Article published in:
Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 42:2 (2018) ► pp. 196–219

No language policy without translation policy

A comparison of Flanders and Wales

| KU Leuven
| KU Leuven | University of Texas at Brownsville
A major challenge for authorities in the modern world is the linguistic integration of minorities. In this context, language policies play a key role as authorities are increasingly faced with the challenge of adjusting their language policies in order to secure the linguistic rights and thus the integration of their multilingual populations. In multilingual democracies, these language policies must include choices about the use or non-use of translation. These choices, when they are systematic, become policies of their own in terms of translation. Thus, translation policies arise in part as a consequence of language policies, and there can be no language policy without an attendant translation policy. This article sheds light on the role of translation policies as part of language policy. Specifically, it shows that translation policies can be a tool for integration and recognition or exclusion and neglect of speakers of minority languages and therefore deserve special attention. This is done by comparing the translation policies adopted in Flanders and Wales, both as applied to autochthonous linguistic minorities and allochthonous linguistic minorities. Lessons can be learned from the similarities and differences of translation policies in these two regions.
Keywords: interpreting, translation, language policy, translation policy, Flanders, Wales
Published online: 21 June 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00028.mey
References

References

Ager, D.
(2001) Motivation in language planning and language policy. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Bevilacqua, G.
(2011) Die Sprachmittlung in Altenbetreuungseinrichtungen. Eine Empirische Forschungsarbeit Über Die Italiener in Limburg. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Leuven: KU Leuven.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, G.
(2009) Beleidsnota Inburgering & Integratie 2009–2014. Vlaamse Overheid.Google Scholar
(2011) Beleidsbrief “Inburgering & Integratie” Beleidsprioriteiten 2011–2012. Vlaamse Overheid.Google Scholar
Commission on Integration and Cohesion
(2007) Our Shared Future. At https://​image​.guim​.co​.uk​/sys​-files​/Education​/documents​/2007​/06​/14​/ourshared​future​.pdf (8 May 2018).Google Scholar
De Varennes, F.
(1999) Equality and Non-discrimination: Fundamental Principles of Minority Language Rights. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 6: 307–318.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012a) Language, rights and opportunities: The role of language in the inclusion and exclusion of indigenous peoples. UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Downloaded from http://​www​.ohchr​.org​/Documents​/lssues​/IPeoples​/EMRIP​/StudyLanguages​/FernandDeVarennes​.doc on May 8, 2018.Google Scholar
(2012b) International and comparative perspectives in the use of official languages: Models and approaches for South Africa. Assessment prepared for the Afrikaans Taalraad on the Use of Official Languages and the Proposed South African Languages Act, 2011, and other issues. Draft report. Afrikaans Taalraad. Downloaded from http://​hkuhk​.academia​.edu​/fernanddevarenneson May 8, 2018.Google Scholar
Diaz Fouces, O.
(2006) Políticas de traducción en Cataluña y Galicia. At http://​www​.cttic​.org​/ACTI​/2004​/papers​/Oscar​_Diaz​_Fouces​_Politicas​_en​_Cataluna​_y​_Galicia​.pdf (8 May 2018).Google Scholar
Dunbar, R.
(2003a) Legislating for language: Facing the challenges in Scotland and Wales. In D. Ó Riagáin (Ed.), Language and law in Northern Ireland, 138–163. Belfast: Queen’s University Belfast.Google Scholar
(2003b) The ratification by the United Kingdom of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages. Mercator Linguistic Rights and Legislation, Working Paper No. 10. At https://​archive​.org​/details​/ERIC​_ED479896 (8 May 2018).Google Scholar
(2007) Diversity in addressing diversity: Canadian and British legislative approaches to linguistic minorities, and their international legal context. In C. Williams (Ed.), Language and Governance, 104–158. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Easton, M.
(2006) Cost in translation. BBC World News. At http://​news​.bbc​.co​.uk​/2​/hi​/uk​_news​/6172805​.stm (8 May 2018).Google Scholar
Edwards, V.
(2008) New minority languages in the United Kingdom. In G. Extra & D. Goter (Eds.), Multilingual Europe: Facts and policies, 253–270. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Extra, G. & Gorter, D.
(2008) Multilingual Europe: Facts and Policies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
González Núñez, G. & Meylaerts, R.
(2017) Translation and Public Policy: Interdisciplinary Perspectives and Case Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
González Núñez, G.
(2013) Translating for linguistic minorities in Northern Ireland: A look at translation policy in the judiciary, healthcare and local government. Current Issues in Language Planning 14/3: 474–489. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grin, F. & Vaillancourt, F.
(1999) The cost-effectiveness evaluation of minority language policies: Case studies on Wales, Ireland and the Basque Country. ECMI Monograph # 2. At http://​www​.ecmi​.de​/uploads​/tx​_lfpubdb​/monograph​_2​.pdf (8 May 2018).Google Scholar
Gülmüs, Z.
(2007) Muttersprachliche Ansprache Als Integrationsstrategie. Eine Translatologische Studie Zu Türkischsprachigen Informationsangeboten. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag.Google Scholar
Hogan-Brun, G., Mar-Molinero, C. & Stevenson, P.
(eds) (2009) Discourses on Language and Integration: Critical Perspectives on Language Testing Regimes in Europe. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights
(2006) International Helsinki Federation Annual Report on Human Rights Violations (2006): Belgium. At http://​www​.unhcr​.org​/refworld​/docid​/469392840​.html (8 May 2018).Google Scholar
Janssens, C. & Craenen, S.
(2012) Een Plaats Voor Vluchtelingen in Het Welzijns- En Armoedebeleid. Oikos 61/2: 18–30.Google Scholar
Keulen, M.
(2005) Omzendbrief BA-2005/03 Betreffende Het Taalgebruik in De Gemeente- En O.C.M.W.-besturen En in De Intergemeentelijke SamenwerkingsverbandenInterpretatie En Gevolgen Van De Arresten Van De Raad Van State Van 23 December 2004.Google Scholar
Kluzer, S., Ferrari, A. & Centeno, C.
(2011) Language Learning by Adult Migrants: Policy Challenges and ICT Responses. Luxembourg: European Commission.Google Scholar
Luykx, T. & Platel, M.
(1985): Politieke Geschiedenis van België (2 vol.). Antwerp: Kluwer.Google Scholar
May, S.
(2008) Language and Minority Rights: Ethnicity, Nationalism, and the Politics of Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meylaerts, R.
2011 Translational justice in a multilingual world. Meta 56/4:743–757.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, R.
(2007) The challenge of language equality. In C. Williams (Ed.), Language and Governance, 43–49. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics
(2012) 2011 census: Key statistics for Wales, March 2011. At http://​www​.ons​.gov​.uk​/ons​/dcp171778​_290982​.pdf (8 May 2018).Google Scholar
(2013) Language in England and Wales, 2011. At http://​www​.ons​.gov​.uk​/ons​/dcp171776​_302179​.pdf (8 May 2018).Google Scholar
Ozolins, U.
(2010) Factors that determine the provision of public service interpreting: Comparative perspectives on government motivation and language service implementation. The Journal of Specialised Translation 14: 194–215.Google Scholar
Peeters, L.
(1997) Omzendbrief BA 97/22 Van 16 December 1997 Betreffende Het Taalgebruik in Gemeentebesturen Van Het Nederlandse TaalgebiedGoogle Scholar
Perrot, M.-C.
(1997) La politique linguistique pendant la Révolution française [Language policy during the French Revolution]. Mots, 52(1): 158-167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, R.
(2003) English-only Europe?: Challenging Language Policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pokorn, N. K. & Čibej, J.
(2017) Interpreting and linguistic inclusion – friends or foes? Results from a field study. The Translator. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richter, D., Richter, I., Toivanen, R. & Ulasiuk, I.
(eds) (2012) Language Rights Revisted – The Challenge of Global Migration and Communication. Berlin: Wolf Legal Publishers / Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, P.
(2007) Linguistic diversity as curse and as by-product. In X. Arzoz. (Ed.), Respecting Linguistic Diversity in the European Union, 17–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2008) Linguistic justice for Europe, Belgium and the World. In B. Raeymaekers (Ed.), Lectures for the XXIst Century, 13–36. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
(2010) Linguistic justice and the territorial imperative. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13/1: 181–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schuck, P. H.
(2009) Immigrants’ incorporation in the United States after 9/11: Two steps forward, one step back. In J. Hochschild & J. H. Mollenkopf, Bringing Outsiders In: Transatlantic Perspectives on Immigrant Political Incorporation, 158–175. Ithaca & London: Cornell Univeristy Press.Google Scholar
Shipton, M.
(2012) Energy firm threatens Welsh bills hike over language concerns. Wales Online. Retrieved from http://​www​.walesonline​.co​.uk​/news​/wales​-news​/energy​-firm​-threatens​-welsh​-bills​-2020298Google Scholar
Soret, K., Janssens, C., & De Muylder, V.
(2012) Gemeenten Geven Thuis. Bruggen Bouwen Tussen Asielopvang En Reguliere Diensten Voor Erkend Vluchtelingen. Vluchtelingenwerk Vlaanderen.Google Scholar
Spolsky, B.
(2012) The Cambridge handbook of language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tipton, R.
(2012) Public service interpreting and the politics of entitlement for new entrants to the United Kingdom. Journal of Language & Politics 11/2: 185–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tollefson , J.
(ed) (2002) Language Policies in Education: Critical Issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Vlaamse Regering
(2012) Voorontwerp Van Decreet Betreffende Het Vlaamse Integratie- En Inburgeringsbeleid.Google Scholar
Walsh, J.
(2012) Language policy and language governance: A case-study of Irish language legislation. Language Policy 11: 323–341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willemyns, R.
(2002) ‘Liever Hollandsch dan Fransch’: Taalcontact en taalconflict in het negentiende-eeuwse Vlaanderen. Verslagen En Mededelingen Van De Koninklijke Academie Voor Nederlandse Taal- En Letterkunde 112/3: 381–425.Google Scholar
Wong, J., & Pontoja, A. D.
(2009) In pursuit of inclusion: Citizenship acquisition among Asian immigrants. In J. Hochschild & J. H. Mollenkopf, Bringing Outsiders In: Transatlantic Perspectives on Immigrant Political Incorporation, 260–276. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, S.
(2004) Language rights, democracy and the European Union. In J. D. P. Freeland (Ed.), Language rights and language survival (pp. 219–242). Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Enríquez Raído, Vanessa, Ineke Crezee & Quintin Ridgeway
2020. Professional, ethical, and policy dimensions of public service interpreting and translation in New Zealand. Translation and Interpreting Studies 15:1 ► pp. 15 ff. Crossref logo
González Núñez, Gabriel
2019. The shape of translation policy: a comparison of policy determinants in Bangor and Brownsville. Meta: Journal des traducteurs 64:3 ► pp. 776 ff. Crossref logo
Kuo, Arista Szu-Yu
2020. Subtitling in the Singaporean context: a case study on the film series Ah Boys to Men. Perspectives 28:4 ► pp. 588 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.