Article published In:
Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 38:3 (2014) ► pp.292303
References
Adams, M
(Ed.) (2011) From Elvish to Klingon: Exploring invented languages. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Blanke, D
(2003) Interlinguistics and Esperanto studies: Paths to the scholarly literature. Language Problems and Language Planning, 27(2), 155–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989) Planned languages: A survey of some of the main problems. In K. Schubert (Ed.), Interlinguistics: Aspects of the science of planned languages (pp. 63–87) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1985) Internationale Plansprachen. Eine Einfürung. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Bonfiglio, T
(2013) Inventing the native speaker. Critical Multilinguism Studies, 1(2), 29–58.Google Scholar
(2010) Mother tongues and nations: The invention of the native speaker. Berlin: De Grutyer Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, S
(2013) Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlevaro, T
(1984) Ric Berger (1894-1984). Planlingvistiko, 12(3), 4.Google Scholar
Cheyne, R
(2008) Created languages in science fiction. Science Fiction Studies, 3(3), 386–403Google Scholar
Cooper, R
(1989) Language planning and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corsetti, R
(1995) A mother tongue spoken mainly by fathers. Language Problems and Language Planning, 20(3), 263–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dell’Aquila, V., & Iannàcaro, G
(2004) La pianificazione linguistica: Lingue, società e istituzioni. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Eco, U
(1993) La ricerca della lingua perfetta nella cultura europea. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Fiedler, S
(2008) Interlinguistics and Esperanto studies: Experience at the University of Leipzig. Language Problems and Language Planning, 32(3), 269–279 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fishman, J
(1991) Reversing language shift: Theory and practice of assistance to threatened languages. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2006) Do not leave your language alone: The hidden status agendas within corpus planning in language policy. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gobbo, F
(2008) Planning languages and language planning: The contribution of interlinguistics to cross-cultural communication. In F. Boers, J. Darquennes, K. Kerremans, & R. Temmerman (Eds.), Multilingualism and applied comparative linguistics, vol. 21 (pp. 24–60). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
(2005) The digital way to spread conlangs. In S. Posteguillo, M. Valor, L. Gea, R. Renau, M. Luisa, M. Esteve, & S. Insa (Eds.) Language at work:Llanguage learning, discourse and translation studies in Internet (pp. 45–53). Castellon: Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I.Google Scholar
(1998) Dirlo in Europanto. Italiano & Oltre, 51, 226–231.Google Scholar
Grossblatt, B., & Fine, A
(2013) How to speak Klingon: Essential phrases for the intergalactic traveler (Star Trek).Google Scholar
Hornberger, N
(2006) Frameworks and models in language policy and planning. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 24–41). London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kazimierczak, K
(2010) Adapting Shakespeare for ‘Star Trek’ and ‘Star Trek’ for Shakespeare: ‘The Klingon Hamlet’ and the spaces of translation. Studies in Popular Culture, 32(2), 35–55.Google Scholar
Kloss, H
(1967) Abstand languages and Ausbau languages. Anthropological Linguistics, 9(7), 29–41.Google Scholar
Kachru, B
(1992) The other tongue: English across cultures. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Krachru, B
(1985) Standards, codification, and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk & H. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the World: Teaching and Learning the language and the literature (pp. 11–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Large, A
(1985) The artificial language movement. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lindstedt, J
(2010) Esperanto as a family language. In F. Dervin (Ed.), Lingua francas: La véhicularité linguistique pour vivre, travailler et étudier (pp. 69–80). Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Lins, U
(2002) Esperanto: The New Latin for the Church and for Ecumenism. Antwerpen: Flandra Esperanto-Ligo.Google Scholar
Nicholas, N. & Strader, A
(2000) The Klingon Hamlet. New York: Pocket Books. Original publication 1996.Google Scholar
Okrand, M
(1985) The Klingon dictionary (Star Trek). New York: Simon & Shuster.Google Scholar
Okrand, M., Adams, M., Hendriks-Hermans, J., & Kroon, S
(2011) ‘Wild and Whirling Words’: The invention and use of Klingon. In M. Adams (Ed.), From Elvish to Klingon: Exploring invented languages (pp. 111–134). Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Pennacchietti, F
(2014) Inizio dell’insegnamento di Interlinguistica ed Esperantologia a Torino. Personal communication via e-mail 22 May.Google Scholar
Phillipson, R
(1991) Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schubert, K
(1989) Interlinguistics: Aspects of the science of planned languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seidlhofer, B
(2011) Understanding English as a lingua franca. A complete introduction to the theoretical nature and practical implications of English used as a lingua franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sherwood, B., & Cheng, Chin-Chuan
(1980) A linguistic course on international communication and constructed languages. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 10, 1.Google Scholar
Street, B
(1993) Culture is a verb: Anthropological aspects of language and cultural processes. In D. Graddol, L. Thompson, & M. Byram (Eds). Language and culture (pp. 23–43). Clevendon.Google Scholar
Sutton, G
(2008) Concise encylopedia of the original literature of Esperanto. New York: Mondial.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, P
(2011) Linguistic justice for Europe and for the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wahlgren, Y
(2004) Klingon as linguistic capital: A sociologic study of nineteen advanced Klingonists. Bachelor’s thesis. Lund University.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Gobbo, Federico
2017. Are planned languages less complex than natural languages?. Language Sciences 60  pp. 36 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.