Since we can only make the observations our method allows us, we will have to adjust our method of investigation to the phenomena and questions we are interested in within the context and timescale of our focus. If we want to test hypotheses about the grand sweep effects of factors affecting language use at one moment in time, traditional group studies using statistics based on the Gaussian distribution are the most appropriate method. But if we are interested in investigating the changing relations in complex adaptive or dynamical systems, we should use nonlinear analyses of longitudinal data in which the denseness of the observations is adjusted to the expected rate of development. The resulting time series can then be analyzed using techniques that allow nonlinearity of the relations and that value variability as containing meaningful information. However, while there is general consensus about the requirements for traditional research in terms of the choice of parametric or nonparametric statistics, desirable power, effect sizes, and other conventions, the requirements and conventions for complexity research are not set. With the increasing popularity of complex dynamic approaches to second language development, and with more and more researchers applying complexity methodology, there is an urgent need for quality norms for this type of research. In this contribution I will make a modest proposal to some quality criteria in complexity research.
Article outline
Introduction
Complex Dynamic Systems Theory (CDST) and second language development
Adolph, K. E., Robinson, S. R., Young, J. W., & Gill-Alvarez, F. (2008). What is the shape of developmental change?Psychological Review, 115(3), 527–543.
Bassano, D., & van Geert, P. (2007). Modeling continuity and discontinuity in utterance length: A quantitative approach to changes, transitions and intra-individual variability in early grammatical development. Developmental Science, 10(5), 588–612.
Caspi, T. (2010). A dynamic perspective on second language development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.
Caspi, T., & Lowie, W. (2013). The dynamics of L2 vocabulary development: A case study of receptive and productive knowledge. Revista Brasiliera de Linguistica, 13(2), 437–462.
Cattell, R. B. (1952). The three basic factor-analytic designs: Their interrelations and derivatives. Psychological Bulletin, 49, 499–520.
Chan, H. (2015). A dynamic approach to the development of lexicon and syntax in a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.
Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49(12), 997–1003.
De Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism, 10(1), 7–21.
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2013). The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A 7-year study. Language Learning, 63(2), 163–185.
Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Hulstijn, J. H. (2015). Discussion: How different can perspectives on L2 development be?Language Learning, 65(1), 210–232.
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med, 2(8), e124.
Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(5), 746–759.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 140–165.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 590–619.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Larson-Hall, J., & Plonsky, L. (2015). Reporting and interpreting quantitative research findings: What gets reported and recommendations for the field. Language Learning, 65(S1), 127–159.
Lee, K., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2002). Macro- and microdevelopmental research: Assumptions, research strategies, constraints, and utilities. In N. Granott & J. Parziale (Eds.), Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning (pp. 243–265). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Linck, J. A., & Cunnings, I. (2015). The utility and application of mixed-effects models in second language research. Language Learning, 65(S1), 185–207.
Lowie, W., van Dijk, M., Chan, H. P., & Verspoor, M. H. (2017). Finding the key to successful L2 learning in groups and individuals. Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 127–148.
Lowie, W., Caspi, T., van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H. (2011). Modeling development and change. In M. H. Verspoor, K. de Bot & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 22–122). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lowie, W., Plat, R., & de Bot, K. (2014). Pink noise in language production: A nonlinear approach to the multilingual lexicon. Ecological Psychology, 26(3), 216–228.
Molenaar, P. C. M. (2015). On the relation between person-oriented and subject-specific approaches. Journal for Person-Oriented Research, 1(1–2), 34–41.
Molenaar, P. C. M., & Campbell, C. G. (2009). The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(2), 112–117.
Murakami, A. (2014). Individual variation and the role of L1 in the L2 development of English grammatical morphemes: Insights from learner corpora. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge, UK.
Murakami, A. (2016). Modeling systematicity and individuality in nonlinear second language development: The case of English grammatical morphemes. Language Learning.
Norris, J. M. (2015). Statistical significance testing in second language research: Basic problems and suggestions for reform. Language Learning, 65(S1), 97–126.
Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science, 253, 530–535.
Porte, G. K. (2012). Replication research in applied linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ross, S. J., & Mackey, B. (2015). Bayesian approaches to imputation, hypothesis testing, and parameter estimation. Language Learning, 65(S1), 208–227.
Siegler, R. S., & Crowley, K. (1991). The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development. American Psychologist, 46(6), 606–620.
Spivey, M. (2007). The continuity of mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Spoelman, M., & Verspoor, M. (2010). Dynamic patterns in the development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study on the acquisition of Finnish. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 532–553.
Steenbeek, H., & van Geert, P. (2013). The emergence of learning-teaching trajectories in education: A complex dynamic systems approach. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 17(2), 233–267.
Todman, J. B., & Dugard, P. (2001). Single-case and small-n experimental designs: A practical guide to randomization tests. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Trafimow, D., & Marks, M. (2015). Editorial. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(1), 1–2.
van Geert, P. (1994). Dynamic systems of development: Change between complexity and chaos. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
van Geert, P. (2008). A dynamic systems approach to the study of L1 and L2 acquisition: An introduction. Modern Language Journal, 92, 179–199.
van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, R. (2008). A complexity and dynamic systems approach to development assessment, modelling and research. In Battro, A., Fischer, K., & P. Léna (Eds.), The educated brain: Essays in neuroeducation (pp. 71–94). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
van Geert, P. (2011). The contribution of complex dynamic systems to development. Child Development Perspectives, 5(4), 273–278.
Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & Van Dijk, M. (2008). Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 214–231.
