Part of
Language, Literacy, and Learning in STEM Education: Research Methods and Perspectives from Applied LinguisticsEdited by Mary Jane Curry and David I. Hanauer
[Language Studies, Science and Engineering 1] 2014
► pp. 11–26
Edited by Mary Jane Curry and David I. Hanauer
[Language Studies, Science and Engineering 1] 2014
► pp. 11–26
Chapter 2. Drawing upon applied linguistics to attain goals in an interdisciplinary chemistry–applied linguistics project
Students in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), like students in other tertiary-level areas, benefit from learning to read and write in their disciplines as they progress in their studies. This chapter reports on a successful collaborative project that brought together faculty in chemistry and applied linguistics to analyze the language of chemistry in four types of disciplinary writing (i.e. genres). Findings were used to design instructional materials and develop a discipline-specific course, to be taught by chemistry faculty, aimed at improving students’ disciplinary literacy skills. The focus of the chapter is on the contributions of various subfields of applied linguistics to project goals, emphasizing the contributions of English for Specific Purposes, discourse analysis, corpus linguistics, and language teaching pedagogy. Interdisciplinary partnerships, such as the one showcased in this chapter, are particularly fruitful when disciplinary-language issues are at stake. STEM faculty and faculty in language-related disciplines can combine their different but complementary resources to achieve goals that might not be possible to attain independently. With a heightened understanding of disciplinary language and the literacy practices specific to particular STEM fields, meaningful instructional materials and discipline-specific classes can be developed to give students access to and control of the literacy practices and genres valued by STEM fields.
References (64)
Basturkmen, H. (2006). Ideas and options in English for specific purposes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (2010). Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 
. (2012). A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 134–144.
Bawarshi, A.S., & Reiff, M.J. (2010). Genre: An introduction to history, theory, research, and pedagogy. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
Belcher, D. (Ed.). (2009). English for specific purposes in theory and practice. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Belcher, D., Johns, A.M., & Paltridge, B. (Eds.). (2011). New directions in English for specific purposes research. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Bhatia, V.K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. New York, NY: Continuum.
Biber, D., Connor, U., & Upton, T.A. (2007). Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Biber, D., Connor, U., Upton, T.A., & Kanoksilapatham, B. (2007). Introduction to move analysis. In D. Biber, U. Connor, & T. A. Upton (Eds.), Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure (pp. 23–41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bowker, L., & Pearson, J. (2002). Working with specialized language: A practical guide to using corpora. New York, NY: Routledge.
Brown, J.D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum: A systematic approach to program development. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Bruce, I. (2009). Results sections in sociology and organic chemistry articles: A genre analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 28, 105–124.
Cheng, A. (2006). Understanding learners and learning in ESP genre-based writing instruction. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 76–89.
Douglas, D. (2000). Assessing languages for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M.J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ferris, D.R. (2005). Reflections of a ‘blue collar linguist’: Analysis of written discourse, classroom research, and EAP pedagogy. In P. Bruthiaux, D. Atkinson, W.G. Eggington, W. Grabe, & V. Ramanathan (Eds.), Directions in applied linguistics (pp. 91–100). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
. (2011). Treatment of error in second language student writing (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Ferris, D.R., & Hedgcock, J.S. (2013). Teaching L2 composition: Purpose, process, and practice (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R.B. (1996). Theory and practice of writing: An applied linguistic perspective. New York, NY: Longman.
Grabe, W., & Zhang, C. (2013). Second language reading–writing relations. In A.S. Horning & E.W. Kraemer (Eds.), Reconnecting reading and writing (pp. 108–133). Anderson, SC: Parlor Press/WAC Clearinghouse.
Gunnarsson, B.-L. (2009). Professional discourse. London: Continuum.
Hirvela, A. (2004). Connecting reading and writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2004a). Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
. (2004b). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Hyland, K., & Bondi, M. (Eds.). (2006). Academic discourse across disciplines. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Johns, A.M. (1997). Text, role, and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. (2007). Genre awareness for the novice academic student: An on-going quest. Language Teaching, 41, 237–252.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 269–292.
. (2007). Rhetorical moves in biochemistry research articles. In D. Biber, U. Connor, & T. Upton (Eds.), Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure (pp. 73–119). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lin, L., & Evans, S. (2012). Structural patterns in empirical research articles: A cross-disciplinary study. English for Specific Purposes, 3, 150–160.
Nation, I.S.P., & Macalister, J. (2010). Language curriculum design. New York, NY: Routledge.
National Commission on Writing in America’s Schools and Colleges. (2003). The neglected “R”: The need for a writing revolution. Retrieved July 10, 2012, from [URL]
Nesi, H., & Gardner, S. (2012). Genres across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nwogu, K.N. (1997). The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 119–138.
O’Keeffe, A., McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2007). From corpus to classroom: Language use and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paltridge, B. (2001). Genre and the language learning classroom. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
. (2006). Discourse analysis: An introduction. New York, NY: Continuum.
Paltridge, B., Harbon, L., Hirsch, D., Shen, H., Stevenson, M., Phakiti, A., & Woodrow, L. (2009). Teaching academic writing: An introduction for teachers of second language writers. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30, 479–497.
Plakans, L. (2009). The role of reading strategies in integrated L2 writing tasks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8, 252–266.
Posteguillo, S. (1999). The schematic structure of computer science research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 139–160.
Reppen, R. (2010). Using corpora in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J.C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, M.S., & Stoller, F.L. (2007). A read-analyze-write approach to research-related literacy skills for upper-division chemistry majors. In K. K. Katukstis & T. Elgren (Eds.), Designing, implementing, and sustaining a research-supportive undergraduate curriculum: A compendium of successful curricular practices from faculty and institutions engaged in undergraduate research (pp. 175–190). Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research.
Robinson, M.S., Stoller, F.L., Costanza-Robinson, M.S., & Jones, J.K. (2008). Write like a chemist: A guide and resource. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Robinson, M.S., Stoller, F.L., & Jones, J.K. (2008). Using the ACS Journals Search to validate assumptions about writing in chemistry and improve chemistry writing instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 85, 650–654.
Samraj, B. (2002). Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 1–17.
Stoller, F.L., Horn, B., Grabe, W., & Robinson, M.S. (2005). Creating and validating assessment instruments for a discipline-specific writing course: An interdisciplinary approach. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 75–104.
. (2006). Evaluative review in materials development. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 174–192.
Stoller, F.L., & Robinson, M.S. (2013). Chemistry journal articles: An interdisciplinary approach to move analysis with pedagogical aims. English for Specific Purposes, 32, 45–57.
Swales, J.M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. (1998). Other floors, other voices: A textography of a small university building. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J.M., & Feak, C.B. (2011). Navigating academia: Writing supporting genres. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (3rd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Tardy, C.M. (2009). Building genre knowledge. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
Tribble, C. (2010). A genre-based approach to developing materials for writing. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching materials: Theory and practice (pp. 157–178). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wardle, E.A. (2004). Can cross-disciplinary links help us teach “academic discourse” in FYC? Across the Disciplines: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Language, Learning, and Academic Writing, 1. Retrieved June16, 2012, from [URL]
Williams, I.A. (1999). Results sections of medical research articles: Analysis of rhetorical categories for pedagogical purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 347–366.
Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wingate, U. (2012). Using academic literacies and genre-based models for academic writing instruction: A ‘literacy’ journey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 26–37.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Pisano, Alycia, Amanda Crawford, Heather Huffman, Barbara Graham & Nicole Kelp
2021. Development and Validation of a Universal Science Writing Rubric That is Applicable to Diverse Genres of Science Writing. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 22:3 
Stoller, Fredricka L. & Marin S. Robinson
2018. Innovative ESP Teaching Practices and Materials Development. In Key Issues in English for Specific Purposes in Higher Education [English Language Education, 11], ► pp. 29 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.