Article published in:
Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 40:1 (2016) ► pp. 1–25

Lenguas de signos y educación en España

Una aproximación desde la comunidad sorda

| Universidade de Vigo
El objetivo principal de este trabajo es valorar el impacto de la ley que reconoce la oficialidad de dos lenguas de signos en España. Para tal fin, diseñamos una encuesta orientada a conocer las opiniones de la comunidad sorda sobre los diferentes ámbitos en que la ley concede derechos lingüísticos a las personas sordas. La encuesta se realizó sobre una plataforma en línea y se difundió por medios electrónicos, con una estrategia de bola de nieve. El análisis de los resultados muestra diferencias relevantes entre las respuestas relativas al ámbito educativo con respecto a otros en que también se valora la posibilidad de usar una lengua de signos. El importante papel que juega la escuela en la transmisión lingüística dentro del contexto de la comunidad sorda ofrece una explicación a estas diferencias y, al mismo tiempo, constituye un reto para el futuro.
Keywords: language policy, sign language, Catalan Sign Language, Spanish Sign Language, deaf education

Article language: Spanish

Published online: 12 May 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.40.1.01cab
References
Alonso, P., Martínez, F., Nogueira, R., Pinto, J., Serna, Mª, Valdemoro, L., y Vázquez A
(2006) Signar (2ª edición). Madrid: Confederación Estatal de Sordos de España.Google Scholar
Batterbury, S.C.E
(2012) Language justice for sign language peoples: The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities”. Language Policy, 111, 253–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brentari, D
(Ed.) (2010) Sign languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cabeza-Pereiro, C. & Iglesias-Lago, S
(2015) Spanish Sign Language (LSE). In J. Jepson Bakken, G. de Clerk, S. Lutalo-Kïngi and W. B. McGregor (eds.), Sign languages of the world (pp. 729–769). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter / Ishara Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
CNLSE
(2014) La lengua de signos española hoy. Madrid: Real Patronato sobre Discapacidad.Google Scholar
Covington, V
(1976) Problems for a sign language planning agency. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 111, 85–106.Google Scholar
De Meulder, M
(2015) The legal recognition of sign languages. Sign Language Studies, 15(4), 498–506. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deumert, A
(2000) The sociolinguistics of sign language. R. Mesthrie, J. Swann, A. Deumert and W. Leap (Eds.), Introducing sociolinguistics (pp. 407–439). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Erting, C
(1978) Language policy and deaf ethnicity in the United States. Sign Language Studies, 191, 139–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Esteban, Mª L
. (Dir) (2003) Libro blanco de la lengua de signos española en el sistema educativo. Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia / Confederación Estatal de Sordos de España. Google Scholar
Ferreiro Lago, E., & Aroca Fernández, E
(2008) Cambio cultural, normalización lingüística de la lengua de signos española. Antonio Moreno Sandoval, ed. Actas del VIII Congreso de Lingüística General. 690–700.Google Scholar
Fishman, J.A
(1991): Reversing language shift. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Fundación Confederación Estatal de Sordos de España
(2008) DILSE: Diccionario normativo de la lengua de signos española. Madrid: Fundación Confederación Estatal de Sordos de España [DVD].Google Scholar
Gil Sabroso, M.ª E
(2015) Presencia de la lengua de signos española en la televisión. Madrid: CNLSE.Google Scholar
Gras, V
(2004) Language census of sign-language users in Spain: Attitudes in a changing language community. In M. Van Herreweghe and M. Vermeerbergen (Eds.), To the lexicon and beyond: Sociolinguistics in European deaf communities (pp. 211–247). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
(2006)  La comunidad sorda como comunidad lingüística: panorama sociolingüístico de la/s lengua/s de signos de España . Ph.D. dissertation, Universidade da Coruña.
Herrero Blanco, Á
(2009) Gramática didáctica de la lengua de signos española (LSE). Madrid: Fundación Confederación Estatal de Sordos de España / SM.Google Scholar
Hult, F., & Compton, S
(2012) Deaf education policy as language policy: A comparative analysis of Sweden and the United States. Sign Language Studies, 121, 602–620. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jarque, M-J
(2012) Las lenguas de signos: Su estudio científico y reconocimiento legal. Anuari de Filología. Estudis de lingüística, 21, 33–48.Google Scholar
Joquinen, M
(2000) The linguistic human rights of sign language users. In R. Phillipson (Ed.), Rights to language: Equity, power and education (pp. 203–213). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R., & Baldauf, R
(1997) Language planning: From practice to theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Krausneker, V
(2015) Ideologies and attitudes toward sign languages: An approximation. Sign Language Studies, 15(4), 411–431. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kusters, Annalies, De Meulder, Marrtje, Friedner, Michele and Emery, Steve
(2015) On ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion’: Exploring paradigms for achieving Sign Language Peoples rights. MMG Working Paper 15-02. Göttingen: Max-Planck-Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity.Google Scholar
Lane, H
(1984) When the mind hears: A history of the Deaf. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Matlosa, L
(2010) Language policy and literacy among deaf people in Lesotho. South African Journal of African Languages, 30(1), 72–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morales López, E., Aliaga, D., Alonso, J., Boldú, R., Garrusta, J., & Gras, V
(2002) Deaf people in bilingual speaking communities: The case of deaf people in Barcelona. In C. Lucas (Ed.), Turn-taking, fingerspelling, and contact in signed languages (pp. 107–155). Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Morales López, E
(2008) Sign bilingualism in Spanish deaf education. In C. Plaza-Pust and E. Morales-López (Eds.), Sign bilingualism: Language development, interaction, and maintenance in sign language contact situations (pp. 223–276). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moreno Fernández, F., & Ramallo, F
(2013) Las lenguas de España a debate. Valencia: Uno y Cero Ediciones.Google Scholar
Murray, J.J
(ed.) (2015) Language planning and sign language rights. Número monográfico de Sign Language Studies, 15(4).Google Scholar
Nosiphiwo Ganiso, M
(2012)  Sign language in South Africa: Language planning and policy challenges . M.D. thesis, Rhodes University.Google Scholar
Padden, C., & Rayman, J
(2002) Concluding thoughts: The future of American Sign Language. In D. Armstrong, M. Karchmer, and J. Vickrey Van Cleve (Eds.), The study of signed languages (pp. 247–261). Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Pérez Martín, M., Valmaseda Balanzategui, M., & Morgan, G
(2014) Sign bilingual and co-enrollment education for children with cochlear implants in Madrid. In M. Marschark, G. Tang and H. Knoors (Eds.), Bilingualism and bilingual deaf education (pp. 368–394). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pizer, G
(2013) Bimodal bilingual families: The negotiation of communication practices between deaf parents and their hearing children. In M. Schwartz and A. Verschik (Eds.), Successful family language policy: Parents, children and educators in interaction (pp. 203–222). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plann, S
(1997) A silent minority: Deaf education in Spain. Berkeley: University of California Press. [Traducción al español: Una minoría silenciosa. Madrid: Fundación Confederación Estatal de Sordos de España, 2004.]Google Scholar
Potowski, K
(2013) Language maintenance and shift. In R. Bayley, R. Cameron, and C. Lucas (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 321–339). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quer, J., & de Quadros, R
(Ed.) (2012) Language planning and policies for sign languages: Special issue of Sign Languages Studies, 12(4).Google Scholar
Ramsey, C
(1989) Language planning in deaf education. In C. Lucas (Ed.), The sociolinguistic of the deaf community (pp. 123–146). San Diego: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reagan, T
(2001) Language planning and language policy. In C. Lucas (Ed.), The sociolinguistics of sign languages (pp. 145–180). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Language policy and sign languages. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 329–345). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2007) Language-in-education policy in South Africa: The challenge of sign language. Africa Education Review, 4(2), 26–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Language policy and planning for sign languages. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Reagan, T., Penn, C., & Ogilvy, D
(2006) From policy to practice: Sign language development in post-apartheid South Africa. Language Policy, 51, 187–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schermer, T
(2012) Language planning. In R. Pfau, M. Steinbach and B. Woll (Eds.), Sign language. An international handbook (pp. 889–908). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schwartz, M., & Verschik, A
(Ed.) (2013) Successful family language policy: Parents, children and educators in interaction. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, T
(2000) Linguistic genocide in education – or worldwide diversity and human rights? Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Smith-Christmas, C
(2016) Family language policy. Maintaining an endangered language in the home. Basingstoke: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spolsky, B
(2004) Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Timmermans, N
(2005) The status of sign languages in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
UNESCO Ad Hoc Expert Group on Endangered Languages
(2003) Language vitality and endangerment: by way of introduction. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Reagan, Timothy
2019. Language policies, language rights, and sign languages: A critique of disability-based approaches. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 16:4 ► pp. 271 ff. Crossref logo
Reagan, Timothy
2020. A twelfth official language? The constitutional future of South African Sign Language. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 38:1 ► pp. 73 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.