Chapter published in:

Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and L2 Writing Development
Edited by Gary G. Fogal and Marjolijn H. Verspoor
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 54] 2020
► pp. 109–131

Chapter 5. Profiling the dynamic changes of syntactic complexity in L2 academic writing

A multilevel synchrony method

R. Rosmawati | The University of Sydney

This chapter investigates changes in the textual manifestation of the syntactic complexity construct in second language (L2) academic writing at the advanced level through linguistically profiling the academic essays of an L2 graduate student in a Master of Education (TESOL) program in Australia. This work explores the dynamic changes of the subconstructs of syntactic complexity at the sentential, clausal, and phrasal levels synchronously through the perspective of complex dynamic systems theory (CDST). To do so, this chapter also introduces a multilevel synchrony method which translates the feature of nestedness of language structure into data mapping, exploration, and profiling. The resulting profile offers visual access, through numerical data and graphs, to the mechanisms that underpin the changes manifest in the language produced by the learner. The findings are then discussed within the framework of CDST and the characteristics of academic writing in English.

Keywords: L2 writing, multilevel synchrony method, syntactic complexity, CDST

Published online: 04 June 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.54.05ros

References

Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bofman, T.

(1989) Attainment of syntactic and morphological accuracy by advanced language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 17–34.

Bhowmik, S.

(2016) Agency, identity and ideology in L2 writing: Insights from the EAP classroom. Writing & Pedagogy, 8(2), 275–308.

Biber, D., & Gray, B.

(2016) Grammatical complexity in academic English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K.

(2011) Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5–35.

Biber, D., Gray, B., & Staples, S.

(2016) Predicting patterns of grammatical complexity across language exam task types and proficiency levels. Applied Linguistics, 37(5), 639–668.

Bulté, B., & Housen, A.

(2012) Defining and operationalising L2 complexity. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in SLA (pp. 21–46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

(2014) Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26(1), 42–65.

(2018) Syntactic complexity in L2 writing: Individual pathways and emerging group trends. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 147–164.

Casanave, C. P.

(1994) Language development in students’ journals. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(3), 179–201.

Caspi, T., & Lowie, W.

(2010) A dynamic perspective on L2 lexical development in academic English. In R. Chacón-Beltrán, C. Abello-Contesse, & M. d. M. Torreblanca-López (Eds.), Insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning (pp. 41–60). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Chan, H., Verspoor, M. H., & Vahtrick, L.

(2015) Dynamic development in speaking versus writing in identical twins. Language Learning, 65(2), 298–325.

Cooper, T.

(1976) Measuring written syntactic patterns of second language learners of German. Journal of Educational Research, 69(5), 176–183.

de Bot, K., & Larsen-Freeman, D.

(2011) Researching second language development from a dynamic systems theory perspective. In M. H. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic systems approach to second language development (pp. 5–23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. H.

(2007) A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7–21.

De Clercq, B., & Housen, A.

(2019) The development of morphological complexity: A cross-linguistic study of L2 French and English. Second Language Research, 35(1), 71–97.

Hokamura, M.

(2018) The dynamics of complexity, accuracy, and fluency: A longitudinal case study of Japanese learners’ English writing. JALT Journal, 40(1), 23–46.

Homburg, T.

(1984) Holistic evaluation of ESL compositions: Can it be validated objectively? TESOL Quarterly, 18, 87–107.

Housen, A., & Kuiken, F.

(2009) Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–473.

Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.

(2012) Complexity, accuracy, and fluency: Definitions, measurement and research. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Kerz, E., Wiechmann, D., & Riedel, F.

(2017) Implicit learning in the crowd: Investigating the role of awareness in the acquisition of L2 knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(4), 711–734.

Khushik, G. A., & Huhta, A.

(2019) Investigating syntactic complexity in EFL learners’ writing across common European framework of reference levels A1, A2, and B1. Applied Linguistics.

Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.

(2008) Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(1), 48–60.

(2012) Syntactic complexity, lexical variation and accuracy as a function of task complexity and proficiency level in L2 writing and speaking. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 143–169). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Kyle, K.

(2016) Measuring syntactic development in L2 writing: Fine grained indices of syntactic complexity and usage-based indices of syntactic sophistication (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/alesl_diss/35/ (7 January 2020).

Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. A.

(2018) Measuring syntactic complexity in L2 writing using fine- grained clausal and phrasal indices. The Modern Language Journal, 102(2), 333–349.

Larsen-Freeman, D.

(1997) Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165.

(2006) The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590–619.

(2017) Complexity theory: The lessons continue. In L. Ortega & Z. Han (Eds.), Complexity theory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman (pp. 11–50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

(2019) On language learner agency: A complex dynamic systems theory perspective. Modern Language Journal, 103(Supplement 2019), 61–79.

Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L.

(2008) Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 200–213.

Lu, X.

(2010) Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 474–496.

(2011) A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 36–62.

Lu, X., & Ai, H.

(2015) Syntactic complexity in college-level English writing: Differences among writers with diverse L1 backgrounds. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 16–27.

Neary-Sundquist, C. A.

(2016) Syntactic complexity at multiple proficiency levels of L2 German speech. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, Early View.

Norris, J. M., & Manchón, R.

(2012) Investigating L2 writing development from multiple perspectives: Issues in theory and research. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 221–244). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.

Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.

(2009) Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578.

Ortega, L.

(2003) Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 492–518.

Pallotti, G.

(2009) CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 590–601.

Park, J. H.

(2017) Syntactic complexity as a predictor of second language writing proficiency and writing quality (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, Ann Arbor.

Parkinson, J., & Musgrave, J.

(2014) Development of noun phrase complextiy in the writing of English for academic purposes students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14, 48–59.

Penris, W., & Verspoor, M. H.

(2017) Academic writing development: A complex, dynamic process. In S. Pfenninger & J. Navracsics (Eds.), Future research directions for Applied Linguistics (pp. 215–242). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Perkins, K.

(1980) Using objective methods of attained writing proficiency to discriminate among holistic evaluations. TESOL Quarterly, 14(1), 61–69.

Rosmawati, R.

(2014) Second language developmental dynamics: How dynamic systems theory accounts for issues in second language learning. The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 31(1), 66–80.

(2016) Dynamic development and interactions of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in ESL academic writing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Schmidt, R.

(1995) Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1–63). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Centre.

Sharma, A.

(1980) Syntactic maturity: Assessing writing proficiency in a second language. In R. Silverstein (Ed.), Occassional papers in linguistics (pp. 318–325). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University.

Taguchi, N., Crawford, W., & Wetzel, D.

(2013) What linguistic features are indicative of writing quality? A case of argumentative essays in a college composition program. TESOL Quarterly, 47(2), 420–430.

van Geert, P.

(2008) The dynamic systems approach in the study of L1 and L2 acquisition: An introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 179–199.

van Geert, P., & van Dijk, M.

(2002) Focus on variability: New tools to study intra- individual variability in developmental data. Infant Behaviour and Development, 25, 340–374.

Vercellotti, M. L.

(2017) The development of complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language performance: A longitudinal study. Applied Linguistics, 38(1), 90–111.

Verspoor, M. H., Lowie, W., Chan, H., & Vahtrick, L.

(2017) Linguistic complexity in second language development: Variability and variation at advanced stages. Recherches en Didactique des Langues et des Cultures, 14(1), 1–27.

Verspoor, M. H., Lowie, W., & van Dijk, M.

(2008) Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 214–231.

Verspoor, M. H., Schmid, M. S., & Xu, X.

(2012) A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(3), 239–263.

Vyatkina, N.

(2012) The development of second language writing complexity in groups and individuals: A longitudinal learner corpus study. The Modern Language Journal, 96(4), 576–598.

(2013) Specific syntactic complexity: Developmental profiling of individuals based on an annotated learner corpus. The Modern Language Journal, 97(S1), 11–30.

Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H. Y.

(1998) Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. Manoa HI: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawai’i.

Yang, W., Lu, X., & Weigle, S. C.

(2015) Different topics, different discourse: Relationships among writing topic, measures of syntactic complexity, and judgments of writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 28(1), 53–67.

Yang, W., & Sun, Y.

(2015) Dynamic development of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in multilingual learners’ L1, L2 and L3 writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(2), 298–308.

Yoon, H. J.

(2017) Linguistic complexity in L2 writing revisited: Issues of topics, proficiency, and construct multidimensionality. System, 66, 130–141.