Article published in:
Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 40:1 (2016) ► pp. 69–84

Language education policy enactment and individual agency

The cauldron of conflicts in policy positions in implementing the Common European Framework of Reference for languages in Vietnam

| The University of Queensland, Australia
| The University of Queensland, Australia
| The University of Queensland, Australia
This article explores language planning and policy from the perspective of individual agency and its embodiments in the process of implementing an English language education policy ensemble at a public university in Vietnam. The policy exemplifies the influence of globalized standards on local language education systems. It aims to build a national framework in Vietnam based on a Western model known as the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) which is expected to serve as a platform for reforming curriculum design, course materials development, and testing and assessment. Drawn from a set of data obtained through in-depth interviews with university administrators, the findings highlight the conflicting policy positions taken up by teacher-cum-administrators engaged in the policy enactment process. The paper argues that a critical barrier to CEFR enactment lies in the constraints and demotivation within each participant, particularly of those involved at a higher level of decision-making process in the institution. It is important, therefore, to deal with these conflicts at the level of macro policy planning to neutralize the paradox of policy enactment at the local site.
Keywords: Vietnam, policy position, individual agency, language policy, CEFR
Published online: 12 May 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.40.1.04van
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Hurdus, Jeremy & David Lasagabaster
2018. Mappings and policies-in-the-making: toward an ontogenetic understanding of language-in-education policy. Language and Education 32:3 ► pp. 227 ff. Crossref logo
Mohamed, Naashia
2019. The agentive role of preschool leaders in language policy enactment: case studies of acceptance and resistance. Current Issues in Language Planning ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Ngo, Xuan Minh
2019. Vietnam's trillion-dong attempt to reform English education. English Today ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Nguyen, Van Huy & M. Obaidul Hamid
2020. The CEFR as a national language policy in Vietnam: insights from a sociogenetic analysis. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Wernicke, Meike
2018. Plurilingualism as agentive resource in L2 teacher identity. System 79 ► pp. 91 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 october 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Baldauf, R.B., Jr
(2012) Introduction – Language planning: where have we been? Where might we be going? Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 12(2), 233–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ball, S.J.J., Braun, A., & Maguire, M.
(2012) How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Biesta, G., & Tedder, M.
(2006) How is agency possible? Towards an ecological understanding of agency-as-achievement. Retrieved from http://​www​.tlrp​.org​/project%20sites​/LearningLives​/papers​/working​_papers​/Working​_paper​_5​_Exeter​_Feb​_06​.pdf
Braun, A., Ball, S.J., & Maguire, M. (2011) Policy enactments in schools introduction: towards a toolbox for theory and research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 581–583. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, E.
(2012) Teacher agency in curriculum contexts. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 183–190. Crossref.Google Scholar
Feryok, A.
(2012) Activity theory and language teacher agency. The Modern Language Journal, 96(1), 95–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gal’perin, P.I.
(1992) The problem of activity in Soviet psychology. Journal of Russian and East European psychology, 30(4), 37–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamid, M.O., & Baldauf, R.B., Jr
(2014) Public-private domain distinction as an aspect of LPP frameworks: A case study of Bangladesh. Language Problems & Language Planning, 38(2), 912–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Honig, M.I.
(2006) New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Hu, G., & McKay, S.L.
(2012) English language education in East Asia: Some recent developments. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 33(4), 345–362. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, R.
(Ed.) (2010) Learning through English: policies, challenges and prospects - Insights from East Asia. Malaysia: British Council.Google Scholar
Kelchtermans, G., & Ballet, K.
(2002) Micropolitical literacy: reconstructing a neglected dimension in teacher development. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(8), 755–767. Crossref.Google Scholar
Louis, K.S.
(1994) Beyond “managed change”: Rethinking how schools improve. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(1), 2–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Menken, K., & Garcia, O.
(Eds.) (2010) Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers. Florence, KY: Routledge. Retrieved from http://​www​.ebrary​.com.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education and Training
(2008) De an day va hoc ngoai ngu trong he thong giao duc quoc dan giai doan 2008-2020 [Project guidelines for teaching and learning foreign languages in the national education system in the period from 2008 to 2020]. Hanoi: Retrieved from http://​www​.cfl​.udn​.vn​/uploads​/uploads​/Vanban​/pub​_dir​/3121​_Deanngoaingu​.pdf.Google Scholar
(2014) Thông tư ban hành khung năng lực ngoại ngữ 6 bậc dùng cho Việt Nam [Circular No. 01/2014/TT-BDGĐT to issue a six-level framework for foreign language proficiency in Vietnam]. Retrieved from http://​vanban​.moet​.gov​.vn​/?page​=6​.10​&view​=5552​&opt​=brpage.Google Scholar
Pham, H.H.
(2001) Teacher development: A real need for English departments in Vietnam. English Teaching Forum, 39(4). Retrieved from http://​americanenglish​.state​.gov​/files​/ae​/resource​_files​/01​-39​-4​-f​.pdf.Google Scholar
(2006) Researching the research culture in English language education in Vietnam. TESL-EJ, 10(2). Retrieved from http://​tesl​-ej​.org​/ej38​/a10​.pdf.Google Scholar
Ricento, T.K., & Hornberger, N.H.
(1996) Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 401–427. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shoba, J.A., & Chimbutane, F.
(Eds.) (2013) Bilingual education and language policy in the Global South. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Singh, P., Thomas, S., & Harris, J.
(2013) Recontextualising policy discourses: A Bernsteinian perspective on policy interpretation, translation, enactment. Journal of Education Policy, 28(4), 465–480. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spolsky, B.
(2009) Language management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, S.
(Ed.) (2009) A dictionary of education. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://​www​.oxfordreference​.com​/view​/10​.1093​/acref​/9780199212064​.001​.0001​/acref​-9780199212064.Google Scholar
Wee, L.
(2003) Linguistic instrumentalism in Singapore. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 24(3), 211–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zacharias, N.T.
(2013) Navigating through the English-medium-of-instruction policy: Voices from the field. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(1), 93–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, S.
(2011) Actors in language planning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 905–923). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zhao, S., & Baldauf, R.B., Jr
(2012) Individual agency in language planning: Chinese script reform as a case study. Language Problems & Language Planning, 36(1), 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar