Cover not available
Article published In:
Promoting linguistic vitality through public policy: The role of rules, costs and incentives
Edited by Bengt-Arne Wickström, Noémi Nagy, Anneliese Rieger-Roschitz and Balázs Vizi
[Language Problems and Language Planning 47:2] 2023
► pp. 182–207

Standardization and vitality

The role of linguistic purism in preventing extinction

ORCID logo | Cardiff University
This paper examines the relation between linguistic purism, standardization, and vitality, arguing that linguistic purism warrants renewed emphasis as a necessary heuristic for preventing language endangerment and extinction. Linguistic purism has developed an unfavourable reputation in contemporary linguistics and is frequently portrayed as irrational and reactionary. This is partly due to its historical association with nationalism, and partly due to the descriptive rather than prescriptive nature of contemporary linguistics. This paper argues that linguistic purism is actually rooted in progressive rather than reactionary political thought and activity, and is a constitutive feature of Western Modernity. Moreover, its historical association with nationalism is more accurately understood as anti-colonial resistance, a grassroots version of which can be observed across numerous non-Han ethnic groups in the People’s Republic of China today. Using the explanatory framework of linguistic relativity, the paper further argues that purism is a rational rather than reactionary response to excessive translingual borrowing.
Keywords: linguistic purism, linguistic relativity, language standardization, China, anticolonialism, linguistic nationalism, nation-building
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Linguistic purism: Conflicting approaches and caricatured characterizations
  • 3.Purism and standardization: A reactionary synthesis or pillar of western modernity?
  • 4.Language as a carrier of culture: Renaissance precursors
  • 5.Linguistic relativity
  • 6.Linguistic purism as anti-colonial resistance
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 January 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00105.dan
References (75)
References
Absillis, K., & Jaspers, J. (2016). Reconsidering purism: The case of Flanders. In G. Rutten & K. Horner (Editors), Metalinguistic perspectives on Germanic languages: European case studies from past to present (Pages 105–130). Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ammon, U. (1997). National-variety purism in the national centers of the German language. In M. Pütz (Editor), Language choices:. Conditions, constraints, and consequences (Pages 161–178). Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Awal, A. (2022). Linguistic purism in Bengali language in Bangladesh: Myth and reality. SELL (Scope of English Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature) Journal, 7 (1), 57–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baioud, G., & Khuanuud, C. (2022). Linguistic purism as resistance to colonization. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 26 (3), 315–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauman, R., & Briggs, Ch. L. (2003). Voices of modernity: Language ideologies and the politics of inequality. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baxandall, M. (1971). Giotto and the orators: Humanist observers of painting in Italy and the discovery of pictorial composition, 1350–1450. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Beckett, G. H., & Postiglione, G. A. (Editors). (2012). China’s assimilationist language policy: The impact on indigenous/minority literacy and social harmony. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berlin, I. (1976). Vico and Herder: Two studies in the history of ideas. Viking Press.Google Scholar
Bilaniuk, L. (2017/2018). Purism and pluralism: Language use trends in popular culture in Ukraine since independence. Harvard Ukrainian Studies, 35 (1–4), 293–309.Google Scholar
Boeynaems, A., Burgers, Ch., Konijn, E. A., & Steen, G. J. (2017). The effects of metaphorical framing on political persuasion: A Systematic literature review. Metaphor and Symbol, 32 (2), 118–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradley, D. (2009). Language policy for China’s minorities. Written Language and Literacy, 12 (2), 170–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brunstad, E. (2003). Standard language and linguistic purism. Sociolinguistica, 17 (1), 52–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bulag, U. E. (2003). Mongolian ethnicity and linguistic anxiety in China. American Anthropologist, 105 (4), 753–763. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burke, P. (2004). Languages and communities in early modern Europe. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cabras, G. (2017). Language ideologies in a Uyghur comedy sketch: The comedy sketch Chüshenmidim “I don’t understand” and the importance of Sap Uyghur . International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2017 (248), 111–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D. (2013). The one, the many, and the other: Representing multi- and mono-lingualism in post-9/11 verbal hygiene. Critical Multilingualism Studies, 1 (2). Multilingual, 2.0? (Part II), 59–77.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1994). Review of: Thomas, George (1992). Linguistic purism. (Studies in language and linguistics.) London & New York: Longman. Pp. xii, 250. Language, 70 (4), 844–846. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cubelli, R., Paolieri, D., Lotto, L., & Job, R. (2011). The effect of grammatical gender on object categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37 (2), 449–460. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Ø. (1995). When the future comes from behind: Malagasy and other time concepts and some consequences for communication [Language, Culture, and World View]. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 19 (2), 197–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danesi, M. (2021). Linguistic relativity today: Language, mind, society, and the foundations of linguistic anthropology. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eberhard, D. M., Simmons, G. F., & Fennig, Ch. D. (Editors). (2022). Ethnologue: Languages of the world (25th edition). SIL International. [URL]
