Chapter published in:
Languaging in Language Learning and Teaching: A collection of empirical studies
Edited by Wataru Suzuki and Neomy Storch
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 55] 2020
► pp. 288–307

Exploring the mediating role of emotions expressed in L2 written languaging in ESL learner text revisions

| Université du Québec à Montréal
| Université du Québec à Montréal
Little is known about the relationship between second language use and written languaging (e.g., Ishikawa & Suzuki, 2016; Suzuki, 2012). The few studies that have investigated the question highlight difficulties in understanding how to correct errors following written corrective feedback (e.g., Simard, Guénette, & Bergeron, 2015; Suzuki, 2012). Following the broaden-and-build theory, (Fredrickson, 2001), we hypothesized that emotions expressed in the written languaging of high school ESL learners (n = 42) produced immediately after receiving their corrected text would be related to text revision successfulness (i.e., correct revision of an incorrect form). Our results show that emotions expressed in the written languaging are not only associated with error rates but also positive emotions predict higher rates of successful revision.
Keywords: L2 written production, written languaging, emotions
Published online: 14 August 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.55.13sim
References

References

Aubrey, S.
(2017) Measuring flow in the EFL classroom: Learners’ perceptions of inter- and intra-cultural task-based interactions. TESOL Quarterly, 51 (3), 661–692. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Y., & Norst, M. J.
(1989) Fear, dependence and loss of self-esteem: Affective barriers in second language learning among adults. RELC Journal, 20 (2), 61–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Czimmermann, E., & Piniel, K.
(2016) Advanced language learners’ experience of flow in the Hungarian EFL classroom. In P. D. MacIntyre, T. Gregersen, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Positive psychology in SLA (pp. 193–214). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A. R.
(2012) L’autre moi-même. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
(1994) Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York, NY: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J. M.
(2005) Investigating the psychological and the emotional dimensions in instructed language learning: Obstacles and possibilities. The Modern Language Journal, 89 (3), 367–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, J. M., & MacIntyre, P. D.
(2014) The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4 (2), 237–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z.
(2007) Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dowden, T., Pittaway, S., Yost, H., & McCarthy, R.
(2013) Students’ perceptions of written feedback in teacher education: Ideally feedback is a continuing two-way communication that encourages progress. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38 (3), 349–362. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J.
(2003) A study of flow theory in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 87 (4), 499–518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L.
(2001) The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden and build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56 (3), 218–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) The value of positive emotions. American Scientist, 91 (4), 330–335. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. Selega (Eds.), A life worth living: Contributions to positive psychology (pp. 85–103). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2013) Updated thinking on positivity ratios. American Psychologist, 68 (9), 814–822. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L., Tugade, M. M., Waugh, C. E., & Larkin, G.
(2003) What good are positive emotions in crises? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the United States on 11 September 2001. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 84 (2), 365–376. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C.
(2005) Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition & Emotion, 19 (3), 313–332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D.
(1993) On the measurement of affective variables in second language learning. Language Learning, 43 (2), 157–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gregersen, T., MacIntyre, P. D., & Meza, M. D.
(2014) The motion of emotion: Idiodynamic case studies of learners’ foreign language anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 98 (2), 574–588. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guénette, D.
(2007) Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies on feedback on writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16 (1), 40–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guénette, D., & Lyster, R.
(2013) Written corrective feedback and its challenges for pre-service ESL teachers. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 69 (2), 129–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J.
(1986) Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70 (2), 125–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, F.
(1998) The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7 (3), 255–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, F., & Hyland, K.
(2001) Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10 (3), 185–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Imai, Y.
(2010) Emotions in SLA: New insights from collaborative learning for an EFL classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 94 (2), 278–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ishikawa, M.
(2018) Written languaging, learners’ proficiency levels and L2 grammar learning. System, 74 , 50–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Metanotes (written languaging) in a translation task: Do L2 proficiency and task outcome matter? Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 9 (1), 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Examining the effect of written languaging: The role of metanotes as a mediator of second language learning. Language Awareness, 22 (3), 220–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ishikawa, M., & Suzuki, W.
(2016) The effect of written languaging on learning the hypothetical conditional in English. System, 58, 97–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kirchhoff, C.
(2011) L2 extensive reading and flow: Clarifying the relationship. Reading in a Foreign Language, 2 , 192–212.Google Scholar
Kuhbandner, C., Aslan, A., Emmerdinger, K., & Murayama, K.
(2016) Providing extrinsic reward for test performance undermines long-term memory acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landis J. R., & Koch, G. G.
(1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33 (1), 159–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, P. D.
(2007) Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. The Modern Language Journal, 91 (4), 564–576. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C.
(1994) The subtle effects of language anxiety on cognitive processing in the second language. Language Learning, 44 (2), 283–305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1991) Methods and results in the study of anxiety and language learning: A review of the literature. Language Learning, 41 (1), 85–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, P. D., Gregersen, T., & Mercer, S.
(2016) Positive psychology in SLA. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M.
(2005) Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mahfoodh, O. H. A.
(2017) “I feel disappointed”: EFL university students’ emotional responses towards teacher written feedback. Assessing Writing, 31 , 53–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mahfoodh, O. H. A., & Pandian, A.
(2011) A qualitative case study of EFL students’ affective reactions to and perceptions of their teachers’ written feedback. English Language Teaching, 4 (1), 14–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M.
(2011) Writing to learn the language: issues in theory and research. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 61–82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moradian, M. R., Miri, M., & Nasab, M. H.
(2017) Contribution of written languaging to enhancing the efficiency of WCF. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27 (2), 406–426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murayama, K., Matsumoto, M., Izuma, K., & Matsumoto, K.
(2010) Neural basis of the undermining effect of monetary reward on intrinsic motivation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 107 (49), 20911–20916. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pavlenko, A.
(2005) Emotion and multilingualism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, S., Pope, D., & Holyoak, L.
(2013) Can we meet their expectations? Experiences and perceptions of feedback in first year undergraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38 (3), 260–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, G., Hirsh, J. B., & Anderson, A. K.
(2007) Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104 (1), 383–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R., & Deci, E.
(2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 68–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz-Friesel, M.
(2013) Sprache und emotion. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.Google Scholar
Simard, D., Guénette, D., & Bergeron, A.
(2015) L2 learners’ understanding of written corrective feedback: Insights from their metalinguistic reflections. Language awareness, 24 (3), 233–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, F. S., & Horwitz, E. K.
(1986) The effect of induced anxiety on the denotative and interpretive content of second language speech. TESOL Quarterly, 20 (1), 131–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N.
(2008) Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness, 17 (2), 95–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, W.
(2012) Written languaging, direct correction, and second language writing revision. Language Learning, 62 (4), 1110–1133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, W., & Itagaki, N.
(2009) Languaging in grammar exercises by Japanese EFL learners of differing proficiency. System, 37 (2), 217–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M.
(2000) The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2010) Talking-it through: Languaging as a source of learning. In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning (pp. 112–130). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
(1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82 (3), 320–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3-4), 285–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) ‘Oh, I get it now!’ From production to comprehension in second language learning. In D. M. Brinton & O. Kagan (Eds.), Heritage language acquisition: A new field emerging (pp. 301–320). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Swain, M., Lapkin, S., Knouzi, I., Suzuki, W., & Brooks, L.
(2009) Languaging: University students learn the grammatical concept of voice in French. The Modern Language Journal, 93 (1), 5–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M., & Watanabe, Y.
(2013) Languaging: Collaborative dialogue as a source of second language learning. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 3218–3225). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Talyzina, N. F.
(1981) Psychology and the learning process. Moscow: Progress Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S.
(1986) Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1987) Thought and word. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 1, pp. 243–285). New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
Waugh, C. E., Wager, T. D., Fredrickson, B. L., Noll, D. C., & Taylor, S. F.
(2008) The neural correlates of trait resilience when anticipating and recovering from threat. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3 (4), 322–332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zacharias, N. T.
(2007) Teacher and student attitudes toward teacher feedback. RELC Journal, 38 (1), 38–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zuniga, M., & Rueb, A.
(2018) Dans le flow: l’Influence des tâches pédagogiques sur la qualité de l’expérience émotionnelle en classe de français de langue seconde. In F. Berdal-Masuy (Ed.), Emotissage. Les émotions dans l’apprentissage des langues. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Sriwidharmanely, Sriwidharmanely, Sumiyana Sumiyana, Jogiyanto H. Mustakini & Ertambang Nahartyo
2021. Encouraging positive emotions to cope with technostress’s adverse effects: insights into the broaden-and-build theory. Behaviour & Information Technology ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.