Zamenhof and the liberal-communitarian debate
This paper proposes to analyze the early thinking of Ludwig Lazarus Zamenhof (1859–1917) in light of the so-called liberal/communitarian debate. In the early 1980s, the debate was launched: On the liberal side were proponents of a liberal self bearing rights, irrespective of identity (John Rawls) and on the communitarian side, champions of communities with prerogatives and purposes (Michael Sandel). But this debate has become in recent years a dialogue, each side challenging the other to assimilate its claims, be they ontological, political, or ethical. This paper argues that, a century earlier, Zamenhof was involved in a similar dialogue between liberalism and communitarianism, inventing a movement that could potentially balance human rights with notions of the good espoused by different communities. The political potential of Esperanto, however, was undermined (though not collapsed) by the Declaration of Boulogne, which eschewed deliberative debate and abjected religious and ethical ideals.
References (27)
Boulton, M. (1960). Zamenhof: Creator of Esperanto. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burke, E. (1986 [1790]). Reflections on the revolution in France. London: Penguin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Etzioni, A. (1995). Rights and the common good: The communitarian perspective. New York: St. Martin’s Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Etzioni, A. (1996). The responsive community: A communitarian perspective. American Sociological Review, 61(1), 1–11. <[URL]> ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gutmann, A. (2003). Communitarian critics of liberalism. In D. Matravers and J. Pike (Eds.), Debates in contemporary political philosophy: An anthology (pp. 182–194). New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Korĵenkov, A. (2009). Homarano: La vivo, verkoj kaj ideoj de D-ro L. L. Zamenhof. Kaliningrad: Sezonoj; Kaunas: Litova Esperanto-Asocio.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kymlicka, W., & Patten, A. (Eds.). (2003). Language rights and political theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lins, U. (1990). La danĝera lingvo (2nd ed.). Moscow: Progreso.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Okrent, A. (2009). In the land of invented languages. New York: Spiegel and Grau.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Patten, A. (2001). Political theory and language policy. Political Theory, 29(5), 691–715. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rawls, J. (2003). The domain of the political and overlapping consensus. In D. Matravers and J. Pike (Eds.), Debates in contemporary political philosophy: An anthology (160–181). New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sandel, M. (1998). Liberalism and the limits of justice (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sandel, M. (2003). Liberalism and the limits of justice. In D. Matravers and J. Pike (Eds.), Debates in contemporary political philosophy: An anthology (pp. 140–159). New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taylor, C. (1994). The politics of recognition. In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition (pp. 25–73). Princeton: Princeton University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taylor, C. (2003). Cross-purposes: The liberal-communitarian debate. In D. Matravers and J. Pike (Eds.), Debates in contemporary political philosophy: An anthology (pp. 195–212). New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tönnies, F. (2001). Community and civil society [Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft]. (trans. J. Harris and M. Hollis). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. <[URL]> ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Universal Congress of Esperanto. (1905). Declaration of Boulogne. (Trans. unidentified.) E@I. <[URL]>
Van Parijs, P. (2011). Linguistic justice for Europe and for the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Walzer, M. (2004). Politics and passion: Toward a more egalitarian liberalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
World Conference on Linguistic Rights. (1996). Universal Declaration of Linguistic Rights. UNESCO, Paris. < [URL]>![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zamenhof, L.L. (1889). Doctor Esperanto’s international language (trans. R.H. Geoghegan). <[URL]>![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zamenhof, L.L. (2006 [1896]). Letter to [Nikolai] Borovko, 1896. In A. Korĵenkov (Ed.), Mi estas homo (pp. 33–38).Kaliningrad: Sezonoj.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zamenhof, L.L. (2006 [1901]). Hilelismo. In A. Korĵenkov (Ed.), Mi estas homo (pp. 39–96). Kaliningrad: Sezonoj.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Alcalde, Javier
2018.
Linguistic Justice: An Interdisciplinary Overview of the Literature. In
Language Policy and Linguistic Justice,
► pp. 65 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.