Article published in:
Applied Linguistics Perspectives on CLIL
Edited by Ana Llinares and Tom Morton
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 47] 2017
► pp. 145164


Bonnet, A.
(2012) Towards an evidence base for CLIL: How to integrate qualitative and quantitative as well as process, product and participant perspectives in CLIL research. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(4), 66–78.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H.
(2013) Positioning writing as meaning-making in writing research: An introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(2), 95–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christie, F.
(2005) Language education in the primary years. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
Christie, F., & Martin, J.R.
(Eds.) (1997) Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Coffin, C.
(2006) Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Coffin, C., & Derewianka, B.
(2008) Multimodal layout in school history books: The texturing of historical interpretation. In G. Thompson & G. Forey (Eds.), Text type and texture: Functional linguistics (pp. 191–215). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C.
(2007) Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) A construct of cognitive discourse functions for conceptualising content-language integration in CLIL and multilingual education. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 1–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R.C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S.
(2009) Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. Stanford, CA: National Staff Development Council, Stanford University. http://​learningforward​.org​/docs​/pdf​/nsdcstudy2009​.pdf.
Disadvantaged Schools Program
(1996) Write it Right project. Sydney: New South Wales Department of Education.Google Scholar
Evans, S.
(2013) The long march to biliteracy and trilingualism: Language policy in Hong Kong education since the handover. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 302–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gebhard, M., & Harman, R.
(2011) Reconsidering genre theory in K-12 schools: A response to school reforms in the United States. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(1), 45–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gebhard, M., Harman, R., & Seger, W.
(2007) Reclaiming recess in urban schools: The potential of systemic functional linguistics for ELLs and their teachers. Language Arts, 84(5), 419–430.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1967) Linguistics and the teaching of English. Reprinted in J. J. Webster (Ed.) 2007 Language and education, Vol. 9 in the Collected Works of M. A .K. Halliday (pp. 25–34). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Greaves, W.
(2008) Intonation in the grammar of English. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R.
(Eds.) (1993) Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
(2014) An introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hammond, J.
(2012) Hope and challenge in The Australian Curriculum: Implications for EAL students and their teachers. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35(2), 224–241.Google Scholar
Hattie, J.
(2003) Teachers make a difference. What is the research evidence? Paper presented at the Australian Council for Educational Research Annual Conference on Building Teacher Quality. Melbourne, Australia.
(2006) Cross-age tutoring and the reading together program. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32(2), 100–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hubber, P., Tytler, R., & Haslam, F.
(2010) Teaching and learning about force with a representational focus: Pedagogy and teacher change. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 5–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaipal, K.
(2010) Meaning making through multiple modalities in a biology classroom: A multimodal semiotics discourse analysis. Science Education, 94(1), 48–72.Google Scholar
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C.
(2001) Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T.
(2006) Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lemke, J. L.
(1990) Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
(1998) Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin, & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 87–113). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2004) The literacies of science. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction (pp. 33–47). Newark, DE: International Reading Association and Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.Google Scholar
Linares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R.
(2012) The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marsh, D., & Meyer, O.
(Eds.) (2012) Quality interfaces: Examining evidence & exploring solutions in CLIL. Eichstaett, Germany: Eichstaett Academic Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., & Maton, K.
(2013) Cumulative knowledge-building in secondary schooling. Linguistics and Education, 24(1), 1–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D.
(2008) Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., & Veel, R.
(1998) Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K. L.
(2005) Mathematical discourse: Language, symbolism and visual images. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K., Podlasov, A., Chua, A., Tisse, C. L., Lim, F.V., & Smith, B. A.
(2014) Challenges and solutions for multimodal analysis: Technology, theory and practice. In Y. Fang, & J. J. Webster (Eds.). Developing systemic functional linguistics: Theory and application (pp. 271–297). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Polias, J.
(2010) Pedagogical resonance: Improving teaching and learning. In C. Coffin (Ed.), Systemic functional linguistics (special edition). National Association for Language Development in the Curriculum (NALDIC) Quarterly, Autumn 8(1), 42–49.Google Scholar
(2011) English language teachers and subject teachers collaborating: recent changes in pedagogical practices in Hong Kong. Viden om læsning, September 2011 Copenhagen, Denmark: Nationellt Videncenter för Læsning.Google Scholar
(2016) Apprenticing students into science: Doing, talking and writing scientifically. Melbourne: Lexis Education.Google Scholar
Polias, J., & Forey, G.
(2016) Teaching through English Maximal Input in meaning making. In D.R. Miller & P. Bayley (Eds.), Hybridity in Systemic Functional Linguistics – Grammer, Text and Discursive Context (pp. 109–132). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Rose, D., & Martin, J.
(2012) Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Rothery, J.
(1996) Making changes: Developing an educational linguistics. In R. Hasan, & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 86–123). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, M. J.
(2004) The language of schooling: A functional linguistics approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, M. J., & Colombi, M. C.
(Eds.) (2002) Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Shoenberg, R. E., & Turlington, B.
(Eds.) (1998) Next steps for languages across the curriculum: Prospects, problems, and promise. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
Shum, M. S. K.
(2006) Developing an approach for teaching subject specific genres in Chinese-the case of post-colonial Hong Kong. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Straight, H. S.
(Ed.) (1994) Languages across the curriculum. Translation Perspectives VII 1994. Invited essays on the use of foreign languages throughout the postsecondary curriculum. Binghamton, NY: Center for Research in Translation, State University of New York.Google Scholar
Tang, K. S., Delgado, C., & Moje, E. B.
(2014) An integrative framework for the analysis of multiple and multimodal representations for meaning-making in science education. Science Education, 98(2), 305–326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. , & Humphrey, S.
(1996) On learning to look through a geographer’s eyes. In R. Hasan, & G. Williams (Eds.). Literacy in society. London: Longman.Google Scholar
van Lier, L.
(2004) The ecology and semiotics of language learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Veel, R.
(1997) Learning how to mean-scientifically speaking: Apprenticeship into scientific discourse in the secondary school. In F. Christie, & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
(2006) The Write it Right project: Linguistic modelling of secondary school and the workplace. In R. Whittaker, M. O’Donnell, & A. McCabe (Eds.), Language and literacy: Functional approaches (pp. 66–92). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Nikula, Tarja
2017.  In Discourse Analytic Perspectives on STEM Education [Educational Linguistics, 32],  pp. 11 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.