgerber, John
2022. The Causes of Learner Pronunciation Problems in English. In Research Anthology on Applied Linguistics and Language Practices, ► pp. 1495 ff.
Gustafson, Erin & Matthew Goldrick
2018. The role of linguistic experience in the processing of probabilistic information in production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 33:2 ► pp. 211 ff.
McKinnon, Sean
2017. TBLT INSTRUCTIONAL EFFECTS ON TONAL ALIGNMENT AND PITCH RANGE IN L2 SPANISH IMPERATIVES VERSUS DECLARATIVES. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39:2 ► pp. 287 ff.
Soenning, Lukas
2014. Unstressed Vowels in German Learner English: An Instrumental Study. Research in Language 12:2 ► pp. 163 ff.
Sayoud, Halim & Siham Ouamour
2010. Pertinent Prosodic Features for Speaker Identification by Voice. International Journal of Mobile Computing and Multimedia Communications 2:2 ► pp. 18 ff.
Sayoud, Halim & Siham Ouamour
2012. Pertinent Prosodic Features for Speaker Identification by Voice. In Advancing the Next-Generation of Mobile Computing, ► pp. 227 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.