Chapter published in:
Writing and Language Learning: Advancing research agendas
Edited by Rosa M. Manchón
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 56] 2020
► pp. 231254


Allan, D.
(1995) Oxford Placement Test. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R.
(1982) Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review 89(4), 369–406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergsleithner, J. M.
(2019) The role of prior knowledge in depth of processing during written production: A preliminary investigation. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 104–120). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H., & Manchón, R. M.
(2014) Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing. An introduction. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning. Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 1–23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Calderón, A. M.
(2013) The effects of L2 learner proficiency on depth of processing, levels of awareness, and intake. In J. M. Bergsleithner, S. N. Frota, & J. K. Yoshioka (Eds.), Noticing and second language acquisition: Studies in honour in Richard Schmidt (pp. 103–121). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i.Google Scholar
Craik, F. I. M.
(2002) Levels of processing: past, present, and… future? Memory, 10, 305–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, A.
(1990) Metalinguistic and ideational thinking in second language composing. Written Communication, 7, 482–511. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, D., & Vedder, I.
(2019) Methodological advances in investigating L2 writing processes: Challenges and perspectives. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 633–645. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S.
(2010) Relating L2 input and L2 output. In E. Macaro (Ed.), Continuum companion to second language acquisition (pp. 194–219). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H.
(2011) Language proficiency in native and nonnative speakers: An agenda for research and suggestions for second language assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8(3), 229–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J.
(2001) Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22, 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P.
(2015) Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centred approach. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
López-Serrano, S., Roca de Larios, J., & Manchón, R. M.
(2019) Language reflection fostered by individual L2 writing tasks: Developing a theoretically-motivated and empirically-based coding system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 503–527. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Macaro, E.
(2014) Reframing task performance: The relationship between tasks, strategic behaviour, and linguistic knowledge in writing. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning. Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 53–77). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Manchón, R. M., & Roca de Larios, J.
(2007) Writing-to-learn in instructed language learning contexts. In E. Alcón-Soler & M. P. Safont-Jordá (Eds.), Intercultural language use and language learning (pp. 101–121). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M., Roca de Larios, J., & Murphy, L.
(2009) The temporal dimension and problem-solving nature of foreign language composing. Implications for theory. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Foreign language writing: Learning, teaching and research (pp. 102–124). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M., & Williams, J.
(2016) L2 writing and SLA studies. In R. M. Manchón, & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.) Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 567–586). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A.
(1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L.
(2009) Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Raimes, A.
(1987) Language proficiency, writing ability, and composing strategies: A study of ESL college student writers. Language Learning, 37(3), 439–468. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Révész, A., Kourtali, N., & Mazgutova, D.
(2017) Effects of task complexity on L2 writing behaviors and linguistic complexity. Language Learning, 67, 208–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Révész, A., & Michel, M.
(2019) Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 491–501. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Manchón, R. M., Murphy, L., & Marín, J.
(2008) The foreign language writer’s strategic behavior in the allocation of time to writing processes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(1), 30–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shing, Y. L., & Brod, G.
(2016) Effects of prior knowledge on memory: Implications for education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 10(3), 153–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N.
(2016) Collaborative writing. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 387–406). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M.
(1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–153). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
(1995) Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step toward second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371–391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Roca de Larios, Julio, Francisco Javier García Hernández & Yvette Coyle
2021. A theoretically-grounded classification of EFL children’s formulation strategies in collaborative writing. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2  pp. 300 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.