Cover not available
Article published In:
Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 46:1 (2022) ► pp.26–54

Language policies and organizational features of international organizations

| Zhejiang University
ORCID logo | Zhejiang University
| Zhejiang University

Language policy, which is directly concerned with organizational operation, functions, and objectives, has become an increasingly important issue in international organizations (IOs). However, research on IOs’ language policies, especially exploration based on large-scale data, is rather limited. Using data from the Yearbook of International Organizations (2020–2021), this study explores how IOs select their languages. It is found that: (1) Federations of IOs and IGOs are more likely to choose languages other than English, whereas universal membership organizations and NGOs are much more likely to use English; (2) IOs headquartered in Western countries adopt more diverse languages than those in Asia, and those headquartered in developed countries are more prone to choose local language(s) than those in developing countries; (3) IOs with a longer history tend more towards multilingualism; (4) IOs dealing with religion, law, society, transportation, and communication are more inclined to be multilingual; and (5) IOs with individual members generally choose fewer languages than those with IO members. These findings reveal that IOs’ language management is shaped not only by internal and external organizational features, but also by the interactions between these features and language values.

Keywords: international organizations, language policies, English, language management, Yearbook of International Organizations
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review on the language management of international organizations
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Data and sample
    • 3.2Data analysis
  • 4.Analysis and results
    • 4.1Overview of official and working languages declared by the sampled IOs
    • 4.2The number of declared languages
      • Membership
      • Region/Continent
      • Age
      • Subject of concern
    • 4.3Declaration of languages other than English
      • Type A vs. Type B
      • Government involvement: IGO vs. NGO
      • Age
    • 4.4Declaration of (de facto) national language(s) of headquarters countries
      • Region/Continent
      • Socioeconomic development of headquarters countries: Developing vs. developed countries
  • 5.Discussion and conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 March 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.21028.zha
References
Ager, D. E.
(1996) Language policy in Britain and France: The processes of policy. London and New York: Cassell.Google Scholar
Akiko, O.
(1999) A study on international communication in regional organizations: The use of English as the “official” language of the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN). Asian Englishes, 2(1), 91–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ammon, U.
(2006a) The dominance of languages and language communities in the European Union (EU) and the consequences. In M. Pütz, J. A. Fishman, & J. Neff-van Aertselaer. (Eds.), Along the Routes to Power: Explorations of Empowerment through Language (pp. 217–238). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006b) Language conflicts in the European Union. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 319–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Angouri, J.
(2013) The multilingual reality of the multinational workplace: Language policy and language use. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 34(6), 564–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arzoz, X.
(2008) Respecting Linguistic Diversity in the European Union. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barkin, J. S.
(2006) International Organization. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P.
(1991) Language and Symbolic Power (trans. G. Raymond, & M. Adamson). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bruthiaux, P.
(2003) Contexts and trends for English as a global language. In H. Tonkin, & T. Reagan. (Eds), Language in the Twenty-First Century (pp. 9–22). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chapman, T. L.
(2009) Audience Beliefs and International Organization Legitimacy. International Organization, 63(4), 733–764. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, P. V.
(2006) Language policy in the European Union: European/English/Elite/Equal/ Esperanto Union? Language Problems and Language Planning, 30(1), 21–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D.
(1997) English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Swaan, A.
(2001) Words of the World: The Global Language System. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press Blackwell.Google Scholar
De Varennes, F.
(2012) Language policy at the supranational level. In B. Spolsky. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Language Policy (pp. 3–16). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dhir, K. S., & Goke-Pariola, A.
(2002) The case for language policies in multinational corporations. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 7(4), 241–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J.
(2003) Language and the future: Choices and constraints. In H. Tonkin, & T. Reagan. (Eds), Language in the Twenty-First Century (pp. 35–46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franzese, M., & Iuliano, A.
(2019) Correlation analysis. In S. Ranganathan, M. Gribskov, K. Nakai, & C. Schönbach. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (pp. 706–721). Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gazzola, M.
(2006) Managing multilingualism in the European Union: Language policy evaluation for the European Parliament. Language Policy, 5(4), 393–417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gazzola, M., & Grin, F.
(2007) Assessing efficiency and fairness in multilingual communication: Towards a general analytical framework. Association Internationale de Linguistique Appliquée Review, 201, 87–105.Google Scholar
Grin, F.
(2003) Language planning and economics. Current Issues in Language Planning, 4:1, 1–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) Coûts et justice linguistique dans l’élargissement de l’Union européenne. Panoramiques, 69(4), 97–104.Google Scholar
(2008) Principles of Policy Evaluation and their Application to Multilingualism in the European Union. In X. Arzoz. (Ed.), Respecting Linguistic Diversity in the European Union (pp. 73–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019) The role of LPLP in a changing landscape. Language Problems and Language Planning, 4(1), 1–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamel, R.
(2013) Language Policy and Ideology in Latin America. In R. Bayley, R. Cameron, & C. Lucas. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics ( 1st edition ) (pp. 609–628). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harmon, D., & Loh, J.
(2010) The index of linguistic diversity: A new quantitative measure of trends in the status of the world’s languages. Language Documentation & Conservation, 41, 97–151.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. K.
(2005) Language diversity in international management teams. International Studies of Management & Organization, 35(1), 66–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hogan-Brun, G.
(2013) Language planning as a complex practice. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(3–4), 359–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hornberger, N. H.
(1994) Language policy and planning in South America. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 141, 220–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) Multilingual language policies and the continua of biliteracy: An ecological approach. In N. H. Hornberger. (Ed.), Continua of biliteracy: An ecological framework for educational policy, research, and practice in multilingual settings. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laverack, P. J.
(2015) The rise of Asia and the status of the French language in International Law. Chinese Journal of International Law, 14(3), 567–583. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, W., & Liu, H.
(2013) Language problems and language planning: A corpus-based historical investigation. Language Problems and Language Planning, 37(2), 151–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddicoat, A. J.
(2009) Language planning and international collaboration: A current issue in language planning. Current Issues in Language Planning, 10(2), 163–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loos, E.
(2000) Language choice, linguistic capital and symbolic domination in the European Union. Language Problems and Language Planning, 24(1), 37–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEntee-Atalianis, L. J.
(2006) Geostrategies of Interlingualism: Language Policy and Practice in the International Maritime Organisation, London, UK. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(2–3), 341–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mooko, T.
(2009) Language policy and practice in the multilingual Southern African Development Community. Current Issues in Languages Planning, 10(2), 166–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neeley, T. B.
(2013) Language matters: Status loss and achieved status distinctions in global organizations. Organization Science, 24(2), 476–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neustupný, J. V.
(1997): Gengokanri to komyuniti gengo no shomondai [Language management and the problems of community languages]. In K. K. Kokuritsu. (Ed.), Tagengo, tabunka komyuniti no tameno gengokanri [Language Management for Multicultural Communities] (pp. 21–37). Tokyo: Bonjinsha.Google Scholar
Neustupný, J. V. & Nekvapil, J.
(2003) Language Management in the Czech Republic. New York, NY, USA: Taylor & Francis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pearce, M.
(2007) The Routledge Dictionary of English Language Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pearl, S.
(1996) Changes in the patterns of language use in the United Nations. In K. E. Müller. (Ed.), Language Status in the Post-Cold-War Era (pp. 29–42). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Phillipson, R.
(2018) English, the lingua nullius of global hegemony. In P. A. Kraus, & F. Grin. (Eds), The Politics of Multilingualism: Europeanisation, Globalisation and Linguistic Governance (pp. 275–304). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piller, I., Zhang, J., & Li, J.
(2020) Linguistic diversity in a time of crisis: Language challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic. Multilingua, 39(5), 503–515. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pool, J.
(1991) The Official Language Problem. American Political Science Review, 851, 495–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quell, C.
(1997) Language choice in multilingual institutions: A case study at the European Commission with particular reference to the role of English, French and German as working languages. Multilingua, 16(1), 57–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spolsky, B.
(2004) Language Policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2009) Language Management. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) Language policy in Portuguese colonies and successor states. Current Issues in Language Planning, 19:1, 62–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tonkin, H.
(2017) Language and the United Nations: A preliminary review. [Online]. Available: [URL]
Wang, Y., & Liu, H.
(2017) From planned language to language planning: Esperantists’ activities in China in 1911–1958. Language Problems and Language Planning, 41(3), 265–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, B.
(2009) Language, Power and Multilateral Trade Negotiations. Review of International Political Economy, 16(4), 597–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H., Wu, Y., & Xie, Z.
(2020) Diversity or division: Language choices on international organizations’ official website. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 63(2), 139–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H., & Xie, Z.
(2018) The choices of official languages of international organizations. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 52(2), 213–224.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J.
(2002) Beyond Survival: Achieving New Venture Growth by Building Legitimacy. The Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar