Interaction and Second Language Development

A Vygotskian perspective

| Carnegie Mellon University
Hardbound – Available
ISBN 9789027213303 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
 
Paperback – Available
ISBN 9789027213310 | EUR 33.00 | USD 49.95
 
e-Book –
ISBN 9789027267696 | EUR 95.00/33.00*
| USD 143.00/49.95*
 
This volume addresses the role of communicative interaction in driving various dimensions of second language development from the perspective of Vygotskian sociocultural psychology. Emphasizing the dialectical relationship between the external-social world and individual mental functioning, the chapters delve into a wide range of topics illustrating how the social and the individual are united in interaction. Themes include psychological and human mediation, joint action, negotiation for meaning, the role of first language use, embodied and nonverbal behaviors, and interactional competencies. Theoretical discussions and key concepts are reinforced and illustrated with detailed qualitative analyses of interaction in a variety of second language contexts. Each chapter also includes pedagogical recommendations. Supplemental materials or ‘data sessions’ that engage the readers with the themes presented in the book through sample analytic exercises are included, while videos have been made available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/lllt.44.video.
[Language Learning & Language Teaching, 44]  2015.  xi, 215 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.44
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements
ix–x
Transcription conventions
xi–xii
Chapter 1. Introduction
1–8
Chapter 2. Key concepts and theoretical considerations
9–34
Chapter 3. Communicative interaction as a source and driver of development
35–62
Chapter 4. L2 Interaction and negotiation for meaning
63–88
Chapter 5. The role of L1 interaction in L2 development
89–112
Chapter 6. Participation and active reception
113–140
Chapter 7. Diagnosis-through-intervention: Dynamic assessment
141–170
Chapter 8. The mediational nature of interactional competence
171–196
Chapter 9. Conclusion
197–204
References
205–214
Index
215–216
“The monograph makes an important contribution to educational praxis (unity of theory and practice) grounded in principles of Vygotskian psychology. Through use of Conversation Analysis, van Compernolle is able to document at a microgenetic level how mediation provided by conceptual knowledge of the target language and teacher sensitivity to a learner’s Zone of Proximal Development promote the growth of second language ability.”
“This book makes an important and original contribution to our understanding of the role of interaction in L2 development. Using a sociocultural theoretical framework and data extracts from L2 classrooms, the author uncovers the mechanisms by which L2 development occurs and explains in an accessible and reader-friendly way how collaborative co-construction is central to the process. Interaction and L2 Development: A Vygotskian Perspective will become a core reference for researchers and students interested in the process of language learning in formal settings.”
“ Interaction and Second Language Development: A Vygotskian Perspective provides a comprehensive and accessible synthesis of sociocultural approaches to understanding instructional interaction and the genesis of second language development. Throughout the book, van Compernolle presents clearly defined and well-illustrated concepts of the major tenets of Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory using numerous examples of co-produced mediation during jointly constructed talk-in-interaction. Theoretical discussion and analyses are complemented by pedagogical implications and recommendations that re-conceptualize the object of language learning, the meaning of linguistic and cultural competency, and the purposes and consequences of classroom interactional practices. I highly recommend this book for those wanting a robust understanding of what it means to conduct sociocultural research on the role of interaction and second language learning and development.”

video

References

References

Agar, M.
(1994) Culture shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. New York, NY: Morrow.Google Scholar
Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J.P.
(1994) Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal, 78, 465–483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Antón, M., & DiCamilla, F.J.
(1998) Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 314–353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, D.
(2011) Introduction: Cognitivism and second language acquisition. InD. Atkinson(Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 1–23). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2011) A sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition: How mind, body, and world work together in learning additional languages. InD. Atkinson(Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 143–166). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M.
(2007) Variation in transcription. Discourse Studies, 9, 784–808. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Budoff, M.
(1987) The validity of learning potential assessment. InC.S. Lidz(Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp.53–81). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Canale, M., & Swain, M.
(1980) Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cazden, C.
(1981) Performance before competence: Assistance to child discourse in the zone of proximal development. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 3(1), 5–8.Google Scholar
Cekaite, A.
(2009) Soliciting teacher attention in an L2 classroom: Affect displays, classroom artefacts, and embodied action. Applied Linguistics, 30, 26–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Centeno-Cortés, B., & Jiménez Jiménez, A.F.
(2004) Problem-solving tasks in a foreign language: The importance of L1 in private verbal thinking. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 7–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chaiklin, S.
(2003) The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky‘s analysis of learning and instruction. InA. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev, & S. Miller(Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39–64). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cole, M.
(2009) The perils of translation: A first step in reconsidering Vygotsky’s theory of development in relation to formal education. Mind, Culture, and Activity: An International Journal, 16, 291–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davin, K.J.
(2013) Integration of dynamic assessment and instructional conversations to promote development and improve assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 303–322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davydov, V.V.
(2004) Problems of developmental instruction: A theoretical and experimental psychological study (Trans. P. Moxay). Moscow: Akademyia Press.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R.
(1993) The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 77, 501–514. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, J.-M., & Li, W.
(2014) Intra- and inter-individual variation in self-reported code-switching patterns of adult multilinguals. International Journal of Multilingualism, 11(2), 225–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DiCamilla, F.J., & Antón, M.
(2004) Private speech: A study of language for thought in collaborative interaction of language learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 36–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Di Pietro, R.J.
(1987) Strategic interaction: Learning languages through scenarios. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Donato, R.
(1994) Collective scaffolding in second language learning. InJ.P. Lantolf & G. Appel(Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Dunn, W., & Lantolf, J.P.
(1998) Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development and Krashen’s i + 1: Incommensurable constructs; incommensurable theories. Language Learning, 48, 411–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N.C.
(2009) The psycholinguistics of the Interaction Hypothesis. InA. Mackey & C. Polio(Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction in SLA: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass. (pp. 11–40). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(1994) The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
(2005) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eskildsen, S.
(2012) L2 negation constructions at work. Language Learning, 62, 335–372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, M.
(2005) A concept-based approach to writing instruction: From the abstract concept to the concrete performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M.
(1979) The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device (LPAD). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Firth, A., & Wagner, J.
(1997) On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Research, 81, 285–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Second/foreign language learning as a social accomplishment: Elaborations on a reconceptualized SLA. Modern Language Journal, 91, 800–819. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frawley, W.
(1997) Vygotsky and cognitive science. Language and the unification of the social and computational mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gal’perin, P.I.
(1989) Organization of mental activity and the effectiveness of learning. Soviet Psychology, 27(3).Google Scholar
(1992) Stage-by-stage formation as a method of psychological investigation. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 30(4).Google Scholar
Gardner, J.
(Ed.) (2012) Assessment and learning (2nd edn). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Mackey, A.
(2006) Input, interaction and output: An overview. AILA Review, 19, 3–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S.M., & Varonis, E.M.
(1985) Variation in native speaker speech modification to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 37–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1994) Input, interaction and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 283–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E.
(1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C.
(2007) Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse and Society, 18, 53–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guk, I., & Kellogg, D
(2007) The ZPD and whole class teaching: Teacher-led and student-led interactional mediation of tasks. Language Teaching Research, 11, 281–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J.K.
(1993) The role of oral practices in the accomplishment of our everyday lives: The sociocultural dimension of interaction with implications for the learning of another language. Applied Linguistics, 14, 145–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Methods for teaching foreign languages: Creating a community of learners in the classroom. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hall, J.K., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
