The worldwide dominance of English is such that only catastrophic upheaval could seemingly threaten it in the near future. In the longer term, an emerging power (eg, China) may come to challenge American supremacy and with it the dominant position of English. However, even in the event of such a realignment, the language of that emerging power (eg, Chinese) may not succeed in arresting the advantage English already derives from critical mass. To have any chance of global spread, a challenger would need to possess structural characteristics — namely, minimal inflectional morphology, non-tonal phonology, and a non-logographic script — that would facilitate its acquisition by individuals with largely utilitarian motivations. Alternatively, to evolve these characteristics, a challenger would need to be subjected to minimal standardization and be allowed the freedom to accommodate user-driven change, including indigenization. Finally, it would need to be perceived as a vehicle for modernizing values. While hypothetical challengers (eg, Chinese, French, German, Spanish, Japanese, Russian, Arabic, or Esperanto) all exhibit some of these characteristics, only English exhibits all of them at present and for the foreseeable future. For these reasons, the worldwide dominance of English is likely to survive even a hypothetical passing of the American Era.
2011. A comparison of the global status of English and Chinese: towards a new global language?. English Today 27:1 ► pp. 52 ff.
Gil, Jeffrey
2020. Will a character based writing system stop Chinese becoming a global language? A review and reconsideration of the debate. Global Chinese 6:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
Gil, Jeffrey
2021. Continuation, Coexistence or Replacement?. In The Rise of Chinese as a Global Language, ► pp. 121 ff.
Gil, Jeffrey
2021. A Language Comprehensive Competitiveness Profile of Chinese. In The Rise of Chinese as a Global Language, ► pp. 93 ff.
Gil, Jeffrey
2021. Introduction: Rising China, Rising Chinese. In The Rise of Chinese as a Global Language, ► pp. 1 ff.
Gil, Jeffrey
2021. The Language Comprehensive Competitiveness of Chinese: The Objective Perspective. In The Rise of Chinese as a Global Language, ► pp. 51 ff.
Gil, Jeffrey
2021. The Role of the Character-Based Writing System in the Future Global Dynamics of Chinese. In The Rise of Chinese as a Global Language, ► pp. 99 ff.
Darby, James
2009. French antipathy to Turkey's EU candidacy: the language dimension. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 30:3 ► pp. 205 ff.
O'Donnell, Paul & Annemarie Toebosch
2008. Multilingualism in Brussels: ‘I'd Rather Speak English’. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 29:2 ► pp. 154 ff.
Wharton, Glenn
2005. Language Learning Interest at a New Management University in Multilingual Singapore. Foreign Language Annals 38:4 ► pp. 544 ff.
Ridge, Brian
2004. Bangsa Malaysia and Recent Malaysian English Language Policies. Current Issues in Language Planning 5:4 ► pp. 407 ff.
Sifakis, Nicos C.
2004. Teaching EIL—Teaching International or Intercultural English? What Teachers Should Know. System 32:2 ► pp. 237 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.