Cover not available
Article published In:
Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 45:3 (2021) ► pp.331–356

Pluricentric linguistic justice in Quebec

An attitudinal study of the politics of norm setting in French

| Queen Mary University of London
| McGill University
With the emergence of the notion of Standard Quebec French, debates about linguistic usage in Quebec are today largely shaped by two competing normative models: an exonorm defined for all intents and purposes in France and an endonorm reflecting socially acceptable usage as determined by Quebec­ers themselves. While language attitude research has provided some indication of the normative preferences of ordinary Quebec­ers, the picture remains largely ambiguous. This article seeks to provide some clarity through a reconceptualisation of language attitudes intended to specifically elicit value judgments on norm setting and enforcement. Building on research in political philosophy and theory, it further develops the notion of ‘pluricentric linguistic justice’, proposed as a tool for assessing questions of authority and legitimacy concerning French in Quebec. It then presents the results of an empirical exploration of this notion focused on the attitudes of a sample of franco­phone Quebec­ers towards endonormativity, including as a function of key social variables. The study represents an innovative attempt to develop and test a methodological instrument for interrogating questions of linguistic justice in pluricentric settings more broadly.
Keywords: linguistic justice, pluricentricity, endonormativity, standards, norms, French, Quebec, language attitudes
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Attitudes towards pluricentric variation in Quebec
  • Pluricentric linguistic justice
  • Research questions
  • Methods
    • Instrument
    • Data collection and participants
    • Preliminary analyses
  • Results
  • Discussion
    • RQ1. Based on the moral arguments presented, what are the respondents’ attitudes towards endonormativity?
    • RQ2. How do the respondents’ attitudes differ according to social variables traditionally associated with language use and linguistic variation in Quebec?
    • RQ3. How do the respondents’ attitudes correlate with their reported manner of speaking and degree of identification as Quebec­ers, Canadians and franco­phones?
  • Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 28 February 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.20041.oak
References (50)
References
d’Anglejan, A., & Tucker, G. R. (1973). Sociolinguistic correlates of speech style in Quebec. In R. W. Shuy & R. W. Fasold (Eds.) Language Attitudes: Current Trends and Prospects (pp. 1–27). Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Association québécoise des professeurs de français (1977). Les résolutions de l’Assemblée générale. Québec français, 28 1, 11.Google Scholar
Barry, B. (2001). Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Block, D. (1998). Exploring interpretations of questionnaire items. System, 26 1, 403–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, C. (2002). La langue et le nombril. Une histoire sociolinguistique du Québec. 2nd edition. Montréal: Fides.Google Scholar
Bouchard, P., & Maurais, J. (1999). La norme et l’école: L’opinion des Québécois. Terminogramme, 91–92 1, 91–116.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (1995). Verbal Hygiene: The Politics of Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Schutter, H. (2020). Intralinguistic justice. In Y. Peled & D. Weinstock (Eds.) Language Ethics (pp. 146–177). Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, J.-M. (2018). Online questionnaires. In A. Phakiti, P. De Costa, L. Plonsky & S. Starfield (Eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology (pp. 269–286). London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dollinger, S. (2019). The Pluricentricity Debate: On Austrian German and Other Germanic Standard Varieties. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Francard, M. (1993). L’insécurité linguistique dans les communautés franco­phones périphériques. Vol. 1 and 2. Cahiers de l’Institut de linguistique de Louvain, 19 (3–4).Google Scholar
Fuga, M. (2002). Attitude Change within Quebec’s Francophone Population. Unpublished honours thesis, McGill University, Montreal.
Gendron, J.-D. (1990). Les arguments pour ou contre un projet de dictionnaire décrivant les usages du français au Québec. In Conseil de la langue française (Ed.) Actes du colloque sur l’aménagement de la langue au Québec. Communications et syntèse, Mont-Gabriel, 7 et 8 décembre 1989. [Québec]: Conseil de la langue française.Google Scholar
Genesee, F., & Holobow, N. E. (1989). Change and stability in intergroup perceptions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 8 (1), 17–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., McIntosh, A., & Strevens, P. (1968). A sociolinguistic typology for describing national multilingualism. In J. A. Fishman (Ed.) Readings in the Sociology of Language (pp. 139–169). Mouton: The Hague. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hausmann, F. J. (1986). Les dictionnaires du français hors de France. In L. Boisvert, C. Poirier and C. Verreault (Eds.) La lexicographie québécoise: bilan et perspectives (pp. 3–19). Québec: Les Presses de l’Université Laval.Google Scholar
Joseph, J. E. (2006). Language and Politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kircher, R. (2009). Language Attitudes in Quebec: A Contemporary Perspective. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Queen Mary University of London.
(2012). How pluricentric is the French language? An investigation of attitudes towards Quebec French compared to European French. Journal of French Language Studies, 22 (3), 345–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klinkenberg, J.-M. (1993). Préface. In M. Francard, with the collaboration of J. Lambert & F. Masuy, L’insécurité linguistique en Communauté française de Belgique ( Français et société 6) (pp. 5–7). Bruxelles: Service de la langue française.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W. (2001). Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism and Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, W., & Patten, A. (Eds.) (2003). Language Rights and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (2001). Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. 2: Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. E., Hodgson, R. C., Gardner, R. C., & Fillenbaum, S. (1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken language. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60 (1), 44–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laur, E. (2001). Perceptions linguistiques à Montréal. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Université de Montréal.
Léger, R., & Lewis, H. (Eds.) (2017). Normative Approaches to Language Policy and Planning. Special issue of Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38(7).Google Scholar
Lodge, R. A. (1993). French: From Dialect to Standard. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martel, P., & Cajolet-Laganière, H. (1996). Le français québécois: usages, standard et aménagement. Québec: Institut québécois de recherche sur la culture.Google Scholar
Maurais, J. (2008). Les Québécois et la norme: L’évaluation par les Québécois de leurs usages linguistiques. [Québec]: Office québécois de la langue française.Google Scholar
Meney, L. (2010). Main basse sur la langue: Idéologie et interventionnisme linguistique au Québec. Montréal: Liber.Google Scholar
Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (2012). Authority in Language: Investigating Standard English. 4th edition. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moreau, M.-L. (1999). Pluralité des normes et des appartenances. Convergences et divergences en situation pédagogique. In C. Ouellon (Ed.) La norme du français au Québec. Perspectives pédagogiques ( Terminogramme , 92–92 1, 41–63).Google Scholar
Moreau, M.-L., Bouchard, P., Demartin, S., Gadet, F., Guerin, E., Harmegnies, B., Huet, K., Laroussi, F., Prikhodkine, A., Singy, P., Thiam, N., & Tyne, H. (2007). Les accents dans la francophonie: une enquête internationale ( Français et société 16). Fernelmont: E.M.E.Google Scholar
Nemni, M. (1998). Le français au Québec: représentation et conséquences pédagogiques. Revue québécoise de linguistique, 26 (2), 151–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oakes, L. (2021). Pluricentric linguistic justice: a new ethics-based approach to pluricentricity in French and other languages. Sociolinguistica, 35 1, 49–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oakes, L., & Peled, Y. (2018). Normative Language Policy: Ethics, Politics, Principles. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oakes, L. & Warren, J. (2007). Language, Citizenship and Identity in Quebec. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Office de la langue française (1965). Norme du français parlé et écrit au Québec. [Québec]: Ministère des affaires culturelles.Google Scholar
Poirier, C. (1995). Les variantes topolectales du lexique français: propositions de classement à partir d’exemples québécois. In M. Francard & D. Latin (Eds.) Le régionalisme lexical (pp. 13–56). Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck Supérieur. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998). De la défense à la codification du français québécois : plaidoyer pour une action concertée. Revue québécoise de linguistique, 26 (2), 129–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pöll, B. (2005). Le français langue pluricentrique? Études sur la variation diatopique d’une langue standard. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Preston, M. S. (1963). Evaluational Reactions to English, Canadian French and European French Voices. Unpublished MA dissertation, McGill University, Montreal.
Reagan, T. (2019). Linguistic Legitimacy and Social Justice. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinke, K., & Ostiguy, L. (2016). Le français québécois d’aujourd’hui. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Remysen, W. (2004). La variation linguistique et l’insécurité linguistique. Le cas du français québécois. In P. Bouchard (Ed.) Langues et societies: La variation dans la langue standard (pp. 23–36). Québec: Office québécois de la langue française.Google Scholar
Riera-Gil, E. (2019). The communicative value of local languages: an underestimated interest in theories of linguistic justice. Ethnicities, 19 (1), 174–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1979). Language structure and linguistic ideology. In P. R. Clyne, W. F. Hanks & C. L. Hofbauer (Eds.) The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels (pp. 193–247). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada (2009). Mother tongue of person. [URL] Accessed 9 August 2020.
Van Parijs, P. (2011). Linguistic Justice for Europe and the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Chen, Fang
2024. The use of discourse fuzzy strategies in movie lines based on random forest model. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 9:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.