(2011) L2 interactional competence and development. InJ.K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. Pekarek Doehler(Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 1–15). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hall, J.K., Hellermann, J., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
(Eds.) (2011) L2 interactional competence and development. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hatch, E.
(1978) Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. InE. Hatch(Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 401–435). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Haywood, H.C., & Lidz, C.S.
(2007) Dynamic Assessment in practice. Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hellermann, J.
(2011) Members’ methods, members’ competencies: Looking for evidence of language learning in longitudinal investigations of other-initiated repair. InJ.K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. Pekarek Doehler(Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 147–172). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hellermann, J., & Doehler, S.
(2010) On the contingent nature of language-learning tasks. Classroom Discourse, 1, 25–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P.
(1987) Emergent grammar [Electronic version]. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 13, 139–157. Available from: http://​home​.eserver​.org​/hopper​/emergence​.html CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P.J.
(1998) Emergent grammar. InM. Tomasello(Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (pp. 155–176). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J.H.
(2003) Incidental and intentional learning. InC.J. Doughty & M.H. Long(Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
John-Steiner, V.P.
(2007) Vygotsky on thinking and speaking. InH. Daniels, M. Cole, & J.V. Wertsch(Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 136–152). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, K.E.
(2009) Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kasper, G., & Wagner, J.
(2011) Conversation analysis as an approach to second language acquisition. InD. Atkinson(Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 117–142). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kendon, A.
(2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kozulin, A.
(2003) Psychological tools and mediated learning. InA. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V.S. Ageyev, & S.M. Miller(Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural contexts (pp. 15–38). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C.
(1986) From language proficiency to interactional competence. Modern Language Journal, 70, 366–372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C., & Whiteside, A.
(2008) Language ecology in multilingual setting. Towards a theory of symbolic competence. Applied Linguistics, 29, 645–671. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S.
(1982) Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
(1985) The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lado, R.
(1957) Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J.P.
(2003) Intrapersonal communication and internalization in the second language classroom. InA. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V.S. Ageyev, & S.M. Miller(Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 349–370). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Sociocultural theory and L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 67–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011a) The sociocultural approach to second language acquisition. Sociocultural theory, second language acquisition and L2 development. InD. Atkinson(Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 24–47). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2011b) Integrating sociocultural theory and cognitive linguistics in the second language classroom. InE. Hinkel(Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol.2; pp. 303–318). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J.P., & Poehner, M.E.
(2004) Dynamic assessment: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 49–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research, 15, 11–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J.P., & Thorne, S.L.
(2006) Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development: Vygotskian praxis and the research/praxis divide. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2007) Reflecting on the cognitive-social debate in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 91, 773–787. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E.
(1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levine, G.S.
(2011) Code choice in the language classroom. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Levinson, S.
(1988) Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman’s concepts of participation. InP. Drew & A. Wooton(Eds.), Erving Goffman (pp. 161–227). Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Long, M.
(1981) Input, interaction and second language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 259–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. InW.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia(Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–454). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L.
(2013) The case for variety in corrective feedback research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35 (1), 167–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Macaro, E.
(2001) Analysing Student Teachers’ Codeswitching in Foreign Language classrooms: Theories and decision making. Modern Language Journal, 85 (4), 531–548. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Teacher use of code-switching in the L2 classroom: Exploring ‘optimal’ use. InM. Turnbull & J. Dailey-O’Cain(Eds.), First language use in second and foreign language learning (pp. 35–49). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., & Polio, C.
(2009a) Introduction. InA. Mackey & C. Polio(Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 1–10). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Markee, N.
(2008) Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29, 404–427. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCafferty, S.G.
(1998) Nonverbal expression and L2 private speech. Applied Linguistics, 19, 73–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Space for cognition: Gesture and second language learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 148–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCafferty, M., & Stam, G.
(Eds.) (2009) Gesture: Second language acquisition and classroom research. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
McNeill, D.
(2005) Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mehan, H.
(1982) The structure of classroom events and their consequences for student performance. InP. Gilmore & A.A. Glatthorn(Eds.), Children in and out of school: Ethnography and education (pp.59–87). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A.N.
(2002) Elements of a developmental theory of imitation. InA.N. Meltzoff & W. Prinz(Eds), The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases (pp.19–41). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meltzoff, A.N., & Gopnik, A.
(1989) On linking nonverbal imitation, representation, and language learning in the first two years of life. InG.E. Speidel & K.E. Nelson(Eds.), The many faces of imitation in language learning (pp. 23–52). New York, NY: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, L.
(2007) Commentary: Transcript variations and the indexicality of transcribing practices. Discourse Studies, 9, 809–821. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, L., & Doehler, S.
(2004) Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 501–518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murphey, T.
(2001) Exploring conversational shadowing. Language Teaching Research, 5, 128–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Negueruela, E.
(2003) A sociocultural approach to teaching and researching second language: Systemic-theoretical instruction and second language development. Unpublished PhD thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
Ochs, E., Schegloff, E., & Thompson, S.
(Eds.) (1996) Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B.
(1984) Language acquisition and socialization: Three developmental stories. InR. Shweder & R. LeVine(Eds.), Culture theory: Mind, self, and emotion. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Ohta, A.S.
(2000) Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. InJ.P. Lantolf(Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 51–78). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
(2001) Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ortega, L.
(2010) The bilingual turn in SLA. Plenary address delivered at the AAAL (American Association for Applied Linguistics) Conference, Atlanta, GA, March 6–9.
Paradis, M.
(2009) Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, S.
(2010) Conceptual changes and methodological challenges: On language and learning from a conversation analytic perspective on SLA. InP. Seedhouse, S. Walsh, & C. Jenks(Eds.), Conceptualising learning in applied linguistics (pp. 105–127). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pica, T.
(1994) Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493–527. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pike, K.L.
(1954) Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior, part 1. Glendale, Calif.: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Poehner, M.E.
(2005) Dynamic assessment among advanced L2 learners of French. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
(2007) Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning. Modern Language Journal, 91, 323–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting second language development. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Group dynamic assessment: Mediation for the L2 classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 471–491. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poehner, M.E., & Lantolf, J.P.
(2013) Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA). Language Teaching Research, 17, 323–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poehner, M.E., & van Compernolle, R.A.
(2011) Frames of interaction in dynamic assessment: Developmental diagnoses of second language learning. InM.E. Poehner & P. Rae-Dickens(Eds.), Addressing issues of access and fairness in education through dynamic assessment [Special issue]. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18(2), 183–198.Google Scholar
(2012, March). Diagnosis and instruction in dynamic assessment interactions. Paper presented at theannual meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics. Boston, MA.
(2013) L2 development around tests: Response processes and dynamic assessment. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 51, 353–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rea-Dickins, P.
(2008) Classroom-based language assessment. InE. Shohamy & N. Hornberger(Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, Vol. 7: Language testing and assessment (pp. 257–271). New York, NY: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rine, E.F.
(2009) Development in dialogic teaching skills: A micro-analytic case study of a pre-service ITA.Unpublished dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
Rogoff, B.
(1995) Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. InJ.V. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez(Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G.
(1974) A simplest systematic for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Savignon, S.J.
(1997) Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice (2nd edn). New York, NY: McGraw HillGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E.A.
(1997) Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes, 23, 499–545. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H.
(1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R., & Frota, S.
(1986) Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. InR.R. Day(Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237–326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Slobin, D.I.
(1991) Learning to think for speaking: Native language, cognition, and rhetorical style. Pragmatics, 1, 7–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smit, U., & Dafouz, E.
(Eds.) (2012)  Integrating content and language in higher education: Gaining insights into English-medium instruction at European universities . AILA Review, 25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spada, N. & Lightbown, P.M.
(2009) Interaction research in second/foreign language classrooms. InC. Polio & A. Mackey(Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass. (pp. 157–175). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Steinbach-Koehler, F., & Thorne, S.L.
(2011) The social life of self-directed talk: A sequential phenomenon?InJ. Hall, J. Hellermann, S. Pekarek Doehler, & D. Olsher(eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 66–92). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R.J., & Grigorenko, E.L.
(2002).
Swain, M.
(1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. InS. Gass & C. Madden(Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp.235–253), Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(2000) The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. InJ.P. Lantolf(Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (97–114). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
