Cover not available
Part of
Writing and Language Learning: Advancing research agendas
Edited by Rosa M. Manchón
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 56] 2020
► pp. 335–356

Chapter 14
An ISLA perspective on L2 learning through writing

Implications for future research agendas

| University of Murcia
| Georgetown University
This chapter argues for the relevance of framing L2 writing research associated with language learning as part of a language curriculum within an instructed second language acquisition (ISLA) perspective. In line with current ISLA theorizing, we argue that the field should prioritize the conduct of additional studies of the processing dimension of writing and we envisage this future work as contributing to both applied ISLA and ISLA applied. We synthesize past research on writing processes and, against this background, we propose several future avenues and methodological directions for a process-oriented agenda in the domain. We conclude with a synthesis of the ideas discussed and with an assessment of what our optic offers to the collective inquiry into writing as a site for language learning that this book attempts to provide.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • The connection between L2 writing and language learning: An ISLA perspective
    • ISLA and language learning through writing
    • Implications for future research on L2 writing as a site for L2 learning
  • Past research on writing processes and its connection with learning through writing
    • Future research directions
      • Research avenues
      • Research methodology considerations
  • Conclusions
  • References
Published online: 20 November 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.56.14man
References (57)
References
Adrada-Rafael, S. (2017). Processing the Spanish imperfect subjunctive: Depth of processing under different instructional conditions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 477–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adrada-Rafael, S., & Filgueras-Gómez, M. (2019). Reactivity, language of think-aloud protocol, and depth of processing in the processing of reformulated feedback. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 201–213). New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breuer, E. O. (2019). Fluency in L1 and FL writing: An analysis of planning, essay writing and final revision. In E. Lindgren & K. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing. Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting (pp. 190–211). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caras, A. (2019). Written corrective feedback in compositions and the role of depth of processing. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 188–200). New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cerezo, L., Caras, A., & Leow, R. P. (2016). Effectiveness of guided induction versus deductive instruction on the development of complex Spanish “gustar” structures: An analysis of learning outcomes and processes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 265–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cerezo, L., Manchón, R. M., & Nicolás-Conesa, F. (2019). What do learners notice while processing written corrective feedback? A look at depth of processing via written languaging. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 173–187). New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cho, M. (2018). Task complexity and modality: Exploring learners’ experience from the perspective of flow. Modern Language Journal, 102(1), 162–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coyle, Y., Cánovas-Guirao, J., & Roca de Larios, J. (2018). Identifying the trajectories of young EFL learners across multi-stage writing and feedback processing tasks with model texts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 42, 25–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cumming, A. (1989). Writing expertise and second language proficiency. Language Learning, 39, 81–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990). Metalinguistic and ideational thinking in second language composing. Written Communication, 7, 482–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Theoretical orientations to L2 writing. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 65–88). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (1990). Instructed second language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2005). Instructed second language acquisition: A literature review. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Gánem-Gutiérrez, A., & Gilmore, A. (2018). Tracking the real-time evolution of a writing event: Second language writers at different proficiency levels. Language Learning, 68(2), 469–506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, D., & Baaijen, V. M. (2019). Aligning keystroke with cognitive processes in writing. In E. Lindgren & K. P. H. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting (pp. 306–325). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, D. & Vedder, I. (2019). Methodological advances in investigating L2 writing processes. Challenges and perspectives. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(3), 633–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hort, S. (2017). Exploring the use of mobile technologies and process logs in writing research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 6, 1–14.Google Scholar
Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning and Technology, 16, 91–109.Google Scholar
Leijten, M., Van Waes, L., Schriver, K., & Hayes, J. R. (2014). Writing in the workplace: Constructing documents using multiple digital sources. Journal of Writing Research, 5, 285–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. (2015). Explicit learning in the classroom. A student-centered perspective. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P. (2018). Explicit learning and depth of processing in the instructed setting: Theory, research, and practice. Studies in English Education, 23, 769–801. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Ed.). (2019a). The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019b). From SLA > ISLA > ILL: A curricular perspective. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 485–493). New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. (2019c). ISLA: How explicit or how implicit should it be? Theoretical, empirical, and pedagogical/curricular issues. Language Teaching Research, 23, 476–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P., & Cerezo, L. (2016). Deconstructing the “I” and “SLA” in ISLA: One curricular approach. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6, 43–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P., Cerezo, L., Caras, A., & Cruz, G. (2019). CALL in ISLA: Promoting depth of processing of complex L2 Spanish “Para/Por” prepositions. In R. M. DeKeyser & G. Prieto Botana (Eds.), SLA research with implications for the classroom. Reconciling methodological demands and pedagogical applicability (pp. 155–178). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P., Donate, A., & Gutierrez, H. (2019). Textual enhancement and L2 development: A depth of processing perspective. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 319–332). New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, E. & Sullivan, K. (Eds.) (2019). Observing writing. Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting. Leiden, The Netherlans: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loewen, S. (2015). Introduction to instructed second language acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (Eds.) (2017). Instructed second language acquisition (ISLA): An overview. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 1–12). New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López-Serrano, S., Roca de Larios, J., & Manchón, R. M. (2019). Language reflection fostered by individual L2 writing tasks: Developing a theoretically-motivated and empirically-based coding system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 503–527. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M. (2014). The internal dimension of tasks: The interaction between task factors and learner factors in bringing about learning through writing. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning – Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 27–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2019). The invisible dimension of L2 writing: Theoretical and empirical developments in research on L2 writing processes. Paper presented at the Ethnographies of academic writing: Research and pedagogy , Zaragoza (Spain), May.
McKee, H., & DeVoss, D. (2007). Digital writing research: Technologies, methodologies, and ethical issues. New dimensions in computers and composition. New York, NY: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Manchón, R. M. (Forthcoming). The contribution of ethnographically-oriented approaches to the study of L2 writing and text production processes. In I. Guillén-Galve & A. Bocanegra-Valle (Eds.), Ethnographies of academic writing research: Theory, methods, and interpretation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Manchón, R. M. & Roca de Larios, J. (Eds.) (Forthcoming). Research methods in the study of writing processes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Manchón, R. M., & Williams, J. (2016). L2 writing and SLA studies. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), The handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 567–586). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M., & Vasylets, O. (2019). Language learning through writing: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. In J. W. Schwieter & A. Benati (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language learning (pp. 341–362). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M., Roca de Larios, J., & Murphy, L. (2009). The temporal dimension and problem-solving nature of foreign language composing processes: Implications for theory. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 102–129). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, A., Niu, M., & Leow, R. P. (2019). Processing instruction, guided induction, and L2 development. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 377–392). New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, J., & Manchón, R. M. (2012). Investigating L2 writing development from multiple perspectives: Issues in theory and research. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 221–244). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ong, J. (2014). How do planning time and task conditions affect metacognitive processes of L2 writers? Journal of Second Language Writing, 23, 17–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, E. S., & Kim, O. Y. (2019). Learners’ engagement with indirect written corrective feedback: Depth of processing and self-correction. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 214–228). New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, K., & Kinginger, C. (2010). Writing/thinking in real time: Digital video and corpus query analysis. Language Learning and Technology, 14, 31–50.Google Scholar
Polio, C., & Freedman, D. (2017). Understanding, evaluating and conducting second language writing research. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Révész, A., Kourtali, N., & Mazgutova, D. (2017). Effects of task complexity on L2 writing behaviors and linguistic complexity. Language Learning, 67, 208–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Révész, A., & Michel, M. (Eds.). (2019a). Methodological advances in investigating L2 writing processes. Special Issue, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(3).Google Scholar
Révesz, A. & Michel, M. (2019b). Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(3), 491–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Révész, A., Michel, M., & Lee, M. (2017). Investigating IELTS academic Writing Task 2: Relationships between cognitive writing processes, text quality, and working memory. IELTS Research Reports, 3, 5–44.Google Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Manchón, R. M., Murphy, L., & Marín, J. (2008). The foreign language writer’s strategic behavior in the allocation of time to writing processes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 30–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Séror, J. (2013). Screen capture technology: A digital window into students’ writing processes. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 39(3), 1–16.Google Scholar
Spelman Miller, K., Lindgren, E. & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2008). The psycholinguistic dimension in second language writing: Opportunities for research and pedagogy using computer keystroke logging. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 433–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, M., Schoonen, R., & de Glopper, K. (2006). Revising in two languages: A multi-dimensional comparison of online writing revisions in L1 and FL. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 201–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, W. (2017). The effect of quality of written languaging on second language learning. Writing & Pedagogy, 8(3), 461–482. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vasylets, O., Gilabert, R., & Manchón, R. M. (2017). The effects of mode and task complexity on second language production. Language Learning, 67(2), 394–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. (2012). The potential role(s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 321–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zalbidea, J. (2017). ‘One task fits all’? The roles of task complexity, modality, and working memory capacity in L2 performance. Modern Language Journal, 101(2), 335–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Borràs, Judith & Sonia López-Serrano
2023. “How Can I Correct What I Don't Know?”. In New Approaches to the Investigation of Language Teaching and Literature [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ], ► pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Coyle, Yvette, Florentina Nicolás-Conesa & Lourdes Cerezo
2023. Chapter 3. Overview of methodological procedures in research on written corrective feedback processing. In Research Methods in the Study of L2 Writing Processes [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 5], ► pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Leow, Ronald P.
2023. Ronald P. Leow's essential bookshelf: The L2 learning process in instructed second language acquisition (ISLA). Language Teaching ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Leow, Ronald P. & Melissa A. Bowles
2023. Chapter 5. Verbally mediated data. In Research Methods in the Study of L2 Writing Processes [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 5], ► pp. 104 ff. DOI logo
Manchón, Rosa M.
2023. Writing and Language Learning. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Manchón, Rosa M. & Julio Roca de Larios
2023. Chapter 1. The study of L2 writing processes. In Research Methods in the Study of L2 Writing Processes [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 5], ► pp. 6 ff. DOI logo
McBride, Sophie & Rosa M. Manchón
2023. Chapter 16. Analysing L2 writers’ processing of written corrective feedback via written languaging and think-aloud protocols. In Research Methods in the Study of L2 Writing Processes [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 5], ► pp. 337 ff. DOI logo
Roca de Larios, Julio
2023. Chapter 10. Exploring the generation, development, and integration of argumentative goals in L1 and L2 composition processes. In Research Methods in the Study of L2 Writing Processes [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 5], ► pp. 202 ff. DOI logo
Leow, Ronald P., Rosa M. Manchón & Charlene Polio
2022. Chapter 13. Writing. In Instructed Second Language Acquisition Research Methods [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3], ► pp. 305 ff. DOI logo
Manchón, Rosa M. & Yvette Coyle
2022. Introduction to the special issue on L2 writing and feedback processing and use in pen and paper and digital environments: Advancing research and practice. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 12:4 ► pp. 541 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Child L2 Writers [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 32], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.