Computer technology has created new options for interlanguage pragmatics analysis. Researchers can now quickly test second language (L2) learner’s efficiency in processing pragmatic meaning without relying on paper-and-pencil methods. This chapter presents examples of such technology-enhanced analysis in the comprehension of conversational implicature among learners of L2 English. Previous research has examined implicature comprehension by using paper-and-pencil tests that require learners to read or listen to conversations and identify speakers’ implied intentions by responding to multiple-choice questions. My studies have expanded the scope of this practice by introducing a computer-based listening test that measures both accuracy and speed (response times) in comprehension. These two attributes have been measured to illustrate different processing loads encoded in implicature as well as different stages of development in L2 learners’ ability to comprehend implicature. This chapter presents two studies which exemplify the uses of response time data.
Díaz Ferrero, Ana María, Isa Vitória Severino & Rafael Porlán Moreno
2023. La enseñanza de la pragmática a través de ejercicios de traducción pedagógica. Diacrítica 36:2
Schulze, Cornelia, David Buttelmann, Liqi Zhu & Henrik Saalbach
2022. Context-Sensitivity Influences German and Chinese Preschoolers’ Comprehension of Indirect Communication. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 53:10 ► pp. 1257 ff.
Yang, He
2022. Literature Review. In Language Learning Motivation and L2 Pragmatic Competence, ► pp. 9 ff.
Ifantidou, Elly
2021. Second Language Pragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 758 ff.
González-Lloret, Marta
2019. Technology and L2 Pragmatics Learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 39 ► pp. 113 ff.
Glaser, Karen
2016. News from the pragmatics classroom: Contrasting the inductive and the deductive approach in the teaching of pragmatic competence
. Intercultural Pragmatics 13:4 ► pp. 529 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Approaches and Methods in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 567 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.