Cover not available
Part of
Applied Linguistics Perspectives on CLIL
Edited by Ana Llinares and Tom Morton
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 47] 2017
► pp. 1–16

Introduction
Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL)

Type of programme or pedagogical model?

| Birkbeck, University of London
| Autonomous University of Madrid
Article outline
  • Why applied linguistics perspectives on CLIL?
    • Second language acquisition (SLA) perspective
    • Systemic functional linguistics (SFL) perspective
    • Discourse analysis perspective
    • Sociolinguistic perspectives
  • An overview of the sections and chapters
  • References
Published online: 16 March 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.47.01mor
References (71)
References
Atkinson, D. (Ed.) Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logo
Blommaert, J. (2013). Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H. (2006). What kind of resource is language and why does it matter for advanced language learning? In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 1–28). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2012). Conceptualizing FL writing development in collegiate settings: A systemic functional linguistics approach In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 191–218). Berlin: deGruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D., & Panovic, I. (2014). Working with written discourse. London: Sage.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cammarata, L., & Tedick, D. J. (2012). Balancing content and language in instruction: The experience of immersion teachers. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 251–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cenoz, J. (2009). Towards multilingual education: Basque educational research from an international perspective. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2015). Content-based instruction and content and language integrated learning: The same or different? Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 8–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C. (Ed.). (2013). The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Christie, F. (2002). The development of abstraction in adolescence in subject English. In M. Schleppegrell & C. Colombi (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power (pp. 45–66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Communicative competence and the CLIL lesson. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 197–214). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C., Llinares, A., Lorenzo, F., & Nikula, T. (2014). “You can stand under my umbrella”: Immersion, CLIL and bilingual education. A Response to Cenoz, Genesee, & Gorter (2013). Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 213–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C., & Nikula, T. (2006). Pragmatics of content-based instruction: Teacher and student directives in Finnish and Austrian classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 241–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Oliveira, L. C., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2015). Focus on grammar and meaning. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., Henry, A., & MacIntyre, P.D. (Eds.). (2014). Motivational dynamics in language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (Eds.). (2009). Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Eggins, S., & Slade, D. (2005). Analysing casual conversation. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1994/2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. Arnold: London.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Webster, J. (2007). Language and education. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hellermann, J. (2008). Social actions for classroom language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hornberger, N. H. (Ed.). (2003). Continua of biliteracy: An ecological framework for educational policy, research, and practice in multilingual settings. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2013). Is the second language acquisition discipline disintegrating? Language Teaching, 46(4), 511–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakonen, T., & Morton, T. (2015). Epistemic search sequences in peer interaction in a content-based language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 73–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, G., et al. (2014). Unit 3.7 Thinking through art: the social body mind map. Learning to Teach Art and Design in the Secondary School: A Companion to School Experience (pp. 56).Google Scholar
Li, W. (2014). Applied linguistics. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Lin, A. (2015). Conceptualising the potential role of L1 in CLIL. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 74–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Llinares, A. (2015). Integration in CLIL: A proposal to inform research and successful pedagogy. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 58–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Llinares, A., & Dalton-Puffer, C. (2015). The role of different tasks in CLIL students’ use of evaluative language. System, 54, 69–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Llinares, A., & Lyster, R. (2014). The influence of context on patterns of corrective feedback and learner uptake: A comparison of CLIL and immersion classrooms. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 181–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R. (2012). The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Llinares, A., & Pastrana, A. (2013). CLIL students’ communicative functions across activities and educational levels. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 81–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo, F. (2007). The sociolinguistics of CLIL: Language planning and language change in 21th century Europe. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 20, 27–38.Google Scholar
Lorenzo, F., & Rodríguez, L. (2014). Onset and expansion of L2 cognitive academic language proficiency in bilingual settings: CALP in CLIL. System, 47, 64–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. (2012). Input, interaction and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 404–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mercer, N., & Hodgkinson, S. (Eds.). (2008). Exploring talk in school: Inspired by the work of Douglas Barnes. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, O., Coyle, D., Halbach, A., Schuck, K. & Ting, T. (2015). A pluriliteracies approach to content and language integrated learning – mapping learner progressions in knowledge construction and meaning-making. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1): 41–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. London: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Nicholas, H., & Starks, D. (2014). Language education and applied linguistics: Bridging the two fields. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nikula, T. (2005). English as an object and tool of study in classrooms: Interactional effects and pragmatic implications. Linguistics and Education, 16(1), 27–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikula, T., Dafouz, E., Moore, P., & Smit, U. (Eds.). (2016). Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Nikula, T., Dalton-Puffer, C., & Llinares, A. (2013). CLIL classroom discourse: Research from Europe. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1(1), 70–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nortier, J., & Svendsen, B.A. (Eds.). (2015). Language, youth and identity in the 21st century: Linguistic practices across urban spaces. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paesani, K., Allen, H. W., & Dupuy, B. (2016). A multiliteracies framework for collegiate foreign language teaching. Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
Paran, A. (2013). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. ELT Journal, 67(1), 137–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, S., & Ziegler, G. (2007). Doing language, doing science and the sequential organization of the immersion classroom. In Z. Hua, P. Seedhouse, & V. Cook (Eds.), Language learning and teaching as social interaction (pp. 72–87). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Cañado, M.L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rampton, B. (2006). Language in late modernity: Interaction in an urban school. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, D., & Martin, J. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2011). Which language competencies benefit from CLIL? An insight into applied linguistics research. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, J.M. Sierra, & F. Gallardo del Puerto (Eds.), Content and foreign language integrated learning: Contributions to multilingualism in European contexts (pp. 129–154). Frankfurt: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seedhouse, P. (2004). Conversation analysis methodology. Language Learning, 54(s1), 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, J. (2011). Conversation analysis: An introduction. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.M., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Spolsky, B., & Hult, F. M. (2010). The handbook of educational linguistics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Strauss, S., & Feiz, P. (2013). Discourse Analysis: Putting our worlds into words. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Swaffar, J., & Arens, K. (2005). Remapping the foreign language curriculum: An approach through multiple literacies. New York, NY: MLA.Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Watanabe, Y. (2012). Languaging: Collaborative dialogue as a source of second language learning. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.). The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2012). Context, individual differences and pragmatic competence. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a socio-cultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R., & Llinares, A. (2009). CLIL in social science classrooms: Analysis of spoken and written productions. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R. M. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.), Content and Language Integrated Learning. Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 215–234). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Whittaker, R., Llinares, A., & McCabe, A. (2011). Written discourse development in CLIL at secondary school. Language Teaching Research, 15(3), 343–362.Google Scholar
Wortham, S., & Reyes, A. (2015). Discourse Analysis Beyond the Speech Event. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by (26)