Elpers, N., Jensen, G., & Holmes, K. J. (2022). Does grammatical gender affect object concepts? Registered replication of Phillips and Boroditsky (2003). Journal of Memory and Language, 127 1, 104357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estival, D., & Pennycook, A. (2011). L’Académie française and Anglophone language ideologies. Language Policy, 10 (4), 325–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Everett, D. L. (2005). Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human language. Current Anthropology, 46 (4), 621–646. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanon, F. (2008). Black skin, white masks (R. Philcox, Translator). Grove Press. (Originally published as: Peau noire, masques blancs. Paris: Éditions de Seuil, 1952.)Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. (1922). Addresses to the German nation (R. F. Jones & G. H. Thurnbull, Translator). The open court publishing company. (Originally published as: Reden an die deutsche Nation. Berlin: Realschulbuchhandlung, 1808.)Google Scholar
Garin, E. (Editor). (1952). Prosatori latini del quattrocento. Riccardo Riccardi.Google Scholar
Hansen, K., Wypych, M., Bańko, M., & Bilewicz, M. (2018). Psychological determinants of linguistic purism: National identification, conservatism, and attitudes to loanwords. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 37 (3), 365–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrison, K. (2021). Attitudes towards linguistic variation in the Ukrainian community in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 0 (0), 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawke, A. (2018). Coping with an expanding vocabulary: The lexicographical contribution to Welsh. International Journal of Lexicography, 31 (2), 229–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herder, J. G. (1891). Herders sämmtliche Werke (B. Suphan, Editor; Volume 51). Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
(1966). Outlines of a philosophy of the history of man (Th. O. Churchill, Translator). Bergman Publishers. (Originally published as: Ideen zur Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit. Riga: Johann Friedrich Hartknoch, 1784.)Google Scholar
Humayoun, M., Hammarström, H., & Ranta, A. (2022). Urdu morphology, orthography and lexicon extraction. arXiv. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Humboldt, W. (1999). “On language”: On the diversity of human language construction and its influence on the mental development of the human species (M. Losonsky, Editor; P. Heath, Translator; 2nd edition). Cambridge University Press. (Originally published as: Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einflus auf die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechts. Berlin: Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1836.)Google Scholar
Jackson, J. C., Watts, J., Henry, T. R., List, J.-M., Forkel, R., Mucha, P. J., Greenhill, S. J., Gray, R. D., & Lindquist, K. A. (2019). Emotion semantics show both cultural variation and universal structure. Science, 366 (6472), 1517–1522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juliard, P. (1970). Philosophies of language in eighteenth-century France. Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kirkness, A. (1984). Das Phänomen des Purismus in der Geschichte des Deutschen. In W. Besch, O. Reichmann, & S. Sonderegger (Editors), Sprachgeschichte. Ein Handbuch zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und ihrer Erforschung (HSK) (Pages 290–299, Volume 2.11). Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kraef, O. (2013). Building Yi (m)other tongue: virtual platforms, language maintenance and cultural awareness in a Chinese minority context. In E. Kasten & T. de Graaf (Editors), Sustaining indigenous knowledge: Learning tools and community initiatives for preserving endangered languages and local cultural heritage (Pages 219–248). Verlag der Kulturstiftung Sibirien.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langer, N., & Nesse, A. (2012). Linguistic purism. In J. M. Hernández-Campoy & J. C. Conde-Silvestre (Editors), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics (Pages 607–625). Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lhagyal, D. (2021). “Linguistic authority” in state-society interaction: Cultural politics of Tibetan education in China. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 42 (3), 353–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lichfield, J. (2002). Our Man in Paris: The mystery of the Académie française. The Independent, (2002-09-30).Google Scholar
Ma, R. (2017). Reconstructing “nation” (minzu) discourses in China. International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology, 1 1, 8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacNamara, J. (1971). The Irish language and nationalism. The Crane Bag, 1 (2), 40–44. [URL]
Martyn, D. (1997). Borrowed fatherland: Nationalism and language purism in Fichte’s Addresses to the German nation . The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory, 72 (4), 303–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Memmi, A. (2021). The colonizer and the ccolonized (H. Greenfeld, Translator). Profile Books. (Originally published as: Portrait du colonisé precede du portrait du colonisateur. Corrêa: Editions Buchet/Chastel, 1957.)Google Scholar
Nauta, L. (2006). Linguistic relativity and the humanist imitation of classical Latin. In L. Nauta (Editor), Language and cultural change: Aspects of the study and use of language in the later Middle Ages and the Renaissance (Pages 173–186). Peeters.Google Scholar
Ngũgĩ, wa Th. (1986). Decolonising the mind: The politics of language in African literature. James Currey.Google Scholar
Orwell, G. (1946). Politics and the English Language. Horizon, 13 (76), 252–264.Google Scholar
Ottati, V., Renstrom, R., & Price, E. (2014). The metaphotic framing model: Political communication and public opinion. In J. Landau, M. D. Robinson, & B. P. Meier (Editors), The power of metaphor: Examining Its influence on social life (Pages 179–202). American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patten, A. (2006). The humanist roots of linguistic nationalism. History of Political Thought, 27 (2), 221–262. [URL]
Phillips, W., & Boroditsky, L. (2003). Can quirks of grammar affect the way you think? Grammatical gender and object concepts. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 25 1. [URL]
Prys, D., Andrews, T., & Prys, G. (2020). Term formation in Welsh: Problems and solutions. In I. Brač & A. Ostroški Anić (Editors), Svijet od riječi. Terminološki i leksikografski ogledi (Pages 159–184). Institut za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje.Google Scholar
Rehm, G., Marheinecke, K., Hegele, S., Piperidis, S., Bontcheva, K., Hajič, J., Choukri, K., Vasiljevs, A., Backfried, G., Prinz, Ch., Gómez-Pérez, J. M., Meertens, L., Lukowicz, P., van Genabith, J., Lösch, A., Slusallek, Ph., Irgens, M., Gatellier, P., Köhler, J., Le Bars, L., Anastasiou, D., Auksoriūtė, A., Bel, N., Branco, A., Budin, G., Daelemans, W., De Smedt, K., Garabík, R., Gavriilidou, M., Gromann, D., Koeva, S., Krek, S., Krstev, C., Lindén, K., Magnini, B., Odijk, J., Ogrodniczuk, M., Rögnvaldsson, E., Rosner, M., Pedersen, B., Skadiņa, I., Tadić, M., Tufis, D., Váradi, T., Vider, K., Way, A., & Yvon, F. (2020). The European language technology landscape in 2020: Language-centric and human-centric AI for cross-cultural communication in multilingual Europe. European Language Resources Association. [URL]
Ritter, V. (2004). The language of Hariaudh’s “Priyapravās”: Notes toward an archaeology of modern standard Hindi. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 124 (3), 417–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roche, G. (2018). Draft Report on Tibet’s Linguistic Minorities (research report). SocArXiv, University of Maryland. College Park. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Articulating language oppression: colonialism, coloniality and the erasure of Tibet’s minority languages. Patterns of Prejudice, 53 (5), 487–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021a). Lexical necropolitics: The raciolinguistics of language oppression on the Tibetan margins of Chineseness. Language & Communication, 76 1, 111–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021b). Tibetan language rights and civil society in the People’s Republic of China: Challenges of and for rights. Asian Studies Review, 45 (1), 67–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roche, G., & Suzuki, H. (2018). Tibet’s minority languages: Diversity and endangerment. Modern Asian Studies, 52 (4), 1227–1278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samuel, S., Cole, G., & Eacott, M. J. (2019). Grammatical gender and linguistic relativity: A systematic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26 1, 1767–1786. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon, A. F., & Jerit, J. (2007). Toward a theory relating political discourse, media, and public opinion. Journal of Communication, 57 (2), 254–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun Hongkai, Hu Zengyi, & Huang Xing [孫宏開, 胡增益, & 黃行] (Editors). (2007). 中國的語言 (The languages of China). Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. (1991). Linguistic purism. Longman.Google Scholar
Trask, R. L. (1999). Key Concepts in Language and Linguistics. Routledge.Google Scholar
Tsung, L. (2012). Language and power: Tuanjie hua, an Yi-Han mixed language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2012 (215), 63–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uszkoreit, H., & Rehm, G. (2012). At least 21 European languages in danger of digital extinction. META-NET. [URL]
Valla (Valllensis), L. [della Valle, L.]. (1471). Elegantiarum linguae latinae libri sex.Google Scholar
Wickström, B.-A. (2012). Language as a renewable resource: Import, dissipation, and absorption of innovations. International Journal of Computational Linguistics, 3 (1), 32–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Witt, R. (2021). In the footsteps of the ancients: The origins of humanism from Lovato to Bruni. Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, H. (2003). Bonan. In J. Janhunen (Editor), The Mongolic languages (Pages 325–345). Routledge.Google Scholar
Xu, Y., Duong, K., Malt, B. C., Jiang, S., & Srinivasan, M. (2020). Conceptual relations predict colexification across languages. Cognition, 201 1, 104280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xú, S. (2013). Language endangerment. In Y. Li & W. Li (Editors), The language situation in China (Pages 261–270, Volume 11, 2006–2007). De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar