Aptitude-treatment interaction studies in second language acquisition
Findings and methodology
Karen Vatz | University of Maryland Center for Advanced Study of Language
Medha Tare | University of Maryland Center for Advanced Study of Language
Scott R. Jackson | University of Maryland Center for Advanced Study of Language
Catherine J. Doughty | University of Maryland Center for Advanced Study of Language
Research in second language acquisition has long posited that learners’ individual differences affect ultimate attainment. This chapter reviews studies that examine how learners with differing cognitive aptitudes respond to instructional treatments. Most of these studies showed significant aptitude-by-treatment interactions (ATI), which suggest that the effectiveness of a particular type of instruction depends on stable, cognitive abilities, such as language analysis or working memory. From our review of this literature, we conclude that, although some interactions have been shown, there is still limited work using a rigorous ATI matched/mis-matched design. We therefore assess the strengths and weaknesses of existing ATI studies, as well as their practical implications, as it is our hope that future research will incorporate the necessary design elements to probe how tailoring instruction to individual cognitive aptitudes affects second language learning.
2024. Optimizing the input for learning of L2-specific constructions: The roles of Zipfian and balanced input, explicit rules and working memory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 46:2 ► pp. 379 ff.
Farshi, Najmeh & Mansoor Tavakoli
2021. Effects of differences in language aptitude on learning grammatical collocations under elaborated input conditions. Language Teaching Research 25:3 ► pp. 476 ff.
2021. Feedback, Aptitude, and Multilingualism. In The Cambridge Handbook of Corrective Feedback in Second Language Learning and Teaching, ► pp. 689 ff.
Ruiz, Simón, Patrick Rebuschat & Detmar Meurers
2021. The effects of working memory and declarative memory on instructed second language vocabulary learning: Insights from intelligent CALL. Language Teaching Research 25:4 ► pp. 510 ff.
Ahmadian, Mohammad Javad
2020. Explicit and implicit instruction of refusal strategies: Does working memory capacity play a role?. Language Teaching Research 24:2 ► pp. 163 ff.
Norouzian, Reza
2020. SAMPLE SIZE PLANNING IN QUANTITATIVE L2 RESEARCH. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 42:4 ► pp. 849 ff.
Benson, Susan & Robert DeKeyser
2019. Effects of written corrective feedback and language aptitude on verb tense accuracy. Language Teaching Research 23:6 ► pp. 702 ff.
Doughty, Catherine J.
2019. Cognitive Language Aptitude. Language Learning 69:S1 ► pp. 101 ff.
2021. Individual differences in memory predict changes in breakdown and repair fluency but not speed fluency: A short-term fluency training intervention study. Applied Psycholinguistics 42:4 ► pp. 969 ff.
2015. Experimental Perspectives on Classroom Interaction. In The Handbook of Classroom Discourse and Interaction, ► pp. 60 ff.
STEFANOU, CHARIS & ANDREA RÉVÉSZ
2015. Direct Written Corrective Feedback, Learner Differences, and the Acquisition of Second Language Article Use for Generic and Specific Plural Reference. The Modern Language Journal 99:2 ► pp. 263 ff.
Linck, Jared A., Meredith M. Hughes, Susan G. Campbell, Noah H. Silbert, Medha Tare, Scott R. Jackson, Benjamin K. Smith, Michael F. Bunting & Catherine J. Doughty
2013. Hi‐LAB: A New Measure of Aptitude for High‐Level Language Proficiency. Language Learning 63:3 ► pp. 530 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.