Chapter published in:
Writing and Language Learning: Advancing research agendas
Edited by Rosa M. Manchón
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 56] 2020
► pp. 335356
References

References

Adrada-Rafael, S.
(2017) Processing the Spanish imperfect subjunctive: Depth of processing under different instructional conditions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 477–508. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adrada-Rafael, S., & Filgueras-Gómez, M.
(2019) Reactivity, language of think-aloud protocol, and depth of processing in the processing of reformulated feedback. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 201–213). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Breuer, E. O.
(2019) Fluency in L1 and FL writing: An analysis of planning, essay writing and final revision. In E. Lindgren & K. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing. Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting (pp. 190–211). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caras, A.
(2019) Written corrective feedback in compositions and the role of depth of processing. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 188–200). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cerezo, L., Caras, A., & Leow, R. P.
(2016) Effectiveness of guided induction versus deductive instruction on the development of complex Spanish “gustar” structures: An analysis of learning outcomes and processes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 265–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cerezo, L., Manchón, R. M., & Nicolás-Conesa, F.
(2019) What do learners notice while processing written corrective feedback? A look at depth of processing via written languaging. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 173–187). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cho, M.
(2018) Task complexity and modality: Exploring learners’ experience from the perspective of flow. Modern Language Journal, 102(1), 162–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coyle, Y., Cánovas-Guirao, J., & Roca de Larios, J.
(2018) Identifying the trajectories of young EFL learners across multi-stage writing and feedback processing tasks with model texts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 42, 25–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, A.
(1989) Writing expertise and second language proficiency. Language Learning, 39, 81–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1990) Metalinguistic and ideational thinking in second language composing. Written Communication, 7, 482–511. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Theoretical orientations to L2 writing. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 65–88). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
(1990) Instructed second language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2005) Instructed second language acquisition: A literature review. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Gánem-Gutiérrez, A., & Gilmore, A.
(2018) Tracking the real-time evolution of a writing event: Second language writers at different proficiency levels. Language Learning, 68(2), 469–506. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, D., & Baaijen, V. M.
(2019) Aligning keystroke with cognitive processes in writing. In E. Lindgren & K. P. H. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting (pp. 306–325). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, D. & Vedder, I.
(2019) Methodological advances in investigating L2 writing processes. Challenges and perspectives. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(3), 633–645.Google Scholar
Hort, S.
(2017) Exploring the use of mobile technologies and process logs in writing research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 6, 1–14.Google Scholar
Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J.
(2012) Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning and Technology, 16, 91–109.Google Scholar
Leijten, M., Van Waes, L., Schriver, K., & Hayes, J. R.
(2014) Writing in the workplace: Constructing documents using multiple digital sources. Journal of Writing Research, 5, 285–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R.
(2015) Explicit learning in the classroom. A student-centered perspective. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P.
(2018) Explicit learning and depth of processing in the instructed setting: Theory, research, and practice. Studies in English Education, 23, 769–801. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2019a) The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2019b) From SLA > ISLA > ILL: A curricular perspective. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 485–493). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R.
(2019c) ISLA: How explicit or how implicit should it be? Theoretical, empirical, and pedagogical/curricular issues. Language Teaching Research, 23, 476–493. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P., & Cerezo, L.
(2016) Deconstructing the “I” and “SLA” in ISLA: One curricular approach. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6, 43–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P., Cerezo, L., Caras, A., & Cruz, G.
(2019) CALL in ISLA: Promoting depth of processing of complex L2 Spanish “Para/Por” prepositions. In R. M. DeKeyser & G. Prieto Botana (Eds.), SLA research with implications for the classroom. Reconciling methodological demands and pedagogical applicability (pp. 155–178). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P., Donate, A., & Gutierrez, H.
(2019) Textual enhancement and L2 development: A depth of processing perspective. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 319–332). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, E. & Sullivan, K.
(Eds.) (2019) Observing writing. Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting. Leiden, The Netherlans: Brill.Google Scholar
Loewen, S.
(2015) Introduction to instructed second language acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Loewen, S., & Sato, M.
(Eds.) (2017) Instructed second language acquisition (ISLA): An overview. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 1–12). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
López-Serrano, S., Roca de Larios, J., & Manchón, R. M.
(2019) Language reflection fostered by individual L2 writing tasks: Developing a theoretically-motivated and empirically-based coding system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 503–527. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M.
(2014) The internal dimension of tasks: The interaction between task factors and learner factors in bringing about learning through writing. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning – Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 27–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2019) The invisible dimension of L2 writing: Theoretical and empirical developments in research on L2 writing processes. Paper presented at the Ethnographies of academic writing: Research and pedagogy , Zaragoza (Spain), May.
McKee, H., & DeVoss, D.
(2007) Digital writing research: Technologies, methodologies, and ethical issues. New dimensions in computers and composition. New York, NY: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Manchón, R. M.
(Forthcoming). The contribution of ethnographically-oriented approaches to the study of L2 writing and text production processes. In I. Guillén-Galve & A. Bocanegra-Valle Eds. Ethnographies of academic writing research: Theory, methods, and interpretation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Manchón, R. M. & Roca de Larios, J.
Eds. (Forthcoming). Research methods in the study of writing processes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Manchón, R. M., & Williams, J.
(2016) L2 writing and SLA studies. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), The handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 567–586). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M., & Vasylets, O.
(2019) Language learning through writing: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. In J. W. Schwieter & A. Benati (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language learning (pp. 341–362). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M., Roca de Larios, J., & Murphy, L.
(2009) The temporal dimension and problem-solving nature of foreign language composing processes: Implications for theory. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 102–129). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A., Niu, M., & Leow, R. P.
(2019) Processing instruction, guided induction, and L2 development. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 377–392). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J., & Manchón, R. M.
(2012) Investigating L2 writing development from multiple perspectives: Issues in theory and research. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 221–244). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ong, J.
(2014) How do planning time and task conditions affect metacognitive processes of L2 writers? Journal of Second Language Writing, 23, 17–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Park, E. S., & Kim, O. Y.
(2019) Learners’ engagement with indirect written corrective feedback: Depth of processing and self-correction. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 214–228). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Park, K., & Kinginger, C.
(2010) Writing/thinking in real time: Digital video and corpus query analysis. Language Learning and Technology, 14, 31–50.Google Scholar
Polio, C., & Freedman, D.
(2017) Understanding, evaluating and conducting second language writing research. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Révész, A., Kourtali, N., & Mazgutova, D.
(2017) Effects of task complexity on L2 writing behaviors and linguistic complexity. Language Learning, 67, 208–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Révész, A., & Michel, M.
(Eds.) (2019a) Methodological advances in investigating L2 writing processes. Special Issue, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(3).Google Scholar
Révesz, A. & Michel, M.
(2019b) Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(3), 491–501.Google Scholar
Révész, A., Michel, M., & Lee, M.
(2017) Investigating IELTS academic Writing Task 2: Relationships between cognitive writing processes, text quality, and working memory. IELTS Research Reports, 3, 5–44.Google Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Manchón, R. M., Murphy, L., & Marín, J.
(2008) The foreign language writer’s strategic behavior in the allocation of time to writing processes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 30–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Séror, J.
(2013) Screen capture technology: A digital window into students’ writing processes. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 39(3), 1–16.Google Scholar
Spelman Miller, K., Lindgren, E. & Sullivan, K. P. H.
(2008) The psycholinguistic dimension in second language writing: Opportunities for research and pedagogy using computer keystroke logging. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 433–454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, M., Schoonen, R., & de Glopper, K.
(2006) Revising in two languages: A multi-dimensional comparison of online writing revisions in L1 and FL. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 201–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, W.
(2017) The effect of quality of written languaging on second language learning. Writing & Pedagogy, 8(3), 461–482. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vasylets, O., Gilabert, R., & Manchón, R. M.
(2017) The effects of mode and task complexity on second language production. Language Learning, 67(2), 394–430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J.
(2012) The potential role(s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 321–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zalbidea, J.
(2017) ‘One task fits all’? The roles of task complexity, modality, and working memory capacity in L2 performance. Modern Language Journal, 101(2), 335–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar