Chapter published in:
Critical Reflections on Data in Second Language Acquisition
Edited by Aarnes Gudmestad and Amanda Edmonds
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 51] 2018
► pp. 197–218

Naturalistic data in L2 pragmatics research

Challenges and opportunities

| Illinois State University
This chapter considers the topic of naturalistic data in L2 pragmatics research, discussing what ‘natural’ means, outlining different means of gathering natural data, and highlighting both the advantages and the challenges of working with data in natural settings. That discussion is followed by suggestions for collecting and analyzing naturalistic data based on the author’s experiences using a longitudinal corpus of naturalistic social interactions for the purpose of studying L2 pragmatics. More specifically, issues of comparability, ethics, recording type, triangulation of data, and targeted pragmatic features are addressed.
Keywords: second language pragmatics, naturalistic data, longitudinal data, research methods
Published online: 10 September 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.51.09shi
References

References

Attardo, S., Wagner, M., & Urios-Aparisi, E.
(2013) Introduction: Prosody and humor. In S. Attardo, M. M. Wagner, & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Prosody and humor (pp.1–14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, B.
(1997) Communication of respect in interethnic service encounters. Language in Society, 26, 327–356.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K.
(2005) Contextualizing interlanguage pragmatics. In A. Tyler, Y. Kim, & D. Marinova (Eds.), Language in use: Cognitive and discourse perspective on language and language learning (pp.65–84). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B. S.
(2005) Institutional discourse and interlanguage pragmatics research. In K. Bardovi-Harlig & B. S. Hartford (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics: Exploring institutional talk (pp.7–36). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bataller, R.
(2013) Role-plays vs. natural data: Asking for a drink at a cafeteria in Peninsular Spanish. Íkala: Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 18, 111–126.Google Scholar
Beebe, L. M.
(1994) Field note data on power and the power of field note data. Paper presented at the annual TESOL Conference (Baltimore, MD).Google Scholar
Beebe, L. M., & Cummings, M. C.
(1996) Natural speech act data versus written questionnaire data: How data collection method affects speech act performance. In S. M. Gass & J. Neu (Eds.), Speech acts across cultures: Challenges to communication in a second language (pp.65–86). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bell, N. D.
(2006) Interactional adjustments in humorous intercultural communication. Intercultural Pragmatics, 3, 1–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Safe territory? The humorous narratives of bilingual women. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40, 199–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bell, N. D., & Pomerantz, A.
(2015) Humor in the classroom: A guide for language teachers and educational researchers. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bell, N. D., Skalicky, S., & Salsbury, T.
(2014) Multicompetence in L2 language play: A longitudinal case study. Language Learning, 64, 72–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cook, H.
(2008) Socializing identities through speech style: Learners of Japanese as a foreign language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Demeter, G.
(2007) Role-plays as a data collection method for research on apology speech acts. Simulation and Gaming, 38, 83–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diao, W.
(2016) Peer socialization into gendered L2 Mandarin language practices in a study abroad context: Talk in the dorm. Applied Linguistics, 37, 599–620.Google Scholar
Dings, A.
(2014) Interactional competence and the development of alignment activity. The Modern Language Journal, 98, 742–756.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drew, P.
(1989) Recalling someone from the past. In D. Roger & P. Bull (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp.96–115). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Drew, P., & Heritage, J.
(1992) Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp.3–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Economidou-Kogetsidis, M.
(2013) Strategies, modification and perspective in native speakers’ requests: A comparison of WDCT and naturally occurring requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 53, 21–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ewald, J. D.
(2012) “Can you tell me how to get there?”: Naturally-occurring versus role-play data in direction-giving. Pragmatics, 22, 79–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C.
(2007) Natural speech vs. elicited data: A comparison of natural and role play requests in Mexican Spanish. Spanish in Context, 4, 159–185.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Data collection methods in speech act performance: DCTs, role plays, and verbal reports. In A. Martínez-Flor & E. Usó-Juan (Eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical and methodological issues (pp.41–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) The language of service encounters: A pragmatic-discursive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernández, J.
(2016) Authenticating language choices: Out-of-class interactions in study abroad. In R. van Compernolle & J. McGregor (Eds.), Authenticity, language and interaction in second language contexts (pp.131–150). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Firth, A.