Verspoor, M. H., & van Dijk, M. (2011). Visualizing interactions between variables. In M. H. Verspoor, K. de Bot & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 85–98). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (30)
Cited by 30 other publications
Henry, Alastair, Cecilia Thorsen & Peter D. MacIntyre
2024. Willingness to communicate in a multilingual context: part one, a time-serial study of developmental dynamics. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 45:4 ► pp. 937 ff.
Mroz, Aurore & Julia Gorham
2024. From Caterpillar to Butterfly: Story of an Ordinarily Extraordinary Generation Z L2 Student Abroad. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad 36:1 ► pp. 312 ff.
Yu, Hanjing, Wander Lowie & Hongying Peng
2024. Understanding salient trajectories and emerging profiles in the development of Chinese learners’ motivation: a growth mixture modeling approach. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 62:2 ► pp. 223 ff.
Al-Hoorie, Ali H., Phil Hiver, Diane Larsen-Freeman & Wander Lowie
2023. From replication to substantiation: A complexity theory perspective. Language Teaching 56:2 ► pp. 276 ff.
Costa Cruz, Marion & Ubiratã Kickhöfel Alves
2023. Desenvolvimento das habilidades de consciência fonológica em inglês (L2) no uso da plataforma Lexia Core5 Reading: uma análise de processo a partir da teoria de sistemas dinâmicos complexos. Diacrítica 36:2 ► pp. 100 ff.
Li, Cha & Lawrence Jun Zhang
2023. The Development of Accuracy and Fluency in Second Language (L2) Speaking Related to Self-Efficacy Through Online Scaffolding: A Latent Growth Curve Modeling Analysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 52:5 ► pp. 1371 ff.
Vergeiner, Philip C., Jan Luttenberger, Lars Bülow, Dominik Wallner & David Britain
2023. Revisiting areal and lexical diffusion: the case of Viennese Monophthongization in Austria’s traditional dialects. Linguistics 61:4 ► pp. 915 ff.
Alves, Ubiratã Kickhöfel & Felipe Guedes Moreira Vieira
2022. O treinamento perceptual no desenvolvimento dos padrões de Voice Onset Time do inglês (L2) por um aprendiz argentino. BELT - Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal 13:1 ► pp. e42967 ff.
Han, ZhaoHong
2022. Issues of narrowness and staticity in ISLA. Instructed Second Language Acquisition
Hiver, Phil, Ali H. Al-Hoorie & Reid Evans
2022. COMPLEX DYNAMIC SYSTEMS THEORY IN LANGUAGE LEARNING. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 44:4 ► pp. 913 ff.
Mroz, Aurore P. & Tricia Thrasher
2022. Proficiency development and smartphone usage in study abroad: Microgenetic longitudinal case studies of French learners. Foreign Language Annals 55:2 ► pp. 455 ff.
Pallotti, Gabriele
2022. Cratylus’ silence: On the philosophy and methodology of Complex Dynamic Systems Theory in SLA. Second Language Research 38:3 ► pp. 689 ff.
Pallotti, Gabriele
2023. Constructive dialogue, disruptive criticism and the complex dynamics of academic life. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 7:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
Rojas, Minerva
2022. Complexité de l’acquisition d’une L2. Étude de cas longitudinale de production orale en FLE. Lidil :66
Verspoor, Marjolijn & Kees de Bot
2022. Measures of variability in transitional phases in second language development. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:1 ► pp. 85 ff.
Bülow, Lars & Philip C. Vergeiner
2021. Intra-individual variation across the lifespan: Results from an Austrian panel study. Linguistics Vanguard 7:s2
KLIESCH, MARIA & SIMONE E. PFENNINGER
2021. Cognitive and Socioaffective Predictors of L2 Microdevelopment in Late Adulthood: A Longitudinal Intervention Study. The Modern Language Journal 105:1 ► pp. 237 ff.
Pfenninger, Simone E.
2021. About the INTER and the INTRA in age-related research: Evidence from a longitudinal CLIL study with dense time serial measurements. Linguistics Vanguard 7:s2
Pinner, Richard S. & Richard J. Sampson
2021. Humanizing TESOL Research Through the Lens of Complexity Thinking. TESOL Quarterly 55:2 ► pp. 633 ff.
Cal, Zuzanna & Jolanta Sypiańska
2020. The interaction of L2 and L3 levels of proficiency in third language acquisition. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 56:4 ► pp. 577 ff.
Evans, D. Reid & Diane Larsen-Freeman
2020. Bifurcations and the Emergence of L2 Syntactic Structures in a Complex Dynamic System. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Levine, Glenn S.
2020. References. The Modern Language Journal 104:S1 ► pp. 103 ff.
Myles, Florence
2020. Commentary: An SLA Perspective on Learner Corpus Research. In Learner Corpus Research Meets Second Language Acquisition, ► pp. 258 ff.
Yu, Hanjing & Wander Lowie
2020. Dynamic Paths of Complexity and Accuracy in Second Language Speech: A Longitudinal Case Study of Chinese Learners. Applied Linguistics 41:6 ► pp. 855 ff.
Alves, Ubiratã Kickhöfel , Luciene Bassols Brisolara, Leonardo Cláudio Da Rosa & Ana Carolina Signor Buske
2019. Efeitos da duração do vozeamento da fricativa [z] na identificação por brasileiros, de pares mínimos produzidos por hispânicos. Insumos para a discussão sobre inteligibilidade de fala estrangeira. Diacrítica 32:2 ► pp. 437 ff.
Belletti, Thais de Freitas Mondini
2019. O conceito de 'jeitinho brasileiro' no âmbito do ensino de português LE/L2. Para além dos lugares-comuns. Diacrítica 32:2 ► pp. 437 ff.
2019. A critical review of research relating to the learning, use and effects of additional and multiple languages in later life. Language Teaching 52:4 ► pp. 419 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.