Chapter 7. Methodological influences of “Interlanguage” (1972)
Data then and data now
This chapter examines the impact of Selinker’s claim that certain data were inappropriate for SLA research: grammaticality judgments and nonsense syllables. The field has gradually come to understand SLA through multiple data types, so that the current view is that data are not appropriate or inappropriate in a vacuum, but rather need to be understood in the context of the research questions asked. The chapter describes the data used in studies prior to 1972, and then focuses on grammaticality judgments and nonsense data, including artificial languages, in studies after 1972. Although both data types are common in current SLA research, Selinker problematized their use and made us consider what we can learn from data other than elicited speech.
References (61)
References
Abrahamsson, A. (2012). Age of onset and nativelike L2 ultimate attainment of morphosyntactic and phonetic intuition.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
, 34, 187–214.
.
Baird, R. (1973). Children's phonological rules: A failure to replicate.
Language Learning
, 23, 223–230. 

Berko, J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology.
Word
, 14, 150–77. 

Bird, S. & Williams, J. (2002). The effect of bimodal input on implicit and explicit memory: An investigation into the benefits of within-language subtitling.
Applied Psycholinguistics
, 23, 509–533.
. 
Birdsong, D. (1992). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition.
Language
, 68, 706–755. 

Bowles, M. (2010).
The Think-aloud Controversy in Second Language Research
. New York, NY: Routledge
Brière, E. (1968).
A Psycholinguistic Study of Phonological Interference
. The Hague: Mouton.
Coppieters, R. (1987). Competence differences between native and non–native speakers.
Language
, 63 544–573. 

Corder, S.P. (1973). The elicitation of interlanguage. In J. Svartvik(Ed.),
Errata: Papers in Error Analysis
(pp. 36–48). Lund: CWK Gleerup.
Crothers, E. & Suppes, P. (1967).
Experiments in Second Language Learning
. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Cornish, H., Tamariz, M., & Kirby, S. (2009). Complex adaptive systems and the origins of adaptive structure: what experiments can tell us.
Language Learning
, 59s, 1 187–205. 

Dörnyei, Z. (2007).
Research Methods in Applied Linguistics
. Oxford: OUP.
Dörnyei, Z. & Taguchi, T. (2009).
Questionnaires in Second Language Research: Construction, Administration, and Processing
. New York, NY: Routledge.
Duff, P. (2008).
Case Study Research in Applied Linguistics
. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Ellis, R. (1991). Grammaticality judgments and second language acquisition.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
, 13 161–186. 

Ellis, R. (2004). The de?nition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge.
Language Learning
, 54 227–275. 

Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
, 27 141–172. 

Ellis, R. (2009). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language . In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.),
Implicit and Explicit Knowledge in Second Language Learning, Testing and Teaching
(pp. 31–64 ). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Ellis, R., & Loewen, S. (2007). Con?rming the operational de?nitions of explicit and implicit knowledge in Ellis (2005) Responding to Isemonger.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
, 29 119–126. 

Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H. (2009).
Implicit and Explicit Knowledge in Second Language Learning, Testing and Teaching
. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Gass, S. (1979). Language transfer and universal grammatical relations.
Language Learning
, 29 327–344. 

Gass, S., & Alvarez Torres, M. (2005). Attention when?: An investigation of the ordering effect of input and interaction.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
, 27 1–31. 

Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2000).
Stimulated Recall Methodology in Second Language Research
. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2007).
Data Elicitation for Second and Foreign Language Research
. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Goo, J. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
, 34 445–474. 

Gutiérrez, X. (2013). The construct validity of grammaticality judgment tests as measures of implicit and explicit knowledge.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
, 35 423–449. 

Huebner, T. (1979). Order-of-acquisition vs. dynamic paradigm: A comparison of method in interlanguage research.
TESOL Quarterly
, 13 21–28. 

Hyltenstam, K. (1977). Implicational patterns in interlanguage syntax variation.
Language Learning
, 27, 383–411. 

Jakobovits, L. (1970).
Foreign Language Learning: A Psycholinguistic Analysis of the Issues
. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Jiang, N. (2012).
Conducting Reaction Time Research in Second Language Studies
. New York, NY: Routledge.
Johnson, J., & Newport, E. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of ESL.
Cognitive Psychology
, 21 60–99. 

Johnson, J., & Newport, E. (1991). Critical period effects on universal properties of language: The status of subjacency in the acquisition of a second language.
Cognition
, 39 215–258. 

Jones, J.L., & Kaschak, M. P. (2009). Do idiomatic constructions always aid language learning?
Language Learning and Development
, 5, 69–93. 

Kaschak, M.P., & Saffran, J.R. (2006).diomatic syntactic constructions and language learning.
Cognitive Science
, 30, 43–63. 

Kersten, A., & Earles, J. (2001). Less really is more for adults learning a miniature artificial language.
Journal of Memory and Language
, 44, 250–273. 

Kovacs, G., & Racsmany, M. (2008). Handling L2 input in phonological STM: The effect of non-L1 phonetic segments and non-L1 phonotactics on nonword repetition.
Language Learning
, 58, 597–624. 

Larson-Hall, J. (2009).
A Guide to Doing Statistics in Second Language Research Using SPSS
. New York, NY: Routledge.
Lasky, E., Jay, B., & Hanz-Ehrman, M. (1975). Meaningful and linguistic variables in auditory processing.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
, 8, 570–577. 

Lawler, J. & Selinker, L. (1971). On paradoxes, rules, and research in second-language learning,
Language Learning
, 21 27–43. 

Loewen, S. (2009). Grammaticality judgment tests and the measurement of implicit and explicit L2 knowledge. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.),
Implicit and Explicit Knowledge in Second Language Learning, Testing and Teaching
(pp. 94–112 ). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2005).
Second Language Research: Methodology and Design
. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Matlin, M. & Stang, D. (1975). Some determinants of word-frequency estimates.
Perceptual and Motor Skills
, 40, 923–929. 

McDonough, K., & Trofimovich, P. (2009).
Using Priming Methods in Second Language Research
. New York, NY: Routledge.
McRehynolds, L. (1972). Generalization during speech sound discrimination training.
Language and Speech
, 15, 385–392. 

Morgan-Short, K. & Sanz, C., & Steinhauer, K., & Ullman, M. (2010). Second language acquisition of gender agreement in explicit and implicit training conditions: An event-related potential study.
Language Learning
, 60, 154–193. 

Nemser, W. (1971). Approximative systems of foreign learners.
International Review of Applied Linguistics
, 9 115–124. 

Newport, E. (1988). Constraints on learning and their role in language acquisition: Studies of the acquisition of American Sign Language.
Language Sciences
, 10, 147–172. 

Norris, J.M., & Ortega, L. (2003). Defining and measuring SLA. In C. J. Doughty, & M. H. Long (Eds.).
Handbook of Second Language Acquisition
(pp. 717–761). Malden, MA: Blackwell. 

Read, C. (1973). Children's judgments of phonetic similarities in relation to English spelling.
Language Learning
, 23, 17–38. 

Rebuschat, P. (in press). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge in second language research.
Language Learning
. 
Roberts, L., Gullberg, M., & Indefey, P. (2008). Online pronoun resolution in L2 discourse: L1 influence and general learner effects.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
, 30 333–357. 

Schachter, J., Tyson, A., & Diffley, F. (1976). Learner intuitions of grammaticality.
Language Learning
, 26 67–76. 

Schulz, B. (2011). Syntactic creativity in second language English: Wh-scope marking in Japanese-English interlanguage.
Second Language Research
, 27 313–341. 

Schütze, C.T. (1996).
The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistics Methodology
. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Selinker, L. (1972a). Interlanguage.
International Review of Applied Linguistics
, 10 209–231. 

Selinker, L. (1972b). Second-language learning experiments and mathematical learning theory.
Language Learning
, 22 291–299. 

Solomon, M. (1972). Stem endings and the acquisition of inflections.
Language Learning
, 22, 43–50. 

Strapp, C., Helmick, A., Tonkovich, H., & Bleakney, D. (2011). Effects of negative and positive evidence on adult word learning.
Language Learning
, 61, 506–532. 

Tarone, E. (1979). Interlanguage as chameleon.
Language Learning
, 29 181–191. 

Wagner–Gough, K., & Hatch, E. (1975). The importance of input in second language acquisition studies.
Language Learning
, 25 297–308. 

Webb, S. (2007). The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge.
Applied Linguistics
, 28, 46–65. 

Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Gass, Susan, Shawn Loewen & Luke Plonsky
2021.
Coming of age: the past, present, and future of quantitative SLA research.
Language Teaching 54:2
► pp. 245 ff.

Plonsky, Luke, Emma Marsden, Dustin Crowther, Susan M Gass & Patti Spinner
2020.
A methodological synthesis and meta-analysis of judgment tasks in second language research.
Second Language Research 36:4
► pp. 583 ff.

Gass, Susan M.
2019.
Future Directions in Language Learning and Teaching. In
The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning,
► pp. 777 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.