(1996) The discursive accomplishment of normality: On ‘lingua franca’ English and conversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 237–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Doing not being a foreign language learner: English as a lingua franca in the workplace and (some) implications for SLA. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47, 127–156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Firth, A., & Wagner, J.
(1997) On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 285–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K.
(2010) Beyond “naturalistic”: On the role of task characteristics and the importance of multiple elicitation methods. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 3, 501–520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Golato, A.
(2003) Studying compliment responses: A comparison of DCTs and recordings of naturally occurring talk. Applied Linguistics, 24, 90–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C.
(1981) Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
González-Lloret, M.
(2010) Conversation analysis and speech act performance. In A. Martínez-Flor & E. Usó-Juan (Eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical and methodological issues (pp.57–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hartford, B. S., & Bardovi-Harlig, K.
(1992) Experimental and observational data in the study of interlanguage pragmatics. In L. Bouton & Y. Kachru (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning, monograph 3 (pp.33–52). Urbana-Champaign, IL: DEIL.Google Scholar
(1996) “At your earliest convenience”: Written student requests to faculty. In L. F. Bouton (Ed.), Pragmatics and language learning (Vol. 7, pp.55–69). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Division of English as an International Language.Google Scholar
He, A. W., & Young, R.
(1998) Language proficiency interviews: Discourse approach. In R. Young & A. W. He (Eds.), Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency (pp.1–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, R. K.
(1989) The ethnography of English compliments and compliment responses: A contrastive sketch. In W. Oleksy (Ed.), Contrastive pragmatics (pp.3–35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Holmes, J.
(1986) Compliments and compliment responses in New Zealand English. Anthropological Linguistics, 28, 485–508.Google Scholar
Holmes, J., & Hazen, K.
(Eds.) (2013) Research methods in sociolinguistics: A practical guide. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R.
(1998) Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Huth, T.
(2010) Can talk be inconsequential? Social and interactional aspects of elicited second-language interaction. The Modern Language Journal, 94, 537–553.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iino, M.
(2006) Norms of interaction in a Japanese homestay setting: Toward two-way flow of linguistic and cultural resources. In M. DuFon & E. Churchill (Eds.), Language learners in study abroad contexts (pp.151–173). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ishida, M.
(2009) Development of interactional competence: Changes in the use of ne in L2 Japanese during study abroad. In H. Nguyen & G. Kasper (Eds.), Talk-in-interaction: Multilingual perspectives (pp.351–385). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Kasper, G.
(2004) Speech acts in (inter)action: Repeated questions. Intercultural Pragmatics, 1, 125–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006a) Speech acts in interaction: Towards discursive pragmatics. In K. Bardovi-Harlig, J. C. Félix-Brasdefer, & A. Omar (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning (Vol. 11, pp.281–314). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i.Google Scholar
(2006b) When once is not enough: Politeness of multiple requests in oral proficiency interviews. Multilingua, 25, 323–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G., & Dahl, M.
(1991) Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 215–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G., & Rose, K.
(2002) Pragmatic development in a second language. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kinginger, C.
(2009) Language learning and study abroad: A critical reading of research. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Language socialization in the homestay: American high school students in China. In R. Mitchell, N. Tracy-Ventura, & K. McManus (Eds.), Social interaction, identity and language learning during residence abroad (pp.53–74). EuroSLA Monograph Series.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C., & Whiteside, A.
(2008) Language ecology in multilingual settings: Toward a theory of symbolic competence. Applied Linguistics, 29, 645–671.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W.
(1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lee, S., & Kinginger, C.
(2016) Authenticating practices in Chinese homestay interactions. In R. van Compernolle & J. McGregor (Eds.), Authenticity, language and interaction in second language contexts (pp.151–176). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, N.
(2011) Spanish at work: Analyzing the discourse of institutions. In N. Lorenzo-Dus (Ed.), Spanish at work: Analyzing institutional discourse across the Spanish-speaking world (pp.1–8). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lynch, M.
(2002) From naturally occurring data to naturally organized ordinary activities: Comment on Speer. Discourse Studies, 4, 531–537.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malone, M.
(1997) Worlds of talk: The presentation of self in everyday conversation. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Manes, J., & Wolfson, N.
