2009. Conventional Expressions as a Pragmalinguistic Resource: Recognition and Production of Conventional Expressions in L2 Pragmatics. Language Learning 59:4 ► pp. 755 ff.
Cieślicka, Anna B., Roberto R. Heredia & Marc Olivares
2014. It’s All in the Eyes: How Language Dominance, Salience, and Context Affect Eye Movements During Idiomatic Language Processing. In Essential Topics in Applied Linguistics and Multilingualism [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 21 ff.
Conklin, Kathy & Norbert Schmitt
2008. Formulaic Sequences: Are They Processed More Quickly than Nonformulaic Language by Native and Nonnative Speakers?. Applied Linguistics 29:1 ► pp. 72 ff.
2021. Incidental reactive focus on form in language classes: Learners' formulaic versus nonformulaic errors, their treatment, and effectiveness in communicative interactions. Foreign Language Annals 54:4 ► pp. 897 ff.
JIANG, NAN & TATIANA M. NEKRASOVA
2007. The Processing of Formulaic Sequences by Second Language Speakers. The Modern Language Journal 91:3 ► pp. 433 ff.
2021. In Search of the Optimal Mode of Input for the Acquisition of Formulaic Expressions. TESOL Quarterly 55:3 ► pp. 1011 ff.
2022. Developing an intelligent tool for computer-assisted formulaic language learning from YouTube videos. ReCALL 34:2 ► pp. 185 ff.
2018. Collocation Studies in Second-Language Learner English. In Vocabulary Increase and Collocation Learning, ► pp. 35 ff.
2018. Introduction. In Vocabulary Increase and Collocation Learning, ► pp. 1 ff.
2015. On the ‘holistic’ nature of formulaic language. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 11:2
Zheng, Hang, Melissa A. Bowles & Jerome L. Packard
2022. NS and NNS processing of idioms and nonidiom formulaic sequences: What can reaction times and think-alouds tell us?. Applied Psycholinguistics 43:2 ► pp. 363 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.