Cover not available
Article published In:
Promoting linguistic vitality through public policy: The role of rules, costs and incentives
Edited by Bengt-Arne Wickström, Noémi Nagy, Anneliese Rieger-Roschitz and Balázs Vizi
[Language Problems and Language Planning 47:2] 2023
► pp. 136–159

Is minority language use a right or a privilege?

European institutions’ contribution to the decline of linguistic diversity

ORCID logo | University of Szeged | HUN-REN Center for Social Sciences | Central European UniversityVienna | Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania
This paper demonstrates how European institutions bend to the idea of the mono-ethnic and monolingual nation-state. Instead of encouraging the use of minority languages and accepting them as a value, minority languages are treated as a tolerated but voluntarily assumed handicap. This is in stark contrast to the treatment of other types of protected identities, such as religion, gender and sexual orientation. Against this background, there is a desperate need for clear value-setting by the European institutions and for a clear message that language shaming is not a venial sin of the monolingual nation-state but a no-go zone even for populists. For this, however, language chauvinism should not be condoned but condemned.
Keywords: European institutions, human rights, language discrimination, monolingualism, nation-state
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The idea of the monolingual nation-state
  • 3.Three methods of denying language rights
    • 3.1Ostrich policy: “Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent”
    • 3.2Outspoken disregard of the law
    • 3.3Cross-category benchmarking: Can antidiscrimination law be discriminatory?
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 January 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00103.nag
References (90)
References
Andresen, J. T., & Carter, Ph. M. (2016). Languages In the world: How history, culture, and politics shape language. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Arp, B. (2008). International norms and standards for the protection of national minorities: Bilateral and multilateral texts with commentary. Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Consiliul Național pentru Combaterea Discriminării. (2020). Declarații cu caracter discriminatoriu la adresa etnicilor maghiari. (443/2020-05-20). [URL]
Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. (1992). European charter for regional or minority languages / Charte européenne des langues régionales ou minoritaires. [URL]
. (1995). Framework convention for the protection of national minorities / Convention-cadre pour la protection des minorités nationales. [URL]
. (2023). Reservations and declarations for Treaty No. 148 – European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages (ETS No. 148). [URL]
Cour européenne des droits de l’homme. (2008). Décision: Requête no. 59894/00, Recevabilité Alain Baylac-Ferrer et Nathalie Suarez c. France. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. [URL]
. (2015). Arrêt: Requête no. 32093/10, Affaire Cumhuriyetçi Eğitim ve Kültür Merkezi Vakfı c. Turkey, Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. [URL]
. (2016). Arrêt: Requête no. 40183/07, Affaire Chapin et Charpentier c. France. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. [URL]
. (2020). Arrêt: Requête no. 41701/16, Affaire Y.T. c. Bulgarie. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. [URL]
ČSR – president republiky. (1945). Dekret č. 12/1945 Sb.: Dekret presidenta republiky o konfiskaci a urychleném rozdělení zemědělského majetku Němců, Maďarů, jakož i zrádců a nepřátel českého a slovenského národa. ČSR. [URL]
Curia: Court of Justice of the European Union. (2022). Case T-158/21, Citizens’ Committee of the European Citizens’ initiative “Minority SafePack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe”. Reports of Cases, ECLI:EU:T:2022:696. [URL]
Curia: Gerichtshof der Europäischen Union. (2017). Rechtssache T-646/13: Bürgerausschuss für die Bürgerinitiative Minority SafePack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe. Sammlung der Rechtsprechung, ECLI:EU:T:2017:59. [URL]
Curtea de Apel Bucureşti. (2021). Anulare act administrativ hot, CNCD nr. 443/20.05.2020: Hotarâre 100/2021-01-29. (2738/2/2020). [URL]
Der Internationale Karlspreis zu Aachen. (2020/2021). Begründung des Direktoriums der Gesellschaft für die Verleihung des Internationalen Karlspreises zu Aachenan den Präsidenten von Rumänien, Klaus Johannis. Stiftung Internationaler Karlspreis zu Aachen. [URL]
European Commission. (2002). Joint press statement ont [sic] the Benes [sic] Decree. European Commision. Retrieved 2023-05-03 from [URL]
European Commission. (2021a). E-001388/2021: Answer given by Mr Reynderson behalf of the European Commission. [URL]
European Commission. (2021b). On the European citizens’ initiative “Minority SafePack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe”. Communication from the Commision, C 1(2021) 171. [URL]
. (2021c). E-002655/2021 & E-002657/2021… Answer given by Mr Reynderson behalf of the European Commission. [URL]
European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission). (2010). Opinion on the act on the state language of the Slovak Republic. Venice Commission / Commission de Venice. [URL]
European Court of Human Rights. (1950). Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms (European convention on human rights). Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. [URL]
. (2006). Decision: Application no. 43983/02, Orange Slovensko, a.s. against Slovakia. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. [URL]
. (2008a). Judgement: Application no. 43546/02, Case of E.B. v. France. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. [URL]
. (2008b). Judgement: Application no.59894/00, Case of Bulgakov v. Ukraine. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. [URL]
. (2009). Decision: Application no.16970/05, Miroslav Mazurek against Slovakia. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. [URL]
. (2011). Judgement: Application no.17763/07, Bubláková v. Slovakia. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. [URL]
. (2015). Judgement: Applications nos. 18766/11 and 36030/11, Case of Oliari and Others v. Italy. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. [URL]
. (2017). Judgement: Applications nos. 79885/12, 52471/13, and 52596/13, Case of A.P., Garçon and Nicot v. France. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. [URL]
. (2018). Judgement: Applications no. 55216/08, Case of S.V. v. Italy. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. [URL]
. (2020). Judgement: Application no. 75041/17, Case of Bositis v. Slovakia. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. [URL]
. (2021a). The ECHR in 50 questions. [URL]
. (2021b). Decision: Application no. 25175/15, Július Pereszlényi- service TV-video against Slovakia. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. [URL]
. (2022). Annual report 2021 of the European Court of Human Rights (English edition). Councel of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. [URL]
. (2023). Judgement: Applications nos. 40792/10, 30538/14, and 43439/14, Case of Fedotova and Others v. Russia. Council of Europe / Conseil de l’Europe. [URL]
European Court of Human Rights / Cour européenne des droits de l’homme. (2002). Thlimmenos v. Greece, no. 34369/97. Reports of judgements and decisions / Recueil des arrêts et décisions, 2000-IV, 263–299. [URL]
. (2004). Andrášik and others v. Slovakia, nos. 57984/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00, 68563/01 and 60226/00. Reports of judgements and decisions / Recueil des arrêts et décisions, 2002-IX, 357–372. [URL]
. (2006). Mentzen v. Latvia, no. 71074/01. Reports of judgements and decisions / Recueil des arrêts et décisions, 2004-XII, 301–335. [URL]
. (2013). Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no. 30141/04. Reports of judgements and decisions / Recueil des arrêts et décisions, 2010-IV, 409–446. [URL]
. (2014). Lautsi and others v. Italy, no. 30814/06. Reports of judgements and decisions / Recueil des arrêts et décisions, 2011-III, 61–117. [URL]
. (2015). Vallianatos and Others v. Greece, nos. 29381/09 & 32684/09. Reports of judgements and decisions / Recueil des arrêts et décisions, 2013-VI, 125–162. [URL]
. (2017). Hämäläinen v. Finland, no. 37359/09. Reports of judgements and decisions / Recueil des arrêts et décisions, 2014-IV, 369–414. [URL]
European Parliament. (2020). European Citizens’ initiative – Minority SafePack: European Parliament resolution of 17 December 2020 on the European citizens’ initiative “Minority SafePack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe”, 2020/2846(RSP). Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0370. [URL]