(1981) The compliment formula. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Conversational routine (pp.115–132). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Margalef-Boada, T.
(1993) Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics: An inquiry into data collection procedures (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Márquez Reiter, R., & Placencia, M. E.
(2005) Spanish pragmatics. Houndmills: Palgrave.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, J.
(2016) Metapragmatic talk and the interactional accomplishment of authenticity in study abroad. In R. van Compernolle & J. McGregor (Eds.), Authenticity, language and interaction in second language contexts (p.177–194). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
McMeekin, A.
(2006) Negotiation in a study abroad setting. In M. DuFon & E. Churchill (Eds.), Language learners in study abroad contexts (pp.177–202). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Mondada, L., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
(2004) Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 501–518.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Placencia, M. E.
(1998) Pragmatic variation: Ecuadorian Spanish vs. Peninsular Spanish. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2, 71–106.Google Scholar
(2016) Las ofertas en el regateo en MercadoLibre-Ecuador. In A. M. Bañón Hernández, M. Espejo Muriel, B. Herrero Muñoz-Cobo, & J. L. López Cruces (Eds.), Oralidad y análisis del discurso: Homenaje a Luis Cortés Rodríguez (pp.521–544). Almería, Spain: Edual.Google Scholar
Placencia, M. E., & Mancera Rueda, A.
(2011)  Vaya, ¡qué chungo! Rapport-building talk in service encounters: The case of bars in Seville at breakfast time. In N. Lorenzo-Dus (Ed.), Spanish at work: Analyzing institutional discourse across the Spanish-speaking world (pp.192–207). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, M.
(2003) The ethnography of communication: An introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schau, H. J., Dellande, S., & Gilly, M. C.
(2007) The impact of code switching on service encounters. Journal of Retailing, 83, 65–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.
(1991) Reflections on talk and social structure. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp.44–70). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
(1998) Reflections on studying prosody in talk-in-interaction. Language and Speech, 41, 235–263.Google Scholar
Shively, R. L.
(2011) L2 pragmatic development in study abroad: A longitudinal study of Spanish service encounters. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 1818–1835.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Learning to be funny in Spanish during study abroad: L2 humor development. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 930–946.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015a) Developing interactional competence during study abroad: Listener responses in L2 Spanish. System, 48, 86–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015b) “ Tú no eres española”: Teasing of L2 learners in host family communities of practice. In D. A. Koike & C. S. Blyth (Eds.), Dialogue in multilingual and multimodal communities (pp.107–137). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Development of assessments in L2 Spanish in study abroad. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 3, 157–170.Google Scholar
Speer, S.
(2002) ‘Natural’ and ‘contrived’ data: A sustainable distinction? Discourse Studies, 4, 511–525.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H.
(2005) (Im)politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research, 1, 95–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E.
(2005) English for specific purposes and interlanguage pragmatics. In K. Bardovi-Harlig & B. S. Hartford (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics: Exploring institutional talk (pp.157–173). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
ten Have, P.
(2002) Ontology or methodology? Comments on Speer’s ‘natural’ and ‘contrived’ data: A sustainable distinction? Discourse Studies, 4, 527–530.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Timpe-Laughlin, V.
(2017) Adult learners’ acquisitional patterns in L2 pragmatics: What do we know? Applied Linguistics Review, 8, 101–129.Google Scholar
Traverso, V.
(2001) Syrian service encounters: A case of shifting strategies within verbal exchange. Pragmatics, 11, 421–444.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ventola, E.
(1987) The structure of social interaction: A systemic approach to the semiotics of service encounters. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Wagner, J., & Gardner, R.
(2004) Introduction. In J. Wagner & R. Gardner (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp.1–17). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S.
(2002) The omnipresent classroom during summer study abroad: American students in conversation with their French hosts. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 157–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, N., & Manes, J.
(1980) The compliment as a social strategy. Papers in Linguistics: International Journal of Human Communication, 13, 391–410.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Young, R.
(2011) Interactional competence in language learning, teaching, and testing. In H. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in language learning and teaching (pp.426–443). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yuan, Y.
(2001) An inquiry into empirical pragmatics data-gathering methods: Written DCTs, oral DCTs, field notes, and natural conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 271–292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar