References
Aaron, J. E. (2010). Pushing
the envelope: Looking beyond the variable
context. Language
Variation and
Change, 22, 1–36. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Adamson, H. D., & Regan, V. (1991). The
acquisition of community speech norms by Asian
immigrants learning English as a second
language. Studies
in Second Language
Acquisition, 13, 1–22. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Back, M. (this
volume). Interlocutor
differences and the role of social others in a
Spanish peer tutoring context. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Cross-
theoretical explorations of interlocutors and
their individual
differences (pp. 99–123). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition,
variation, and language
learning. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms
of language
acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bayley, R. (1994). Interlanguage
variation and the quantitative paradigm:
Past-tense marking in
Chinese-English. In E. Tarone, S. M. Gass, & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research
methodology in second language
acquisition, (pp. 157–181). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bayley, R., & Langman, J. (2004). Variation
in the group and the individual: Evidence from
second language
acquisition. IRAL-International
Review of Applied Linguistics in Language
Teaching, 42, 303–318. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beebe, L. M. (1977). The
influence of the listener on
code-switching. Language
Learning, 27, 331–339. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beebe, L. M. (1980). Sociolinguistic
variation and style shifting in second language
acquisition. Language
Learning, 30, 433–445. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beebe, L., & Zuengler, J. (1983). Accommodation
theory: An explanation for style shifting in
second language
dialects. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics
and Language
Acquisition (pp. 195–213). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bell, A. (1984). Language
style as audience
design. Language in
Society, 13, 145–204. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bell, A. (2001). Back
in style: Reworking audience
design. In P. Eckert & J. Rickford (Eds.), Style
and sociolinguistic
variation (pp. 139–169). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bell, A. (2009). Language
style as audience
design. In N. Coupland & A. Jaworski (Eds.), The
new sociolinguistics
reader (pp. 265–275). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berkowitz, D. (1989). The
effect of cultural empathy on second-language
phonological
production. In M. Einstein (Ed.), The
dynamic
interlanguage (pp. 101–114). New York, NY: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blackwell, S. E., & Quesada, M. L. (2012). Third-person
subjects in native speakers’ and L2 learners’
narratives: Testing (and revising) the Givenness
Hierarchy for
Spanish. In K. Geeslin & M. Díaz-Campos (Eds.), Selected
proceedings of the 14th Hispanic Linguistics
Symposium (pp. 142–164). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bongiovanni, S., Long, A. Y., Solon, M., & Willis, E. (2015). The
effect of short-term study abroad on second
language Spanish phonetic
development. Studies
in Hispanic and Lusophone
Linguistics, 8, 243–283. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, E. K. (2009). The
relative importance of lexical frequency in
syllable- and word-final /s/ reduction in Cali,
Colombia. In J. Collentine, M. García, B. Lafford, & F. Marín, (Eds.), Selected
proceedings of the 11th Hispanic Linguistics
Symposium (pp. 165–178). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2004). Theorizing
identity in language and sexuality
research. Language
in
Society, 33, 469–515. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cameron, R. (1995). The
scope and limits of switch reference as a
constraint on pronominal subject
expression. Hispanic
Linguistics, 6, 1–28.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cameron, R. (2005). Aging
and
gendering. Language
in
Society, 34, 23–61. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cameron, R. (2011). Aging,
age, and
sociolinguistics. In M. Díaz-Campos (Ed.), The
handbook of Hispanic
sociolinguistics (pp. 207–229). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Campbell-Kibler, K. (2007). Accent,
(ING) and the social logic of listener
perceptions. American
Speech, 82, 32–64. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Campbell-Kibler, K. (2008). I’ll
be the judge of that: Diversity in social
perceptions of
(ING). Language in
Society, 37, 637–659. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Campbell-Kibler, K. (2009). The
nature of sociolinguistic
perception. Language
Variation and
Change, 21, 135–156. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Campbell-Kibler, K. (2010). The
effect of speaker information on attitudes toward
(ING). Journal of
Language and Social
Psychology, 29, 214–223. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Campbell-Kibler, K. (2011). The
sociolinguistic variant as a carrier of social
meaning. Language
Variation and
Change, 22, 423–441. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical
bases of communicative approaches to second
language teaching and
testing. Applied
Linguistics, 1, 1–47. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carvalho, A. M., & Child, M. (2011). Subject
pronoun expression in a variety of Spanish in
Contact with
Portuguese. In J. Michnowicz & R. Dodsworth (Eds.), Selected
proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Spanish
Sociolinguistics (pp. 14–25). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carvalho, A. M., Orozco, R., & Shin, N. L. (2015). Subject
pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal
perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cedergren, H. (1973). The
interplay of social and linguistic factors in
Panama (Unpublished
doctoral
dissertation). Cornell University, NY.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chambers, J. (2009). Sociolinguistic
theory: Linguistic variation and its social
significance. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cook, V. (1992). Evidence
for
multicompetence. Language
Learning, 42, 557–591. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coupland, N. (1981). The
social differentiation of function language use: A
sociolinguistic investigation of travel agency
talk (Unpublished
doctoral
dissertation). Cardiff University, Wales, UK.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dracos, M. (2018). Teacher
talk and Spanish subject personal
pronouns. Journal
of Spanish Language
Teaching, 5, 1–15. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Duff, P. (1993). Tasks
and interlanguage performance: An SLA
perspective. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks
and language learning: Integrating theory and
practice (pp. 57–95). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eckert, P. (1989). Jocks
and burnouts: Social categories and identity in
the high
school. New York, NY: Teaching College.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eckert, P. (1997). Age
as a sociolinguistic
variable. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Handbook
of
sociolinguistics (pp. 151–167). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eckert, P. (2008). Variation
and the indexical
field. Journal of
Sociolinguistics, 12, 453–476. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eckert, P. (2012). Three
waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning
in the study of sociolinguistic
variation. Annual
Review of
Anthropology, 41, 87–100. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Think
practically and look locally: Language and gender
as community-based
practice. Annual
Review of
Anthropology, 21, 461–490. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eisenstein, M. (1986). Target
language variation and second-language
acquisition: Learning English in New York
City. World
Englishes, 5, 31–46. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Erker, D., & Guy, G. R. (2012). The
role of lexical frequency in syntactic
variability: Variable subject personal pronoun
expression in
Spanish. Language, 88, 526–557. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1964). An
analysis of the interaction of language, topic,
and
listener. American
Anthropologist, 66, 86–102. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fantuzzi, C. (1992). Connectionism:
Explanation or
implementation? Issues
in Applied
Linguistics, 3, 319–340.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
File-Muriel, R. J., & Brown, E. K. (2011). The
gradient nature of s-lenition in Caleño
Spanish. Language
Variation and
Change, 23, 223–243. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On
discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental
concepts in SLA
research. Modern
Language
Journal, 81, 285–300. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fishman, J. (1972). Domains
and the relationship between micro- and
macrosociolinguistics. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions
on sociolinguistics: The ethnography of
communication (pp. 435–453). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fishman, J. (1997). Language,
ethnicity and
racism. In N. Coupland & A. Jaworski (Eds.), Sociolinguistics:
A reader and
coursebook (pp. 329–340). New York, NY: St. Martin’s. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gass, S. M., Behney, J., & Plonsky, L. (2013). Looking
at inter-language
processing. In S. M. Gass, J. Behney, & L. Plonsky (Eds.), Second
language acquisition: An introductory
course (pp. 252–292). New York, NY: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gass, S., Mackey, A., & Pica, T. (1998). The
role of input and interaction in second language
acquisition: Introduction to the Special
Issue. Modern
Language
Journal, 82, 299–305. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gass, S. M., & Madden, C. G. (Eds.) (1985). Input
in second language
acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. M. (1985). Variation
in native speaker speech modification to nonnative
speakers. Studies
in Second Language
Acquisition, 7, 283–302. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gasser, M. (1990). Connectionism
and universals of second language
acquisition. Studies
in Second Language
Acquisition, 12, 179–199. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeslin, K. (2006). Task
design, discourse context and variation in second
language data
elicitation. In C. Klee & T. Face (Eds.) Selected
proceedings of the 7th Conference on the
Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and
Second
Languages (pp. 74–85). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeslin, K. (2011a). Variation
in L2 Spanish: The state of the
discipline. Studies
in Hispanic and Lusophone
Linguistics, 4, 461–520. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeslin, K. (2011b). The
acquisition of variation in second language
Spanish: How to identify and catch a moving
target. In M. Díaz-Campos (Ed.), The
handbook of Hispanic
sociolinguistics (pp. 303–319). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeslin, K., & Evans-Sago, T. (2018). Lenguas
en
contacto. In J. Muñoz-Basols, E. Gironzetti & M. Lacorte (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of Spanish language teaching:
Metodologías, contextos y recursos para la
enseñanza del español
L2 (pp. 432–446). London, UK: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeslin, K., Fafulas, S., & Kanwit, M. (2013). Acquiring
geographically-variable norms of use: The case of
the present perfect in Mexico and
Spain. In C. Howe, S. E. Blackwell, & M. Lubbers Quesada et al. (Eds.), Selected
proceedings of the 15th Hispanic Linguistics
Symposium (pp. 205–220). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeslin, K. L., García-Amaya, L. J., Hasler-Barker, M., Henriksen, N. C., & Killam, J. (2010). The
SLA of direct object pronouns in a study abroad
immersion environment where use is
variable. In C. Borgonovo, M. Español-Echevarría, & P. Prévost (Eds.), Selected
proceedings of the 12th Hispanic Linguistics
Symposium (pp. 246–259). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeslin, K. L., García-Amaya, L. J., Hasler-Barker, M., Henriksen, N. C., & Killam, J. (2012). The
L2 acquisition of variable perfective past time
reference in Spanish in an overseas immersion
setting. In K. Geeslin & M. Díaz-Campos (Eds.), Selected
proceedings of the 14th Hispanic Linguistics
Symposium (pp. 197–213). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeslin, K. L., & Gudmestad, A. (2011). Using
sociolinguistic analyses of discourse-level
features to expand research on L2 variation:
Native and non-native contrasts in forms of
Spanish subject
expression. In L. Plonsky & M. Schierloh (Eds.), Selected
proceedings of the Second Language Research
Forum (pp. 16–30). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeslin, K., & Linford, B. (2012, April). Cross-sectional
study of the effects of discourse cohesiveness and
perseveration on subject
expression. Paper
presented
at
6th
International Workshop on Spanish
Sociolinguistics
. Tucson,
AZ.
Geeslin, K., Linford, B., & Fafulas, S. (2015). Variable
subject expression in second language Spanish:
Uncovering the developmental sequence and
predictive linguistic
factors. In A. M. Carvalho, R. Orozco, & N. Lapidus Shin (Eds.), Subject
pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal
perspective (pp. 191–209). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeslin, K., with Long, A. (2014). Sociolinguistics
and second language acquisition: Learning to use
language in
context. New York, NY: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeslin, K., & Schmidt, L. (2018). L2
learner sociolinguistic evaluations of regional
varieties of
Spanish. In A. Morales-Front & C. Sanz (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of study abroad research and
practice (pp. 387–405). New York, NY: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
George, A. (2014). Study
abroad in Central Spain: The development of
regional phonological
features. Foreign
Language
Annals, 47, 97–114. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gudmestad, A. (2013). Variationist
approaches to second-language
Spanish. In K. L. Geeslin (Ed.), The
handbook of Spanish second language
acquisition (pp. 80–95). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gudmestad, A., & Geeslin, K. L. (2011). Assessing
the use of multiple forms in variable contexts:
The relationship between linguistic factors and
future-time reference in
Spanish. Studies in
Hispanic and Lusophone
Linguistics, 4, 3–33. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2010). Factors
influencing oral corrective feedback provision in
the Spanish foreign language classroom:
Investigating instructor native/nonnative speaker
status, second language acquisition education, and
teaching
experience. Unpublished
doctoral
dissertation. Georgetown University, Washington, DC.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2013). Instructor
characteristics and classroom-based second
language acquisition of
Spanish. In K. L. Geeslin (Ed.), The
handbook of Spanish second language
acquisition (pp. 530–546). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., Geeslin, K., Daidone, D., Linford, B., Long, A., Michalski, I., & M. Solon. (2018). L2
classrooms as multi-faceted sources of input: The
synergy of variationist and usage-based
approaches. In A. Tyler & L. Ortega (eds.), Usage-based
L2
instruction (pp. 293–313). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., Geeslin, K. L., Long, A. Y.; Daidone, D. (2017). Linguistic
variation in instructor provision of oral
input. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Expanding
individual difference research in the interaction
approach: Investigating learners, instructors, and
other
interlocutors (pp. 225–254). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gutiérrez, M., & Fairclough, M. (2006). Incorporating
linguistic variation into the
classroom. In R. Salaberry & B. Lafford (Eds.), The
art of teaching Spanish: Second language
acquisition, from research to
praxis (pp. 173–192). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion
in English. London, UK: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, R., & Rampton, B. (Eds.) (2003). The
language, ethnicity, and race
reader. New York, NY: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hay, J., & Drager, K. (2010). Stuffed
toys and speech
perception. Linguistics, 48(4), 865–892. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hay, J., Nolan, A., & Drager, K. (2006). From
fush to feesh: Exemplar priming in speech
perception. Linguistic
Review, 23, 351–379. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hay, J., Warren, P., & Drager, K. (2006). Factors
influencing speech perception in the context of a
merger-in-progress. Journal
of
Phonetics, 34, 458–484. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Henriksen, N. C., Geeslin, K. L., & Willis, E. W. (2010). The
development of L2 Spanish intonation during a
study abroad immersion program in León, Spain:
Global contours and final boundary
movements. Studies
in Hispanic and Lusophone
Linguistics, 3, 113–162. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holmquist, J. (1985). Social
correlates of a linguistic variable: A study in a
Spanish
village. Language
in
Society, 14, 191–203. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holmquist, J. (2011). Gender
and variation: Word final /s/ in men’s and women’s
speech in Puerto Rico’s Western
Highlands. In M. Díaz-Campos (Ed.), The
handbook of Hispanic
sociolinguistics (pp. 230–243). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
In’nami, Y., & Koizumi, R. (2016). Task
and rater effects in L2 speaking and writing: A
synthesis of generalizability
studies. Language
Testing, 33, 341–366. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, D. E. (2009). Getting
off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for
mixed-effects variable rule
analysis. Language
and Linguistics
Compass, 3, 359–383. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kanwit, M., Geeslin, K. & Fafulas, S. (2015). The
role of geography in the SLA of variable
structures: A look at the present perfect, the
copula contrast, and the present progressive in
Mexico and
Spain. Probus, 27, 307–348. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kiesling, S. F. (1998). Men’s
identities and sociolinguistic variation: The case
of fraternity
men. Journal of
Sociolinguistics, 2, 69–99. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kiesling, S. F. (2009). Style
as stance: Stance as the explanation for patterns
of sociolinguistic
variation. In A. Jaffe (Ed.), Stance:
Sociolinguistic
perspectives (pp. 171–194). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Knouse, S. M. (2013). The
acquisition of dialectal phonemes in a study
abroad context: The case of the Castilian
theta. Foreign
Language
Annals, 45, 512–542. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, W. (1966). The
social stratification of English in New York
City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic
patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, W. (1990). The
intersection of sex and social class in the course
of linguistic
change. Language
Variation and
Change, 2, 205–254. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, W. (2000). Principles
of linguistic change: Social
factors. Cambridge: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lantolf, J. P. (this
volume). I ~ You
> You ~ Me: The hidden other in L2
development. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Cross-theoretical
explorations of interlocutors and their individual
differences (pp. 79–97). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1975). The
acquisition of grammatical morphemes by adult ESL
students. TESOL
Quarterly, 9, 409–419. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2007). Reflecting
on the cognitive-social debate in second language
acquisition. Modern
Language
Journal, 91, 773–787. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Larsen-Freeman, D. (this
volume). Complexity
Theory: Relational systems in interaction and in
interlocutor differences in second language
development. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Cross-theoretical
explorations of interlocutors and their individual
differences (pp. 189–208). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Lavandera, B. (1978). Where
does the sociolinguistic variable
stop? Language in
Society, 7, 171–182. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leal, T., Geeslin, K. L., & Escalona Torres, J. (2016, October). A
María sí la ayudo pero a Jaime no puedo ayudarle
más: Speaker expectations and the processing of
geographically-variable
structures. Paper
presented at the 2016
Hispanic Linguistic Symposium. Georgetown
University, Washington,
D.C.
Leal, T., Slabakova, R., & Farmer, T. (2017). The
fine-tuning of linguistic expectations over the
course of L2
learning. Studies
in Second Language
Acquisition, 39, 493–525. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levon, E. (2006). Hearing
‘gay’: Prosody, interpretation and the affective
judgments of men’s
speech. American
Speech, 81, 56–78. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levon, E. (2007). Sexuality
in context: Variation and the sociolinguistic
perception of
identity. Language
in
Society, 36, 533–554. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levon, E. (2014). Categories,
stereotypes, and the linguistic perception of
sexuality. Language
in
Society, 43, 539–566. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levon, E., & Buchstaller, I. (2015). Perception,
cognition, and linguistic structure: The effect of
linguistic modularity and cognitive style on
sociolinguistic
processing. Language
Variation and
Change, 27, 319–348. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, X. (2010). Sociolinguistic
variation in the speech of learners of Chinese as
a second
language. Language
Learning, 60, 366–408. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, X. (2014). Variation
in subject pronominal expression in L2
Chinese. Studies in
Second Language
Acquisition, 36, 39–68. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Linford, B., & Shin, N. L. (2013). Lexical
frequency effects on L2 Spanish subject pronoun
expression. In J. C. Amaro, G. Lord, A. de Prada Pérez, & J. E. Aaron (Eds.), Selected
proceedings of the 16th Hispanic Linguistics
Symposium (pp. 175–189). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liskin-Gasparro, J. (2000). The
use of tense-aspect morphology in Spanish oral
narratives: Exploring the perceptions of advanced
learners. Hispania, 83, 830–844. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Long, M. (1990). The
least a Second Language Acquisition theory needs
to explain. TESOL
Quarterly, 24, 649–666. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Long, M. (1996). The
role of the linguistic environment in second
language
acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook
of second language
acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Long, M., & Porter, P. (1985). Group
work, interlanguage talk, and second language
acquisition. TESOL
Quarterly, 19, 207–228. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lumley, T., & O’Sullivan, B. (2005). The
effect of test-taker gender, audience and topic on
task performance in tape-mediated assessment of
speaking. Language
Testing, 22, 415–437. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mackey, A. (Ed.) (2012). Input,
interaction, and corrective feedback in L2
classrooms. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacWhinney, B. (2001). The
Competition Model: The input, the context, and the
brain. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition
and second language
instruction (pp. 69–90). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacWhinney, B. (2008). A
Unified
Model. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook
of cognitive linguistics and second language
acquisition (pp. 341–371). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Milroy, L. (1980). Language
and social
networks. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (1985). Linguistic
change, social network, and speaker
innovation. Journal
of
Linguistics, 21, 339–384. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Molnar, M., Ibáñez-Molina, A., & Carreiras, M. (2015). Interlocutor
identity affects language activation in
bilinguals. Journal
of Memory and
Language, 81, 91–104. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mougeon, R., Nasadi, T., & Rehner, K. (2004). The
sociolinguistic competence of immersion
students. Bristol, UK: Multilingual matters.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moonwomon-Baird, B. (1997). Toward
a study of lesbian
speech. In A. Livia & K. Hall (Eds.), Queerly
phrased: Language, gender, and
sexuality (pp. 202–213). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Niedzielski, N. (1999). The
effect of social information on the perception of
sociolinguistic
variables. Journal
of Language and Social
Psychology, 18, 62–85. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Norton, B. (2010). Language
and
identity. In N. Hornberger & S. McKay (Eds.), Sociolinguistics
and language
education (pp. 349–369). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ortega, L. (2011). SLA
after the social turn: Where cognitivism and its
alternatives
stand. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative
approaches in second language
acquisition (pp. 167–180). New York, NY: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ortega, L. (2013). SLA
for the 21st century: Disciplinary progress,
transdisciplinary relevance, and the
bi/multilingual
turn. Language
Learning, 63, 1–24. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Philp, J., & Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (this
volume). On the
role of the interlocutor in second language
development: A cognitive-interactionist
approach. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Cross-theoretical
explorations of interlocutors and their individual
differences (pp. 19–50). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Plough, I., & Gass, S. M. (1993). Interlocutor
and task familiarity: Effects on interactional
structure. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks
and language learning: Integrating theory and
practice (pp. 35–56). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Podesva, R. (2007). Phonation
type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto
in constructing a
persona. Journal of
Sociolinguistics, 11, 478–504. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Podesva, R. (2008). Three
sources of stylistic
meaning. Texas
Linguistic
Forum, 51, 134–143.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Polio, C., Gass, S., & Chapin, L. (2006). Using
stimulated recall to investigate native speaker
perceptions in native-nonnative speaker
interaction. Studies
in Second Language
Acquisition, 28, 237–267. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poteau, C. (2011). Effects
of interlocutor familiarity on second language
learning in
groupwork (Unpublished
doctoral
dissertation). Temple University, Philadelphia.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Preston, D. (1993). Variationist
linguistics and second language
acquisition. Second
Language
Research, 9, 153–172. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Preston, D. (2000). Three
kinds of sociolinguistics and SLA: a
psycholinguistic
perspective. In B. Swierzbin, M. Anderson, C. Klee, & E. Tarone (Eds.), Social
and cognitive factors in
SLA (pp. 3–30). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Preston, D. (2002). A
variationist perspective on SLA: Psycholinguistic
concerns. In R. Kaplan (Ed.), Oxford
handbook of applied
linguistics (pp. 141–159). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Preston, D. (2004). Three
kinds of sociolinguistics: a psycholinguistic
perspective. In C. Fought (Ed.), Sociolinguistic
variation: Critical
reflections (pp. 140–160). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Regan, V., Howard, M., & Lemée, I. (2009). The
acquisition of sociolinguistic competence in a
study abroad
context. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rickford, J., & McNair-Knox, F. (1994). Addressee-
and topic-influenced style
shift. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic
perspectives on
register (pp. 235–276). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rickford, J., & Price, M. (2013). Girlz
II women: Age-grading, language change and
stylistic
variation. Journal
of
Sociolinguistics, 17, 143–179. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ringer-Hilfinger, K. (2012). Learner
acquisition of dialect variation in a study abroad
context: The case of the Spanish
[θ]. Foreign
Language
Annals, 45, 430–446. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robinson, P. (1995). Task
complexity and second language narrative
discourse. Language
Learning, 45, 99–140. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robinson, P. (2001). Task
complexity, task difficulty, and task production:
Exploring interactions in a componential
framework. Applied
Linguistics, 22, 27–57. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive
complexity and task sequencing: A review of
studies in Componential Framework for second
language task
design. IRAL, 43, 1–33. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robinson, P. (2007). Task
complexity, theory of mind, and intentional
reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production,
interaction, uptake and perceptions of task
difficulty. IRAL, 45, 193–213. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rogers, H., Smyth, R., & Jacobs, G. (2003). Vowel
reduction as a cue to distinguishing gay- and
straight-sounding male
speech. In J. T. Jensen & G. Van Herk (Eds.), Proceedings
of the annual meeting of the Canadian Linguistics
Society (pp. 167–176). Ottawa: University of Ottawa.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rothman, J. (2007). Pragmatic
solutions for syntactic problems: Understanding
some L2 syntactic errors in terms of pragmatic
deficits. In S. Bauuw, F. Drijkoningen, & M. Pinto (Eds.), Romance
languages and linguistic
theory (pp. 299–320). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Salgado-Robles, F. (2011). The
acquisition of sociolinguistic variation by
learners of Spanish in a study abroad
context (Unpublished
doctoral
dissertation). University of Florida, Gainesville.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Salgado-Robles, F. (2014). Variación
dialectal por aprendientes de español en un
contexto de inmersión en el extranjero: Un
análisis cuantitativo del uso leísta en el
discurso oral y
escrito. Lenguas
Modernas, 43, 97–112.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Salgado-Robles, F. (2018). Efectos
del contexto de inmersión en la competencia
sociolingüística de EL2: La adquisición del laísmo
madrileño. Círculo
de Lingüística Aplicada a la
Comunicación, 74, 307–332. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Samper Padilla, J. A. (2011). Sociophonological
variation and change in
Spain. In M. Díaz-Campos (Ed.), The
handbook of Hispanic
sociolinguistics (pp. 98–120). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sankoff, D. (1988). Sociolinguistics
and syntactic
variation. In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics:
The Cambridge
survey (pp. 140–161). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schilling-Estes, N. (2004). Exploring
intertextuality in the sociolinguistic
interview. In C. Fought (Ed.), Sociolinguistic
variation: Critical
reflections (pp. 44–61). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schumann, J. (1976). Second
language acquisition: The Pidginization
Hypothesis. Language
Learning, 26, 391–408. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schumann, J. (1978). The
relationship of pidginization, creolization and
decreolization to second language
acquisition. Language
Learning, 28, 367–379. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schwenter, S., & Torres-Cacoullos, R. (2008). Defaults
and indeterminacy in temporal grammaticalization:
The ‘perfect’ road to
perfective. Language
Variation and
Change, 20, 1–39. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shea, C., & Curtin, S. (2011). Experience,
representations and the production of second
language
allophones. Second
Language
Research, 27, 229–250. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shin, N. L., & Otheguy, R. (2013). Social
class and gender impacting change in bilingual
settings: Spanish subject pronoun use in New
York. Language in
Society, 42, 429–452. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Silva-Corvalán, C. (1997). Variación
sintáctica en el discurso oral: Problemas
metodológicos. In F. Moreno Fernández (Ed.), Trabajo
de sociolingüística
hispánica (pp. 115–135). Alcalá, Spain: Universidad de Alcalá (UAH) Madrid.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smyth, R., & Rogers, H. (2002). Phonetics,
gender, and sexual
orientation. In Proceedings
of the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Linguistics
Association (pp. 299–301). Montreal: l’Universite du Quebec au Montreal.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Squires, L. (2013). It
don’t go both ways: Limited bidirectionality in
sociolinguistic
perception. Journal
of
Sociolinguistics, 17, 200–237. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Squires, L. (2014a). Talker
specificity and the perception of grammatical
variation. Language,
Cognition and
Neuroscience, 29, 856–876. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Squires, L. (2014b). Knowledge,
processing, evaluation: Testing the
sociolinguistic perception of English subject-verb
agreement
variation. Journal
of English
Linguistics, 42, 144–172. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Staum Casasanto, L. (2008). Does
social information influence sentence
processing? Proceedings
of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science
Society, 30, 799–804.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tarone, E. (2007). Sociolinguistic
approaches to second language acquisition
research –
1997–2007. Modern
Language
Journal, 91, 837–848. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tarone, E. (2010). Social
context and cognition in SLA: A variationist
perspective. In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive
perspectives on language use and language
learning (pp. 54–72). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tarone, E., & Liu, G. Q. (1995). Situational
context, variation, and second language
acquisition. In G. Cook & B. Seidhofer (Eds.), Principle
and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in
honour of H. G.
Widdowson (pp. 107–124). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tarone, E., & Parrish, B. (1988). Task-related
variation in interlanguage: The case of
articles. Language
Learning, 38, 21–44. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Travis, C. E. (2007). Genre
effects on subject expression in Spanish: Priming
in narrative and
conversation. Language
Variation and
Change, 19, 101–35. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Valdman, A. (1988). Classroom
foreign language learning and language variation:
The notion of pedagogical
norms. World
Englishes, 7, 221–236. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Valdman, A. (2002). The
acquisition of sociostylistic and sociopragmatic
variation by instructed second language learners:
The elaboration of pedagogical
norms. In C. Blyth (Ed.), The
sociolinguistics of foreign-language classrooms:
Contributions of the native, the near-native, and
the non-native
speaker (pp. 57–78). Boston, MA: Heinle.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
VanPatten, B., & Benati, A. G. (2010). Key
terms in second language
acquisition. London, UK: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
VanPatten, B., & Williams, J. (Eds.) (2014). Theories
in second language acquisition: An
introduction. New York, NY: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Willis, E., Geeslin, K. & Henriksen, N. (2009, October). The
acquisition of /θ/ by study abroad learners in
León. Spain. Paper
presented at the 13th
Hispanic Linguistics
Symposium, San Juan,
Puerto Rico.
Woolsey, D. (2008). From
theory to research: Contextual predictions of
“estar + adjective” and the study of the SLA of
Spanish copula
choice. Bilingualism:
Language and
Cognition, 11, 277–295. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhang, Q. (2005). A
Chinese yuppie in Beijing: Phonological variation
and the construction of a new professional
identity. Language
in
Society, 34, 431–466. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhang, Q. (2008). Rhotacization
and the “Beijing Smooth Operator”: The social
meaning of a linguistic
variable. Journal
of
Sociolinguistics, 12, 201–222. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)