Cover not available
Part of
Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda
Edited by Masatoshi Sato and Susan Ballinger
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 45] 2016
► pp. 291–316

11. Small-group meta-analytic talk and Spanish L2 development

| University of Pennsylvania
| Temple University

In this chapter, we examine the meta-analytic talk of nine adolescent L2 Spanish learners and their subsequent accuracy on a grammaticality judgment task, with the pronoun se as an instructional target. Data come from a U.S. high school during three 90-minute lessons, where learners “co-constructed” rules for se in groups based on its use in reading passages. We coded learners’ analytic talk as belonging to higher or lower levels of analytical abstraction (LAAs) to distinguish labeling L2 forms and categories from identifying broader patterns and rules. The amount of individual and group analytic talk, as well as talk at higher LAAs, was compared to individual grammaticality judgment scores before and six weeks after instruction. Results show that learners in groups with greater mutuality improved their scores even when their overall individual participation was only low or moderate. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

Published online: 10 March 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.12mor
References
Adair-Hauck, B., & Donato, R
(2010) Using a story-based approach to teach grammar. In J.L. Shrum & E.W. Glisan (Eds.), Teacher’s handbook: Contextualized foreign language instruction (4th ed., pp. 216–244). Boston, MA: Heinle Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages
(2012) ACTFL proficiency guidelines. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL.Google Scholar
Brooks, F.B, & Donato, R
(1994) Vygotskyan approaches to understanding foreign language discourse during communicative tasks. Hispania, 77(2), 262–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brooks, F.B, Donato, R., & McGlone, J.V
(1997) When are they going to say “it” right? Understanding learner talk during pair-work activity. Foreign Language Annals, 30(4), 524–541. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, T.S, & Perry, F.L
(1991) A comparison of three learning strategies for ESL vocabulary acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 655–670. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, L
(2007) Depth of processing in private and social speech: Its role in the retention of word knowledge by adult EAP learners. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes, 64(2), 273–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craik, F.I, & Lockhart, R.S
(1972) Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donato, R
(1994) Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J.P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Ellis, R
(1999) Theoretical perspectives on interaction and language learning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Learning a second language through interaction (pp. 3–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fassnacht, C., & Woods, D.K
(2009) Transana (Version 2.42). Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research, School of Education, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Joe, A
(1998) What effects do text-based task promoting generation have on incidental vocabulary acquisition? Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 357–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juffs, A
(2001) Discussion: Verb classes, event structure, and second language learners’ knowledge of semantics-syntax correspondences. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(2), 305–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kowal, M., & Swain, M
(1994) Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students’ awareness. Language Awareness, 3, 73–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J.P, & Thorne, S.L
(2006) Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leow, R., Moreno, N., & Hsieh, H
(2014)  Awareness, type of medium, and L2 development . Paper presented at the annual Georgetown University Roundtable on linguistics, Washington, DC, March.
Oded, B., & Walters, J
Deeper processing for better EFL reading comprehension. System, 29, 357–370. DOI logo
Ohta, A.S
(1995) Applying sociocultural theory to an analysis of learner discourse: Learner-learner collaborative interaction in the Zone of Proximal Development. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 93–121.Google Scholar
Rouhshad, A., & Storch, N
(2016) A focus on mode: Patterns of interaction in face-to-face and computer-mediated contexts. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 267–289). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar
Sato, M., & Ballinger, S
(2016) Understanding peer interaction: Research synthesis and directions. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 1–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sato, M., & Viveros, P
(2016) Interaction or collaboration? The proficiency effect on group work in the foreign language classroom. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 91–112). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R.W
(1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seedhouse, P
(2004) The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Storch, N
(2002) Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, M., Lapkin, S., Knouzi, I., Suzuki, W., & Brooks, L
(2009) Languaging: University students learn the grammatical concept of voice in French. Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 5–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, M
(2010) ‘Talking-it-through’: Languaging as a source of learning. In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning (pp. 112–130). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S
(2000) Task-based second language learning: The uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 251–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toth, P.D
(2008) Teacher- and learner-led discourse in task-based grammar instruction: Providing procedural assistance for L2 morphosyntactic development. Language Learning, 58(2), 237–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toth, P.D, & Guijarro-Fuentes, P
(2013) The impact of instruction on second-language implicit knowledge: Evidence against encapsulation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(6), 1163–1193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toth, P.D, Wagner, E., & Moranski, K
(2013) ‘Co-constructing’ explicit L2 knowledge with high school Spanish learners through guided induction. Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L.S
(1981) The genesis of higher mental functions (J. V. Wertsch, Trans.). In J.V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
(1987) Thinking and speech. In R.W. Reiber & A.S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Volume 1, Problems in general psychology (pp. 39–288). New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Young, A., & Tedick, D.J
(2016) Collaborative dialogue in a two-way Spanish/English immersion classroom: Does heterogeneous grouping promote peer linguistic scaffolding? In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 135–160). Amsterdam: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar
Young, R.F, & Astarita, A.C
(2013) Practice theory in language learning. Language Learning, 63(Supplement 1), 171–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 18 other publications

Azkarai, Agurtzane, Rhonda Oliver & Yohana Gil‐Berrio
2022. Examining Deductive Versus Guided Instruction From an Interactionist Perspective. Language Learning 72:S1 ► pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
Davin, Kristin J. & Ali Kushki
2022. A Sociocultural Perspective: Seeking Evidence of Development in a PACE Approach to Grammar Instruction. Language Learning 72:S1 ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Jiang, Michael Yi-chao, Morris Siu-yung Jong, Wilfred Wing-fat Lau, Ching-sing Chai, Kelly Shu-xia Liu & Moonyoung Park
2022. A scoping review on flipped classroom approach in language education: challenges, implications and an interaction model. Computer Assisted Language Learning 35:5-6 ► pp. 1218 ff. DOI logo
Kos, Tomas
2021. Exploring young learners’ L2 development and perceptions of mixed-age and same-age peer interactions in EFL mixed-age classrooms. European Journal of Applied Linguistics 9:2 ► pp. 331 ff. DOI logo
Kołsut, Sławomira & Mateusz Szumilas
2023. Exploring student engagement in task-based and communicative language classrooms. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
MORANSKI, KARA & FREDERIC KIM
2016. ‘Flipping’ Lessons in a Multi‐Section Spanish Course: Implications for Assigning Explicit Grammar Instruction Outside of the Classroom. The Modern Language Journal 100:4 ► pp. 830 ff. DOI logo
Moranski, Kara & Janire Zalbidea
2022. Context and Generalizability in Multisite L2 Classroom Research: The Impact of Deductive Versus Guided Inductive Instruction. Language Learning 72:S1 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Moranski, Kara & Nicole Ziegler
2021. A Case for Multisite Second Language Acquisition Research: Challenges, Risks, and Rewards. Language Learning 71:1 ► pp. 204 ff. DOI logo
Philp, Jenefer
2016. New pathways in researching interaction. In Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 45], ► pp. 377 ff. DOI logo
Philp, Jenefer & Susan Duchesne
2016. Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36 ► pp. 50 ff. DOI logo
Pladevall-Ballester, Elisabet
2021. Pair dynamics and language-related episodes in child EFL task-based peer interaction. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2 ► pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Ranta, Leila
2022. Process and Product in ISLA Research: Courage, Commitment, and Tolerance for Ambiguity. Language Learning 72:S1 ► pp. 314 ff. DOI logo
Rouhshad, Amir & Neomy Storch
2016. 10. A focus on mode. In Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 45], ► pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Sato, Masatoshi
2017. Interaction Mindsets, Interactional Behaviors, and L2 Development: An Affective-Social-Cognitive Model. Language Learning 67:2 ► pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
Tajabadi, Azar, Moussa Ahmadian, Hamidreza Dowlatabadi & Hooshang Yazdani
2023. EFL learners’ peer negotiated feedback, revision outcomes, and short-term writing development: The effect of patterns of interaction. Language Teaching Research 27:3 ► pp. 689 ff. DOI logo
Toth, Paul D.
2022. Introduction: Investigating Explicit L2 Grammar Instruction Through Multiple Theoretical and Methodological Lenses. Language Learning 72:S1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Toth, Paul D. & Kristin J. Davin
2016. The Sociocognitive Imperative of L2 Pedagogy. The Modern Language Journal 100:S1 ► pp. 148 ff. DOI logo
Toth, Paul D. & Kara Moranski
2018. Why haven't we solved instructed SLA? A sociocognitive account. Foreign Language Annals 51:1 ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.