Review published In:
Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 15:2 (1991) ► pp.211216
References (10)
References
Bauman, Richard. 1981. Christ Respects No Man’s Person: The Plain Language of the Early Quakers and the Rhetoric of Impoliteness. Sociolinguistic Working Paper Number 881. Austin, Texas: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.Google Scholar
. 1983. Let Your Words Be Few: Symbolism of Speaking and Silence among Seventeenth-Century Quakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blaubergs, Maija S. 1980. An Analysis of Classic Arguments against Changing Sexist Language. Women’s Studies International Quarterly 31: 135–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenfeld, Howard. 1978. Our Ever-Changing Language. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 31: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 41–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janicki, Karol and Adam Jaworski. Forthcoming. Purism and Propaganda: The First Congress for Polish. In Joshua A. Fishman (ed.), The First Congress for Language X.
Kramarae, Cheris. Forthcoming 1992. Punctuating the Dictionary. In Toril Swan and Tove Bull (eds.), Language, Sex, and Society. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Casey and Kate Swift. 1981. The Handbook of Non-Sexist Writing for Writers, Editors and Speakers. British Edition Revised by Stephanie Dowrick. London: The Women’s Press.Google Scholar
Pei, Mario. 1963. The Dictionary as a Battlefront: English Teachers’ Dilemma. In Jack C. Gray (ed.), Words, Words, and Words about Dictionaries. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing, 100–114.Google Scholar
Shenker, Israel. 1979. Harmless Drudges: Wizards of Language – Ancient, Medieval and Modern. Bronxville, N.Y.: Barnhart Books.Google Scholar