Review published In:
Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 5:3 (1981) ► pp.309314
References (9)
References
Gilbert, Glenn G. 1976. “Hugo Schuchardt’s View of Simplification in Pidgin and Creole Languages.” In 1975 Mid-America Linguistics Conference Papers, edited by Frances Ingemann. pp. 136–144. Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lù Eř-Kúi et al.. 1977. “Neues Ö1 für Alte Lampen: Die Auseinandersetzung zwischen Hugo Schuchardt und Adolpho Coelho über die Simplifikation in den Pidgin- und Kreolsprachen.” In Deutsch im Kontakt mit anderen Sprachen/German in Contact with Other Languages, edited by Carol Molony, Helmut Zobl, and Wilfried Stölting. pp. 47–57. Kronberg/Taunus: Scriptor.Google Scholar
(ed. and trans.). 1980. Pidgin and Creole Languages: Selected Essays by Hugo Schuchardt. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hesseling, Dirk Christiaan. 1905. Het Negerhollands der Deense Antillen, Bijdrage tot de Geschiedenis der Nederlandse Taal in Amerika. Leiden: A. W. Sijthoff.Google Scholar
Markey, Thomas L. (ed. and trans.). 1979. The Ethnography of Variation: Selected Writings on Pidgins and Creoles by Hugo Schuchardt. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Karoma.Google Scholar
Meijer, Guus and Pieter Muysken. 1977. “On the Beginnings of Pidgin and Creole Studies.” In Pidgin and Creole Linguistics, edited by Albert Valdman. pp. 21–48. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo Ernst Mario. 1909. “Die Lingua Franca.” Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie, 331: 441–461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1914. Die Sprache der Saramakkaneger in Surinam. (Verhandelingen der Kon. Akad. v. Wetensch. te Amsterdam, Afdeeling Letterkunde, NR. XIV, No. 6.) Amsterdam: Muller.Google Scholar
Valkhoff, Marius François. 1966. Studies in Portuguese and Creole with Special Reference to South Africa. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar