Cover not available
Part of
Writing and Language Learning: Advancing research agendas
Edited by Rosa M. Manchón
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 56] 2020
► pp. 231–254

Chapter 10
Processing output during individual L2 writing tasks

An exploration of depth of processing and the effects of proficiency

| Pompeu Fabra University | University of Murcia
| University of Murcia
| University of Murcia
The present study explored the different levels of processing as well as the strategic orientation involved in the language-related episodes identified in the think-aloud protocols produced by 21 EFL writers (divided into three proficiency groups: pre-intermediate, intermediate and advanced) during the individual completion of an argumentative writing task. Results confirmed previous predictions on (i) the manner in which engaging in L2 writing may foster deep levels of language processing, and (ii) the proficiency-dependency of such processing. In particular, advanced learners engaged in deeper levels of processing with an upgrading strategic orientation, which involved complex manipulation and evaluation of L2 forms and structures. These findings are discussed through the lens of the language learning potential of individual L2 writing tasks.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Theoretical and empirical background
    • Writing as a site for language learning: The relevance of studying individual writing
    • Writing and language learning opportunities in individual writing conditions: The empirical evidence
    • The role of L2 proficiency in linguistic processing
    • L2 proficiency and depth of processing
    • L2 proficiency and learners’ strategic orientation of problem-solving behaviour
  • The present study
    • Research questions
  • Method
    • Participants
    • Task and data collection procedures
    • Data coding and analysis procedures
      • Identification of LREs
      • Depth of processing
      • Strategic orientation
      • Examples
  • Results
    • Research question 1
    • Research question 2
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions, limitations, and future directions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 20 November 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.56.10lop
References (27)
References
Allan, D. (1995). Oxford Placement Test. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review 89(4), 369–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergsleithner, J. M. (2019). The role of prior knowledge in depth of processing during written production: A preliminary investigation. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 104–120). New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H., & Manchón, R. M. (2014). Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing. An introduction. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning. Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 1–23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Calderón, A. M. (2013). The effects of L2 learner proficiency on depth of processing, levels of awareness, and intake. In J. M. Bergsleithner, S. N. Frota, & J. K. Yoshioka (Eds.), Noticing and second language acquisition: Studies in honour in Richard Schmidt (pp. 103–121). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i.Google Scholar
Craik, F. I. M. (2002). Levels of processing: past, present, and… future? Memory, 10, 305–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cumming, A. (1990). Metalinguistic and ideational thinking in second language composing. Written Communication, 7, 482–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, D., & Vedder, I. (2019). Methodological advances in investigating L2 writing processes: Challenges and perspectives. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 633–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. (2010). Relating L2 input and L2 output. In E. Macaro (Ed.), Continuum companion to second language acquisition (pp. 194–219). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2011). Language proficiency in native and nonnative speakers: An agenda for research and suggestions for second language assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8(3), 229–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22, 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P. (2015). Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centred approach. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López-Serrano, S., Roca de Larios, J., & Manchón, R. M. (2019). Language reflection fostered by individual L2 writing tasks: Developing a theoretically-motivated and empirically-based coding system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 503–527. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macaro, E. (2014). Reframing task performance: The relationship between tasks, strategic behaviour, and linguistic knowledge in writing. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning. Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 53–77). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Manchón, R. M., & Roca de Larios, J. (2007). Writing-to-learn in instructed language learning contexts. In E. Alcón-Soler & M. P. Safont-Jordá (Eds.), Intercultural language use and language learning (pp. 101–121). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M., Roca de Larios, J., & Murphy, L. (2009). The temporal dimension and problem-solving nature of foreign language composing. Implications for theory. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Foreign language writing: Learning, teaching and research (pp. 102–124). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M., & Williams, J. (2016). L2 writing and SLA studies. In R. M. Manchón, & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.) Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 567–586). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Raimes, A. (1987). Language proficiency, writing ability, and composing strategies: A study of ESL college student writers. Language Learning, 37(3), 439–468. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Révész, A., Kourtali, N., & Mazgutova, D. (2017). Effects of task complexity on L2 writing behaviors and linguistic complexity. Language Learning, 67, 208–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Révész, A., & Michel, M. (2019). Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 491–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Manchón, R. M., Murphy, L., & Marín, J. (2008). The foreign language writer’s strategic behavior in the allocation of time to writing processes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(1), 30–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shing, Y. L., & Brod, G. (2016). Effects of prior knowledge on memory: Implications for education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 10(3), 153–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storch, N. (2016). Collaborative writing. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 387–406). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–153). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step toward second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Cui, Yachong & Shaoqian Luo
2024. “Writing-to-learn”: the influence of task repetition on CSL writers’ attention to form. Applied Linguistics Review 15:3 ► pp. 793 ff. DOI logo
Leow, Ronald P. & Melissa A. Bowles
2023. Chapter 5. Verbally mediated data. In Research Methods in the Study of L2 Writing Processes [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 5], ► pp. 104 ff. DOI logo
Manchón, Rosa M. & Julio Roca de Larios
2023. Chapter 1. The study of L2 writing processes. In Research Methods in the Study of L2 Writing Processes [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 5], ► pp. 6 ff. DOI logo
Roca de Larios, Julio, Francisco Javier García Hernández & Yvette Coyle
2021. A theoretically-grounded classification of EFL children’s formulation strategies in collaborative writing. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2 ► pp. 300 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.