Cover not available
Part of
Interlanguage: Forty years later
Edited by ZhaoHong Han and Elaine Tarone
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 39] 2014
► pp. 47–74

Chapter 3. From Julie to Wes to Alberto

Revisiting the construct of fossilization

| Teachers College, Columbia University
This chapter revisits the construct of fossilization, the bedrock of Selinker’s (1972) Interlanguage Hypothesis. After reviewing the early conception of fossilization, I focus my discussion on intra-learner, and to a lesser extent, inter-learner differential success or failure, arguing that fossilization is selective, idiosyncratic, and contingent. I end the discussion by underscoring that the study of fossilization is less about revealing deviances from the presumed norm than about resolving a dual cognitive conflict, namely, why is it that in spite of propitious conditions, development is cut short in some areas? And why is the developmental interruption made most apparent when learners attempt self-expressions (i.e., meaning-based production) in the target language?
Published online: 30 April 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.39.05ch3
References (98)
References
Andersen, R.W. (1983). Transfer to somewhere. In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language Transfer in Language Learning (pp. 177–201). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Belletti, A., Bennati, E., & Sorace, A. (2007). Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory , 25, 657–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. (1992). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language , 68, 706–755. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Why not fossilization. In Z.-H. Han (Ed.), Studies of Fossilization in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 173–188). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D., & Paik, J. (2008). Second language acquisition and ultimate attainment. In B. Spolsky & F. Hult (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Linguistics (pp. 424–436). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1989). The logical problem of second language learning. In S. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition (pp. 41–68). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). The evolving context of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 31(Special Issue 02), 175–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohnacker, U., & Rosén, C. (2008). The clause-initial position in L2 German declaratives. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 30, 511–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S.E. (2013). Introduction to the special issue: Aspects of word learning on first exposure to a second language. Second Language Research , 29(2), 131–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly , 33(2), 185–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coppieters, R. (1987). Competence differences between native and non-native speakers. Language , 63, 544–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, B. (2012a). Topicalization. In P. Robinson (Ed.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 651–652). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2012b). Syntax and discourse in near-native French: Clefts and focus. Language Learning , 62(3), 902–930. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N.C. (2002). Frequency effects in language acquisition: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 24(2), 143–188.Google Scholar
(2006). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in SLA: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics , 27, 164–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2007). SLA: The associative cognitive CREED. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction . . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Ellis, N.C. (2008). The dynamics of second language emergence: Cycles of language use, language change, and language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 232–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Frequency. In P. Robinson (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 260–265). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fries, C. (1952). The Structure of English: An Introduction to the Construction of English Sentences . New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Gass, S. (2009). A survey of SLA research. In B. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), The New Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 3–28). Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (Eds.). (2011). The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition . New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Han, Z.-H. (2000). Persistence of the implicit influence of NL: The case of the pseudo-passive. Applied Linguistics , 21(1), 78–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Han, Z.H. (2004). Fossilization in Adult Second Language Acquisition . Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Han, Z.-H. (2006). Fossilization: Can grammaticality judgment be a reliable source of evidence? In Z.-H. Han & T. Odlin (Eds.), Studies of Fossilization in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 56–82). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2009). Interlanguage and fossilization: Towards an analytic model. In V. Cook & L. Wei (Eds.), Contemporary Applied Linguistics, Vol. I: Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 137–162). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2010). Grammatical morpheme inadequacy as a function of linguistic relativity: A longitudinal study. In Z.-H. Han & T. Cadierno (Eds.), Linguistic Relativity in Second Language Acquisition: Thinking for Speaking (pp. 154–182). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2011). Fossilization -A classic concern of SLA research. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 476–490). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2013). Forty years later: Updating the Fossilization Hypothesis. Language Teaching , 46(2), 133–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Han, Z.-H., & Finneran, R. (2013). Re-engaging the interface debate in SLA: Strong, weak, none or all? The International Journal of Applied Linguistics . DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Han, Z.-H., & Lew, W.M. (2012). Acquisitional complexity: What defies complete acquisition in SLA. In B. Szmrecsanyi & B. Kortmann (Eds.), Linguistic Complexity in Interlanguage Varieties, L2 Varieties, and Contact Languages (pp. 192–217). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Han, Z.-H., & Odlin, T. (2006). Introduction. In Z.-H. Han & T. Odlin (Eds.), Studies of Fossilization in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 1–20). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. (2000). Persistent selective fossilization in second language acquisition and the optimal design of the language faculty. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics , 34, 75–90.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Chan, C. (1997). The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The 'failed functional features hypothesis'. Second Language Research , 13, 187–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M., Hendricks, H., & Roland, F. (1996). The marking of new information in children's narratives: A comparison of English, French, German, and Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Child Language , 23, 591–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M., & Hendricks, H. (1999). Reference maintenance in children's narrative discourse. Journal of Child Language , 26, 419–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, H. (1998). Reference to person and space in narrative discourse: A comparison of adult second language and child first language acquisition. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teoretica e Applicata , 27, 67–86.Google Scholar
(2000). The acquisition of topic marking in L1 Chinese and L1 an L2 French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 22, 369–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, A. (1955). Introduction to Linguistic Structures . New York: Brace Harcourt.Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2009). The syntax-discourse interface in near-native SLA: Off-line and on-line performance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , 12, 463–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between nonnative and native speakers. Lingua , 120, 901–931. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ioup, G., Boustagui, E., El Tigi, M., & Moselle, M. (1994). Reexamining the critical period hypothesis: A case study of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 16(1), 73–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J., Shenkman, K., Newport, E., & Medin, D. (1996). Indeterminacy in the grammar of adult language learners. Journal of Memory and Language , 35, 335–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kellerman, E. (1995). Crosslinguistic influence: Transfer to nowhere? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , 15, 125–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across Cultures: Applied Linguistics for Language Teachers . Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Lardiere, D. (1998a). Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar. Second Language Research , 14(4), 359–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998b). Case and tense in the 'fossilized' steady state. Second Language Research , 14, 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000). Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In J. Archibald (Ed.), Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory (pp. 102–129). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2007). Ultimate Attainment in Second Language Acquisition . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2012). Fossilization. In P. Robinson (Ed.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 256–260). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). Second language acquisition and the issue of fossilization: There is no end, and there is no state. In Z.-H. Han & T. Odlin (Eds.), Studies of Fossilization in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 189–200). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological Foundations of Language . New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Li, C., & Thompson, S. (1976). Subject and Topic: A New Typology of Language . New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Long, M. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 12, 251–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M.H. (2003). Stabilization and fossilization in interlanguage development. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 487–535). Malden MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. (2006). Incomplete acquisition as a feature of L2 and bilingual grammars. In R. Slabakova, S. Montrul & P. Prévost (Eds.), Inquiries in Language Development. Studies in Honor of Lydia White (pp. 335–359). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Multiple interfaces and incomplete acquisition. Lingua , 121(4), 591–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Novoa, L., Fein, D., & Obler, L. (1988). Talent in foreign languages: A case study. In L. Obler & D. Fein (Eds.), The Exceptional Brain: The Neuropsychology of Talent and Special Abilities (pp. 294–302). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Obler, L. (1989). Exceptional second language learners. In S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preston & L. Selinker (Eds.), Variation in Second Language Acquisition: Psycholinguistic Issues . Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000). Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research , 16, 103–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schachter, J. (1996). Learning and triggering in adult L2 acquisition. In G. Brown, K. Malmkjaer & J. Williams (Eds.), Performance and Competence in SLA (pp. 70–88). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Schachter, J., & Rutherford, W. (1979). Discourse function and language transfer. In B. Robinett & J. Schachter (Eds.), Second Language Learning: Contrastive Analysis, Error Analysis, and Related Aspects (pp. 1–11). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1983). Interaction, acculturation, and the acquisition of communicative competence. In N. Wolfson & J. Manes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 137–174). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Schneiderman, E., & Desmarais, C. (1988). The talented language learner: Some preliminary findings. Second Language Research , 4, 91–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schumann, J. (1978). The Pidginization Process: A Model for Second Language Acquisition . Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics , 10(2), 209–231.Google Scholar
Selinker, L., & Douglas, D. (1985). Wrestling with 'context' in interlanguage studies. Applied Linguistics 6(2), 190–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selinker, L., Dumas, & Swain, M. (1975). The interlanguage hypothesis extended to children. Language Learning , 25(1), 139–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selinker, L., & Lakshmanan, U. (1992). Language transfer and fossilization: The multiple effects principle. In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language Transfer in Language Learning (pp. 190–216). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selinker, L., & Lamendella, J. (1978). Two perspectives on fossilization in interlanguage learning. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin , 3(2), 143–191.Google Scholar
Sheen, R. (1980). The importance of negative transfer in the speech of near-bilinguals. International Review of Applied Linguistics , 18(2), 105–119.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Slabakova, R., & Ivanov, I. (2011). A more careful look at the syntax-discourse interface. Lingua , 121(4), 637–651. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. (1987). Thinking for speaking. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 13, 435–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D.I. (1996). From 'thought and language' to 'thinking for speaking'. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (2007). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In V. Evans, B. Bergen, & J. Zinken (Eds.), The Cognitive Linguistics Reader (pp. 902–928). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Sorace, A. (2005). Selective optionality in language development. In L. Cornips & K. Corrigan (Eds.), Syntax and Variation Reconciling the Biological and the Social (pp. 111–160). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Pinning down the concept of ‘‘interface’’ in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism , 1, 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research , 22(3), 339–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Keller, F. (2005). Gradience in linguistic data. Lingua , 115, 1497–1524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Serratrice, L. (2009). Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism , 13, 195–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & L. Serratrice(2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research 22(3), 339–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E. (1979). Interlanguage as chameleon. Language Learning , 29, 181–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1983). On the variability of interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics , 4, 142–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Towell, R., & Hawkins, R. (1994). Approaches to Second Language Acquisition . Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Trager, G., & Smith, H. L. (1951). An Outline of English Structure . Norman, OK: Battenburg Press.Google Scholar
Trahey, M., & White, L. (1993). Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 15, 181–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trévise, A. (1986). Is it transferable, topicalization? In E. Kellerman & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), Crosslinguistic Influence in Second Language Acquisition . New York, NY: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Trévisiol, P. (1996, May). Marques des processus de thématisation en français L2 dans le discours narratif d'apprenants japonais [Thematization process markers in L2 French in the narrative discourse of Japanese learners] . Paper presented at the Sixth International EuroSLA Conference, Nijmegen.
Tsimpli, T., Sorace, A., Heycock, C., & Filiaci, F. (2004). First language attrition and syntactic subjects: A study of Greek and Italian near-native speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism , 8(3), 257–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
VanBuren, P. (2001). Brief apologies and thanks. Second Language Research , 17(4), 457–462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (2007). Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Wang, T. Y. (2012). Selective Fossilization in Advanced L2 Speakers of Japanese . Unpublished M.A. thesis.Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
White, L. (1989). The principle of adjacency in second language acquisition: Do L2 learners observe the subset principle? In S. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition (pp. 134–158). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991). The verb-movement parameter in second language acquisition. Language Acquisition , 1, 337–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: Persistent problems with inflectional morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , 6, 129–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Grammatical theory: Interfaces and L2 knowledge. In T.K. Bhatia & W.C. Ritchie (Eds.), The New Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 49–68). Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar
Wilson, F., Keller, F., & Sorace, A. (2009). Antecedent preferences for anaphoric demonstratives in L2 German Proceedings of BUCID 33 . Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Yip, V. (1995). Interlanguage and Learnability: From Chinese to English . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Larsen-Freeman, Diane
2023. Complex dynamic systems theory: A webinar with Diane Larsen-Freeman. Language Teaching 56:3 ► pp. 402 ff. DOI logo
Saturno, Jacopo
2023. Bliskość pomiędzy językami słowiańskimi a integracja uchodźców z Ukrainy w Polsce. Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne. Seria Językoznawcza 30:1 ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Han, ZhaoHong
2021. Corrective Feedback from Behaviorist and Innatist Perspectives. In The Cambridge Handbook of Corrective Feedback in Second Language Learning and Teaching, ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Ellis, Rod
2019. Towards a modular language curriculum for using tasks. Language Teaching Research 23:4 ► pp. 454 ff. DOI logo
Kang, Eun Young, Sarah Sok & ZhaoHong Han
2019. Thirty-five years of ISLA on form-focused instruction: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research 23:4 ► pp. 428 ff. DOI logo
Montrul, Silvina
2019. Chapter 11. Heritage language development and the promise of Processability Theory. In Teachability and Learnability across Languages [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 6], ► pp. 237 ff. DOI logo
Han, ZhaoHong, Gang Bao & Paul Wiita
2017. Chapter 10. Energy conservation in SLA. In Complexity Theory and Language Development [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 48], ► pp. 209 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.