(2006) Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced language proficiency. InH. Byrnes(Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
(1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersionstudents working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, S., & Lapkin, S.
(2002) Talking it through: Two French immersion learners' response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 285–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M., Lapkin, S., Knouzi, I., Suzuki, W., & Brooks, L.
(2009) Languaging: University students learn the grammatical concept of voice in French. Modern Language Journal, 93, 5–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ten Have, P.
(2007) Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tharp, R., & Gallimore, R.
(1988) Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning and schooling in social context. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Thorne, S.L., & Lantolf, J.P.
(2007) A linguistics of communicative activity. InS. Makoni & A. Pennycook(Eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages (pp. 170–195). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., & Carpenter, M.
(2007) Shared intentionality. Developmental Science, 10, 121–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, M., & Dailey-O’Cain, J.
(Eds.) (2009) First language use in second and foreign language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Tyler, A.
(2012) Cognitive linguistics and second language learning: Theoretical basics and experimental evidence. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J., & Van der Veer, R.
(2000) The social mind: Development of the idea. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
van Compernolle, R.A.
(2009) What do women want? Linguistic equality and the feminization of job titles in contemporary France. Gender and Language, 3(1), 33–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Incidental microgenetic development in second-language teacher-learner talk-in-interaction. Classroom Discourse, 1, 66–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Responding to questions and L2 learner interactional competence during language proficiency interviews: A microanalytic study with pedagogical implications. InJ.K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. Pekarek Doehler(Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 117–144). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2013) Interactional competence and the dynamic assessment of L2 pragmatic abilities. InS. Ross & G. Kasper(Eds.), Assessing second language pragmatics (pp. 327–353). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014a) Sociocultural theory and L2 instructional pragmatics. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2014) Profiling second language sociolinguistic development through dynamically administered strategic interaction scenarios. Language and Communication, 37, 86–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Compernolle, R.A., & Henery, A.
(2014) Instructed concept appropriation and L2 pragmatic development in the classroom. Language Learning, 64, 549–578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Learning to do concept-based pragmatics instruction: Teacher development and L2 pedagogical content knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 19, 351–372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Compernolle, R.A., & Smotrova, T.
(2014) Corrective feedback, gesture, and mediation in classroom language learning. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 1, 25–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Compernolle, R.A., & Williams, L.
(2011) Thinking with your hands: Speech-gesture activity during an L2 awareness-raising task. Language Awareness, 20(3), 203–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Group dynamics in the language classroom: Embodied participation as active reception in the collective ZPD. Classroom Discourse, 4(1), 42–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J.
(1991) Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Van Lier, L.
(2000) From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J.P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 155–177). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van Lier, L.
(2004) The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Villamil, O., & DeGuerrero, M.
(1996) Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 51–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L.S.
(1978) Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1986) Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Walsh, S.
(2006) Investigating classroom discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2011) Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Walter, D., & van Compernolle, R.A.
in press). Concept-based instruction of L2 German declension. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching.
Wertsch, J.V.
(1985) Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1991) Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1994) The primacy of mediated action in sociocultural studies. Mind, Culture, and Activity: An International Journal, 1, 202–208.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J.
(2007) Mediation. InH. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch(Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 178–192). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, L.
(2006) Web-based machine translation as a tool for promoting electronic literacy and language awareness. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 565–578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wong, J., & Waring, H.Z.
(2010) Conversation analysis and second language pedagogy: A guide for ESL/EFL teachers. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wood, D., Bruner, J.S., & Ross, G.
(1976) The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Young, R.F.
(2000) Interactional competence: Challenges for validity. Paper presented at ajoint symposium on 'Interdisciplinary Interfaces with Language Testing' held at the annual meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics and the Language Testing Research Colloquium, March 11, 2000, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
(2011) Interactional competence in language learning, teaching, and testing. InE. Hinkel(Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 426–443). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2013) Learning to talk the talk and walk: Interactional competence in academic spoken English. Ibérica, 25, 15–38.Google Scholar
Zhang, H., & van Compernolle, R.A.
in preparation). Learning potential and the dynamic assessment of Chinese grammar through elicited imitation. Crossref
Zinchenko, V.P.
(2002) From classical to organic psychology. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 39, 32–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 20 other publications

Al Masaeed, Khaled
2016. Judicious Use of L1 in L2 Arabic Speaking Practice Sessions. Foreign Language Annals 49:4 ► pp. 716 ff. Crossref logo
AL MASAEED, KHALED
2020. Translanguaging in L2 Arabic Study Abroad: Beyond Monolingual Practices in Institutional Talk. The Modern Language Journal 104:1 ► pp. 250 ff. Crossref logo
Alonso, Rosa Alonso
2018.  In Speaking in a Second Language [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 17], ► pp. 225 ff. Crossref logo
Dolce, Frank M. & Rémi A. van Compernolle
2020. Topic management and student initiation in an advanced Chinese-as-a-foreign-language classroom. Classroom Discourse 11:1 ► pp. 80 ff. Crossref logo
Feryok, Anne
2017. Sociocultural Theory and Task-Based Language Teaching: The Role of Praxis. TESOL Quarterly 51:3 ► pp. 716 ff. Crossref logo
Kinginger, Celeste & Qian Wu
2018. Learning Chinese through Contextualized Language Practices in Study Abroad Residence Halls: Two Case Studies. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 38 ► pp. 102 ff. Crossref logo
Kinginger, Celeste, Qian Wu, Sheng-Hsun Lee & Dali Tan
2016. The short-term homestay as a context for language learning. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 1:1 ► pp. 34 ff. Crossref logo
Lee, Sheng-Hsun
2019. How memories of study abroad experience are contextualized in the language classroom . Applied Linguistics Review 0:0 Crossref logo
Lee, Sheng-Hsun, Qian Wu, Chunyuan Di & Celeste Kinginger
2017. Learning to Eat Politely at the Chinese Homestay Dinner Table: Two Contrasting Case Studies. Foreign Language Annals 50:1 ► pp. 135 ff. Crossref logo
Li, Li
2020.  In Language Teacher Cognition, ► pp. 19 ff. Crossref logo
Marden, Mariolina Pais & Jan Herrington
2020. Collaborative foreign language learning practices and design principles for supporting effective collaboration in a blended learning environment. Educational Media International 57:4 ► pp. 299 ff. Crossref logo
Matsumoto, Yumi
2018. “Because We Are Peers, We Actually Understand”: Third-Party Participant Assistance in English as a Lingua Franca Classroom Interactions. TESOL Quarterly 52:4 ► pp. 845 ff. Crossref logo
Matsumoto, Yumi & Abby Mueller Dobs
2017. Pedagogical Gestures as Interactional Resources for Teaching and Learning Tense and Aspect in the ESL Grammar Classroom. Language Learning 67:1 ► pp. 7 ff. Crossref logo
Salomão, Ana Cristina Biondo
2019. Teletandem and Teacher's Beliefs about Culture and Language. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 9:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Sato, Masatoshi
2017. Interaction Mindsets, Interactional Behaviors, and L2 Development: An Affective-Social-Cognitive Model. Language Learning 67:2 ► pp. 249 ff. Crossref logo
Shintani, Natsuko
2018.  In Learning Language through Task Repetition [Task-Based Language Teaching, 11], ► pp. 255 ff. Crossref logo
Sánchez-García, Davinia
2020. Mapping lecturer questions and their pedagogical goals in Spanish- andEnglish-medium instruction. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 8:1 ► pp. 28 ff. Crossref logo
Toth, Paul D. & Kara Moranski
2018. Why haven't we solved instructed SLA? A sociocognitive account. Foreign Language Annals 51:1 ► pp. 73 ff. Crossref logo
Van Compernolle, Rémi A
2019. Constructing a Second Language Sociolinguistic Repertoire: A Sociocultural Usage-based Perspective. Applied Linguistics 40:6 ► pp. 871 ff. Crossref logo
van Compernolle, Rémi A.
2018.  In Speaking in a Second Language [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 17], ► pp. 27 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects

Linguistics

Applied linguistics
Language teaching
Language acquisition
Psycholinguistics
BIC Subject: CJA – Language teaching theory & methods
BISAC Subject: FOR000000 – FOREIGN LANGUAGE STUDY / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2015032986 | Marc record