Federal Union of European Nationalities (FUEN). (2021). Minority SafePack: The European Commission turned its back on national minorities. FUEN. [URL]
Fiala-Butora, J. (2018). Implementation of the framework convention for the protection of national minorities and the European Language Charter: Unified standard or divergence? Hungarian Journal of Minority Studies, 2 1, 7–21. [URL]
(2022a). Linguistic discrimination and linguistic equality: Three models of coexistence (research report Number 2022/10). MTA Társadalomtudományi Kutatóközpont. Budapest. [URL]
(2022b). Linguistic discrimination as a social, legal and human rights phenomenon. Jazykovedný časopis / Journal of Linguistics, 73 (3), 285–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, H. (with Crowther, S.). (1922). My life and work. Garden City Publishing Company.Google Scholar
High Commissioner on National Minorities. (2009a). OSCE minorities commissioner discusses amendments to Slovakia’s language law. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). Retrieved 2023-03-03 from [URL]
. (2009b). Statement by OSCE Minorities Commissioner on Slovakia’s State Language Act. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). Retrieved 2023-03-03 from [URL]
. (2009c). Non-paper: Amendment to the Act on the State Language of the Slovak Republic. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). Retrieved 2023-04-17 from [URL]
Holzer, L. (2022). Legal gender recognition in times of change at the European Court of Human Rights. ERA Forum, 23 1, 165–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hungarian Human Rights Foundation. (2010). Opinion on the implementing principles to the Slovak State Language Law prepared by the EC’s Legal Service. [URL]
Hunt, L. A. (1996). The French Revolution and human rights: A brief documentary history. Bedford Books of St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție a României. (2022). Anulare act administrativ, 2022-11-17. (2738/2/2020). [URL]
JustNews. (2022). De ce a câștigat Gheorghe Funar procesul cu CNCD și udemeristul Tanczos Barna. Retrieved 2022-03-04 from [URL]
Kis, J. (1997). Túl a nemzetállamon. In Az állam semlegessége (Pages 129–185). Atlantisz Könyvkiadó.Google Scholar
Kochenov, D. (2008). A summary of contradictions: An outline of the EU’s main internal and external approaches to ethnic minority protection. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 31 (1), 1–51. [URL]
(2019). Citizenship. MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lantschner, E., Constantin, S., & Marko, J. (Editors). (2012). Practice of minority protection in Central Europe. Nomos.Google Scholar
Meijknecht, A. K. (2004). Minority protection: Standards and reality: implementation of Council of Europe standards in Slovakia, Romania and Bulgaria. T.M.C. Asser Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michel, Ch. (2021). Speech by President Charles Michel at the award ceremony of the International Charlemagne Prize to Klaus Iohannis. European Council. [URL]
Mickonytė, A. (2017). The right to a name versus national identity in the context of eu law: The case of Lithuania. Review of Central and East European Law, 42 (4), 325–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mikalayeva, L., Schwellnus, G., & Balázs, L. (2012). The revocation of minority protection rules in new EU member states: Language and education policy in Slovakia and Latvia. L’Europe en Formation, 364 (2), 379–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagy, Cs. I. (2017). Do European Union member states have to respect human rights? application of the European Union’s “Federal Bill of Rights” to member states. Indiana Internationall & Comparative Law Review, 27 (1), 1–13. [URL]. DOI logo
Nagy, N. (2018). Language rights as a sine qua non of democracy: A comparative overview of the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union. Central and Eastern European Legal Studies, 2018(2), 247–269. [URL]
(2019). A hatalom nyelve – a nyelv hatalma: Nyelvi jog és nyelvpolitika Európa történetében. Dialóg Campus Kiadó.Google Scholar
(2020). Nesze semmi, fogd meg jól: A nemzeti kisebbségek nyelvi jogainak védelme az Emberi Jogok Európai Bizottságának és Bíróságának joggyakorlatában. Pro Minoritate, 2020 (3-ősz), 3–19. [URL]
Pap, A. L. (2022). Genealogy in law as a technology for categorizing, contesting and deconstructing monoracialism. Genealogy, 7 (1), 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scharffs, B. G. (2019). Kokkinakis and the narratives of proper and improper proselytizing. In J. Temperman, T. J. Gunn, & M. D. Evans (Editors), The European Court of Human Rights and the freedom of religion or belief: The 25 Years since Kokkinakis (Pages 153–177). Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slovenská národná rada. (1945). Nariadenie 104/1945 Sb. SNR: O konfiškovaní a urýchlenom rozdelení pôdohospodárskeho majetku Nemcov, Maďarov, ako aj zradcov a nepriateľov slovenského národa. SNR. [URL]
Slovenská republika/Szlovák Köztársaság. (1995). Zákon o štátnom jazyku Slovenskej republiky, z 15. novembra 1995, 270/1995 Z. z. / Törvény a Szlovák Köztársaság államnyelvéről, kelt: 1995. november 15. Tt. 270/1995. Slovenská republika/Szlovák Köztársaság. Bratislava/Pozsony.Google Scholar
. (2022). Zákon o používaní jazykov národnostných menšín z 10. júla 1999, 184/1999 Z.z. Zmena: 318/2009 Z.z.; Zmena: 204/2011 Z.z. Zmena: 287/2012 Z.z.; Zmena: 417/2021 Z.z./Törvény a nemzeti kisebbségi nyelvek használatáról 1999. július 10., Tt. 184/1999. Módosítva: a Tt. 318/2009. sz. törvényével; Módosítva: a Tt. 204/2011. sz. törvényével; Módosítva: a Tt. 287/2012. sz. törvényével;Módosítva: a Tt. 417/2021. sz. törvényével. Slovenská republika/Szlovák Köztársaság. Bratislava/Pozsony. [URL]
Solé, J., Riba i Giner, D., Pedicini, P., Alfonsi, F., & Ždanoka, T. (2021). Question for written answer E-003262/2021 to the Commission. [URL]
Spiliopoulou Åkermark, A. (2021). Justifications of minority protection in international law. Brill. (Originally published as: Justifications of minority protection in international law. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1997.)Google Scholar
Tárnok, B. (2020). Slovakia still applying the Beneš Decrees: Principle of collective guilt in the European Union (research report). Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem. Budapest. [URL]
(2021). EP committee demanding action of the European Commission on the Beneš Decrees (research report). Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem. Budapest. [URL]
Ternes, E. (1992). The Breton language. In D. MacAulay (Editor), The Celtic languages (Pages 371–452). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
The Economist. (2009). Hovorte po slovensky! Slovakia criminalises the use of Hungarian, (2009-07-30). [URL]
United Nation Human Rights Committee. (2000). J.G.A. Diergaardt (late Captain of the Rehoboth Baster Community) et al. v. Namibia. Communication, (760/1997). [URL]
Varga, P. (2020). Az Emberi Jogok Európai Bíróságának ítélete a nemzeti kisebbségi iskolák diákjai érettségi többletterhének ügyében. Kisebbségi Szemle, 5 (3), 59–70. [URL]
Vass, Á. (2016). If yes, why not? Minority language use and accommodation of minority language rights in Slovakia. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, European and Regional Studies, 8 (1), 43–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veress, E. (2021). Tízéves a Sapientia Erdélyi Magyar Tudományegyetem jogászképzése: mérleg és jövőkép. Magyar Jog, 68 (9), 531–537. [URL]
Vincze, L. (2021a). Question for written answer E-001388/2021 to the Commission. [URL]
(2021b). Question for written answer E-002655/2021 to the Commission. [URL]
(2021c). Question for written answer E-002657/2021 to the Commission. [URL]
Wardyn, Ł., & Fiala, J. (2009). The 2009 amendment of the Slovakian State Language Law and its impact on minority rights. Polish Yearbook of International Law, 29 1, 153–174. [URL]
Wickström, B.-A. (2020). On the political economy of minority rights. Three ways to manipulate a minority: Goals, rules, and border poles. European Journal of Political Economy, 64 1, 101894 (16 pages). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2023a). Unstable orders and changing minority protection: The effects of urbanisation. In A.-M. Bíró & D. Newman (Editors), Minority rights and liberal democratic insecurities: The challenge of unstable orders (Pages 76–95). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. J. J. (1921). Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung. Annalen der Naturphilosophie, 14 (3/4), 185–262.Google Scholar
(1999). Tractatus logico-philosoficus (Ch. K. Ogden, Translator). Dover Publications. (Originally published as: Tractatus Logico-philosophicus. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co, 1922.)Google Scholar