Cover not available
Part of
Cross-theoretical Explorations of Interlocutors and their Individual Differences
Edited by Laura Gurzynski-Weiss
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 53] 2020
► pp. 127–158

Chapter 6
Variationist perspective(s) on interlocutor individual differences

| Indiana University
The variationist perspective provides tools for modeling language use in context by incorporating the influences of social and linguistic factors in the interactional setting. These influencing factors include speaker characteristics (age, regional origin), characteristics of the setting (formality), and characteristics of other participants in the interaction (Geeslin & Long, 2014). In second language research, these factors can describe change over time (i.e., development) and the acquisition of sociolinguistic competence (i.e., the ability to modify one’s speech in socially acceptable ways across settings) (Canale & Swain, 1980; Tarone, 2007). While the variationist perspective is well equipped for addressing the role of the interlocutor, the potential of variationist tools has not been fully exploited. The present chapter reviews existing variationist research, provides a new model that includes these interlocutor-related factors, and proposes a research agenda for moving forward.
Keywords: individual differences, models of language use, second language variation, sociolinguistic competence, variation
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • An overview of the variationist approach
  • A focus on the interlocutor
  • Empirical studies on interlocutors
    • Existing research: Second languages
  • Moving forward
  • Conclusion: Variationism and the interlocutor
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 January 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.53.06gee
References (178)
References
Aaron, J. E. (2010). Pushing the envelope: Looking beyond the variable context. Language Variation and Change, 22, 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adamson, H. D., & Regan, V. (1991). The acquisition of community speech norms by Asian immigrants learning English as a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auger, J. (2002). French immersion in Montreal: Pedagogical norm and functional competence. In K. Bardovi-Harlig, S. Gass, S. Magnan, & J. Walz (Eds.), Pedagogical norms for second and foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 81–101). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Back, M. (this volume). Interlocutor differences and the role of social others in a Spanish peer tutoring context. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Cross- theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences (pp. 99–123). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation, and language learning. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bayley, R. (1994). Interlanguage variation and the quantitative paradigm: Past-tense marking in Chinese-English. In E. Tarone, S. M. Gass, & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition, (pp. 157–181). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bayley, R., & Langman, J. (2004). Variation in the group and the individual: Evidence from second language acquisition. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 42, 303–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beebe, L. M. (1977). The influence of the listener on code-switching. Language Learning, 27, 331–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1980). Sociolinguistic variation and style shifting in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 30, 433–445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beebe, L., & Zuengler, J. (1983). Accommodation theory: An explanation for style shifting in second language dialects. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition (pp. 195–213). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13, 145–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). Back in style: Reworking audience design. In P. Eckert & J. Rickford (Eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation (pp. 139–169). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2009). Language style as audience design. In N. Coupland & A. Jaworski (Eds.), The new sociolinguistics reader (pp. 265–275). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berdan, R. (1996). Disentangling language acquisition from language variation. In R. Bayley & D. Preston (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation (pp. 203–244). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berkowitz, D. (1989). The effect of cultural empathy on second-language phonological production. In M. Einstein (Ed.), The dynamic interlanguage (pp. 101–114). New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blackwell, S. E., & Quesada, M. L. (2012). Third-person subjects in native speakers’ and L2 learners’ narratives: Testing (and revising) the Givenness Hierarchy for Spanish. In K. Geeslin & M. Díaz-Campos (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 14th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 142–164). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Bongiovanni, S., Long, A. Y., Solon, M., & Willis, E. (2015). The effect of short-term study abroad on second language Spanish phonetic development. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 8, 243–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, E. K. (2009). The relative importance of lexical frequency in syllable- and word-final /s/ reduction in Cali, Colombia. In J. Collentine, M. García, B. Lafford, & F. Marín, (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 11th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 165–178). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2004). Theorizing identity in language and sexuality research. Language in Society, 33, 469–515. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, R. (1995). The scope and limits of switch reference as a constraint on pronominal subject expression. Hispanic Linguistics, 6, 1–28.Google Scholar
(2005). Aging and gendering. Language in Society, 34, 23–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Aging, age, and sociolinguistics. In M. Díaz-Campos (Ed.), The handbook of Hispanic sociolinguistics (pp. 207–229). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, R., & Flores-Ferrán, N. (2004). Perseveration of subject expression across regional dialects of Spanish. Spanish in Context, 1, 41–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, K. (2007). Accent, (ING) and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech, 82, 32–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). I’ll be the judge of that: Diversity in social perceptions of (ING). Language in Society, 37, 637–659. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). The nature of sociolinguistic perception. Language Variation and Change, 21, 135–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). The effect of speaker information on attitudes toward (ING). Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 214–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). The sociolinguistic variant as a carrier of social meaning. Language Variation and Change, 22, 423–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, A. M., & Child, M. (2011). Subject pronoun expression in a variety of Spanish in Contact with Portuguese. In J. Michnowicz & R. Dodsworth (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics (pp. 14–25). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Carvalho, A. M., Orozco, R., & Shin, N. L. (2015). Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Cedergren, H. (1973). The interplay of social and linguistic factors in Panama (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Cornell University, NY.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. (2009). Sociolinguistic theory: Linguistic variation and its social significance. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cook, V. (1992). Evidence for multicompetence. Language Learning, 42, 557–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N. (1981). The social differentiation of function language use: A sociolinguistic investigation of travel agency talk (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Cardiff University, Wales, UK.Google Scholar
Dracos, M. (2018). Teacher talk and Spanish subject personal pronouns. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 5, 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duff, P. (1993). Tasks and interlanguage performance: An SLA perspective. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 57–95). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York, NY: Teaching College.Google Scholar
(1997). Age as a sociolinguistic variable. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 151–167). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12, 453–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 87–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 461–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eisenstein, M. (1986). Target language variation and second-language acquisition: Learning English in New York City. World Englishes, 5, 31–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erker, D., & Guy, G. R. (2012). The role of lexical frequency in syntactic variability: Variable subject personal pronoun expression in Spanish. Language, 88, 526–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1964). An analysis of the interaction of language, topic, and listener. American Anthropologist, 66, 86–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fantuzzi, C. (1992). Connectionism: Explanation or implementation? Issues in Applied Linguistics, 3, 319–340.Google Scholar
File-Muriel, R. J., & Brown, E. K. (2011). The gradient nature of s-lenition in Caleño Spanish. Language Variation and Change, 23, 223–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal, 81, 285–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fishman, J. (1972). Domains and the relationship between micro- and macrosociolinguistics. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions on sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 435–453). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
(1997). Language, ethnicity and racism. In N. Coupland & A. Jaworski (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: A reader and coursebook (pp. 329–340). New York, NY: St. Martin’s. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M., Behney, J., & Plonsky, L. (2013). Looking at inter-language processing. In S. M. Gass, J. Behney, & L. Plonsky (Eds.), Second language acquisition: An introductory course (pp. 252–292). New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., Mackey, A., & Pica, T. (1998). The role of input and interaction in second language acquisition: Introduction to the Special Issue. Modern Language Journal, 82, 299–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M., & Madden, C. G. (Eds.) (1985). Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. M. (1985). Variation in native speaker speech modification to nonnative speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 283–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gasser, M. (1990). Connectionism and universals of second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 179–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K. (2006). Task design, discourse context and variation in second language data elicitation. In C. Klee & T. Face (Eds.) Selected proceedings of the 7th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 74–85). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings.Google Scholar
(2011a). Variation in L2 Spanish: The state of the discipline. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 4, 461–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011b). The acquisition of variation in second language Spanish: How to identify and catch a moving target. In M. Díaz-Campos (Ed.), The handbook of Hispanic sociolinguistics (pp. 303–319). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K., & Evans-Sago, T. (2018). Lenguas en contacto. In J. Muñoz-Basols, E. Gironzetti & M. Lacorte (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Spanish language teaching: Metodologías, contextos y recursos para la enseñanza del español L2 (pp. 432–446). London, UK: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K., Fafulas, S., & Kanwit, M. (2013). Acquiring geographically-variable norms of use: The case of the present perfect in Mexico and Spain. In C. Howe, S. E. Blackwell, & M. Lubbers Quesada et al. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 15th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 205–220). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., García-Amaya, L. J., Hasler-Barker, M., Henriksen, N. C., & Killam, J. (2010). The SLA of direct object pronouns in a study abroad immersion environment where use is variable. In C. Borgonovo, M. Español-Echevarría, & P. Prévost (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 12th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 246–259). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
(2012). The L2 acquisition of variable perfective past time reference in Spanish in an overseas immersion setting. In K. Geeslin & M. Díaz-Campos (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 14th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 197–213). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., & Gudmestad, A. (2011). Using sociolinguistic analyses of discourse-level features to expand research on L2 variation: Native and non-native contrasts in forms of Spanish subject expression. In L. Plonsky & M. Schierloh (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the Second Language Research Forum (pp. 16–30). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K., & Linford, B. (2012, April). Cross-sectional study of the effects of discourse cohesiveness and perseveration on subject expression. Paper presented at 6th International Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics. Tucson, AZ.
Geeslin, K., Linford, B., & Fafulas, S. (2015). Variable subject expression in second language Spanish: Uncovering the developmental sequence and predictive linguistic factors. In A. M. Carvalho, R. Orozco, & N. Lapidus Shin (Eds.), Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective (pp. 191–209). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K., with Long, A. (2014). Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition: Learning to use language in context. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K., & Schmidt, L. (2018). L2 learner sociolinguistic evaluations of regional varieties of Spanish. In A. Morales-Front & C. Sanz (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of study abroad research and practice (pp. 387–405). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
George, A. (2014). Study abroad in Central Spain: The development of regional phonological features. Foreign Language Annals, 47, 97–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gudmestad, A. (2013). Variationist approaches to second-language Spanish. In K. L. Geeslin (Ed.), The handbook of Spanish second language acquisition (pp. 80–95). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gudmestad, A., & Geeslin, K. L. (2011). Assessing the use of multiple forms in variable contexts: The relationship between linguistic factors and future-time reference in Spanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 4, 3–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2010). Factors influencing oral corrective feedback provision in the Spanish foreign language classroom: Investigating instructor native/nonnative speaker status, second language acquisition education, and teaching experience. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
(2013). Instructor characteristics and classroom-based second language acquisition of Spanish. In K. L. Geeslin (Ed.), The handbook of Spanish second language acquisition (pp. 530–546). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., Geeslin, K., Daidone, D., Linford, B., Long, A., Michalski, I., & M. Solon. (2018). L2 classrooms as multi-faceted sources of input: The synergy of variationist and usage-based approaches. In A. Tyler & L. Ortega (eds.), Usage-based L2 instruction (pp. 293–313). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., Geeslin, K. L., Long, A. Y.; Daidone, D. (2017). Linguistic variation in instructor provision of oral input. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach: Investigating learners, instructors, and other interlocutors (pp. 225–254). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, M., & Fairclough, M. (2006). Incorporating linguistic variation into the classroom. In R. Salaberry & B. Lafford (Eds.), The art of teaching Spanish: Second language acquisition, from research to praxis (pp. 173–192). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Harris, R., & Rampton, B. (Eds.) (2003). The language, ethnicity, and race reader. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hay, J., & Drager, K. (2010). Stuffed toys and speech perception. Linguistics, 48(4), 865–892. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, J., Nolan, A., & Drager, K. (2006). From fush to feesh: Exemplar priming in speech perception. Linguistic Review, 23, 351–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, J., Warren, P., & Drager, K. (2006). Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 458–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, N. C., Geeslin, K. L., & Willis, E. W. (2010). The development of L2 Spanish intonation during a study abroad immersion program in León, Spain: Global contours and final boundary movements. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 3, 113–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmquist, J. (1985). Social correlates of a linguistic variable: A study in a Spanish village. Language in Society, 14, 191–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Gender and variation: Word final /s/ in men’s and women’s speech in Puerto Rico’s Western Highlands. In M. Díaz-Campos (Ed.), The handbook of Hispanic sociolinguistics (pp. 230–243). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
In’nami, Y., & Koizumi, R. (2016). Task and rater effects in L2 speaking and writing: A synthesis of generalizability studies. Language Testing, 33, 341–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. E. (2009). Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanwit, M., Geeslin, K. & Fafulas, S. (2015). The role of geography in the SLA of variable structures: A look at the present perfect, the copula contrast, and the present progressive in Mexico and Spain. Probus, 27, 307–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiesling, S. F. (1998). Men’s identities and sociolinguistic variation: The case of fraternity men. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 2, 69–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Style as stance: Stance as the explanation for patterns of sociolinguistic variation. In A. Jaffe (Ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 171–194). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knouse, S. M. (2013). The acquisition of dialectal phonemes in a study abroad context: The case of the Castilian theta. Foreign Language Annals, 45, 512–542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
(1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
(1990). The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change, 2, 205–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000). Principles of linguistic change: Social factors. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. (this volume). I ~ You > You ~ Me: The hidden other in L2 development. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences (pp. 79–97). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1975). The acquisition of grammatical morphemes by adult ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 409–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Reflecting on the cognitive-social debate in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 91, 773–787. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(this volume). Complexity Theory: Relational systems in interaction and in interlocutor differences in second language development. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences (pp. 189–208). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Lavandera, B. (1978). Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? Language in Society, 7, 171–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leal, T., Geeslin, K. L., & Escalona Torres, J. (2016, October). A María sí la ayudo pero a Jaime no puedo ayudarle más: Speaker expectations and the processing of geographically-variable structures. Paper presented at the 2016 Hispanic Linguistic Symposium. Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.
Leal, T., Slabakova, R., & Farmer, T. (2017). The fine-tuning of linguistic expectations over the course of L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 493–525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levon, E. (2006). Hearing ‘gay’: Prosody, interpretation and the affective judgments of men’s speech. American Speech, 81, 56–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Sexuality in context: Variation and the sociolinguistic perception of identity. Language in Society, 36, 533–554. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Categories, stereotypes, and the linguistic perception of sexuality. Language in Society, 43, 539–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levon, E., & Buchstaller, I. (2015). Perception, cognition, and linguistic structure: The effect of linguistic modularity and cognitive style on sociolinguistic processing. Language Variation and Change, 27, 319–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, X. (2010). Sociolinguistic variation in the speech of learners of Chinese as a second language. Language Learning, 60, 366–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Variation in subject pronominal expression in L2 Chinese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 39–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linford, B., & Shin, N. L. (2013). Lexical frequency effects on L2 Spanish subject pronoun expression. In J. C. Amaro, G. Lord, A. de Prada Pérez, & J. E. Aaron (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 16th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 175–189). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Liskin-Gasparro, J. (2000). The use of tense-aspect morphology in Spanish oral narratives: Exploring the perceptions of advanced learners. Hispania, 83, 830–844. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M. (1990). The least a Second Language Acquisition theory needs to explain. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 649–666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Long, M., & Porter, P. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 207–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lumley, T., & O’Sullivan, B. (2005). The effect of test-taker gender, audience and topic on task performance in tape-mediated assessment of speaking. Language Testing, 22, 415–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. (Ed.) (2012). Input, interaction, and corrective feedback in L2 classrooms. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2001). The Competition Model: The input, the context, and the brain. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 69–90). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). A Unified Model. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 341–371). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mayol, L. (2012). An account of the variation in the rates of overt subject pronouns in Romance. Spanish in Context, 9, 420–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, L. (1980). Language and social networks. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (1985). Linguistic change, social network, and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics, 21, 339–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Molnar, M., Ibáñez-Molina, A., & Carreiras, M. (2015). Interlocutor identity affects language activation in bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 81, 91–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mougeon, R., Nasadi, T., & Rehner, K. (2004). The sociolinguistic competence of immersion students. Bristol, UK: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Moonwomon-Baird, B. (1997). Toward a study of lesbian speech. In A. Livia & K. Hall (Eds.), Queerly phrased: Language, gender, and sexuality (pp. 202–213). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Niedzielski, N. (1999). The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 62–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norton, B. (2010). Language and identity. In N. Hornberger & S. McKay (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp. 349–369). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. (2011). SLA after the social turn: Where cognitivism and its alternatives stand. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches in second language acquisition (pp. 167–180). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2013). SLA for the 21st century: Disciplinary progress, transdisciplinary relevance, and the bi/multilingual turn. Language Learning, 63, 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philp, J., & Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (this volume). On the role of the interlocutor in second language development: A cognitive-interactionist approach. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences (pp. 19–50). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Plough, I., & Gass, S. M. (1993). Interlocutor and task familiarity: Effects on interactional structure. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 35–56). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Podesva, R. (2007). Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11, 478–504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Three sources of stylistic meaning. Texas Linguistic Forum, 51, 134–143.Google Scholar
Polio, C., Gass, S., & Chapin, L. (2006). Using stimulated recall to investigate native speaker perceptions in native-nonnative speaker interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 237–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poteau, C. (2011). Effects of interlocutor familiarity on second language learning in groupwork (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Temple University, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Preston, D. (1993). Variationist linguistics and second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 9, 153–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996). Variationist perspectives on second language acquisition. In R. Bayley & D. R. Preston (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation (pp. 1–45). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000). Three kinds of sociolinguistics and SLA: a psycholinguistic perspective. In B. Swierzbin, M. Anderson, C. Klee, & E. Tarone (Eds.), Social and cognitive factors in SLA (pp. 3–30). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
(2002). A variationist perspective on SLA: Psycholinguistic concerns. In R. Kaplan (Ed.), Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 141–159). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2004). Three kinds of sociolinguistics: a psycholinguistic perspective. In C. Fought (Ed.), Sociolinguistic variation: Critical reflections (pp. 140–160). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Regan, V., Howard, M., & Lemée, I. (2009). The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence in a study abroad context. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rickford, J., & McNair-Knox, F. (1994). Addressee- and topic-influenced style shift. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register (pp. 235–276). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rickford, J., & Price, M. (2013). Girlz II women: Age-grading, language change and stylistic variation. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 17, 143–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ringer-Hilfinger, K. (2012). Learner acquisition of dialect variation in a study abroad context: The case of the Spanish [θ]. Foreign Language Annals, 45, 430–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (1995). Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning, 45, 99–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: A review of studies in Componential Framework for second language task design. IRAL, 43, 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. IRAL, 45, 193–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rogers, H., Smyth, R., & Jacobs, G. (2003). Vowel reduction as a cue to distinguishing gay- and straight-sounding male speech. In J. T. Jensen & G. Van Herk (Eds.), Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Canadian Linguistics Society (pp. 167–176). Ottawa: University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Rothman, J. (2007). Pragmatic solutions for syntactic problems: Understanding some L2 syntactic errors in terms of pragmatic deficits. In S. Bauuw, F. Drijkoningen, & M. Pinto (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory (pp. 299–320). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Salgado-Robles, F. (2011). The acquisition of sociolinguistic variation by learners of Spanish in a study abroad context (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
(2014). Variación dialectal por aprendientes de español en un contexto de inmersión en el extranjero: Un análisis cuantitativo del uso leísta en el discurso oral y escrito. Lenguas Modernas, 43, 97–112.Google Scholar
(2018). Efectos del contexto de inmersión en la competencia sociolingüística de EL2: La adquisición del laísmo madrileño. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 74, 307–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samper Padilla, J. A. (2011). Sociophonological variation and change in Spain. In M. Díaz-Campos (Ed.), The handbook of Hispanic sociolinguistics (pp. 98–120). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, D. (1988). Sociolinguistics and syntactic variation. In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey (pp. 140–161). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schilling-Estes, N. (2004). Exploring intertextuality in the sociolinguistic interview. In C. Fought (Ed.), Sociolinguistic variation: Critical reflections (pp. 44–61). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. (1976). Second language acquisition: The Pidginization Hypothesis. Language Learning, 26, 391–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1978). The relationship of pidginization, creolization and decreolization to second language acquisition. Language Learning, 28, 367–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, S., & Torres-Cacoullos, R. (2008). Defaults and indeterminacy in temporal grammaticalization: The ‘perfect’ road to perfective. Language Variation and Change, 20, 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shea, C., & Curtin, S. (2011). Experience, representations and the production of second language allophones. Second Language Research, 27, 229–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shin, N. L., & Otheguy, R. (2013). Social class and gender impacting change in bilingual settings: Spanish subject pronoun use in New York. Language in Society, 42, 429–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. (1997). Variación sintáctica en el discurso oral: Problemas metodológicos. In F. Moreno Fernández (Ed.), Trabajo de sociolingüística hispánica (pp. 115–135). Alcalá, Spain: Universidad de Alcalá (UAH) Madrid.Google Scholar
Smyth, R., & Rogers, H. (2002). Phonetics, gender, and sexual orientation. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Linguistics Association (pp. 299–301). Montreal: l’Universite du Quebec au Montreal.Google Scholar
Squires, L. (2013). It don’t go both ways: Limited bidirectionality in sociolinguistic perception. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 17, 200–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014a). Talker specificity and the perception of grammatical variation. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 856–876. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014b). Knowledge, processing, evaluation: Testing the sociolinguistic perception of English subject-verb agreement variation. Journal of English Linguistics, 42, 144–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Staum Casasanto, L. (2008). Does social information influence sentence processing? Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 30, 799–804.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. (2007). Sociolinguistic approaches to second language acquisition research – 1997–2007. Modern Language Journal, 91, 837–848. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Social context and cognition in SLA: A variationist perspective. In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning (pp. 54–72). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tarone, E., & Liu, G. Q. (1995). Situational context, variation, and second language acquisition. In G. Cook & B. Seidhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 107–124). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tarone, E., & Parrish, B. (1988). Task-related variation in interlanguage: The case of articles. Language Learning, 38, 21–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Travis, C. E. (2005). The yo-yo effect: Priming in subject expression in Colombian Spanish. In R. Gess & E. J. Rubin (Eds.), Theoretical and experimental approaches to Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the 34th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL) (pp. 329–349). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Genre effects on subject expression in Spanish: Priming in narrative and conversation. Language Variation and Change, 19, 101–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valdman, A. (1988). Classroom foreign language learning and language variation: The notion of pedagogical norms. World Englishes, 7, 221–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). The acquisition of sociostylistic and sociopragmatic variation by instructed second language learners: The elaboration of pedagogical norms. In C. Blyth (Ed.), The sociolinguistics of foreign-language classrooms: Contributions of the native, the near-native, and the non-native speaker (pp. 57–78). Boston, MA: Heinle.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Benati, A. G. (2010). Key terms in second language acquisition. London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Williams, J. (Eds.) (2014). Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willis, E., Geeslin, K. & Henriksen, N. (2009, October). The acquisition of /θ/ by study abroad learners in León. Spain. Paper presented at the 13th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Woolsey, D. (2008). From theory to research: Contextual predictions of “estar + adjective” and the study of the SLA of Spanish copula choice. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 277–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Q. (2005). A Chinese yuppie in Beijing: Phonological variation and the construction of a new professional identity. Language in Society, 34, 431–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Rhotacization and the “Beijing Smooth Operator”: The social meaning of a linguistic variable. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12, 201–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Jung, YeonJoo & Scott Crossley
2024. Stylistic alignment in natural conversation involving second language speakers. Applied Linguistics Review 15:3 ► pp. 871 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Chang
2023. A critical understanding of second language acquisition from two sociolinguistic strands: The Variationist approach and the Investment Perspective. Journal of Language Teaching 3:3 ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Schoonmaker-Gates, Elena
2023. Dialect-specificity and learners’ L2 perceptual resilience after study abroad. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 9:3 ► pp. 362 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.