Chapter published in:
Cross-theoretical Explorations of Interlocutors and their Individual Differences
Edited by Laura Gurzynski-Weiss
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 53] 2020
► pp. 189208
Atkinson, D., Churchill, E., Nishino, T., & Okada, H.
(2007) Alignment and interaction in a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 91(2), 169–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Babel, M.
(2012) Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation. Journal of Phonetics, 40, 177–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M.
(1981) The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Beebe, L.
(1980) Risk-taking and the language learner. In H. Seliger & M. Long (Eds.), Classroom-oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 39–66). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Cameron, L.
(2003) Challenges for ELT from the expansion in teaching children. ELT Journal, 57(2), 105–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L.
(2014) The systems view of life: A unifying vision. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.
(1996) Using language. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Pickering, M. J., & Sorace, A.
(2008) Alignment in second language dialogue. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(4), 528–556. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cowley, S. J.
(2011) Distributed language. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dale, R., & Spivey, M.
(2006) Unraveling the dyad: Using recurrence analysis to explore patterns of syntactic coordination between children and caregivers in conversation. Language Learning, 56(3), 391–430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A.
(2003) Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. New York, NY: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z.
(2009) Individual differences: Interplay of learner characteristics and learning environment. Language Learning, 59(Suppl 1), 230–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P. D., & Henry, A.
(Eds.) (2015) Motivational dynamics in language learning. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J. W.
(2014) Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 359–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duran, N., & Dale, R.
(2014) Perspective-taking in dialogue as self-organization under social constraints. New Ideas in Psychology, 32(1), 131–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2009) Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from usage. Language Learning, 59(Suppl. 1), 90–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emirbayar, M.
(1997) Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C. A.
(1975) Toward a characterization of English foreigner talk. Anthropological Linguistics, 17(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Fusaroli, R., & Tylén, K.
(Eds.) (2014) Special Issue on linguistic coordination: Models, dynamics, and effects. New Ideas in Psychology, 32(1), 115–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gallotti, M., & Frith, C. D.
(2013) Social cognition in the we-mode. Trends in Cognitive Science, 17(4), 160–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, S.
(2017) Enactivist interventions: Rethinking the mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garrod, S., & Anderson, A.
(1987) Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic coordination. Cognition, 27(2), 181–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., & Mackey, A.
(2006) Input, interaction, and output. In K. Bardovi-Harlig & Z. Dörnyei (Eds.), Themes in SLA research: AILA Review, 19, 3–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., & Varonis, E. M.
(1984) The effect of familiarity on the comprehensibility of nonnative speech. Language Learning, 34(1), 65–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K.
this volume). Variationist perspective(s) on interlocutor individual differences. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss Ed. Cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences pp. 127 157 Amsterdam, Netherlands John Benjamins
Ghanem, R.
(2017) Nonnative speakers’ alignment of linguistic features with different interlocutors. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.Google Scholar
Giles, H., & Smith, P.
(1979) Accommodation theory: Optimal levels of conversation. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 45–65). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Guiora, A., Acton, W., Erard, R., & Strickland, F.
(1980) The effects of benzodiazepine (Valium) on permeability of language ego boundaries. Language Learning, 30(2), 351–363. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, F.
(2012) Agency. In D. Favareau, P. Cobley, & K. Kull (Eds.), A more developed sign: Interpreting the work of Jesper Hoffmeyer (pp. 13–16). Tartu, Finland: Tartu University Press.Google Scholar
Gries, S. T.
(2005) Syntactic priming: A corpus-based approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34(4), 365–399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, L.
this volume). Synthesizing cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss Ed. Cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences pp. 247 266 Amsterdam, Netherlands John Benjamins
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Baralt, M.
(2014) Exploring learner perception and use of task-based interactional feedback in FTF and CMC modes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(1), 1–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, L.
(2015) Beyond member-checking: A dialogic approach to the research interview. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(1), 23–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H.
(2016) A dynamic ensemble for second language research: Putting complexity theory into practice. Modern Language Journal, 100(4), 741–756. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hiver, P. & Al-Hoorie, A. H.
(2020) Research methods for complexity theory in applied linguistics. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Iacoboni, M.
(2008) Mirroring people: The new science of how we connect with others. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.Google Scholar
Jackson, P., & Cosca, C.
(1974) The inequality of educational opportunity in the Southwest: An observational study of ethnically mixed classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 219–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Joaquin, A. D. L., & Schumann, J. H.
(Eds.) (2013) Exploring the interactional instinct. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keller-Cohen, D.
(2015) Audience design and social relations in aging. Research on Aging, 37(7), 741–762. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kelso, J. A. S.
(1999) The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kim, M., Horton, W. S., & Bradlow, A. R.
(2011) Phonetic convergence in spontaneous conversations as a function of interlocutor language distance. Laboratory Phonology, 2(1), 125–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
King, J.
(Ed.) (2016) The dynamic interplay between context and language learner. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kirk, S.
(2017, September). The function of rhythm and interactive alignment in creating confluence in conversation. Paper presented at the British Association of Applied Linguistics Conference, University of Leeds, UK.
Lantolf, J. P.
this volume). I ~ You > You ~ Me: The hidden other in L2 development. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss Ed. Cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences pp. 79 97 Amsterdam, Netherlands John Benjamins
Larsen-Freeman, D.
(1997) Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 140–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) A complexity theory approach to second language development/acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 48–72). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2015) Ten ‘lessons’ from Complex Dynamic Systems Theory: What is on offer. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 11–19). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2017a) Shifting metaphors: From computer input to ecological affordances to adaptation. In Proceedings from the IATEFL 50th Anniversary Conference, Birmingham (pp. 10–19). Kent, UK: IATEFL.Google Scholar
(2017b) Complexity Theory: The lessons continue. In L. Ortega & Z.-H. Han (Eds.), Complexity theory in language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman (pp. 11–50). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017c, October). On particularizing second language development. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, The Ohio State University.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L.
(2008a) Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2008b) Research methodology on language development from a Complex Systems perspective. Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 200–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M.
(1991) An introduction to second language acquisition research. London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Lee, N., Mikesell, L., Joaquin, D. J., Mates, A. W., & Schumann, J. H.
(2009) The interactional instinct: The evolution and acquisition of language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linell, P.
(2009) Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Long, M. H.
(1983) Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5(2), 177–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Macqueen, S.
(2012) The emergence of patterns in second language writing: A sociocognitive exploration of lexical trails. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mascolo, M. F., van Geert, P., Steenbeek, H., & Fischer, K. W.
(2016) What can dynamic systems models of development offer to the study of developmental psychopathology? In D. Cicchetti (Ed.), Developmental psychopathology (3rd ed., pp. 665–716). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., & Mackey, A.
(2006) Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning, 56(4), 693–720. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meadows, S.
(1993) The child as thinker. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Namy, L., Nygaard, L. C., & Sauerteig, D.
(2012) Gender differences in vocal accommodation: The role of perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21, 422–432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norton, B.
(2013) Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation (2nd ed.). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L., & Han, Z.-H.
(Eds.) (2017) Complexity Theory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oullier, O., de Guzman, G. C., Jantzen, K. J., Lagarde, J., & Kelso, J. A. S.
(2008) Social coordination dynamics: Measuring human bonding. Social Neuroscience, 3(2), 178–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pardo, J. S.
(2006) On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(4), 2382–2393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S.
(2004) The interactive-alignment model: Developments and refinements. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 212–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pikovsky, A., Rosenblum, M., & Kurths, J.
(2001) Synchronization. A universal concept in nonlinear sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ricca, B.
(2012) Beyond teaching methods: A complexity approach. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 9(2), 31–51.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sato, C.
(1982) Ethnic styles in classroom discourse. In M. Hines & W. Rutherford (Eds.), On TESOL ’81 (pp. 11–24). Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
Serafini, E. J.
(2017) Exploring the dynamic long-term interaction between cognitive and psychosocial resources in adult second language development at varying proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 101(2), 369–390. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
this volume). The impact of learner perceptions of interlocutor individual differences on learner possible selves during a short-term experience abroad. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss Ed. Cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences pp. 209 243 Amsterdam, Netherlands John Benjamins
Snow, C.
(1972) Mothers’ speech to children learning language. Child Development, 43(2), 549–565. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spevack, S. C., Falandays, J. B., Batzloff, B., & Spivey, M. J.
(2018) Interactivity of language. Linguistics and Language Compass. wileyonlinelibrary​.com​/journal​/lnc3 (June 30 2018) doi:  Crossref
Spivey, M.
(2013) The emergence of intentionality. Ecological Psychology, 25(3), 233–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T.
(2008) Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strogatz, S.
(2003) Sync: How order emerges from chaos in the universe, nature, and daily life. New York, NY: Hachette Books.Google Scholar
Tarone, E.
(2015) Second language acquisition in applied linguistics: 1925–2015 and beyond. Applied Linguistics, 36(4), 444–453. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E., & Swain, M.
(1995) A sociolinguistic perspective on second-language use in immersion classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 79(2), 166–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, E.
(2005) Dynamic systems theory and the complexity of change. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 15(2), 255–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thibault, P.
(2015) The microgenesis of meaning and value: Differentiation-articulation in brain and body and the text-context relation in systemic functional linguistics. In G. Kvåle, E. Maagerø, & A. Veum (Eds.), Kontekst, språk og multimodaltitet (pp. 201–269). Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget Vigmostad & Bjørke AS.Google Scholar
Thoms, J. J.
(2014) An ecological view of whole-class discussions in a second language literature classroom: Teacher reformulations as affordances for learning. Modern Language Journal, 98(3), 724–741. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tognoli, E., & Kelso, S.
(2015) The coordination dynamics of social neuromarkers. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, article 563, 1–16.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Kennedy, S.
(2014) Interactive alignment between bilingual interlocutors: Evidence from two information-exchange tasks. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17(4), 822–836. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ushioda, E.
(2015) Context and complex dynamic systems theory. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 47–54). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Van Engen, K. J., Baese-Berk, M., Baker, R. E., Kim, M., & Bradlow, A. R.
(2010) The Wildcat Corpus of native- and foreign-accented English: Communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles. Language & Speech, 53(4), 510–540. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M., de Bot, K., & Lowie, W.
(Eds.) (2011) A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Hiver, Phil, Ali H. Al-Hoorie & Diane Larsen-Freeman
2022. Toward a transdisciplinary integration of research purposes and methods for complex dynamic systems theory: beyond the quantitative–qualitative divide. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:1  pp. 7 ff. Crossref logo
2022. Combinations and Connections: Reaching Across Disciplinary Boundaries. The Modern Language Journal 106:S1  pp. 132 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 october 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.