Chapter published in:
Interlanguage: Forty years later
Edited by ZhaoHong Han and Elaine Tarone
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 39] 2014
► pp. 147–172

Chapter 7. Methodological influences of “Interlanguage” (1972)

Data then and data now

| Michigan State University
| Michigan State University
This chapter examines the impact of Selinker’s claim that certain data were inappropriate for SLA research: grammaticality judgments and nonsense syllables. The field has gradually come to understand SLA through multiple data types, so that the current view is that data are not appropriate or inappropriate in a vacuum, but rather need to be understood in the context of the research questions asked. The chapter describes the data used in studies prior to 1972, and then focuses on grammaticality judgments and nonsense data, including artificial languages, in studies after 1972. Although both data types are common in current SLA research, Selinker problematized their use and made us consider what we can learn from data other than elicited speech.
Published online: 30 April 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.39.09ch7
References

References

Abrahamsson, A.
(2012) Age of onset and nativelike L2 ultimate attainment of morphosyntactic and phonetic intuition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 34, 187–214. Crossref.Google Scholar
Baird, R.
(1973) Children's phonological rules: A failure to replicate. Language Learning , 23, 223–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berko, J.
(1958) The child's learning of English morphology. Word , 14, 150–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bird, S. & Williams, J.
(2002) The effect of bimodal input on implicit and explicit memory: An investigation into the benefits of within-language subtitling. Applied Psycholinguistics , 23, 509–533. Crossref. Google Scholar
Birdsong, D.
(1992) Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language , 68, 706–755. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, M.
(2010)  The Think-aloud Controversy in Second Language Research . New York, NY: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Brière, E.
(1968)  A Psycholinguistic Study of Phonological Interference . The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Coppieters, R.
(1987) Competence differences between native and non–native speakers. Language , 63 544–573. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corder, S.P.
(1973) The elicitation of interlanguage. In J. Svartvik(Ed.), Errata: Papers in Error Analysis (pp. 36–48). Lund: CWK Gleerup.Google Scholar
Crothers, E. & Suppes, P.
(1967)  Experiments in Second Language Learning . New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cornish, H., Tamariz, M., & Kirby, S.
(2009) Complex adaptive systems and the origins of adaptive structure: what experiments can tell us. Language Learning , 59s, 1 187–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z.
(2007)  Research Methods in Applied Linguistics . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. & Taguchi, T.
(2009)  Questionnaires in Second Language Research: Construction, Administration, and Processing . New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duff, P.
(2008)  Case Study Research in Applied Linguistics . New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(1991) Grammaticality judgments and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 13 161–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) The de?nition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning , 54 227–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 27 141–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language . In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and Explicit Knowledge in Second Language Learning, Testing and Teaching (pp. 31–64 ). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., & Loewen, S.
(2007) Con?rming the operational de?nitions of explicit and implicit knowledge in Ellis (2005) Responding to Isemonger. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 29 119–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H.
(2009)  Implicit and Explicit Knowledge in Second Language Learning, Testing and Teaching . Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gass, S.
(1979) Language transfer and universal grammatical relations. Language Learning , 29 327–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., & Alvarez Torres, M.
(2005) Attention when?: An investigation of the ordering effect of input and interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 27 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., & Mackey, A.
(2000)  Stimulated Recall Methodology in Second Language Research . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2007)  Data Elicitation for Second and Foreign Language Research . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Goo, J.
(2012) Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 34 445–474. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, X.
(2013) The construct validity of grammaticality judgment tests as measures of implicit and explicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 35 423–449. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huebner, T.
(1979) Order-of-acquisition vs. dynamic paradigm: A comparison of method in interlanguage research. TESOL Quarterly , 13 21–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K.
(1977) Implicational patterns in interlanguage syntax variation. Language Learning , 27, 383–411. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobovits, L.
(1970)  Foreign Language Learning: A Psycholinguistic Analysis of the Issues . Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Jiang, N.
(2012)  Conducting Reaction Time Research in Second Language Studies . New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnson, J., & Newport, E.
