Review published In:
Language Problems and Language Planning
Vol. 6:1 (1982) ► pp.8591
References
Glenn, Wanda G.
1976 “Feminine Designators: A Quantitative Study.” Paper presented at Annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Francisco, December 1976.
Lakoff, Robin
1973 “Language and Women’s Place.” Language in Society 21: 45–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1974 “You Are What You Say.” Ms 31 (July 1974): 65–67.Google Scholar
1975 “Why Women Are Ladies.” Berkeley Studies in Syntax and Semantics 1, 15: 1–45.Google Scholar
Martyna, Wendy
1980 “The Psychology of the Generic Masculine.” In S. McConnell-Ginet, R. Borker, and N. Furman (eds.), Women and Language in Literature and Society. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Neustupný, Jirí V.
1974 “Basic Types of Treatment of Language Problems.” In J. Fishman (ed.), Advances in Language Planning. The Hague, Paris, and New York: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Patricia C.
1980 “Planning for Language Change.” San José Studies 61: 18–25.Google Scholar
O’Barr, William M. and Bowman K. Atkins
1980 “ ‘Women’s Language’ or ‘Powerless Language’?” In S. McConnell-Ginet, R. Borker, and N. Furman (eds.), Women and Language in Literature and Society. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
“Publishers Depict Women in New Ways.”
New York Times, April 30 1978.Google Scholar
Pyles, Thomas
1971The Origins and Development of the English Language, 2nd ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Stevick, R. D.
1964 “The Morphemic Evolution of Middle English SheEnglish Studies 451: 381–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar