Chapter 3
Teachers’ awareness, knowledge and attitudes towards instruction in L2 pragmatics
Despite its crucial contribution to second/foreign language (L2) competence, pragmatics has still not gained a fixed place in many language teacher training programs. To address this, a workshop for in-service primary English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers was conducted to raise awareness of L2 pragmatics and to present suggestions for teaching it in the classroom. This chapter documents the contents of this professional training course and presents insights into the participants’ expectations and perceptions of the workshop, as well as their knowledge and attitudes towards the teaching of L2 pragmatics. Data was collected by means of questionnaires at the beginning and end of the workshop. In addition to presenting the results, the chapter discusses implications for teacher education to help bring pragmatics into the L2 classroom on a wider scale.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review: L2 pragmatics in language teacher professionalisation
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Setting and participants
- 3.2Structure and contents of the teacher training workshop
- 3.3Data collection instruments
- 4.Results
- 4.1RQ1: Knowledge of pragmatics
- 4.2RQ2: Attitudes towards the teaching of L2 pragmatics
- 4.3RQ3: Expectations and perceptions of the workshop
- 5.Conclusion and pedagogical implications
- 6.Limitations and future directions
-
References
References (58)
References
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford University Press.
Bagherkazemi, M., & Arefkal, M. (2021). Impact of an awareness-raising workshop on the pragmatic awareness and attitudes of high school English language teachers in Iran. English Teaching & Learning, 46, 1–18.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2013). Developing L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 63, 68–86.
BIG-Kreis (2015). Der Lernstand im Englischunterricht am Ende von Klasse 4. Ergebnisse der BIG-Studie [English language proficiency at the end of grade 4. Results of the BIG study]. Domino.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47.
Chavez de Castro, M. C. L. (2005). Why teachers don’t use their pragmatic awareness. In N. Bartels (Ed.), Researching applied linguistics in language teacher education (pp. 281–294). Springer.
Cohen, A. D. (2016). The teaching of pragmatics by native and nonnative language teachers: What they know and what they report doing. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(4), 561–585. .
Cohen, A. D. (2018). Learning pragmatics from native and nonnative language teachers. Multilingual Matters.
Culpeper, J., Mackey, A., & Taguchi, N. (2018). Second language pragmatics: From theory to research. Routledge.
Eslami, Z. R., & Eslami-Rasekh, A. (2008). Enhancing the pragmatic competence of non-native English-speaking teacher candidates (NNESTCs) in an EFL context. In E. Alcón-Soler, & A. Martínez-Flor (Eds.), Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 178–197). Multilingual Matters.
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2021). Pragmatic competence and speech-act research in second language pragmatics. In J. C. Félix-Brasdefer, & R. Shively (Eds.), New directions in second language pragmatics (pp. 11–26). De Gruyter Mouton.
Flöck, I., & Pfingsthorn, J. (2014). Pragmatik und Englischunterricht [Pragmatics and English language teaching]. In W. Gehring, & M. Merkl (Eds.), Englisch lehren, lernen, erforschen [Teaching, learning and researching English] (pp. 175–199). BIS-Verlag.
Glaser, K. (2018). Enhancing the role of pragmatics in primary English teacher training. Glottodidactica – An International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 45(2), 119–131.
Glaser, K. (2020). Pragmatikvermittlung im Englischunterricht der Primarstufe: Der Sprechakt ‘Begrüßen‘ in Lehrplänen und Lehrwerken [Pragmatics in primary EFL teaching: The speech act ‚greeting‘ in curricula and text books]. In H. Limberg, & K. Glaser (Eds.), Pragmatische Kompetenzen im schulischen Fremdsprachenunterricht [Pragmatic competence in foreign language teaching in school contexts] (pp. 199–248). Peter Lang.
Glaser, K., & Limberg, H. (2020). Pragmatische Kompetenzen und Fremdsprachenvermittlung – Forschung und Praxis [Pragmatic competence and foreign language teaching – research and practice]. In H. Limberg, & K. Glaser (Eds.), Pragmatische Kompetenzen im schulischen Fremdsprachenunterricht [Pragmatic competence in foreign language teaching in school contexts] (pp. 19–103). Peter Lang.
Haugh, M., & Chang, W. L. M. (2015). Understanding im/politeness across cultures: An interactional approach to raising sociopragmatic awareness. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 53(4), 389–414.
Hsie, M.-H., & Chuang, H.-H. (2021). Investigating pre-service English teachers’ beliefs of sociolinguistic instruction in EFL classes in Taiwan. TESOL and Technology Studies, 2(2), 16–28.
Huth, T. (2021). Interaction, language use, and second language teaching. Routledge.
Huth, T., Betz, E., & Taleghani-Nikazm, C. (2019). Rethinking language teacher training: Steps for making talk-in-interaction research accessible to practitioners. Classroom Discourse, 10(1), 99–122.
Ishihara, N. (2011). Co-constructing pragmatic awareness: Instructional pragmatics in EFL teacher development in Japan. TESL-EJ, 15(2). Retrieved on 10 November 2022 from [URL]
Ishihara, N., with A. D. Cohen. (2022). Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Ivanova, I. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions of the role of pragmatics in the EFL classroom. Studies in Linguistics, Culture and FLT, 3, 27–44. .
Jakupčević, E., & Portolan, M. Ć. (2021). An analysis of pragmatic content in EFL textbooks for young learners in Croatia. Language Teaching Research [Advance Access], 1–24.
Karatepe, Ç., & Civelek, M. (2021). A case study on EFL teachers’ views on material adaptation for teaching pragmatics. RumeliDE Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 23, 894–910. .
Lacorte, M. (2020). Pragmatics and teacher education. In D. A. Koike, & J. C. Félix-Brasdefer (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Spanish pragmatics (pp. 469–484). Routledge.
Lehnen, L. (2020). An der Schnittstelle von Theorie und Praxis: Das Unterrichten von Pragmatik im Fremdsprachenunterricht Englisch aus Sicht von (angehenden) Lehrkräften [At the interface of theory and practice: Teaching pragmatics in the EFL classroom from the perspective of (prospective) teachers]. In H. Limberg, & K. Glaser (Eds.), Pragmatische Kompetenzen im schulischen Fremdsprachenunterricht [Pragmatic competence in foreign language teaching in school contexts] (pp. 317–350). Peter Lang.
Limberg, H. (2020). Zur Vermittlung von sprachlicher Höflichkeit in Englischlehrwerken für die gymnasiale Oberstufe [On the teaching of linguistic politeness in English textbooks for upper high school level]. In H. Limberg, & K. Glaser (Eds.), Pragmatische Kompetenzen im schulischen Fremdsprachenunterricht [Pragmatic competence in foreign language teaching in school contexts] (pp. 275–315). Peter Lang.
Marmaridou, S. (2011). Pragmalinguistics and sociopragmatics. In W. Bublitz, & N. R. Norrick (Eds.), Foundations of pragmatics (pp. 77–106). Walter de Gruyter.
Martínez-Flor, A., & Usó-Juan, E. (2006). A comprehensive pedagogical framework to develop pragmatics in the foreign language classroom: The 6Rs Approach. Applied Language Learning, 16(2), 39–64. Retrieved on 10 November 2022 from [URL]
Mugford, G. (2021). Pragmatics of (im)politeness in EIL interactions. In Z. Tajeddin, & M. Alemi (Eds.), Pragmatics pedagogy in English as an International Language (pp. 117–135). Routledge.
Myrset, A. (2021). Scientific concepts as meaning-making resources for young EFL learners in the learning of pragmatics. Intercultural Communication Education, 4(2), 191–212.
Ngai, P., & Janusch, S. (2018). Professional development for TESL teachers: A course in transcultural pragmatics. TESL-EJ, 22(3). Retrieved on 10 November 2022 from [URL]
Ogiermann, E. (2013). On pragmatic input in Green Line New. In E. Karagiannidou, C. Papadopoulou, & E. Skourtou (Eds.), Sprachenvielfalt und Sprachenlernen: Neue Wege zur Literalität [Language diversity and language learning: New paths to literacy] (pp. 451–460). Peter Lang.
Povolná, R. (2012). Pragmatic awareness in teacher education. Acta Academica Karviniensia, 12(1), 148–158.
Rademacher, J. (Ed.). (2019). access 1. [Pupil’s book for grade 5]. Cornelsen.
Ren, W., & Han, Z. (2016). The representation of pragmatic knowledge in recent ELT textbooks. ELT Journal, 70(4), 424–434.
Rose, K. R. (1997). Pragmatics in teacher education for nonnative-speaking teachers: A consciousness-raising approach. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 10(2), 125–138.
Sato, M., & Loewen, S. (2019). Do teachers care about research? The research-pedagogy dialogue. ELT Journal, 73(1), 1–10. .
Savvidou, C., & Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. (2019). Teaching pragmatics: Nonnative-speaker teachers’ knowledge, beliefs and reported practices. Intercultural Communication Education, 2(1), 39–58. .
Schauer, G. (2019). Teaching and learning English in the primary school. Interlanguage pragmatics in the EFL context. Springer.
Schauer, G. (2022a). Intercultural competence and pragmatics in the L2 classroom: Views of in-service EFL teachers in primary, secondary, and adult education. In T. McConachy, & A. J. Liddicoat (Eds.), Teaching and learning second language pragmatics for intercultural understanding (pp. 173–198). Routledge.
Schmidt, R. (1993). Consciousness, learning, and interlanguage pragmatics. In G. Kasper, & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 21–42). Oxford University Press.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2005). (Im)politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 95–119.
Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48(1), 1–50.
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C. (2017). Second language pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Taguchi, N., & Yamaguchi, S. (2019). Implicature comprehension in L2 pragmatics research. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics (pp. 31–46). Routledge.
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91–112. .
Usó-Juan, E., & Martínez-Flor, A. (2021). Teacher pragmatic awareness in English as an International Language. In Z. Tajeddin, & M. Alemi (Eds.), Pragmatics pedagogy in English as an International Language (pp. 44–58). Routledge.
Van Compernolle, R. A., & Henery, A. (2015). Learning to do concept-based pragmatics instruction: Teacher development and L2 pedagogical content knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 19(3), 351–372.
Vásquez, C., & Sharpless, D. (2009). The role of pragmatics in the master's TESOL curriculum: Findings from a nationwide survey. TESOL Quarterly, 43(1), 5–28.
Vásquez, C., & Fioramonte, A. (2011). Integrating pragmatics into the MA-TESL program: Perspectives from former students. TESL-EJ, 15(2), 1–22. Retrieved on 10 November 2022 from [URL]
Vellenga, H. (2004). Learning pragmatics from ESL and EFL textbooks: How likely? TESL-EJ, 8(2), 1–18. Retrieved on 10 November 2022 from [URL]
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986/1934). Thought and language. The MIT Press.
Waring, H. Z. (2018). Teaching L2 interactional competence: Problems and possibilities. Classroom Discourse, 9(1), 57–67.
Yates, L., & Wigglesworth, G. (2005). Researching the effectiveness of professional development in pragmatics. In N. Bartels (Ed.), Applied linguistics and language teacher education (pp. 261–279). Springer.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Ton-Nu, Anh
2024.
Why is L2 pragmatics still a neglected area in EFL teaching? Uncovered stories from Vietnamese EFL teachers.
International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.