Article published In:
Language Problems and Language PlanningVol. 38:1 (2014) ► pp.1–18
Language-education policies and international institutions
The World Bank’s vs. UNESCO’s global framework
One of the grand claims of neoliberalism is that the free-market world is an ‘actor-free’ process, in which no one is in charge. The aim of this article is to problematize this claim by examining the agency of two international institutions, the World Bank and UNESCO, and the ways in which they shape global language-education policies. In light of the latest reports released by the two institutions, the findings of this study suggest that both institutions are key players in the realm of global policies. Their differences, however, recline in their orientations, motives, and power. Whereas the World Bank is a finance institution with ‘economic prosperity’ as its motto, and neoliberalism as the basis of its policies, UNESCO is an intellectual institution with peace as its mantra, and universal consensus and social inclusion as the basis of its policies. The impact of such differences is notable on the type of policies each institution advocates. Whereas the World Bank’s policies call for an alliance between language, education and economy as a means to eradicate poverty and achieve development, UNESCO’s policies call for multiculturalism, multilingualism, and pluralism in education as a means to promote intercultural and international dialogues as a strategy to safeguard peace. The former model is currently in vogue in education sectors worldwide. Its global domination, however, cannot be explained without taking into account the financial supremacy of the World Bank, the economic dependency of many world’s nations on the World Bank’s long-term developmental loans, and the many conditions set by the Bank for its loan distributions, which includes, among others, the implementation of its neoliberal-driven educational and linguistic policies.
References (42)
Alidou, H., Glanz, C. & Nikièma, N. (2011). Quality multilingual and multicultural education for lifelong learning. International Review of Education, 57(5/6), 529-539. 
Altbach, P. & Salmi, J. (Eds.) (2011). The road to academic excellence: Making of world-class research universities. Washington DC: The World Bank.
Ammon, U. (2012). Linguistic inequality and its effects on participation in scientific discourse and on global knowledge accumulation—with a closer look at the problems of the second-rank language communities. Applied Linguistic Review, 3(2), 333-355.
Block, D., Gray, J. & Holborow, M. (2012). Neoliberalism and applied linguistics. London and NewYork: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Borjian, M. (2013). English in post-revolutionary Iran: From indigenization to internationalization. Bristol, Buffalo, Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
Bourdieu, P. (2001). Pour un movement social européen [For a European social movement]. Paris: Raisons D’agir.
Brock-Utne, B. (2000). Whose education for all? Retrieved August 2nd, 2013, from:[URL]
. (1999). African universities and the African heritage. International Review of Education, 45(1), 87–104.
Garcia, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Gutting, G. (2005). Foucault: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jones, P. (2006). World Bank financing of education: Lending, learning, and development. New York: Routledge.
Jones, P. & Coleman, D. (2005). The United Nations and education: Multilingualism, development and globalization. London: Routledge Falmer & Taylor & Francis Group.
Jones, P. (2004). Taking the credit: Financing and policy linkages in the education portfolio of the World Bank. In G. Steiner-Khamsi (Ed.), The global politics of educational borrowing and lending (pp. 188–200). New York: Teachers College.
. (1998). Globalisation and internationalism: Democratic prospects for world education. Comparative Education, 34(2), 143–155.
Mazrui, A. (2004). English in Africa after the cold war. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
May, S. (2001). Language and minority rights: Ethnicity, nationalism, and the politics of language. London & New York: Longman and Pearson Education.
Ogawa, R. (1994). The institutional sources of educational reform: The case of school-based management. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 519–548.
Ouane, A. & Glanz, C. (Eds.) (2011). Optimising learning, education, and publishing in Africa: The language factor. Hamburg, Germany:UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning (UIL) & Tunisia: Association for the Development of Education in Africa (ADEA) and African Development Bank.
Peet, R. (1999). Theories of development. New York and London: The Guilford Press.
Piller, I. & Cho, J. (2013). Neoliberalism and language policy. Language in Society, 42(1), 23–44.
Phillipson, R. (2008). Linguistic imperialism continued. Hyderabad: Orient Black Swan.
Rapatahana, V. & Bunce, P. (Eds.) (2012). English language as hydra: Its impacts on non-English language cultures. Bristol, Buffalo, Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
Ricento, T. (2005). Problems with the ‘language-as-resource’ discourse in the promotion of heritage languages in the U.S.A. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(3), 348–368.
Romaine, S. (2013). Politics and policies of promoting multilingualism in the European Union. Language Policy, 121,115–137.
Ruiz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal, 8(2), 15–34.
Salmi, J. (2009). The challenge of establishing world-class universities. Washington DC: The World Bank.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2000). Linguistic genocide or worldwide diversity and human rights? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T., Phillipson, R., Mohanty, A. & Panda, M. (Eds.) (2009a). Social justice through multilingual education. Bristol, Buffalo, Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T., Phillipson, R., Panda, M. & A. Mohanty. (2009b). Multilingual education concepts, goals, needs, and expense: English for all or achieving justice? In T. Skutnabb-Kangas, R. Phillipson, A. Mohanty & M. Panda (Eds.), Social justice through multilingual education (pp. 320–344). Bristol, Buffalo, Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steger, M. (2009). Globalization: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2012). For all by all? The World Bank’s global framework for education. In S.J. Klees et al. (Eds.), The World Bank and education (pp. 3–20). Sense Publishers.
Stiglitz, J. (2003). Globalization and its discontents. New York and London: Norton Company.
Tollefson, J. & Tsui, A. (Eds.) (2004). Medium of instruction policies: Which agenda? Whose agenda? Mahwah, New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Treffgarne, C. (1981). The World Bank on language and education: A lot more could be done. Comparative Education, 17(2), 163–171.
UNESCO (2013). Refers to all the information available on the website of UNESCO. Retrievable from: [URL].
2003).
Education in a multilingual world
. UNESCO position paper. Paris: UNESCO.
2002). The universal declaration on cultural diversity. Adopted by the 31st session of the general conference of UNESCO, Paris 2 November 2001. Paris: UNESCO.
1996). Learning: The treasure within. Report to UNESCO of the International Commission in Education for the Twenty First Century. Paris: UNESCO.
1953). The use of vernacular languages in education. Paris: UNESCO.
World Bank (2011). Leaning for all: Investing in people’s knowledge and skills to promote development. Prepared by the World Bank Group Education Strategy 2020. Washington DC: The World Bank.
1980). Education Sector Policy Paper. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Ingabire, Marie Yvonne, Gabriel Nizeyimana, Delphine Mukingambeho & Michael Tusiime
2024. Pedagogical Strategies Limitations and Practices Leading to Improved Teacher-Learners’ Classroom Interactions through English in Lower Primary Schools of Rwanda. African Journal of Empirical Research 5:2 ► pp. 813 ff. 
Koutsiouri, Sofia & Antigone Sarakinioti
2024. Working with constructs of inclusion for understanding teachers’ literacy practices and their impact on student learning. International Studies in Sociology of Education ► pp. 1 ff.
郑, 梦书
2023. A Study on Language Policies of International Organizations in China’s Peripheries—Taking ASEAN in Southeast Asia as an Example. Modern Linguistics 11:01 ► pp. 30 ff.
Bamkin, Sam
2022. From Enthusiasm to Caution: Remaining Questions Surrounding the New Curriculum. In Japan’s School Curriculum for the 2020s [Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, 67], ► pp. 195 ff.
Sunata, Ulaş & Ayşe Beyazova
2022. Challenges of Syrian Refugee Children in the Turkish Education System: Pathways to Inclusive Education. In Childhood in Turkey: Educational, Sociological, and Psychological Perspectives [Science Across Cultures: The History of Non-Western Science, 11], ► pp. 73 ff.
Tesseur, Wine
Taylor-Leech, Kerry & Carol Benson
2017. Language planning and development aid: the (in)visibility of language in development aid discourse. Current Issues in Language Planning 18:4 ► pp. 339 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.