Cover not available
Part of
Writing and Language Learning: Advancing research agendas
Edited by Rosa M. Manchón
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 56] 2020
► pp. 121–144

Chapter 6
The effects of task repetition across modalities and proficiency levels

| University of Murcia
| University of Murcia
| University of Barcelona
Research on task repetition (TR) has consistently showed beneficial effects for L2 oral production in terms of CAF measures (complexity, accuracy, and fluency). However, open questions exist regarding the modality-dependency and proficiency-dependency of TR learning affordances. To advance research in these two areas, the study reported in this chapter investigated TR across modalities and L2 proficiency levels. The participants were 29 (16 high-school and 13 university) Spanish EFL learners who completed a decision-making task twice, either orally or in writing. Their task performance was assessed in terms of CAF measures using a wide range of indices. Results confirm some of the previous predictions regarding the modality-dependency of TR effects, and additional modality-related effects were also found. These findings shed light on the greater language learning affordances of writing as compared to those created by speaking tasks.
Article outline
  • Introduction
    • Task repetition and language learning: Rationale
    • Empirical research on task repetition in speaking and writing
    • The role of proficiency
  • The present study: Research questions
  • Method
    • Participants
    • Tasks and procedures
    • Data analyses procedures
    • Data analysis procedures
  • Results
    • Complexity
    • Modality-related Effects
    • Accuracy
    • Fluency
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions
  • Funding
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 20 November 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.56.06san
References (60)
References
Ahmadian, M. J. (2011). The effect of “massed” task repetitions on complexity, accuracy, and fluency: Does it transfer to a new task? Language Learning Journal, 39(3), 269–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ahmadian, M. J., & Tavakoli, M. (2010). The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency in EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 35–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Agustín-Llach, M. P. (2011). Lexical errors and accuracy in foreign language writing. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Amiryousefi, M. (2016). The differential effects of two types of task repetition on the complexity, accuracy, and fluency in computer-mediated L2 written production: A focus on computer anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(5), 1052–1068. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harling, K. (1992). The relationship of form and meaning: A cross sectional study of tense and aspect in the interlanguage of learners of English as a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 253–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harling, K., & Bofman, T. (1989). Attainment of syntactic and morphological accuracy by advanced language learners. Studies in second language acquisition, 11, 17–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birjandi, P., & Ahangari, S. (2008). Effects of task repetition on the fluency, complexity and accuracy of Iranian EFL learners. The Asian EFL Journal, 10(3), 28–52.Google Scholar
Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2012). Defining and operationalizing L2 complexity. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 21–46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 42–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M. (1996). Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 136–146). Oxford: Macmillan.Google Scholar
(2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks, second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 23–48). London: Longman.Google Scholar
(2006). Areas of research that influence L2 speaking instruction. In E. Usó-Juan & A. Martínez-Flor (Eds.), Current trends in the development and teaching of the four language skills (pp. 159–186). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018a). Introduction. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Learning language through task repetition (pp. 1–25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2018b). Learning language through task repetition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M., & Samuda, V. (2005). Integrative planning through the use of task-repetition. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 37–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Daller, H., van Hout, R., & Trefers-Daller, J. (2003). Lexical richness in the spontaneous speech of bilinguals. Applied Linguistics, 24, 197–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Jong, N., & Tillman, P. (2018). Grammatical structures and oral fluency in immediate task repetition. Trigrams across repeated performances. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Learning language through task repetition (pp. 43–73). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Planning and task-based research: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Ed.). Planning and task performance in a second language. (pp. 3–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Language teaching research and language pedagogy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Understanding second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2005). The effects of careful within-task planning on oral and written task performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 167–193). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fukuta, J. (2015). Effects of task repetition on learners’ attention orientation in L2 oral production. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 321–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., Álvarez-Torres, M. J. & Fernández-García, M. (1999). The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49(4), 549–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilabert, R. (2005). Evaluating the use of multiple sources and methods in needs analysis: A case study of journalists in the autonomous community of Catalonia (Spain). In M. H. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis (pp. 182–99). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Effects of manipulating task complexity on self-repairs during L2 production. IRAL, 45, 215–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guiraud, P. (1954). Les Charactères Statistiques du Vocabulaire. Essai de méthodologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Heatley, A., Nation, I. S. P., & Coxhead, A. (2002). RANGE and FREQUENCY programs. <[URL]> (26 May, 2020).
Hu, X. (2018). Effects of task-type, task-type repetition and performance criteria on L2 oral production. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Learning language through task repetition (pp. 149–175). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y., Crossley, S., Jung Kyle, K. & Kang, S. (2018). The effects of task repetition and task complexity on L2 lexicon use. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Learning language through task repetition (pp. 75–97). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2013). The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based interaction? System, 41, 829–840. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, E., & Kobayashi, M. (2018). Second language learning through repeated engagement in a poster presentation task. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Learning language through task repetition (pp. 229–260). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J. (2014). Differences across modalities on performance: An investigation of linguistic and discourse complexity in narrative tasks. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.) Task-based language learning. Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 193–216). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2007). Task complexity and measures of linguistic performance in L2 writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 261–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Boston, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lu, X. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15, 474–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 36–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lu, X., & Ai, H. (2015). Syntactic complexity in college-level English writing: Differences among writers with diverse L1 backgrounds. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 16–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynch, T., & Maclean, J. (2000). Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 4, 221–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynch, T., & MacLean, J. (2001). Effects of the benefits of immediate task repetition on learners’ performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks, second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 141–162). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Malvern, D., & Richards, B. (2002). Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity. Language Testing, 19, 85–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M. (2011a). The language learning potential of writing in foreign language contexts: Lessons from research. In T. Cimasko & M. Reichelt (Eds.), Foreign language writing instruction: Principles and practices (pp. 44–64). Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.Google Scholar
(2011b). Learning to write and writing to learn in an additional language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014a). The distinctive nature of task repetition in writing. Implications for theory, research, and pedagogy. ELIA, 14,13–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014b). The internal dimension of tasks: The interaction between task factors and learner factors in bringing about learning through writing. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning. Insights to and from writing (pp. 27–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Manchón, R. M., & Williams, J. (2016). L2 writing and SLA studies. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), The handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 567–586). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumara, M., Kawamura, K., & Affricano, A. (2008). Narrative task type repetition and changes in second language use in a classroom environment: A case study. The Educational Sciences, 10, 124–145.Google Scholar
Mazgutova, D., & Kormos, J. (2015). Syntactic and lexical development in an intensive English for Academic Purposes programme. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 3–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D., Graesser, A., McCarthy, P., & Cai, Z. (2014). Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mojavezi, A. (2013). The relationship between task repetition and language proficiency. Applied Research on English Language, 3(1), 29–40.Google Scholar
Murphy, L., & Roca de Larios, J. (2010). Searching for words: One strategic use of the mother tongue by advanced Spanish EFL learners. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 61–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nitta, R., & Baba, K. (2014). Task repetition and L2 writing development: A longitudinal study from a dynamic systems perspective. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning. Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 107–136). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2018). Understanding benefits of repetition from a complex dynamic systems perspective. The case of a writing task. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Learning language through task repetition (pp. 285–316). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. (2015). Statistical power, p values, descriptive statistics and effect sizes: A “back-to-basics” approach to advancing quantitative methods in L2 research. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research (pp. 23–45). New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Manchón, R. M., & Murphy, L. (1996). Generating text in native and foreign language writing: A temporal analysis of problem solving formulation processes. Modern Language Journal, 90(1), 100–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, C., & Ellis, R. M. (2018). The effects of awareness-raising through stimulated recall on the repeated performance of the same task and on a new task of the same type. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Learning language through task repetition (pp. 177–198). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vasylets, O., Gilabert, R., & Manchón, R. M. (2017). The effects of mode and task complexity on second language production. Language Learning, 67(2), 394–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. (2012). The potential role (s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 321–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud, Phil Hiver & Reza Norouzian
2024. Interactions between task complexity, task repetition, and task motivation in L2 writing. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud, Sima Khezrlou & Yu Tian
2024. Verb argument construction complexity indices and L2 written production: effects of task complexity and task repetition. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 18:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi, Sima Khezrlou & Yu Tian
2024. Task complexity, task repetition, and L2 writing complexity: exploring interactions in the TBLT domain. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 62:2 ► pp. 871 ff. DOI logo
Hiver, Phil, Ali H. Al‐Hoorie & Akira Murakami
2024. Modeling the Effects of Task Repetition in Second Language Writing: Examining Interindividual and Intraindividual Variability. Language Learning DOI logo
Khezrlou, Sima
2024. Effects of task repetition with grammatizing on oral task performance and knowledge development. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics DOI logo
Mostafaei Alaei, Mahnaz & Abbas Mansouri
2024. Unraveling the differential effects of task rehearsal and task repetition on L2 task performance: the mediating role of task modality. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching DOI logo
Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi & Seyyed Ehsan Golparvar
2024. The interplay of task repetition and task rehearsal in L2 written production across varied proficiency levels. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi, Sima Khezrlou & Hessameddin Ghanbar
2024. Task repetition versus task rehearsal: Understanding effects of task-readiness factors and elemental genres on L2 writing task performance. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Fukunaga, Tatsushi
2023. L2 writing development through two types of writing task repetition. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:3 ► pp. 1109 ff. DOI logo
McBride, Sophie & Rosa M. Manchón
2023. Chapter 16. Analysing L2 writers’ processing of written corrective feedback via written languaging and think-aloud protocols. In Research Methods in the Study of L2 Writing Processes [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 5], ► pp. 337 ff. DOI logo
Leow, Ronald P., Rosa M. Manchón & Charlene Polio
2022. Chapter 13. Writing. In Instructed Second Language Acquisition Research Methods [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3], ► pp. 305 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Child L2 Writers [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 32], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.