(1989) Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of ESL. Cognitive Psychology , 21 60–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1991) Critical period effects on universal properties of language: The status of subjacency in the acquisition of a second language. Cognition , 39 215–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, J.L., & Kaschak, M. P.
(2009) Do idiomatic constructions always aid language learning? Language Learning and Development , 5, 69–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaschak, M.P., & Saffran, J.R.
(2006).diomatic syntactic constructions and language learning. Cognitive Science , 30, 43–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kersten, A., & Earles, J.
(2001) Less really is more for adults learning a miniature artificial language. Journal of Memory and Language , 44, 250–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kovacs, G., & Racsmany, M.
(2008) Handling L2 input in phonological STM: The effect of non-L1 phonetic segments and non-L1 phonotactics on nonword repetition. Language Learning , 58, 597–624. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larson-Hall, J.
(2009)  A Guide to Doing Statistics in Second Language Research Using SPSS . New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lasky, E., Jay, B., & Hanz-Ehrman, M.
(1975) Meaningful and linguistic variables in auditory processing. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 8, 570–577. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, J. & Selinker, L.
(1971) On paradoxes, rules, and research in second-language learning, Language Learning , 21 27–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loewen, S.
(2009) Grammaticality judgment tests and the measurement of implicit and explicit L2 knowledge. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and Explicit Knowledge in Second Language Learning, Testing and Teaching (pp. 94–112 ). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., & Gass, S.
(2005)  Second Language Research: Methodology and Design . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Matlin, M. & Stang, D.
(1975) Some determinants of word-frequency estimates. Perceptual and Motor Skills , 40, 923–929. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., & Trofimovich, P.
(2009)  Using Priming Methods in Second Language Research . New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
McRehynolds, L.
(1972) Generalization during speech sound discrimination training. Language and Speech , 15, 385–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morgan-Short, K. & Sanz, C., & Steinhauer, K., & Ullman, M.
(2010) Second language acquisition of gender agreement in explicit and implicit training conditions: An event-related potential study. Language Learning , 60, 154–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nemser, W.
(1971) Approximative systems of foreign learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics , 9 115–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newport, E.
(1988) Constraints on learning and their role in language acquisition: Studies of the acquisition of American Sign Language. Language Sciences , 10, 147–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J.M., & Ortega, L.
(2003) Defining and measuring SLA. In C. J. Doughty, & M. H. Long (Eds.). Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 717–761). Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Read, C.
(1973) Children's judgments of phonetic similarities in relation to English spelling. Language Learning , 23, 17–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rebuschat, P.
in press). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge in second language research. Language Learning . Crossref
Roberts, L., Gullberg, M., & Indefey, P.
(2008) Online pronoun resolution in L2 discourse: L1 influence and general learner effects. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 30 333–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, J., Tyson, A., & Diffley, F.
(1976) Learner intuitions of grammaticality. Language Learning , 26 67–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, B.
(2011) Syntactic creativity in second language English: Wh-scope marking in Japanese-English interlanguage. Second Language Research , 27 313–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, C.T.
(1996)  The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistics Methodology . Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Selinker, L.
(1972a) Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics , 10 209–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1972b) Second-language learning experiments and mathematical learning theory. Language Learning , 22 291–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, M.
(1972) Stem endings and the acquisition of inflections. Language Learning , 22, 43–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strapp, C., Helmick, A., Tonkovich, H., & Bleakney, D.
(2011) Effects of negative and positive evidence on adult word learning. Language Learning , 61, 506–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E.
(1979) Interlanguage as chameleon. Language Learning , 29 181–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wagner–Gough, K., & Hatch, E.
(1975) The importance of input in second language acquisition studies. Language Learning , 25 297–308. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S.
(2007) The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics , 28, 46–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Gass, Susan, Shawn Loewen & Luke Plonsky
2021. Coming of age: the past, present, and future of quantitative SLA research. Language Teaching 54:2 ► pp. 245 ff. Crossref logo
Gass, Susan M.
2019.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning, ► pp. 777 ff. Crossref logo
Plonsky, Luke, Emma Marsden, Dustin Crowther, Susan M Gass & Patti Spinner
2020. A methodological synthesis and meta-analysis of judgment tasks in second language research. Second Language Research 36:4 ► pp. 583 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.