Cover not available
Part of
Language Teacher Development in Digital Contexts
Edited by Hayriye Kayi-Aydar and Jonathon Reinhardt
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 57] 2022
► pp. 135–156

Chapter 7
Fostering (Critical) digital teaching competence through virtual exchange

This chapter reports on findings in relation to one of the sub-questions that the Evaluating and Upscaling Telecollaborative Teacher Education (EVALUATE) project, an Erasmus+ funded European Policy Experimentation (EPE), set out to address. We explore how online (language) teacher trainees are best supported in developing critical digital literacy as framed by Darvin (2017) and Morris (2017) as well as critical digital teaching competence, which remains underexplored in Virtual Exchange (VE)-based teacher education. The insights gained from a close examination of one EVALUATE exchange highlight how crucial systematic reflective evaluation of the processes the trainees are involved in is for competence development in VE contexts.
Keywords: critical digital literacy, teaching competence, Virtual Exchange (telecollaboration), reflective evaluation, task design
Article outline
  • Critical digital literacy and its constituent elements
  • VE, teacher education and (critical) digital competence development
  • Methodological approach
    • The German-Polish exchange: Participants
    • Learning context and task sequence
    • Research methodology
  • Findings and discussion
    • Safe learning environment
    • Task design
    • Interactional support
  • Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 20 January 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.57.07mul
References (39)
References
Allwright, D. (2003). Exploratory practice: Rethinking practitioner research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 7(2), 113–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Chai, C. S., Teo, T., & Lee, C. B. (2010). Modelling the relationships among beliefs about learning, knowledge, and teaching of preservice teachers in Singapore. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 79(1), 25-42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darvin, R. (2017). Language, ideology, and critical digital literacy. In S. Thorne & S. May (Eds.), Language, education and technology. Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 1–14). Springer.Google Scholar
Desjardins, F., & Peters, M. (2007). Single-course approach versus a program approach to develop technological competencies in preservice language teachers. In M. A. Kassen, R. Z. Lavine, K. Murphy-Judy, & M. Peters (Eds.), Preparing and developing technology-proficient L2 teachers (pp. 3–21). CALICO Publications.Google Scholar
Devlieger, M., & Goossens, G. (2007). An assessment tool for the evaluation of teacher practice in powerful task-based language learning environments. In K. Van den Branden, K. Van Gorp, & M. Verhelst (Eds.), Tasks in action. Task-based language education form a classroom-based perspective (pp. 92–130). Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Fuchs, C., Hauck, M., & Müller-Hartmann, A. (2012). Promoting learner autonomy through multiliteracy skills development in cross-institutional exchanges. Language Learning & Technology, 16(3), 82–102. https://doi.org/10125/44301Google Scholar
Giger, P. (2006). Participation literacy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Blekinge Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Guikema J. P., & Menke, M. R. (2014). Preparing future foreign language teachers: The role of digital literacies. In J. P. Guikema, & L. Williams (Eds.), Digital literacies in foreign and second language education (pp. 265–287). CALICO Publications.Google Scholar
Guth, S., & Helm, F. (2010). Introduction. In S. Guth & F. Helm (Eds.), Telecollaboration 2.0: Language, literacy and intercultural learning in the 21st century (pp. 13–38). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hauck, M. (2010). The enactment of task design in telecollaboration 2.0. In M. Thomas, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching with technology (pp. 197–217). Continuum.Google Scholar
Hauck, M., & Kurek, M. (2017). Digital Literacies in teacher preparation. In S. L. Thorne & S. May (Eds.), Language, education and technology, encyclopedia of language and education (3rd ed., pp. 275–287). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hauck, M., Müller-Hartmann, A., Rienties, B., & Rogaten, J. (2020). Approaches to researching digital pedagogical competence development in VE-based teacher education. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 3, 5–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hauck, M., & Warnecke, S. (2012). Fostering social presence through task design. Fremdsprachen und Hochschule, 85(2), 175–200.Google Scholar
Helm, F. (2014). Developing digital literacies through virtual exchange. Elearning Papers, 38, 1–10.Google Scholar
Hoven, D. (2006). Designing for disruption: Remodeling a blended course in technology in (language) teacher education. Presented at the 23rd Annual Ascilite Conference: Who’s learning? Whose technology? University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Kehrwald, B. (2008). Understanding social presence in text-based online learning environments. Distance Education, 29(1), 89–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimmons, R. (2015). Examining TPACK’s theoretical future. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 23(1), 53–77.Google Scholar
Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2014). Studying new literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(2), 97–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). Teachers learning technology by design. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21(3), 94–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kurek, M., & Müller-Hartmann, A. (2017). Task design for telecollaborative exchanges: In search of new criteria. System, 64, 7–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). The formative role of teaching presence in blended Virtual Exchange. Language Learning & Technology, 23(3), 52–73. https://doi.org/10125/44696Google Scholar
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morris, J. M. (2017). Critical Pedagogy and Design. Retrieved on 7 July 2021 from [URL]Google Scholar
Müller-Hartmann, A. (2006). Learning how to teach intercultural communicative competence via telecollaboration: A model for language teacher education. In J. A. Belz & S. L. Thorne (Eds.), Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education (pp. 63–84). Thomson Heinle.Google Scholar
(2007). The teacher role in telecollaboration: Setting up and managing exchanges. In R. O’Dowd (Ed.), Online intercultural exchange. An introduction for foreign language teachers (pp. 167–192). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller-Hartmann, A., O’Dowd, R., & Colleagues from The EVALUATE Group (2017). A training manual on telecollaboration for teacher trainers. Retrieved on 7 July 2021 from [URL]Google Scholar
O’Dowd, R. (2015). The competences of the telecollaborative teacher. The Language Learning Journal, 43(2), 194–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). From telecollaboration to virtual exchange: State-of-the-art and the role of UNICollaboration in moving forward. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 1, 1–23. Research-publishing.net. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Dowd, R., & Ware, P. (2009). Critical issues in telecollaborative task design. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(2), 173–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pegrum, M. (2010). I link, therefore I am: Network literacy as a core digital literacy. E-Learning and Digital Media, 7(4), 346–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rogaten, J., Rienties, B., Sharpe, R., Cross, S., Whitelock, D., Lygo-Baker, S., & Littlejohn, A. (2018). Reviewing affective, behavioural, and cognitive learning gains in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(3), 321–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, J. M., & Koehler, M. J. (2015). Context and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(3), 186–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The EVALUATE Group. (2019a). Evaluating the impact of virtual exchange on initial teacher education: a European policy experiment. Research-publishing.net. DOI logo
. (2019b). Executive summary – the key findings from the EVALUATE European policy experiment project on the impact of virtual exchange on initial teacher education. Research-publishing.net. DOI logo
Torgerson, D. J., & Torgerson, C. (2008). Designing randomised trials in health, education and the social sciences: An introduction. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ware, P., & Kramsch, C. (2005). Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 190–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. M. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 1–12). Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Herrero, Carmen & Paul Spence
2023. Introduction: Reflections on Post-Pandemic Pedagogical Trends in Language Education. Modern Languages Open 2023:1 DOI logo
Markovic, Mihaela
2023. Systematischer Überblick virtueller Austausche im Fremdsprachenbereich. Einflussfaktoren, Potenziale und Herausforderungen. In IDT 2022: *mit.sprache.teil.haben Band 3: Sprachliche Teilhabe fördern, ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.