Cited by 26 other publications

Liang, Weijun & Yanjun Wu
2024. A scoping review of the literature on content and language integrated learning assessment. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 12:1 ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Lo, Alfred W. T.
2024. Unlocking CLIL success: exploring the interplay between students’ self-regulation levels, linguistic challenges and learning outcomes in Hong Kong secondary education. Language and Education ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Salvador-Garcia, Celina, Oscar Chiva-Bartoll & David Hortigüela-Alcalá
2024. Finding the place of content and language integrated learning in physical education within the models-based practice framework. European Physical Education Review 30:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Teng, Xing San, Janet Hsiao & Yuen Yi Lo
2024. Cognitive processes and strategies of bilingual students when attempting assessments in an L2. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 12:2 ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Lee , Jang Ho, Hansol Lee & Yuen Yi Lo
2023. Effects of EMI-CLIL on secondary-level students’ English learning: A multilevel meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 13:2 ► pp. 317 ff. DOI logo
Morton, Tom
2023. Afterword: SFL, theoretical pluralism and content and language integration at the levels of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 26:3 ► pp. 363 ff. DOI logo
Morton, Tom & Nashwa Nashaat‐Sobhy
2023. Exploring Bases of Achievement in Content and Language Integrated Assessment in a Bilingual Education Program. TESOL Quarterly DOI logo
Lo, Yuen Yi & Constant Leung
2022. Conceptualising assessment literacy of teachers in Content and Language Integrated Learning programmes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 25:10 ► pp. 3816 ff. DOI logo
Martínez Agudo, Juan de Dios
2022. Do CLIL programmes help to balance out gender differences in content and language achievement?. Language, Culture and Curriculum 35:2 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Banegas, Darío Luis
2021. Understanding the impact of teaching systemic functional grammar in initial English language teacher education. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 31:3 ► pp. 492 ff. DOI logo
Belskaya, T.V.
2021. In Search of Methodology for English Medium Instruction. Cultural-Historical Psychology 17:3 ► pp. 42 ff. DOI logo
He, Peichang & Angel M.Y. Lin
2021. Co-developing science literacy and foreign language literacy through “Concept + Language Mapping”. In Teaching, Learning and Scaffolding in CLIL Science Classrooms [Benjamins Current Topics, 115], ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
van Kampen, Evelyn, Jacobiene Meirink, Wilfried Admiraal & Amanda Berry
2021. Characterising integrated content-language pedagogies of global perspectives teachers in Dutch bilingual schools. Language, Culture and Curriculum 34:1 ► pp. 18 ff. DOI logo
Gallardo‐del‐Puerto, Francisco, María Basterrechea & María Martínez‐Adrián
2020. Target language proficiency and reported use of compensatory strategies by young CLIL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Gierlinger, Erwin Maria
2020. Review of Möller (2017): Language acquisition in CLIL and non-CLIL settings: Learner corpus and experimental evidence on passive constructions. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 6:2 ► pp. 258 ff. DOI logo
Lo, Yuen Yi & Daniel Fung
2020. Assessments in CLIL: the interplay between cognitive and linguistic demands and their progression in secondary education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 23:10 ► pp. 1192 ff. DOI logo
Oxbrow, Gina
2020. Addressing the language challenge in monolingual CLIL contexts: stakeholder perspectives in the Canary Islands. The Language Learning Journal 48:1 ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Basterrechea, María & Michael J. Leeser
2019. Language-related episodes and learner proficiency during collaborative dialogue in CLIL. Language Awareness 28:2 ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
He, Peichang & Angel M. Y. Lin
2019. Co-developing science literacy and foreign language literacy through “Concept + Language Mapping”. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 7:2 ► pp. 261 ff. DOI logo
Lo, Yuen Yi, Wai-mei Lui & Mona Wong
2019. Scaffolding for cognitive and linguistic challenges in CLIL science assessments. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 7:2 ► pp. 289 ff. DOI logo
Lo, Yuen Yi, Wai-mei Lui & Mona Wong
2021. Scaffolding for cognitive and linguistic challenges in CLIL science assessments. In Teaching, Learning and Scaffolding in CLIL Science Classrooms [Benjamins Current Topics, 115], ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Kampen, Evelyn van, Tessa Mearns, Jacobiene Meirink, Wilfried Admiraal & Amanda Berry
2018. How do we measure up?. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 7:2 ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Mearns, Tessa & Rick de Graaff
2018. Bucking the trend?. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 6:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mearns, Tessa & Rick de Graaff
2018. Bilingual education and CLIL in the Netherlands. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 7:2 ► pp. 122 ff. DOI logo
Rumlich, Dominik
2018. Current research on CLIL and bilingual education in the Netherlands. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 7:2 ► pp. 264 ff. DOI logo
Rumlich, Dominik
2020. Bilingual education in monolingual contexts: a comparative perspective. The Language Learning Journal 48:1 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.