Article published in:
Motivation and Foreign Language Learning: From theory to practice
Edited by David Lasagabaster, Aintzane Doiz and Juan Manuel Sierra
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 40] 2014
► pp. 117–138

Giving voice to the students

What (de)motivates them in CLIL classes?

| University of the Basque Country
| University of the Basque Country
| University of the Basque Country
As a result of the widespread implementation of the CLIL approach in the educational system across European countries, research on its effects has become a much debated topic. Yet there is a dearth of studies on the role of motivation in CLIL. Many studies on motivation have focused on why students are (de)motivated to learn. We will paid heed to what makes them feel (de)motivated. In our study students express their opinions about what they like most and least in their CLIL classes, and the advantages and disadvantages they associate with this curricular proposal. The analysis of 221 participants’ answers allows us to end up with a set of recommendations which may help CLIL teachers to boost their students’ motivation.
Keywords: CLIL, methodological aspects, mixed-ability classes, secondary students’ reflections
Published online: 31 July 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.40.06doi
References

References

Breidbach, S., & Viebrock, B.
(2012) CLIL in Germany: Results from recent research in a contested field of education. International CLIL Research Journal, 1, 1–16.Google Scholar
Chambers, G.N.
(1999) Motivating language learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Coyle, D.
(2007) Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10, 543–562.Google Scholar
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D.
(2010) CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Csizér, K., & Kormos, J.
(2009) Learning experiences, selves, and motivated learning behavior: A comparative analysis of structural models for Hungarian secondary and university learners of English. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 98–119). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Csizér, K., & Lukács, G.
(2010) The comparative analysis of motivation, attitudes and selves: The case of English and German in Hungary. System, 38, 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C.
(2011) Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J.M.
2014). CLIL and motivation: The effect of individual and contextual variables. Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 209–224. Crossref
Dörnyei, Z.
(2001) Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Researching motivation: from integrativeness to the Ideal L2 self. In 
S. Hunston, & D. Oakey (Eds.), Introducing applied linguistics: Concepts and skills 
(pp. 74–83). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E.
(Eds.) (2009) Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Eurydice. (
2006) Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at school in Europe. 
Brussels: The Eurydice European Unit.Google Scholar
Garrett, P., & Gallego, L.
(2011) Perceptual shapes of international universities and implications for minority languages: views from university students in Catalonia and Wales. Paper presented at the Symposium on Multilingual and International Universities: Policies and Practices. 11–12 November 2011, University of Lleida, Spain.
Graddol, D.
(2006) English next. London: British Council.Google Scholar
Henry, A.
(2012) L3 motivation. PhD thesis. Göteborg, Sweden: University of Gothenburgh.Google Scholar
Kern, R.G.
(1995) Students’and teachers’ beliefs about language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 28, 71–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, T.-Y.
(2006) Interview method development for qualitative study of ESL motivation. Foreign Language Education, 13, 231–256.Google Scholar
Lasagabaster, D.
(2008) Foreign language competence in content and language integrated learning courses. The Open Applied Linguistic Journal, 1, 30–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) English achievement and student motivation in CLIL and EFL settings. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5(1), 3–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo, F., Casal, S., & Moore P.
(2010) The effects of content and language integrated learning in European Education: Key findings from the Andalusian bilingual sections evaluation project. Applied Linguistics, 31, 418–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murray, G., Gao, X., & Lamb, T.
(Eds.) (2011) Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Nikolov, M.
(2001) A study of unsuccessful language learners. In Z. Dörnyei, & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 147–172). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., Sierra, J.M., & Gallardo del Puerto, F.
(Eds.) (2011) Content and foreign language integrated learning: Contributions to multilingualism in European contexts. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Seikkula-Leino, J.
(2007) CLIL learning: Achievement levels and affective factors. Culture and Education, 21, 328–341.Google Scholar
Tedick. D.J., & Cammarata, L.
(2012) Content and language integration in K-12 contexts: Student outcomes, teacher practices, and stakeholder perspectives. Foreign Language Annals, 45, 28–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ushioda, E.
(2011) Motivating learners to speak as themselves. In G. Murray, X. Gao, & 
T. Lamb (Eds.), Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning (pp. 11–24). 
Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Williams, M., Burden, R., & Lanvers, U.
(2002) ‘French is the language of love and stuff’: Student perceptions of issues related to motivation in learning a foreign language. British Educational Research Journal, 28, 503–528. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Czura, Anna & Ada Anklewicz
2018. Pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of CLIL in primary school: A case study. Linguodidactica 22 ► pp. 47 ff. Crossref logo
Friðriksdóttir, Kolbrún
2019. The effect of tutor-specific and other motivational factors on student retention on Icelandic Online. Computer Assisted Language Learning ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Gómez Ramos, José Luis, José Luis Palazón Fernández, Juan Lirio Castro & Isabel Mª Gómez-Barreto
2020. CLIL: graphic organisers and concept maps for noun identification within bilingual primary education natural science subject textbooks. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Lasagabaster, David & Aintzane Doiz
2016. CLIL students' perceptions of their language learning process: delving into self-perceived improvement and instructional preferences. Language Awareness 25:1-2 ► pp. 110 ff. Crossref logo
Lialikhova, Dina
2018. Triggers and constraints of lower secondary students’ willingness to communicate orally in English in a CLIL setting in the Norwegian context. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 6:1 ► pp. 27 ff. Crossref logo
Madrid, Daniel & Steven Julius
2020. Profiles of Students in Bilingual University Degree Programs Using English as a Medium of Instruction in Spain. Profile: Issues in Teachers´ Professional Development 22:2 ► pp. 79 ff. Crossref logo
Orcasitas-Vicandi, María & Oihana Leonet
2020. The study of language learning in multilingual education: students’ perceptions of their language learning experience in Basque, Spanish and English. International Journal of Multilingualism ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Pladevall-Ballester, Elisabet
2019. A longitudinal study of primary school EFL learning motivation in CLIL and non-CLIL settings. Language Teaching Research 23:6 ► pp. 765 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.