Cover not available
Part of
Interlanguage: Forty years later
Edited by ZhaoHong Han and Elaine Tarone
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 39] 2014
► pp. 127–146

Chapter 6. Documenting interlanguage development

| Indiana University at Bloomington
This chapter illustrates Selinker’s (1972) claim that interlanguage is a linguistic system in its own right by examining research in three different areas of L2 development: interlanguage temporality, L2 pragmatics, and conventional expressions. The chapter begins with a review of functional approaches to interlanguage analysis. It then reviews a longitudinal study of interlanguage temporality illustrating the development of form-meaning mappings as learners acquire temporal expression in L2 English. The importance of interlanguage development in the pragmatics of L2 learners is emphasized in the next section which demonstrates that the interpretation of learner forms in conversation is dependent on the inventory of available linguistic devices. The chapter closes by considering the role of interlanguage grammar in the production of formulaic expressions.
Published online: 30 April 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.39.08ch6
References (33)
References
Andersen, R.W. (1984). The one to one principle of interlanguage construction. Language Learning , 34, 77–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1994). Reverse-order reports and the acquisition of tense: Beyond the principle of chronological order. Language Learning , 44, 243–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997). Another piece of the puzzle: The emergence of the present perfect. Language Learning , 47, 375–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999). The interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning , 49, 677–713. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000). Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form, Meaning, and Use . Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
(2004b). The emergence of grammaticalized future expression in longitudinal production data. In M. Overstreet, S. Rott, B. VanPatten, & J. Williams (Eds.) Form and Meaning in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 115–137). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2005). The future of desire: Lexical futures and modality in L2 English future expression. In L. Dekydtspotter & R. Sprouse (Eds.), 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition, (pp. 1–12). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. <[URL]>
(2006). On the role of formulas in the acquisition of L2 pragmatics. In K. Bardovi-Harlig, C. Félix-Brasdefer, & A.S. Omar (Eds.), Pragmatics and Language Learning, (Vol. 11, pp. 1–28). Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
(2009). Conventional expressions as a pragmalinguistic resource: Recognition and production of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Language Learning , 59, 755–795. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Pragmatic variation and conventional expressions. In J. C. Félix-Brasdefer & D. Koike (Eds.), Pragmatic Variation in First and Second Language Contexts: Methodological Issues (pp. 141–173). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Salsbury, T. (2004). The organization of turns in the disagreements of L2 learners: A longitudinal perspective. In D. Boxer & A.D. Cohen (Eds.), Studying Speaking to Inform Second Language Learning (pp. 199–227) . Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cooreman, A., & Kilborn, K. (1991). Functionalist linguistics: Discourse structure and language processing in second language acquisition. In T. Huebner & C.A. Ferguson (Eds.), Cross Currents in Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory (pp. 195–224). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Ö. (1984). Temporal distance: Remoteness distinctions in tense aspect systems. In B. Butterworth, B. Comrie, & Ö. Dahl (Eds.), Explanations for Language Universals (pp. 105 122). Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, R., Klein, W., & Noyau, C. (1995). The Acquisition of Temporality in a Second Language . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eisenstein, M., & Bodman, J. W.(1986). ‘I very appreciate’: Expressions of gratitude by native and non-native speakers of American English. Applied Linguistics , 7 167–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, L. (1989). Be Going to and Will: A pragmatic account. Journal of Linguistics , 25, 291–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G. (2001). Classroom research on interlanguage pragmatics. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in Language Teaching (pp. 33–60). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, W. (1986). Second Language Acquisition . (Rev. ed., Bohuslaw Jankowski, Trans.) Cambridge: CUP. (Original work published 1984) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995). The acquisition of English. In R. Dietrich, W. Klein, & C. Noyau (Eds.), The Acquisition of Temporality in a Second Language (pp. 31 70). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Krashen, S., Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1982). Language Two . Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar
Leech, G.N. (1971). Meaning and the English Verb . Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Long, M., & Sato, C.J. (1984). Methodological issues in interlanguage studies: An interactionist perspective. In A. Davies, C. Criper, & A.P.R. Howatt (Eds.), Interlanguage (pp. 253 279). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Meisel, J.M. (1987). Reference to past events and actions in the development of natural language acquisition. In C.W. Pfaff (Ed.), First and Second Language Acquisition Processes (pp. 206–224). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Pawley, A., & Syder, F.H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J.C. Richards & R.W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication (pp. 191–226). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Salsbury, T., & Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). “I know your mean, but I don’t think so” Disagreements in L2 English. In L. Bouton (Ed.), Pragmatics and Language Learning (Vol. 10) (pp. 131–151). Urbana-Champaign IL: University of Illinois, Division of English as an International Language.Google Scholar
(2000). Oppositional talk and the acquisition of modality in L2 English. In B. Swierzbin, F. Morris, M.E. Anderson, C.A. Klee, & E. Tarone (Eds.), Social and Cognitive Factors in Second Language Acquisition: Selected Proceedings of the 1999 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 57–76). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1983). Interaction, acculturation and the acquisition of communicative competence. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 137–174). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL, 10, 209–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, C., & Klein, W. (1987). A concept-oriented approach to second language studies. In C.W. Pfaff (Ed.), First and Second Language Acquisition Processes (pp. 191–205). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Yorio, C. (1989). Idiomaticity as an indicator of second language proficiency. In K. Hyltenstam & L.K. Obler (Eds.), Bilingualism across the Lifespan (pp. 55–72) . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Wu, Xiaoling
2024. A Literature Review on Teaching Pragmatics in the EFL Context: Challenges and Implications. International Journal of Education and Humanities 15:2 ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Schramm, Andreas, Verena Haser, Michael C. Mensink, Jonas Reifenrath & Parinaz Kassemi
2022. Implicit Textually Enhanced Processing of Aspectual Meanings in English Learners with German as a First Language. Discourse Processes 59:7 ► pp. 520 ff. DOI logo
Guijarro-Fuentes, Pedro & Cristina Suárez-Gómez
2021. Tense in Speakers of English as a Contact Language: World Englishes and First Generation Long-immersed Immigrants. English Studies 102:5 ► pp. 601 ff. DOI logo
Morbiato, Anna
2020. Acquisition of Double-Nominative Constructions by Italian L1 Learners of Chinese. Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie orientale :56 DOI logo
Neumann, Farrah & Matthew Kanwit
2020. Acquiring variable commands at home and abroad: Examining optatives and imperatives in L1 and L2 Spanish . Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen
2018. Chapter 7. Concept-oriented analysis. In Critical Reflections on Data in Second Language Acquisition [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 51], ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
WERNER, VALENTIN & ROBERT FUCHS
2017. The present perfect in Nigerian English. English Language and Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Schramm, Andreas & Michael C. Mensink
2016. Processing of aspectual meanings by non-native and native English speakers during narrative comprehension. In New Approaches to English Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 177], ► pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. A Pragmatic Approach to Fluency and Disfluency in Learner Language [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 332], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.