Chapter 8
Task motivation effects on L2 pragmatics
Noticing target pragmatic features in the input does not necessarily lead to learning, as evidenced by Takahashi (2013, 2015). By focusing on aware learners, this study explored the extent to which Japanese English language learners’ task motivation affects their awareness of English bi-clausal request forms in implicit intervention and their subsequent learning outcomes. Data from the awareness tasks and learning assessment measures were analysed in the framework of provision (noticing + learning) versus non-provision (noticing only) learners. The results indicated that the target forms were most likely to be learned by those who maintained their mastery goals regarding the target forms and adequate motivational intensity throughout the multiple tasks.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Conceptualising task motivation: Towards a dynamic view of motivation
- 2.2Motivational task-processing system
- 2.3Research on motivation in L2 pragmatics
- 2.4The present study
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Design
- 3.2Participants
- 3.3Materials
- 3.3.1Pre- and post-test measures
- 3.3.2Awareness session materials
- 3.4Procedures
- 3.5Data analysis
- 4.Results and discussion
- 4.1Awareness levels: Full-detection forms
- 4.2Awareness and task motivation
- 4.2.1Pattern 1 (provision) vs. Pattern 3 (non-provision): Mastery-oriented learners
- 4.2.2Pattern 2 (provision) vs. Patterns 4 and 5 (non-provision): Performance-oriented learners
- 4.3General discussion
- 5.Conclusion and pedagogical implications
- 6.Limitations and future directions
-
Notes
-
References
References (40)
References
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267. Retrieved on 13 November 2022 from [URL].
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic versus grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 233–262.
Chiravate, B. (2012). The effects of motivation and proficiency on pragmatic and grammatical awareness in foreign language learning. In W. M. Chan, K. N. Chin, S. K. Bhatt, & I. Walker (Eds.), Perspectives on individual characteristics and foreign language education (pp. 93–114). Mouton de Gruyter.
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.
Crookes, G., & Schmidt, R. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language Learning, 41, 469–512.
De Bot, K. (2008). Introduction: Second language development as a dynamic process. Modern Language Journal, 92, 166–178.
Dörnyei, Z. (2000). Motivation in action: Towards a process-oriented conceptualisation of student motivation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 519–538.
Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances in theory, research, and applications. In Z. Dörnyei (Ed.), Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning (pp. 3–32). Blackwell.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P. D., & Henry, A. (Eds.). (2015). Motivational dynamics in language learning. Multilingual Matters.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ottó, I. (1998). Motivation in action: A process model of L2 motivation. Working papers in applied linguistics (Thames Valley University), 4, 43–69. Retrieved on 12 November 2022 from [URL]
Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge.
Dörnyei, Z., & Tseng, W.-T. (2009). Motivational processing in interactional tasks. In A. Mackey, & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of S. M. Gass (pp. 117–134). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Pearson.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold.
Guo, Y., Xu, J., & Xu, X. (2020). An investigation into EFL learners’ motivational dynamics during a group communicative task: A classroom-based case study. System, 89, 12–15.
Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 541–577.
Julkunen, K. (2001). Situation- and task-specific motivation in foreign language learning. In Z. Dörnyei, & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 29–41). University of Hawai‘i Press.
Kasper, G., & Schmidt, R. (1996). Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 149–169.
Kormos, J., & Wilby, J. (2019). Task motivation. In M. Lamb, K. Csizér, A. Henry, & S. Ryan (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of motivation for language learning (pp. 267–286). Palgrave Macmillan.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Serroul, A. (2015). Motivation on a per-second timescale: Examining approach-avoidance motivation during L2 task performance. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 109–138). Multilingual Matters.
Poupore, G. (2013). Task motivation in process: A complex systems perspective. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 69, 91–116.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.
Schmidt, R. (1993). Consciousness, learning and interlanguage pragmatics. In G. Kasper, & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 21–42). Oxford University Press.
Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1–63). University of Hawai‘i Press.
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3−32). Cambridge University Press.
Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48, 1–50.
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C. (2017). Second language pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Tajeddin, Z., & Zand Moghadam, A. (2012). Interlanguage pragmatic motivation: Its construct and impact on speech act production. RELC Journal, 43, 353–372.
Takahashi, S. (2005). Pragmalinguistic awareness: Is it related to motivation and proficiency? Applied Linguistics, 26, 90–120.
Takahashi, S. (2010). Assessing learnability in second language pragmatics. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Handbook of pragmatics (Vol. 7, pp. 391–421). Mouton de Gruyter.
Takahashi, S. (2012). Individual differences and pragmalinguistic awareness: A structural equation modeling approach. Language, Culture, and Communication, 4, 103–125.
Takahashi, S. (2013). Awareness and learning in second language pragmatics. Language, Culture, and Communication, 5, 53–76.
Takahashi, S. (2015). The effects of learner profiles on pragmalinguistic awareness and learning. System, 48, 48–61.
Takahashi, S. (2017). Pragmatics-grammar interface in pragmalinguistic awareness and learning. Language, Culture, and Communication, 9, 87–111.
Ushioda, E. (2001). Language learning at university: Exploring the role of motivational thinking. In Z. Dörnyei, & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 93–125). University of Hawai‘i Press.
Yanguas, Í. (2011). The dynamic nature of motivation during the task: Can it be captured? Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5, 35–61.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Vo, Phuong
2024.
Comparing synonymous adjectives in Vietnamese and English.
Práticas Educativas, Memórias e Oralidades - Rev. Pemo 6
► pp. e12277 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.